by Bernie LaForest and Michael Boldin
UPDATE 07-28-11: This story is FALSE. The Stevens County Assembly which passed this ordinance is not the recognized governing body of that county. Is it an assembly of local residents only. The ordinance passed holds no weight, whatsoever, with the population at large. And, to be put into effect, it would need to be passed by the actual governing body of the county. We have seen no indication, whatsoever, that this is within range. Four legitimate towns in Maine HAVE passed similar food freedom ordinances (see this link), and we hope that although this story is false, it will end up helping spread the word that people can do something on a local level.
*******
A county assembly in Washington State has just passed a food freedom ordinance which would punish federal agents with up to ten years in prison and $20,000 fines.
On July 20th, the Stevens County Assembly finalized the ordinance. They are now in the process of collecting signatures from the residents of Stevens County – urging them to to claim his/her natural right to grow, produce, purchase, and consume the foods of their choice.
Beyond that, the passed ordinance would make it unlawful for agents of either the State or Federal government to execute laws that interfere with the ordinance.
Already four towns in Maine have passed similar measures, and others around the country have indicated they’re looking at the same.
REGULATIONS, REGULATIONS, AND MORE REGULATIONS
Last year, Congress introduced the Food Safety Modernization Act (S. 510) which opponents say will lead to crushing regulations on local food production – at the benefit of the big corporate farming interests that backed passage of the law. Local food ordinances appear to be a direct response to the new regulations. The Stevens County Ordinance states, in part, that:
WHEREAS, We find the history of government regulators, even with hundreds of food regulations on the books, shows they are incapable of protecting citizens from exposure to food poisoning events from foods produced by corporate farming
What exactly have all of these regulations given you? For example:
–The year-long raw milk sting operation that resulted in a raid consisting of two US Marshals, two State Troopers and two FDA officials on a SWAT like assault on an Amish farm in Pennsylvania at 5 a.m.
–In the first half of 2008, there was an epidemic of human salmonella poisoning that afflicted 1,294 people in 43 states, the District of Columbia and Canada. The FDA immediately sprang into action and after a hasty investigation they proclaimed that tainted tomatoes may be the source of the epidemic. Several varieties of tomatoes were withdrawn from markets and restaurants across the country. Several weeks later, the FDA proclaimed that it may indeed be jalapeno peppers and cilantro that could be contributing to the outbreak. All of these ingredients are commonly used to make salsa which is a staple when eating Mexican food. Surprise! Finally the FDA pinpointed the peppers and cilantro that were imported from Mexico because it had traced contaminated irrigation water. The American tomato industry lost millions of dollars because of these errant recalls.
–Last year, FDA “Investigators†entered an organic grocery store in Venice, California – warrant and guns in hand. As reported by the LA Times, they “ordered the hemp-clad workers to put down their buckets of mashed coconut cream and to step away from the nuts. Then, guns drawn, four officers fanned out across Rawesome Foods in Venice. Skirting past the arugula and peering under crates of zucchini, they found the raid’s target inside a walk-in refrigerator: unmarked jugs of raw milk.
These are but a few of the seemingly endless examples of how the FDA and its increasing regulatory and police power have been keeping you “safe.†Some people, as shown by the five towns taking matters into their own hands, have decided that “enough is enough.â€
LOCALS SPEAK OUT
Sedgwick, Maine resident Mia Strong told Natural News: “Tears of joy welled in my eyes as my town voted to adopt this ordinance. I am so proud of my community. They made a stand for local food and our fundamental rights as citizens to choose that food.”
“I still can’t believe they took our yogurt,” Rawesome volunteer Sea J. Jones told the LA Times a few days after the raid. “There’s a medical marijuana shop a couple miles away, and they’re raiding us because we’re selling raw dairy products?”
COMMUNITY FARMING, ORGANIC FOODS: TENTHER 101
While the media would like to portray any and all actions that assert the Tenth Amendment as a “tea party†or “right wing†movement, support for food sovereignty ordinances, along with fifteen states passing medical marijuana laws, certainly proves that stereotype to be little more than media hype.
The ordinance from Stevens County makes this clear:
WHEREAS, We, the people of the State of Washington domiciled on Stevens county, declare:
1. The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution for the United States, states, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the peopleâ€; and
2. That pursuant to Article 1, Section 8, of the Constitution for the United States, there is no power granted to the federal government to regulate local foods on Stevens county; and
3. The Ninth Amendment to the Constitution for the United States, states, “The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.â€; and
4. That pursuant to the Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the Constitution for the United States, the power to regulate local foods on Stevens county is reserved to the State of Washington or the people of the State of Washington.
WARNING TO THE FEDS
Like the four towns in Maine that have passed similar ordinances, Stevens County means business. They’ve also included an enforcement clause – telling the feds, in essence, to butt out.
ENFORCEMENT CLAUSE;
(A)(1) The people of the State of Washington domiciled on Stevens county, declare that any law enacted by the congress of the United States; any federal regulation, rule, or policy promulgated; any executive order issued by the president of the United States; and any court decision; that seeks, purports, or is otherwise intended to regulate, in any way, the unalienable and fundamental rights of the people on Stevens county to choose the local foods they produce; process or prepare; sell, purchase, or distribute; preserve and store for extended periods of time; and consume, for food or drink, for people or other life forms, is not authorized by the Constitution for the United States of America; and
(2) The people of the State of Washington domiciled on Stevens county, declare the federal laws, etc., referred to in subsection (A)(1):
(a) Are invalid on Stevens county; and
(b) Will not be recognized by Stevens county; and
(c) Are specifically rejected by Stevens county; and
(d) Are null and void, having no effect on Stevens county.
