The following is based off a speech given at Nullify Now! in Orlando, FL on 10-10-10.
Watch the video here: Part 1, Part 2
We don’t need no stinkin’ permission to exercise our rights. We need to exercise our rights whether they the government want us to or not.
Ok, so let’s start out with the easy stuff, here… I’m a proud tenther. That means I believe that the federal government is authorized to exercise only those powers that we the people delegated to it in the constitution – and nothing more.
The founders created a system, unique in history, where the most difficult and most divisive issues would be kept close to home in our states and our communities. And, there’s a good reason for such a system – it’s the only kind that can allow people of widely varying political, religious, and economic viewpoints living together in peace. I’m from California. In Florida, you likely don’t want California’s policies. We shouldn’t be required to have Florida’s. Maine should be different from Montana, Texas should be different from South Carolina, and so on. This is the system that best advances freedom.
Unfortunately, though, for a long long time, there’s been very little that the federal government does that actually IS authorized by the constitution.
QUESTION: WHAT DO WE DO ABOUT IT?
- Do we lobby congress or march on DC and ask that federal politicians limit their own power?
- Do we sue them in court and ask federal judges to limit federal power?
- Do we vote the bums out – and hope that the new bums will reject their own power?
Thomas Jefferson and James Madison both warned us that if the federal government ever became the sole and exclusive arbiter of the extent of its own powers – that power would endlessly grow…regardless of elections, separation of powers, courts, or other vaunted parts of our system.
They were right. For over a century, we the people have been suing, and marching, and lobbying, and voting the bums out. But yet…year in and year out, government continues to grow and your liberty continues to diminish. And, it doesn’t matter who is the president, or what political party controls congress – the growth of power in the federal government never stops.
Power – the problem we face today is about power – and until we address the absolute fact that the federal government has too much power, and going to the federal government to fix problems caused by federal power – things will never change.
John Adams once gave us a warning that “liberty once lost, is lost forever.” He wasn’t necessarily saying that there’s no hope whatsoever. But instead, it was an important lesson. Whenever government tells us they need more power to deal with an “emergency” – and they always have them for both foreign and domestic issues – that same government will never voluntarily give that power back. They’ll never just decide that the newfound power is something they don’t want, and that liberty will never be regained without a long, difficult struggle by the people.
How do we fix this mess? Well, I think I’m in pretty good company if i go with Thomas Jefferson’s advice that “whensoever” the federal government exercises “undelegated powers” … “a nullification of the act is the rightful remedy.”
Reading this, you’ll notice that Jefferson didn’t say that a nullification of the act is a pretty decent remedy. He didn’t say that nullification is just a rightful remedy, or even a good idea to try after voting bums out or going to court. He told us that when the feds exercise powers they’re not supposed to exercise, We’re not supposed to wait for the federal government to correct itself. Jefferson’s advice is that we must resist violations of our rights on a state level – every time it happens.
Around the country, there’s a lot of talk about nullification – but what is it, really? I can think of no better way to define it than how Tenth Amendment Center research analyst Derek Sheriff has done – by describing what it is not:
Nullification is not secession or insurrection, but neither is it unconditional or unlimited submission. Nullification is not something that requires any decision, statement or action from any branch of the federal government. Nullification is not the result of obtaining a favorable court ruling. Nullification is not the petitioning of the federal government to start doing or to stop doing anything. Nullification doesn’t depend on any federal law being repealed. Nullification does not require permission from any person or institution outside of one’s own state.
Nullification is something that’s already happening around the country – and Derek explains the process:
Nullification begins with a decision made in your state legislature to resist a federal law deemed to be unconstitutional. It usually involves a bill, which is passed by both houses and is signed by your governor. In some cases, it might be approved by the voters of your state directly, in a referendum. It may change your state’s statutory law or it might even amend your state constitution. It is a refusal on the part of your state government to cooperate with, or enforce any federal law it deems to be unconstitutional.
At its very core, nullification is any action on a state level that results in some federal law being null and void – and of no effect. It’s about “We the People” exercising our rights whether the politicians or judges in Washington D.C want to give us “permission” to exercise those rights or not. We don’t need no stinkin’ permission.
HEMPCON
I recently went to an event called Hemp Con down in my part of the state – Los Angeles. This is a big event at the LA convention center – with loads of vendors and businesses from every angle you can think of in support of the marijuana industry.
There were home security companies to help protect your weed, solar power companies to help you grow your weed, doctors giving out medical marijuana cards to virtually anyone with $80 and an hour of time. There were even delivery services – you can get your marijuana delivered to you 24 hours a day…in 30 minutes or less. The pizza companies have nothing on these guys! It was amazing if you think about it from an economic standpoint – this was capitalism, the free market – working its wonders around an industry.
What’s the point?
