<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nullification Victories!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/07/nullification-victories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/07/nullification-victories/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:11:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; #Election2012: Obama Handily Wins Re-Election, and the GOP Must Change to Win Nationally; More Confirmations</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/07/nullification-victories/comment-page-2/#comment-928819</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; #Election2012: Obama Handily Wins Re-Election, and the GOP Must Change to Win Nationally; More Confirmations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 14:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=13320#comment-928819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Tenth Amendment-based initiatives have become significantly easier to come by. Consider that 6 out of 10 such ballot initiatives passed last night by overwhelming majorities. Ironically, they were set to satisfy both the right [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tenth Amendment-based initiatives have become significantly easier to come by. Consider that 6 out of 10 such ballot initiatives passed last night by overwhelming majorities. Ironically, they were set to satisfy both the right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Henry</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/07/nullification-victories/comment-page-1/#comment-934622</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=13320#comment-934622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@LindaTucker  @Patrick Henry I actually bought one of these Linda. It&#039;s much cheaper.
 
http://www.beingwater.com/urban-farming/handy-well-pump/hwp-pump-only]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@LindaTucker  @Patrick Henry I actually bought one of these Linda. It&#8217;s much cheaper.<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.beingwater.com/urban-farming/handy-well-pump/hwp-pump-only" rel="nofollow">http://www.beingwater.com/urban-farming/handy-well-pump/hwp-pump-only</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ObamaCare: The Gift That No-One&#8217;s Taking — GraniteGrok</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/07/nullification-victories/comment-page-2/#comment-926497</link>
		<dc:creator>ObamaCare: The Gift That No-One&#8217;s Taking — GraniteGrok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=13320#comment-926497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] protections against their citizens being compelled to purchase Federally mandated insurance (Tenth Amendment Center):  Wyoming, Amendment A &#8211; voters passed a health care freedom amendment to the Declaration of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] protections against their citizens being compelled to purchase Federally mandated insurance (Tenth Amendment Center):  Wyoming, Amendment A &#8211; voters passed a health care freedom amendment to the Declaration of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Now &#8216;Paulbots&#8217;? &#124; r3volution! News</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/07/nullification-victories/comment-page-2/#comment-925295</link>
		<dc:creator>What Now &#8216;Paulbots&#8217;? &#124; r3volution! News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=13320#comment-925295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/07/nullification-victories/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/07/nullification-victories/" rel="nofollow">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/07/nullification-victories/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Henry</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/07/nullification-victories/comment-page-1/#comment-933492</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=13320#comment-933492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@StephenSmith1  @Bob_In_Boston I think you&#039;re right about Governor Gardisil, he&#039;s another NWO stooge. It was a nice thought though. Who knows, if  the state legislatures start getting enough blowback from this. It might at least get the conversation started in a few states. The way I have it figured is, if you&#039;re going to dream. Might as well dream BIG!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@StephenSmith1  @Bob_In_Boston I think you&#8217;re right about Governor Gardisil, he&#8217;s another NWO stooge. It was a nice thought though. Who knows, if  the state legislatures start getting enough blowback from this. It might at least get the conversation started in a few states. The way I have it figured is, if you&#8217;re going to dream. Might as well dream BIG!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_In_Boston</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/07/nullification-victories/comment-page-1/#comment-933489</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob_In_Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=13320#comment-933489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@StephenSmith1  @Patrick Henry I know it was naive of me, but I was hoping that Texas would throw the TSA agents in jail for sexual assault, the same way you would anyone else who touched your junk without permission.  But alas, like I said, Perry didn&#039;t have the &#039;nads to go through with it once the FAA said they would close down the airspace over Texas if they didn&#039;t back down. I would have called their bluff - there is no way the FAA could do that for more than a couple of days without HUGE repercussions from business who just needed to get there - the special interests would actually do some good for once!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@StephenSmith1  @Patrick Henry I know it was naive of me, but I was hoping that Texas would throw the TSA agents in jail for sexual assault, the same way you would anyone else who touched your junk without permission.  But alas, like I said, Perry didn&#8217;t have the &#8216;nads to go through with it once the FAA said they would close down the airspace over Texas if they didn&#8217;t back down. I would have called their bluff &#8211; there is no way the FAA could do that for more than a couple of days without HUGE repercussions from business who just needed to get there &#8211; the special interests would actually do some good for once!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StephenSmith1</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/07/nullification-victories/comment-page-1/#comment-933488</link>
		<dc:creator>StephenSmith1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=13320#comment-933488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Bob_In_Boston  @Patrick Henry Rick Perry attended a Bilderberg meeting a few years ago.  Nobody attends Bilderberg meetings without being a globalist One-Worlder first and always.  It should go without saying that globalist One-Worlders would never vote for secession of any state.  That would be totally contrary to the the basic tenet of world government. which is to concentrate power in one central place rather than scattering it in multiple places.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bob_In_Boston  @Patrick Henry Rick Perry attended a Bilderberg meeting a few years ago.  Nobody attends Bilderberg meetings without being a globalist One-Worlder first and always.  It should go without saying that globalist One-Worlders would never vote for secession of any state.  That would be totally contrary to the the basic tenet of world government. which is to concentrate power in one central place rather than scattering it in multiple places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_In_Boston</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/07/nullification-victories/comment-page-1/#comment-933487</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob_In_Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=13320#comment-933487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Patrick Henry  @StephenSmith1 I&#039;ve seen this misrepresented on a BUNCH of different websites and the Daily Show - it&#039;s not that a certain number of STATES have talked about succession, it&#039;s that some PEOPLE within those states have started petitions for succession.  Those are two wildly different things as far as I&#039;m concerned.  If a state were to actually start preparing for succession that would be news.  This?  Not so much...
