<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kentucky Joins Movement to Resist Abuses of Commerce Clause, 2nd Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/11/kentucky-joins-movement-to-resist-abuses-of-commerce-clause-2nd-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/11/kentucky-joins-movement-to-resist-abuses-of-commerce-clause-2nd-amendment/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 03:12:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: #iamthemob: States&#8217; Rights, Healthcare, and Term Limits &#124; The Right Side of Life</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/11/kentucky-joins-movement-to-resist-abuses-of-commerce-clause-2nd-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-928805</link>
		<dc:creator>#iamthemob: States&#8217; Rights, Healthcare, and Term Limits &#124; The Right Side of Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3655#comment-928805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] As I&#8217;ve been chronicling highlights on my blog &#8212; and much more can be found at Michael Boldin&#8217;s TenthAmendmentCenter.com site &#8212; movement towards the concept of &#8220;nullification&#8221; is certainly at hand. The latest from Kentucky: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I&#8217;ve been chronicling highlights on my blog &#8212; and much more can be found at Michael Boldin&#8217;s TenthAmendmentCenter.com site &#8212; movement towards the concept of &#8220;nullification&#8221; is certainly at hand. The latest from Kentucky: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toshiba coupon code</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/11/kentucky-joins-movement-to-resist-abuses-of-commerce-clause-2nd-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-571014</link>
		<dc:creator>toshiba coupon code</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 23:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3655#comment-571014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to me this is an excellent site that give an important information about any thing. in the state House and governor will probably do their best to kill it as they did our &quot;sovereignty&quot; resolution from the last session. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to me this is an excellent site that give an important information about any thing. in the state House and governor will probably do their best to kill it as they did our &quot;sovereignty&quot; resolution from the last session. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Virginia Nullify Federal Gun Laws? &#171; Dark Politricks Retweeted</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/11/kentucky-joins-movement-to-resist-abuses-of-commerce-clause-2nd-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-300794</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Virginia Nullify Federal Gun Laws? &#171; Dark Politricks Retweeted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 02:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3655#comment-300794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] As previously reported here, while the FFAâ€™s title focuses on federal gun regulations, it has far more to do with the 10th Amendmentâ€™s limit on the power of the federal government. The bills in state houses contain language such as the following: â€œfederal laws and regulations do not apply to personal firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition that is manufactured in [this state] and remains in [state]. The limitation on federal law and regulation stated in this bill applies to a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured using basic materials and that can be manufactured without the inclusion of any significant parts imported into this state.â€ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As previously reported here, while the FFAâ€™s title focuses on federal gun regulations, it has far more to do with the 10th Amendmentâ€™s limit on the power of the federal government. The bills in state houses contain language such as the following: â€œfederal laws and regulations do not apply to personal firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition that is manufactured in [this state] and remains in [state]. The limitation on federal law and regulation stated in this bill applies to a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured using basic materials and that can be manufactured without the inclusion of any significant parts imported into this state.â€ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kentucky Joins Movement to Resist Abuses of Commerce Clause, 2nd Amendment</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/11/kentucky-joins-movement-to-resist-abuses-of-commerce-clause-2nd-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-294823</link>
		<dc:creator>Kentucky Joins Movement to Resist Abuses of Commerce Clause, 2nd Amendment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3655#comment-294823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Kentucky Joins Movement to Resist Abuses of Commerce Clause, 2nd AmendmentÂ &#124;Â Tenth Amendment Cente....   Share and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kentucky Joins Movement to Resist Abuses of Commerce Clause, 2nd AmendmentÂ |Â Tenth Amendment Cente&#8230;.   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Utah to Feds: Hands off our guns!&#160;&#124;&#160;Tenth Amendment Center Blog</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/11/kentucky-joins-movement-to-resist-abuses-of-commerce-clause-2nd-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-293561</link>
		<dc:creator>Utah to Feds: Hands off our guns!&#160;&#124;&#160;Tenth Amendment Center Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3655#comment-293561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] previously reported here, while the FFAâ€™s title focuses on federal gun regulations, it has far more to do with the 10th [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] previously reported here, while the FFAâ€™s title focuses on federal gun regulations, it has far more to do with the 10th [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kentucky Joins Movement to Resist Abuses of Commerce Clause, 2nd Amendment &#124; The Ruthless Truth blog</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/11/kentucky-joins-movement-to-resist-abuses-of-commerce-clause-2nd-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-293555</link>
		<dc:creator>Kentucky Joins Movement to Resist Abuses of Commerce Clause, 2nd Amendment &#124; The Ruthless Truth blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3655#comment-293555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/11/kentucky-joins-movement-to-resist-abuses-of-commerce-...       Easy AdSense by Unreal  Bookmark It                    Hide Sites [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/11/kentucky-joins-movement-to-resist-abuses-of-commerce-" rel="nofollow">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/11/kentucky-joins-movement-to-resist-abuses-of-commerce-</a>&#8230;       Easy AdSense by Unreal  Bookmark It                    Hide Sites [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monorprise</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/11/kentucky-joins-movement-to-resist-abuses-of-commerce-clause-2nd-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-293451</link>
		<dc:creator>Monorprise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3655#comment-293451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because that ruling has been ignored and overturned, as well as made pointless by the broadcasting of federal areas, and the thinning of states, by the federal employees in black robes. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because that ruling has been ignored and overturned, as well as made pointless by the broadcasting of federal areas, and the thinning of states, by the federal employees in black robes. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Johnson</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/11/kentucky-joins-movement-to-resist-abuses-of-commerce-clause-2nd-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-293150</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3655#comment-293150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sorry, but while these state sovereignty movements are a step in the right direction, I cannot get excited about what legislators are doing so far.  My problem with these saber-rattling sovereignty gestures by state lawmakers is this.  The USSC has already decided that the feds cannot lay taxes to fund spending programs that are actually based on state power issues. 
 
