Comments on: Shouldn’t Laws be Constitutional?

By: Jeremiah

Jeremiah — Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:32:30 +0000

The Bill itself would be unconstitutional. Congress does not have the authority to determine whether or not a bill or a law is unconstitutional. That authority is retained solely by the Judicial branch with the precedent of Judicial Review.

By: PSI

PSI — Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:02:07 +0000

I couldn't agree more with your view. It is times like this where the constitution itself is revolutionary. I do believe that as individuals and states we are at the point where we need to be prepared to not just speak, but sacrifice to gain back the freedoms laid out by the constitution.

By: blog comment service

blog comment service — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:47:10 +0000

In 2004 Massachusetts became the first state in the United States to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and California followed suit in 2008.

By: Security Systems

Security Systems — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:57:28 +0000

I think that's the whole idea is to keep us from really knowing what's going on. Draw some attention to this bill and to what our representatives are doing.

By: Michael Boldin

Michael Boldin — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:54:37 +0000

Ryan, following the constitution is a terrible idea? Would be interesting in knowing why you feel that way.

By: ryan

ryan — Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:24:43 +0000

except its a terrible terrible idea