<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rome, Revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/06/27/rome-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/06/27/rome-revisited/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:48:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: banter2345</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/06/27/rome-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-931307</link>
		<dc:creator>banter2345</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 15:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12958#comment-931307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ @babcicathy The reason there is no across the line competition is that the insurance companies have too many politicians in their back pockets.  If prices dropped as happens with competition, their profits would suffer.  It&#039;s part of the crony capitalism that&#039;s strangling the people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> @babcicathy The reason there is no across the line competition is that the insurance companies have too many politicians in their back pockets.  If prices dropped as happens with competition, their profits would suffer.  It&#8217;s part of the crony capitalism that&#8217;s strangling the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: banter2345</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/06/27/rome-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-931306</link>
		<dc:creator>banter2345</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 15:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12958#comment-931306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I disagree with the U.S. being a &quot;country&quot;.  It is an alliance, supposedly a mutually beneficial one between the States, and it was only suppose to be on economic and military (defensive, not offensive) grounds.  There was to be a standing Navy, but the States were to retain control over their Armies (militias) and only relinquished that right to the President under order of Congress declaring war.  The commerce clause was only to deal with tariffs and excises on trade between the various States and between them and other countries.  The Supreme Court was only to hear cases involving people of different States, between the States, and dealing with Admiralty law.  They were never to hear about &quot;Constitutionality&quot; of a federal law.  That is up to the States and the people therein to decide, and either follow it or nullify it, plain and simple.  What should happen is Arizona just goes through with implementing all aspects of the law, if the jack boots send troops in that would be the worst mistake they ever made.  If they try to withhold funds, then Arizona can quit sending federal tax payments in and expel every feral, oops federal, agent in their borders that aren&#039;t citizens of Arizona.  PLAIN AND SIMPLE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with the U.S. being a &#8220;country&#8221;.  It is an alliance, supposedly a mutually beneficial one between the States, and it was only suppose to be on economic and military (defensive, not offensive) grounds.  There was to be a standing Navy, but the States were to retain control over their Armies (militias) and only relinquished that right to the President under order of Congress declaring war.  The commerce clause was only to deal with tariffs and excises on trade between the various States and between them and other countries.  The Supreme Court was only to hear cases involving people of different States, between the States, and dealing with Admiralty law.  They were never to hear about &#8220;Constitutionality&#8221; of a federal law.  That is up to the States and the people therein to decide, and either follow it or nullify it, plain and simple.  What should happen is Arizona just goes through with implementing all aspects of the law, if the jack boots send troops in that would be the worst mistake they ever made.  If they try to withhold funds, then Arizona can quit sending federal tax payments in and expel every feral, oops federal, agent in their borders that aren&#8217;t citizens of Arizona.  PLAIN AND SIMPLE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_CThomas</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/06/27/rome-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-931289</link>
		<dc:creator>The_CThomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12958#comment-931289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sorry guys. I let you down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry guys. I let you down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susie07</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/06/27/rome-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-931266</link>
		<dc:creator>susie07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12958#comment-931266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ How do we get the right to buy health insurance across state lines or on the internet?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> How do we get the right to buy health insurance across state lines or on the internet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: babcicathy</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/06/27/rome-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-931265</link>
		<dc:creator>babcicathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12958#comment-931265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obamacare is constitutional!??? Can the states refuse to participate?  Can the states refuse to create health insurance coops?  How do we get the right to buy health insurance across state lines or on the internet?  Why is competition not allowed in purchasing health care?
 
I will not pay a tax for non-participation!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obamacare is constitutional!??? Can the states refuse to participate?  Can the states refuse to create health insurance coops?  How do we get the right to buy health insurance across state lines or on the internet?  Why is competition not allowed in purchasing health care?<br />
 <br />
I will not pay a tax for non-participation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rome, Revisited &#8211; Tenth Amendment Center &#124; Daily Serps</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/06/27/rome-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-920704</link>
		<dc:creator>Rome, Revisited &#8211; Tenth Amendment Center &#124; Daily Serps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12958#comment-920704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Rome, Revisited &#8211; Tenth Amendment Center   This entry was posted in Back to the Future and tagged boldin, due tomorrow, tumblr by admin. Bookmark the permalink. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rome, Revisited &#8211; Tenth Amendment Center   This entry was posted in Back to the Future and tagged boldin, due tomorrow, tumblr by admin. Bookmark the permalink. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Weitz</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/06/27/rome-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-931264</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Weitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 06:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12958#comment-931264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree.  Send King Barry to Club Gitmo!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  Send King Barry to Club Gitmo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra Finley Etheredge</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/06/27/rome-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-931263</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Finley Etheredge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 03:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12958#comment-931263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walter Shank - who will be arrested??  So many of them deserve to be arrested and sent to Club Gitmo!!!  Including King Barry!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter Shank &#8211; who will be arrested??  So many of them deserve to be arrested and sent to Club Gitmo!!!  Including King Barry!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rome, Revisited &#124; Libertarios of America</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/06/27/rome-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-920666</link>
		<dc:creator>Rome, Revisited &#124; Libertarios of America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 03:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12958#comment-920666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] parts of that state law, but kind of upheld the “show me yourRead the rest of this article at: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/06/27/rome-revisited/     Click &quot;Home&quot; to find this article in English. Clic &quot;Inicio&quot; para encontrar este artículo en [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] parts of that state law, but kind of upheld the “show me yourRead the rest of this article at: <a href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/06/27/rome-revisited/" rel="nofollow">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/06/27/rome-revisited/</a>     Click &quot;Home&quot; to find this article in English. Clic &quot;Inicio&quot; para encontrar este artículo en [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Shank</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/06/27/rome-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-931262</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Shank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 03:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12958#comment-931262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Word has it there may be some arrests happening in the next 72 hours.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Word has it there may be some arrests happening in the next 72 hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