&quot;Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.&quot; --Chief Justice Marshall, GIBBONS V. OGDEN, 1824.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://supreme.justia.com/us/22/1/case.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://supreme.justia.com/us/22/1/case.html&lt;/a&gt; 
 
Yet I don&#039;t see any state lawmakers attempting to fight constitutionally unauthorized federal taxes. (Did you hear that bankrupt California?) A part of the problem is that the ill-conceived 17th A. has made it too easy for the feds to lay constitutionally unauthorized taxes, IMO. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m sorry, but while these state sovereignty movements are a step in the right direction, I cannot get excited about what legislators are doing so far.  My problem with these saber-rattling sovereignty gestures by state lawmakers is this.  The USSC has already decided that the feds cannot lay taxes to fund spending programs that are actually based on state power issues. </p>
<p>&quot;Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.&quot; &#8211;Chief Justice Marshall, GIBBONS V. OGDEN, 1824.  <a href="http://supreme.justia.com/us/22/1/case.html" target="_blank">http://supreme.justia.com/us/22/1/case.html</a> </p>
<p>Yet I don&#039;t see any state lawmakers attempting to fight constitutionally unauthorized federal taxes. (Did you hear that bankrupt California?) A part of the problem is that the ill-conceived 17th A. has made it too easy for the feds to lay constitutionally unauthorized taxes, IMO. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Push Back Begins:Health Care Freedom in Virginia &#171; www.offmyfrontporch.com</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/11/kentucky-joins-movement-to-resist-abuses-of-commerce-clause-2nd-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-292944</link>
		<dc:creator>The Push Back Begins:Health Care Freedom in Virginia &#171; www.offmyfrontporch.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3655#comment-292944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] on the 2nd amendment we have Tennessee,Montana and now Kentucky passing their Firearms Freedom Acts. These things happening is making me believe what the Russian [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the 2nd amendment we have Tennessee,Montana and now Kentucky passing their Firearms Freedom Acts. These things happening is making me believe what the Russian [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monorprise</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/11/kentucky-joins-movement-to-resist-abuses-of-commerce-clause-2nd-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-292915</link>
		<dc:creator>Monorprise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3655#comment-292915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to say I agree with both Bruce and Michael Boldin. 
 
In that I don&#8217;t think the feds have the balls to invade a State, but just in case we need to move more slowly to be sure that we get all our pieces setup and in position on the board before we put this game into play. 
 
Namely we need to delay in this until we got several other states at least doing the same thing at the same time. With many more prepared to back them politically, and vocally, as to make the Feds thing twice about invading. 
 
This will take us more then a few election cycles as well as much more importantly a change in the sentiment and attitudes of the people.  In short a revolution to accomplish. 
 
Let us not get ahead of ourselves we go too soon, before we&#8217;re ready and I&#8217;m afraid Fred is right it will blow up in our face making future efforts more difficult to revive. 
 
So yes by all means Slow down, we must have time to make sure our enemy is checkmated before they even know what&#8217;s happening to them. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say I agree with both Bruce and Michael Boldin. </p>
<p>In that I don&rsquo;t think the feds have the balls to invade a State, but just in case we need to move more slowly to be sure that we get all our pieces setup and in position on the board before we put this game into play. </p>
<p>Namely we need to delay in this until we got several other states at least doing the same thing at the same time. With many more prepared to back them politically, and vocally, as to make the Feds thing twice about invading. </p>
<p>This will take us more then a few election cycles as well as much more importantly a change in the sentiment and attitudes of the people.  In short a revolution to accomplish. </p>
<p>Let us not get ahead of ourselves we go too soon, before we&rsquo;re ready and I&rsquo;m afraid Fred is right it will blow up in our face making future efforts more difficult to revive. </p>
<p>So yes by all means Slow down, we must have time to make sure our enemy is checkmated before they even know what&rsquo;s happening to them. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
