http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/05/16/gutzman-napolitano-talk-10th-amendment-on-glenn-beck/ Concordia res Parvae Crescunt Sat, 18 May 2013 16:05:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/05/16/gutzman-napolitano-talk-10th-amendment-on-glenn-beck/comment-page-1/#comment-293930 Tim Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:50:16 +0000 http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1790#comment-293930 Yes. It would a continental congress would be bad because it would leave things wide open.

]]> http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/05/16/gutzman-napolitano-talk-10th-amendment-on-glenn-beck/comment-page-1/#comment-256102 Gabe McGranahan Mon, 18 May 2009 21:41:49 +0000 http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1790#comment-256102 While it’s good to see folks “awakening” some to the loss of states rights, I find it very troublesome that some of the talking heads are proponents of a very dangerous Article V Constitutional Convention. We can all find some things we’d like the Constitution amended for, a balanced budget amendment perhaps, but that should be done through the traditional means of amendment and ratification by the states. A Con-Con leaves the whole thing open for a re-write. Not to mention the rules for ratification, or lack there-of. Remember, there’s only one precedent. That’s how we have the Constitution as we now know it, and lost the Articles of Confederation. Given the state of current politics, to even begin to think that the current congress would stand by the wishes of the State Legislatures would be foolish and naive. Youtube “Beware Article V”.

]]>