Virtually every single one of those businesses was either directly violating federal law, or aiding someone else in doing so because marijuana is illegal, according to the feds – but not the constitution – in all situations. And guess what – no ATF or DEA thugs shut the place down. Business functioned, people did what they wanted to in freedom, and that was that.
In fact, in 2005, the Supreme Court ruled that state medical marijuana laws were illegal. At that time there were 10 states that had such laws. Since that court ruling came down, not one single state has repealed their law. And today, there’s even more adding on – there’s now 15 states defying Washington DC on marijuana, and they’re getting away with it.
THE BLUEPRINT
When enough people say no to unconstitutional laws, regulations, and mandates…and enough states pass laws to back those people up, there’s not much the federal government can do, but slowly and consistently back off. There’s no tanks rolling into Los Angeles to shut down the dispensaries. This is far from perfect, but it can work, and it is working right now.
Whether it’s gun rights, or health freedom, or maybe someone should start rejecting the Department of Education because we’re sick of the federal government controlling our schools…the solution to our problems does not lie with the federal government. It lies in our states, and with ourselves.
THE BIG QUESTION
So here’s the final question – and my big challenge to you today. When it happens some day, and it will, that the federal government tells you that you have to purchase some healthcare plan, and you start thinking about penalties for violating that “law” – ask yourself this…do you have as much courage as the pot smokers?
I sure hope you do. Because we need to exercise our rights whether they give us “permission” to or not!










In the Pennsylvania Ratifying Convention of 1787, James Wilson said the following concerning the lack of a bill of rights in the proposed constitution:
"[A] bill of rights is by no means a necessary measure. In a government possessed of enumerated powers, such a measure would be not only unnecessary, but preposterous and dangerous. Whence comes this notion, that in the United States there is no security without a bill of rights?"
He concluded his remarks by stating:
"To every suggestion concerning a bill of rights, the citizens of the United States may always say, WE reserve the right to do what we please."
Like Michael said: "We don’t need no stinkin’ permission to exercise our rights.
So what do you do when states oppress their people?
the same.
Move. Costly, but a bargain in light of what every one of the fifty four signers of the Declaration of Independence put up when they fixed their hand to that document.
Work to change the laws in your state, and as worst case scenario move to another state with laws you find more favorable or in which you are more able to influence. The good thing about most power being with the states is that it is far easier to influence laws, directly interact with legislators, etc.
All governments are criminal and tyrannical. Moving just means exchanging one plantation master for a slightly less rapacious one. And working to change laws in your state is just begging for your freedom again.
At some point, it no longer makes sense to beg. "We don't need no stinking permission!" If they come after you for being free, you are at war. Yeah, that's scary, but it's reality too. Time to clean your battle rifle.
There is only one Amendment on which the Government can attack us: it is the First Amendment. I say this for one simple reason: when they attack us on the 2nd Amendment, they meet a hail of bullets, and any of those who aid in the destruction of our Rights, then fall face down from serious injuries. We do not have to give the government anything without our permission, and therefore we have the unalienable Right to protect ourselves and property. No matter their rank, status, or position, if they violate our Rights and come at us with force, they have declared themselves to be our enemy, bent on destroying us, and we have the Constitutional Right to defend ourselves. Do not feel sorry for our enemies, for they receive what they deserve. Be an Oath Keeper, or remove the badge.
Please make your font larger and darker for OLD eyes. I find your site almost impossible to read.
There are zoom functions available on your browser that will allow you to increase the font size for you to read better. For example, if you are using Firefox, you just go to the menu at the top and click VIEW, then ZOOM….then ZOOM IN.
Internet Explorer and just about every other browser I have ever used offers something similar.
Also – for those who do not like to – or are unable to – read what we have printed, we have available a video of this speech. Just click the play button on the youtube video included in the article here and you can listen and watch.
Don't ever rely on our federal judges to give a citizen an even break, I've got some perfect examples of federal court judges refusing to comply with court rules, case and/or statutory laws, and your constitutional right to trial by jury. Also, whatever became of our rights to be secure in our persons and papers? Doesn't that Right supposedly undermine the TSA's ability to require us to go through full body scanners and/or pat down searches without reasonable cause?
this sounds great but my state is is in lockstep with Obama. so trying to get anything done here is like pulling teeth. the Senators and Congressman and Governor think with the same liberal thinking that reminds me of the Communism that i saw when i flew the East German border and i know of no way to get the people to open there eyes and see what is happening. they all call me a fearmonger, i'm begining to think all i can protect or do anything for are my chilldren and grandchildren.
I agree one trillion %.
My situation is virtually the same as oldvet53, But I Refuse to give in.
I'd rather die on my feet fighting for this country than to be controled by the plutocracy that the Demonic-rats have manipu;lated this country into under the control from the likes of none other than George Soros.
These sheeple follow "their bible"… Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals."
They demonize the people (who are the citizens of this country) who see what is actually going on, they see past the smoke and mirrors that are put up to distract the people of country.
It all about globalism, That is the actual enemy of this country.
