<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Georgia Senate Passes SR632 Affirming States&#8217; Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/06/georgia-senate-passes-sr632-affirming-states-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/06/georgia-senate-passes-sr632-affirming-states-rights/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:21:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed Martin</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/06/georgia-senate-passes-sr632-affirming-states-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-255554</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 22:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1212#comment-255554</guid>
		<description>can you say F**K YOU WASHINGTON?? This is what we NEED! To reestablish the principles of FREE states united together for common DEFENSE! NOW IS THE TIME TO DEFEAT THE COMMUNIST FORCES CONSPIRING TO OVERTAKE OUR NATION AND ABOLISH THE PRICIPLES OF 50 FREE STATES AND INSTITUTE ONE SOVIET STYLE STATE! 
WAR MAY BE THE ONLY WAY TO RESTORE OUR FREEDOMS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can you say F**K YOU WASHINGTON?? This is what we NEED! To reestablish the principles of FREE states united together for common DEFENSE! NOW IS THE TIME TO DEFEAT THE COMMUNIST FORCES CONSPIRING TO OVERTAKE OUR NATION AND ABOLISH THE PRICIPLES OF 50 FREE STATES AND INSTITUTE ONE SOVIET STYLE STATE!<br />
WAR MAY BE THE ONLY WAY TO RESTORE OUR FREEDOMS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grey Soldier</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/06/georgia-senate-passes-sr632-affirming-states-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-254709</link>
		<dc:creator>Grey Soldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1212#comment-254709</guid>
		<description>This is in reply to one &quot;SANE PERSON&quot; (posted April 18th, 2009 at 4:56 pm):

Please enumerate the exact amendment(s) in the ten amendments commonly referred to as the &quot;Bill of Rights&quot; that are &quot;ignored&quot; in the above resolution. Since you seem not to be familiar with them, the amendments in question are listed below for your convenience. 

I dare say it would seem that us Southerners are more familiar with the Constitution than you are, sir!  

---


(Note: The following text is a transcription of the first ten amendments to the Constitution in their original form. These amendments were ratified December 15, 1791, and form what is known as the &quot;Bill of Rights.&quot;)

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment III

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Amendment VII

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in reply to one &#8220;SANE PERSON&#8221; (posted April 18th, 2009 at 4:56 pm):</p>
<p>Please enumerate the exact amendment(s) in the ten amendments commonly referred to as the &#8220;Bill of Rights&#8221; that are &#8220;ignored&#8221; in the above resolution. Since you seem not to be familiar with them, the amendments in question are listed below for your convenience. </p>
<p>I dare say it would seem that us Southerners are more familiar with the Constitution than you are, sir!  </p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>(Note: The following text is a transcription of the first ten amendments to the Constitution in their original form. These amendments were ratified December 15, 1791, and form what is known as the &#8220;Bill of Rights.&#8221;)</p>
<p>Amendment I</p>
<p>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.</p>
<p>Amendment II</p>
<p>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.</p>
<p>Amendment III</p>
<p>No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.</p>
<p>Amendment IV</p>
<p>The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.</p>
<p>Amendment V</p>
<p>No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.</p>
<p>Amendment VI</p>
<p>In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.</p>
<p>Amendment VII</p>
<p>In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.</p>
<p>Amendment VIII</p>
<p>Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.</p>
<p>Amendment IX</p>
<p>The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.</p>
<p>Amendment X</p>
<p>The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sane Person</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/06/georgia-senate-passes-sr632-affirming-states-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-254619</link>
		<dc:creator>Sane Person</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 00:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1212#comment-254619</guid>
		<description>Wow. Did you guys actually read this teabag of a resolution? These goons are declaring the power to ignore the Bill of Rights, among other things. It&#039;s always heartening to hear a southern state whine about &quot;states rights.&quot; This is the movement you loons have created. Enjoy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Did you guys actually read this teabag of a resolution? These goons are declaring the power to ignore the Bill of Rights, among other things. It&#8217;s always heartening to hear a southern state whine about &#8220;states rights.&#8221; This is the movement you loons have created. Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: And Now It Stops Being Funny</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/06/georgia-senate-passes-sr632-affirming-states-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-254600</link>
		<dc:creator>And Now It Stops Being Funny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 05:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1212#comment-254600</guid>
		<description>[...] about secession, the Georgia state senate passed this doozie 43 to 1. They passed resolution 632. Here is said resolution in full, but I&#8217;ll spare you some of the legalese, and cut to the chase. Firstly, they redefine the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about secession, the Georgia state senate passed this doozie 43 to 1. They passed resolution 632. Here is said resolution in full, but I&#8217;ll spare you some of the legalese, and cut to the chase. Firstly, they redefine the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Johnson</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/06/georgia-senate-passes-sr632-affirming-states-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-254552</link>
		<dc:creator>James Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1212#comment-254552</guid>
		<description>Are you people retarded, or just ignorant rednecks?  This kind of pre-school political rhetoric is exactly why Georgia gets such a bad name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you people retarded, or just ignorant rednecks?  This kind of pre-school political rhetoric is exactly why Georgia gets such a bad name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GTSp</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/06/georgia-senate-passes-sr632-affirming-states-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-254260</link>
		<dc:creator>GTSp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 04:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1212#comment-254260</guid>
		<description>...and yet this was not in the news down here.  Anywhere.  Not even Boortz mentioned it.

That&#039;s curious.

Let&#039;s all stand together now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and yet this was not in the news down here.  Anywhere.  Not even Boortz mentioned it.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s curious.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s all stand together now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Right Side of Life &#187; States&#8217; Rights Update: Alaska, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Montana</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/06/georgia-senate-passes-sr632-affirming-states-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-254258</link>
		<dc:creator>The Right Side of Life &#187; States&#8217; Rights Update: Alaska, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Montana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 01:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1212#comment-254258</guid>
		<description>[...] from TenthAmendmentCenter.com: On April 1, 2009, the Georgia State Senate passed Resolution 632 (SR632) [status page] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from TenthAmendmentCenter.com: On April 1, 2009, the Georgia State Senate passed Resolution 632 (SR632) [status page] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Boldin</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/06/georgia-senate-passes-sr632-affirming-states-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-254254</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boldin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1212#comment-254254</guid>
		<description>Some great steps forward here - kudos to those legislators in GA who voted on the side of the constitution.  I believe this is going to be a long, long process - and will likely take more than one simple legislative session in the states....but good to see this movement gaining some steam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some great steps forward here &#8211; kudos to those legislators in GA who voted on the side of the constitution.  I believe this is going to be a long, long process &#8211; and will likely take more than one simple legislative session in the states&#8230;.but good to see this movement gaining some steam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trouble</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/06/georgia-senate-passes-sr632-affirming-states-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-254251</link>
		<dc:creator>Trouble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1212#comment-254251</guid>
		<description>Cross your fingers Frank, the state do seem (for the most part) to be getting behind this.  Hopefully NH and AR will try again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cross your fingers Frank, the state do seem (for the most part) to be getting behind this.  Hopefully NH and AR will try again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Bogdan</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/06/georgia-senate-passes-sr632-affirming-states-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-254249</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Bogdan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1212#comment-254249</guid>
		<description>Every state in the Union should do this, it&#039;s time to reign in the federal government and get the constitution back !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every state in the Union should do this, it&#8217;s time to reign in the federal government and get the constitution back !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

