Nullification: Alive and Well on the Left and Right

by Michael Boldin

“If you don’t like it here, move to Cuba!”

“Why don’t you go spout your mouth off in Iraq with your buddy Saddam, you terrorist!”

Those were common emails for me to receive while George W. Bush was president. Opposing Bush policies like the Patriot Act, Real ID, and just about everything else back then didn’t win too many conservative friends for the Tenth Amendment Center, of which I am executive director.

These days, taking a stand for the Constitution – every issue, every time, no exceptions, no excuses – doesn’t win us too many friends from the left. When writing about our Nullify Now! event in Manchester on March 19th (http://www.nullifynow.com/newhampshire), a local “blue” blogger proclaimed:

“There ought to be a price paid for this sort of misbehavior”

Montana’s Democratic Governor Brian Schweitzer recently told the AP that state nullification bills were “unamerican.”

Nullification – any act or acts which result in a particular federal law being rendered null and void, or unenforceable, in your state – really seems to get people’s blood boiling. On this issue, though, I believe both sides of the political aisle have been guilty of being little more than partisan hacks. They support the idea when “the other side” is in power, and viciously attack it when their team is in charge.

In my home state of California, medical marijuana has been “legal” for nearly 15 years now. When the idea was first proposed, it was attacked as nearly treasonous, mostly by those on the right. “You can’t just pick and choose what federal laws to obey” and “the supremacy clause pretty much settles the question” were the most common attacks on those who believed that the federal government shouldn’t have any say in whether people here could grow and consume a plant as they saw fit.

In 2007, when Governor John Lynch signed House Bill 685 refusing compliance with the Real ID Act, New Hampshire was participating in a nationwide nullification movement championed by the ACLU. The bill stated, in part:

“The general court finds that the public policy established by Congress in the Real ID Act of 2005, Public Law 109-13, is contrary and repugnant to Articles 1 through 10 of the New Hampshire constitution as well as Amendments 4 though 10 of the Constitution for the United States of America. Therefore, the state of New Hampshire shall not participate in any driver’s license program pursuant to the Real ID Act of 2005 or in any national identification card system that may follow therefrom.”

Didn’t hear too much opposition from the left on either of those issues, did ya? Neither did I.

Today, there are fifteen states actively defying Congress and the Supreme Court on marijuana. And, twenty-five states have joined the fray by refusing to comply with Real ID. The result? Through these state-level efforts, the Feds are being pushed back. Successfully.

The lesson? Nullification works.

These days, the big noise isn’t really about weed or ID cards – it’s pretty much accepted that states reject these things. But, after learning of the success that the left has had in recent years advancing their causes on a state level, many on the right are working to do the same.

In New Hampshire and other states around the country, legislatures are considering bills that will have the practical effect of nullifying federal laws on health care, guns, marijuana and even TSA body scanners.

The beauty of it all rests in the system that the Founders gave us in the Constitution. What’s right for New Hampshire might not be right for California, and vice-versa. The bottom line? Our federal system is the only one that allows a huge range of political and economic viewpoints to live under a big defense umbrella in peace.

Have the people of New Hampshire ever violated federal law to the point that it was unenforceable? I don’t know if the people here really live up to their motto, but it’s high time that they started.

And in the end, if medical marijuana or health care nullification takes hold, the People will have spoken loudly – nullification is alive and well…in New Hampshire.

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?
3 comments
David Welsh
David Welsh

I don't read that into the 14th Amendment. I see it as a positive statement. To me, no amendment can nullify another existing amendment, nor can it change how this Republic was formed, or take away our inalienable rights. I'm not worried.
http://www.constitution.org/col/intent_14th.htm

GreyLmist
GreyLmist

David,

Thank you for your reply and for the informative link. The attackers of the 14th Amendment have built a cottage industry to undermine loyalty to the Constitution. It is the clear expression in the 14th of the Nullification and Interposition powers, inherent in the context of the 9th and 10th Amendments, that I see as one their main motives to deceptively twist the 14th as a distraction in order to cause confusion and defection from our Constitutional form of government. The scarcity of rebuttal to their noise is hamperng teaching efforts to restore confidence in the Constitution. Am hoping TAC can address that situation or provide direction to other resources that do. Your assistance is much appreciated, sir.

GreyLmist
GreyLmist

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; -- The United States Constitution, Amendment 14, Paragraph 1, Sentence 2.

That is what I consider to be the Nullification and Interposition Clause, whether the abridging law is at the State level or at the Federal level, like the "PATRIOT Act". I suspect that empowerment is one of the main reasons that the 14th Amendment is under particular attack by some people and groups posing as "Patriots" who've been working to convince Americans that the 14th and a smattering of SCOTUS cases have rendered us corporate slaves and serfs with questionable citizenship status. Would appreciate research recommendations and whatever commentary TAC and this forum can provide regarding the above referenced phrase in Paragraph 1, Sentence 2 of the 14th Amendment.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] article by Michael Boldin on TenthAmendmentCenter.com. … In New Hampshire and other states around the country, legislatures are considering bills [...]