BUT all the political minions in this administration chany globalism….. For it is they who are the TRUE ENEMY of this country and its soverignity.
My war cry has been…and will always be,
Si Vis Pacem, Parabellum!
Acta Non Verba.
Semper Peratus.
"Power – the problem we face today is about power – and until we address the absolute fact that the federal government has too much power, and going to the federal government to fix problems caused by federal power – things will never change."
The concept that the Constitution was divided into three separate and equal powers is what confuses most when talking about the government. The first two powers, legislative and executive make up the federal government (statutory – democracy). The judicial power makes the national government (common law – Republic). The federal government has usurped the power of the national government because it is incumbent upon each individual to establish their place outside of the federal (this is by presumption). To rebut this presumption takes an order of the court, because they presume we are in the federal. Each individual who want to be left alone by the federal government must get the order so the feds will have something to follow. That's a restraining order that each of us needs in the specific case where the feds are violating Constitutional Rights. I know this is a new concept for many, but just take some time to think about it.
If there is only one thing that we can thank the Obama administration for it is for forcing patriots to re-read and explore the constitution. And, it is their complete disregard for that founding document that has forced us to do so. So then, we can say that out of the most evil administration in memory, some good has emerged.
I don’t need permission!
that’s the POINT!!! They are rights granted by God, not by any government, hence they are there to remind the government of what IS and that they are inalienable!
exactly so. But of course, with a Muslim – and not a very good one at that – in the white house, who is an Alynsky acolyte for two decades at least, one can only expect lies and deceit.
yes and he has not disappointed on that score! he’s probably a better Muslim that it may seem, he does their work as a semi under cover agent
Let them write all the laws they want, sign all the bills to their hearts content. Any unconstitutional law is NOT a law. Non compliance and civil disobedience is the way! Maybe if we ignore them enough they’ll lose all credibility and disappear.
Civil disobedience is nullification at the level of the individual.
Screw this Goverment, they need to go.
Exactly!
I’m not authorized to follow unconstitutional laws.
It’s against my religion.
Molon Labe
great! as long as you’re not deferring to the courts on what is or is not constitutional, you’re in great company here…
The courts have become unconstitutional, so guess I’m not deferring to them either.
Rights!
AMEN!
That’s the whole point of the Bill of Rights (and their ideological foundation in the Declaration of Indpendence).
permission not required…
just ask rosa parks…
exactly!
we the people give government the power and we can take it away
Agreed! with 10th Amendment’s comment that is.
Permission is something we give to be Governed, it is called consent.
Hello! Where you been. NOW!
… if an act requires “permission”, it is a privilege, not a right…
… rights do not require “permission”…
… the Founders did NOT enact a Bill of Privileges!
… WAKE UP!
… STAND UP!
If it’s a RIGHT, you don’t NEED anybody’s permission!
That goes for obamacare also.A law they make and pass is not constitutional if the law makers that make and pass the laws exempt themselves from having to abide by said laws.
Unless you live in NY or CO
State Senator Mark Green Stacey Campfield Senator John Stevens Tennessee any time soon???
This would be the best way to nullify the Treasonous Senators and Congressmen of the Republicocrat Bilderberg CFR Party! This may end the Treason Tyranny Party! http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-f4vGFwqTRE4/T4tIMuCOM9I/AAAAAAAAHYI/yYPrixHLeDc/s1600/hanging.jpg
tell it Thom!
nullify the louisiana purchase
Let’s do it! Now!
Hard to do when the State is complicit!! Colorado has a bill to abolish Medicare and Medicaid in favor of a “Single Payer System” Democrats are COMMUNISTS!!! Let alone the UNCONSTITUTIONAL GUN LAWS!!! So Much for the OATH OF OFFICE!! Just a ritual that means NOTHING to Politicians!!!
There r several good books about nullification, a very easy process. States would need to plan on a future without federal funding, which is as it should be.
It’s time for the residents (common sense thinking ones) to merge on the State House, enter and physically remove all therein.
Not sure he was talking specifically about the states, but wherever it works — the principle is still there.
every state is complicit. We can either complain that things are impossible, or do something. we encourage your dedication and effort – for YEARS – to liberty.
Or the people in the Judicial branch of corruption
I live in NY so how do you do it & not go to jail or rack up thousands in legal bills?
United We Stand…..
Divided We Fall?????
Do you Have the BALLS?????
LOVE & Light
@Terry Black, and all the treasonous Democrats starting with Obama.
I would classify myself as a Jeffersonian. Almost immediately after ratification, Jefferson saw that the states made a huge mistake when they signed away their sovereignty to the federal government. His position is problematic in today’s legal climate. The emergence of judicial review, and the seizing of power by the executive in the early twentieth century has warped our great document into something that is less than desirable.
What evidence of the bias against redheads? How come images of Jefferson almost uniformly depict him with a vibrant young face, but gray hair?