Introduced in the South Carolina State Senate on May 6, 2009, the “Firearms Freedom Act” (s-794)Â seeks “to provide that a firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition manufactured and retained in South Carolina is exempt from federal regulation under the commerce clause of the Constitution of the United States.”
The bill is sponsored by South Carolina State Senators Bright, Bryant, Mulvaney, Davis, Shoopman, S. Martin and McConnell. They join Montana, Utah, and Texas in an effort to limit federal regulation of guns, and specifically invoke the 9th and 10th Amendments as restrictions on federal power:
“the regulation of intrastate commerce is vested in the states under the ninth and tenth amendments to the United States Constitution, particularly if not expressly preempted by federal law. Congress has not expressly preempted state regulation of intrastate commerce pertaining to the manufacture on an intrastate basis of firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition”
Read the full text of the legislation below:
A BILL TO AMEND CHAPTER 31, TITLE 23 OF THE 1976 CODE, RELATING TO FIREARMS, BY ADDING ARTICLE 9, THE “SOUTH CAROLINA FIREARMS FREEDOM ACT”, TO PROVIDE THAT A FIREARM, FIREARM ACCESSORY, OR AMMUNITION MANUFACTURED AND RETAINED IN SOUTH CAROLINA IS EXEMPT FROM FEDERAL REGULATION UNDER THE COMMERCE CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.
Whereas, the tenth amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees and reserves for the states all powers not granted to the federal government in the Constitution; and
Whereas, the ninth amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees to the people rights not granted in the Constitution and reserves to the people of South Carolina certain rights. The guaranty of those rights is a matter of contract between the state and people of South Carolina and the United States; and
Whereas, the regulation of intrastate commerce is vested in the states under the ninth and tenth amendments to the United States Constitution, particularly if not expressly preempted by federal law. Congress has not expressly preempted state regulation of intrastate commerce pertaining to the manufacture on an intrastate basis of firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition; and
Whereas, the second amendment to the United States Constitution reserves to the people the right to keep and bear arms as that right was understood at the time that South Carolina was admitted to statehood in 1788, and the guaranty of the right is a matter of contract between the state and people of South Carolina and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by South Carolina and the United States in 1788; and
Whereas, Article I, Section 20 of the South Carolina Constitution clearly secures to South Carolina citizens, and prohibits government interference with, the right of individual South Carolina citizens to keep and bear arms. This constitutional protection is unchanged from the 1895 South Carolina Constitution, which was approved by Congress and the people of South Carolina, and the right exists as it was understood at the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by South Carolina and the United States in 1895. Now, therefore,
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:
SECTION 1. Chapter 31, Title 23 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:
“Article 9
South Carolina Firearms Freedom Act
Section 23-31-700. This article may be cited as the ‘South Carolina Firearms Freedom Act’.
Section 23-31-705. For purposes of this article:
(1) ‘Borders of South Carolina’ means the boundaries of South Carolina described in Article I, Section 1 of the 1895 South Carolina Constitution.
(2) ‘Firearms accessories’ means items that are used in conjunction with or mounted upon a firearm but are not essential to the basic function of a firearm, including, but not limited to, telescopic or laser sights, magazines, flash or sound suppressors, folding or aftermarket stocks and grips, speedloaders, ammunition carriers, and lights for target illumination.
(3) ‘Generic and insignificant parts’ includes, but is not limited to, springs, screws, nuts, and pins.
(4) ‘Manufactured’ means that a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition has been created from basic materials for functional usefulness, including, but not limited to, forging, casting, machining, or other processes for working materials.
Section 23-31-710. (A) A personal firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured commercially or privately in South Carolina and that remains within the borders of South Carolina is not subject to federal law or federal regulation, including registration, under the authority of Congress to regulate interstate commerce.
(B) This section applies to a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured in South Carolina from basic materials and that can be manufactured without the inclusion of any significant parts imported from another state.
(1) Generic and insignificant parts that have other manufacturing or consumer product applications are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition.
(2) Basic materials such as unmachined steel and unshaped wood are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition.
(C) Basic materials are subject only to intrastate commerce regulation.
(D) Firearms accessories that are imported into South Carolina from another state and that are subject to federal regulation as being in interstate commerce do not subject a firearm to federal regulation under interstate commerce because they are attached to or used in conjunction with a firearm in South Carolina.
Section 23-31-715. This article does not apply to the following:
(1) a firearm that cannot be carried and used by one person;
(2) a firearm that has a bore diameter greater than one and one half inches and that uses smokeless powder, not black powder, as a propellant;
(3) ammunition with a projectile that explodes using an explosion of chemical energy after the projectile leaves the firearm; or
(4) a firearm that discharges two or more projectiles with one activation of the trigger or other firing device.
Section 23-31-720. A firearm manufactured or sold in South Carolina under must have the words ‘Made in South Carolina’ clearly stamped on a central metallic part, such as the receiver or frame.”
SECTION 3. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.








Hell, yeah! Montana and South Carolina rock my socks. I hope Louisiana jumps on the bandwagon soon.
Good news from Louisiana is that their senate did in fact pass a resolution in support of the 10th amendment. Hopefully this just leads to more and more people getting on board with the idea of limiting the federal government to their constitutionally enumerated powers.
RIGHT ON! Hope the other states follow soon. If they don’t, the states that have passed their Freedom of Firearms acts will be inundated with new citizens. Oregon will be among the last – if ever – to pass a FFA, so I’m getting ready to move.
This is getting big. So far my count is 7 states; Montana, Texas, Utah, Tennessee, Alaska, Minnesota, and South Carolina. It will be interesting to see what these states do if the Supreme Court strikes the FFA down…
This is starting out like the Tenth Amendment resolutions did. Although the momentum seems to be growing more quickly with regard to this one.
Will our protected guns have to be manufactured in SC? Why not get rid of 23-31-715 part-(4), what if I want the same fire power abilty as our military counterparts? I do love to see our state standing up for it’s rights and enforcing the U.S. Constitution.
It’s definitely going to be interesting to see where this all leads. I think a good start is this effort to roll back an out of control vision of the commerce clause..
It is clear the NRA does not support the firearms Freedom act, we neen not know the way, we only need to know the NRA has lost it’ way to protecting all gun rights
Leave the NRA and Join the GAO if you want to support a rel pro gun group
As stated by Executive Cox NRA do not expect any help from the NRA per the firearms freedom act,
Larry, that’s an interesting statement. I haven’t heard a peep from the NRA on the FFA. It seems to me that these big gun rights organizations are more interested in national “solutions” which will never get anywhere – instead of an effective state-level move like is happening with the firearms freedom act.
Amen! Glad to see my home state doing the right thing……..I hope it passes.
JDB
Already passed in MT and TN. Odds are that the courts will rule against it – but will people still have the courage to resist even if that happens?