Comments on: Health Care Nullification and Interposition

By: gymnastics

gymnastics — Mon, 17 May 2010 11:48:12 +0000

That this Assembly doth explicitly and peremptorily declare, that it views the powers of the federal government, as resulting from the compact, to which the states are parties; as limited by the plain sense and intention of the instrument constituting the compact. Current nullification efforts around the U.S. have states passing laws that effectively defy federal laws and regulations on firearms, marijuana, identification cards and more. In 2010, we expect to see similar legislation in response to Health Care.

By: Health Care Reform: The Return of Interposition « Lawyer Don Hecker Message

Health Care Reform: The Return of Interposition « Lawyer Don Hecker Message — Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:48:58 +0000

[...] civil rights initiatives, including Supreme Court rulings, it is now being used by opponents of health care reform as they marshal their forces with an eye toward post-passage litigation [...]

By: The TAC On Health Care Nullification and Interposition | RedState

The TAC On Health Care Nullification and Interposition | RedState — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:26:45 +0000

[...] article at the Tenth Amendment Center by Michael Boldin concerning Health Care nullification: When a state â€˜nullifiesâ€™ a federal law or regulation, it is passing legally-binding [...]

By: As an American, I refuse to buy mandatory health insurance that supports corrupt conventional medicine « The PPJ Gazette

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:18:49 +0000

[...] carries a highly relevant article on this matter: Health Care Nullification and Interposition (http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com&#8230 . It paraphrases James Madison, saying, “…state governments not only have the right to [...]

By: Making National Health Care Null and Void in Washington State | Tenth Amendment Center Blog

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:08:28 +0000

[...] New Hampshire recently introduced a bill to make law that not only makes federal restrictions of health care choices illegal in the state, but also expressly prohibits interference in these choices by federal agents and requires state agencies to interpose as a protection. Click here to learn more. [...]

By: South Carolina to Consider Health Care Nullification | Tenth Amendment Center Blog

Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:36:06 +0000

By: Will Georgia Nullify National Health Care? | Tenth Amendment Center Blog

Sat, 09 Jan 2010 01:28:11 +0000

By: As an American, I refuse to buy mandatory health insurance that supports corrupt conventional medicine « NaturalNews.com – Natural Health

Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:37:59 +0000

By: AS AN AMERICAN, I REFUSE TO BUY MANDATORY HEALTH INSURANCE THAT SUPPORTS CORRUPT CONVENTIONAL MEDICINE « THE MORENO REPORT

Thu, 07 Jan 2010 23:33:55 +0000

By: Michael Boldin

Michael Boldin — Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:58:35 +0000

Jsmith – thanks for your perspective. The question is this – are you saying that you are with us on supporting the constitution 100% EXCEPT in regards to the use of the guard?

Or, are you saying you just don’t expect success on that front?

Either way, this is not a political party, so what we promote has far less to do with political realities or potential for practical success. Our sole goal is to educate about the proper role of the government under the constitution and demand that the constitution be followed – every issue, every time. No exceptions. No excuses.

The constitution makes quite clear in what situations the guard can be “federalized” (which is actually a nationalization, but either way, put under control of the federal government) – and we demand that the federal government follow the constitution. Do you?