Comments on: Kentucky Joins Movement to Resist Abuses of Commerce Clause, 2nd Amendment

By: toshiba coupon code

toshiba coupon code — Mon, 16 May 2011 23:37:37 +0000

According to me this is an excellent site that give an important information about any thing. in the state House and governor will probably do their best to kill it as they did our "sovereignty" resolution from the last session.

By: Will Virginia Nullify Federal Gun Laws? « Dark Politricks Retweeted

Will Virginia Nullify Federal Gun Laws? « Dark Politricks Retweeted — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 02:33:40 +0000

[...] As previously reported here, while the FFAâ€™s title focuses on federal gun regulations, it has far more to do with the 10th Amendmentâ€™s limit on the power of the federal government. The bills in state houses contain language such as the following: â€œfederal laws and regulations do not apply to personal firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition that is manufactured in [this state] and remains in [state]. The limitation on federal law and regulation stated in this bill applies to a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured using basic materials and that can be manufactured without the inclusion of any significant parts imported into this state.â€ [...]

By: Kentucky Joins Movement to Resist Abuses of Commerce Clause, 2nd Amendment

Kentucky Joins Movement to Resist Abuses of Commerce Clause, 2nd Amendment — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:12:57 +0000

[...] Kentucky Joins Movement to Resist Abuses of Commerce Clause, 2nd AmendmentÂ |Â Tenth Amendment Cente…. Share and [...]

By: Utah to Feds: Hands off our guns! | Tenth Amendment Center Blog

Utah to Feds: Hands off our guns! | Tenth Amendment Center Blog — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:28:37 +0000

[...] previously reported here, while the FFAâ€™s title focuses on federal gun regulations, it has far more to do with the 10th [...]

By: Kentucky Joins Movement to Resist Abuses of Commerce Clause, 2nd Amendment | The Ruthless Truth blog

Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:14:10 +0000

[...] http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/11/11/kentucky-joins-movement-to-resist-abuses-of-commerce-… Easy AdSense by Unreal Bookmark It Hide Sites [...]

By: Monorprise

Monorprise — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:16:49 +0000

Because that ruling has been ignored and overturned, as well as made pointless by the broadcasting of federal areas, and the thinning of states, by the federal employees in black robes.

By: B. Johnson

B. Johnson — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:09:07 +0000

I'm sorry, but while these state sovereignty movements are a step in the right direction, I cannot get excited about what legislators are doing so far. My problem with these saber-rattling sovereignty gestures by state lawmakers is this. The USSC has already decided that the feds cannot lay taxes to fund spending programs that are actually based on state power issues.

"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." –Chief Justice Marshall, GIBBONS V. OGDEN, 1824. http://supreme.justia.com/us/22/1/case.html

Yet I don't see any state lawmakers attempting to fight constitutionally unauthorized federal taxes. (Did you hear that bankrupt California?) A part of the problem is that the ill-conceived 17th A. has made it too easy for the feds to lay constitutionally unauthorized taxes, IMO.

By: The Push Back Begins:Health Care Freedom in Virginia « www.offmyfrontporch.com

Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:53:31 +0000

[...] on the 2nd amendment we have Tennessee,Montana and now Kentucky passing their Firearms Freedom Acts. These things happening is making me believe what the Russian [...]

By: Monorprise

Monorprise — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:26:49 +0000

I have to say I agree with both Bruce and Michael Boldin.

In that I don’t think the feds have the balls to invade a State, but just in case we need to move more slowly to be sure that we get all our pieces setup and in position on the board before we put this game into play.

Namely we need to delay in this until we got several other states at least doing the same thing at the same time. With many more prepared to back them politically, and vocally, as to make the Feds thing twice about invading.

This will take us more then a few election cycles as well as much more importantly a change in the sentiment and attitudes of the people. In short a revolution to accomplish.

Let us not get ahead of ourselves we go too soon, before we’re ready and I’m afraid Fred is right it will blow up in our face making future efforts more difficult to revive.

So yes by all means Slow down, we must have time to make sure our enemy is checkmated before they even know what’s happening to them.

By: Monorprise

Monorprise — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:19:15 +0000

Perhaps our legislator should make this clear in passing a renewed law explicitly stating and establishing an anther/new-legal penalty for the violation of the already existing Federal Constitutional law by one of their agents.

Basically such a law would have to reassert certain eternal facts:

1: No one regardless of office is above the laws namely and most importantly the Constitutional laws of the United States and this State. Meaning explicitly they can, should, and must be prosecuted the same as everyone else for violating them.

2: Any agent enforcing any order or law which is not empowered by the Constitution of the government they clam to work for as recognized by this state is committing a crime, if that act would otherwise be in anyway injurious to others, and is subject to the same prosecution as anyone and everyone else for such a crime.

3: This State did not empower the Federal Government with sovereign immunity over and regarding its own Constitutional law. Such a immunity cannot exist in our Republican system of government. Without such government being rendered non-republican in that it is subject to the will of its rulers elected or otherwise and not that of law, which such sovereign immunity would enable them to ignore.