 
PS: I still be Texas will be first, but if Perry couldn&#039;t even hold his stones when he threatened to throw the TSA out, I don&#039;t see how he would stand up to the Feds on complete succession!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Patrick Henry  @StephenSmith1 I&#8217;ve seen this misrepresented on a BUNCH of different websites and the Daily Show &#8211; it&#8217;s not that a certain number of STATES have talked about succession, it&#8217;s that some PEOPLE within those states have started petitions for succession.  Those are two wildly different things as far as I&#8217;m concerned.  If a state were to actually start preparing for succession that would be news.  This?  Not so much&#8230;<br />
 <br />
PS: I still be Texas will be first, but if Perry couldn&#8217;t even hold his stones when he threatened to throw the TSA out, I don&#8217;t see how he would stand up to the Feds on complete succession!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob_In_Boston</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/07/nullification-victories/comment-page-1/#comment-933486</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob_In_Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=13320#comment-933486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@StephenSmith1  @West Texan You are right on target - the answer isn&#039;t Republicans OR Democrats.  The answer is finding good candidates (whatever letter they have after their name) and electing them to office. How do you determine who is a good candidate?  Research how they voted when nobody was watching, and see if it lines up with their rhetoric.  If what they say and what they actually did doesn&#039;t match (like Romney) then you know you can&#039;t trust them - they are immediately taken out of consideration.  That&#039;s why Romney, Santorum and Gingrich were all non-starters as far as I&#039;m concerned.
Then once you&#039;ve taken the liars out, look for someone who agrees with your political philosophies.  This isn&#039;t necessarily simple - for example there were votes that Congressman Ron Paul took during his 30+ years in office that I thought I didn&#039;t agree with initially, but once I read the actual content of the bills he was voting on, in every instance I understood why he voted the way he did, and most of the time, once I understood what was at stake, I agreed with him.  That&#039;s what made Ron Paul the best candidate for me, and I&#039;m doubly disappointed for him being cheated out of the nomination by the Romney campaign, as well as the fact that he&#039;s retiring from Congress this year.  But it&#039;s our responsibility as Americans to find more good candidates and vote them into office!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@StephenSmith1  @West Texan You are right on target &#8211; the answer isn&#8217;t Republicans OR Democrats.  The answer is finding good candidates (whatever letter they have after their name) and electing them to office. How do you determine who is a good candidate?  Research how they voted when nobody was watching, and see if it lines up with their rhetoric.  If what they say and what they actually did doesn&#8217;t match (like Romney) then you know you can&#8217;t trust them &#8211; they are immediately taken out of consideration.  That&#8217;s why Romney, Santorum and Gingrich were all non-starters as far as I&#8217;m concerned.<br />
Then once you&#8217;ve taken the liars out, look for someone who agrees with your political philosophies.  This isn&#8217;t necessarily simple &#8211; for example there were votes that Congressman Ron Paul took during his 30+ years in office that I thought I didn&#8217;t agree with initially, but once I read the actual content of the bills he was voting on, in every instance I understood why he voted the way he did, and most of the time, once I understood what was at stake, I agreed with him.  That&#8217;s what made Ron Paul the best candidate for me, and I&#8217;m doubly disappointed for him being cheated out of the nomination by the Romney campaign, as well as the fact that he&#8217;s retiring from Congress this year.  But it&#8217;s our responsibility as Americans to find more good candidates and vote them into office!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama Wins?! Now What? &#171; The Art of Diesel</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/07/nullification-victories/comment-page-2/#comment-925185</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Wins?! Now What? &#171; The Art of Diesel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=13320#comment-925185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] So, if a power claimed by the feds isn&#8217;t spelled out specifically in the Constitution, the states and the people need to assert their authority via nullification.  What does that mean?  Here&#8217;s a great article by the Tenth Amendment Center about yesterday&#8217;s victories in this sense: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/07/nullification-victories/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, if a power claimed by the feds isn&#8217;t spelled out specifically in the Constitution, the states and the people need to assert their authority via nullification.  What does that mean?  Here&#8217;s a great article by the Tenth Amendment Center about yesterday&#8217;s victories in this sense: <a href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/07/nullification-victories/" rel="nofollow">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/07/nullification-victories/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