The ordinance continues
(D)(1) Public employees employed at the federal, state, or local levels, including, but not limited to, agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Homeland Security, Food and Drug Administration, Washington state Patrol, sheriff’s departments, and municipal and county police will not enforce or attempt to enforce the federal laws, etc., referred to in (A) subsections (1) and (2); or treaties referred in (B) subsections (1) and (2); or Washington state laws, etc., referred in (C) subsections (1) and (2);
and
(2) A violation of subsection (D)(1) is a class B felony (as defined at RCW 9A.20.021(1)(b)) and is punishable by confinement in a state correctional institution for a term fixed by the court not to exceed ten (10) years, or by a fine in an amount fixed by the court not to exceed twenty thousand dollars ($20,000), or by both such confinement and fine; an
WHAT NEXT?
While the FDA has been getting increasingly aggressive – raiding raw milk activists, threatening walnut producers, and the like – these activists believe that they can push back and win by doing the same to DC. Will a local government ever attempt to arrest an FDA official? Only time will tell, and maybe they’ll never have to. With five local ordinances now passed, the “food sovereignty†movement is just in its infancy. But, if they learn from the efforts of those who defied DC on issued like medical marijuana and the real ID act, they’ll recognize that when enough people, towns, and even states – say NO to Washington DC, there’s not much the feds can do to stop them.
Bernie LaForest is the Outreach Director for the Wisconsin Tenth Amendment Center.








Freakin' awesome!! Check out http://www.baldyandtheblonde.com for more coverage of our battle against government tyranny.
Thanks for sharing that about B & the B!! Good stuff.
Please provide guidance as to how other counties can initiate a change in our county laws.
Stevens county gave the blueprint, as did the towns in Maine. Now it\’s up to other places to do the same!
See U.N. agenda under proposition 21
I use to think that was crazy until I started to read about it on the internet. FOx news or MSNBC would not have told anyone about that. I had to learn about it on the internet. I wish TAC would do an article on it.
Glen Beck did cover U.N. Proposition 21 on his Fox show.
Well THERE'S an unbiaased source. *snort*
Wow! This is wonderful news. Thanks for publicising this, Bernie and Michael. Now I need to find a way to get this enacted in towns and parishes in Louisiana…
sadly this will never happen in police state #1 NY.
Find a reason that will appeal to New Yorkers. In liberal NY it is going to be hard to justify nullification for things like federal gun control but you can find reasons for federal drug laws or DOMA. Once the idea seem pleasing to them then it is easier to justify nullification for other things. Also, don't forget nullification on a local level against state or federal governments. I'm sure there are a few conservative enclave still inside NY. Why can't they nullify NY law? Imagine the effect that would have on the rest of liberal NY. A state law was nullified by a small county or city….
Trust me on this. Deep down the left are rabid collectivist that can't understand individuals who oppose each other. It is a very wholistic thinking so nullification by a smaller municipality of NY law will have a devastating affect on liberal NY. The collectivist bubble is popped at that moment.
I still don't get why my state, NJ, my former state, NJ and the 55 electoral vote CA haven't come out against REAL ID. From the foaming at the mouth I used to see every day that Bush 43 was President, just saying it was passed by Bush and the Republican Congress should be enough to get those three states all over it!
I meant my former state, NY, not NJ.
Well, I don't know about that "rabid collectivist" part.
I'm not sure what in hell you even mean by that.
Not sure you do, either.
But either way, I think you've got them wrong.
I know people who call themselves "conservative" and I know people who call themselves "liberal."
I don't know ANY liberals who AREN'T in favor of resisting the FDA on this; the dozen or so whom I know personally all would favor this kind of nullifying legislation.
Thing is, that whole left v. right thing is a scam.
You go to the extremes at either end of that scale and they're just about identical, with no personal freedom for anybody — except themselves, of course.
I think we really need to move past that and realize that we have a whole lot more interests in common than we have differences.
Just my opinion,
sj
Collectivist as in the opposite of individualist. Does that help?
The left will oppose decentralization for the simply reason that it is to individualistic since individual states may have separate and at times opposing ideas. Collectivism can't comprehend that. Look up the works of original socialist and you will see that they viewed individualism destructive to the common good. States acting independently goes against that concept since the states will not be acting in concert with the whole.
I don't know why my original comment was removed by the administrator. There was no bad words in it. The censorship around this website is getting a little to much for me.
Collectivist is the opposite of individualist? Does that help?
I wish the state of Colorado would get some stones and fight this but we have two democrats as our senators and who take millons of dollars from BIG CORPS and the senators do as big bisness tells them, the HELL WITH WE THE PEOPLE!
Start local, Edward. If your elected officials who are supposedly representing your state in Congress are in the pocket of the national power brokers, take it to your state legislature. But even before that, take it to your county and municipal governments too. They can be a great form of pressure to apply on your state legislators, and I'm glad the TAC is highlighting this too.
The cities in Colorado, most notably Fort Collins, are utterly corrupt. The city council runs things for the UN / ICLEI / Governments for Sustainability. The "justice" system here is unbelievably corrupt–remember Tim Masters? The liberal sheep here think they're better than everyone else and they're hard at work destroying any appearance of real law; we're awash in unConstitutional ordinances, statutes, international codes, destruction of property rights. I'd expect this to be one of the last places to regain any semblance of freedom and constitutionality.
You are not alone!
I live in Colorado as well and you are right, they are corrupt, but then you have to remember, the larges private land owner in this state including the land under the Denver Airport is the "QUEEN OF ENGLAND" who is owned and run by the Rothschild international banking criminal mafia. The internationalists have been working a long time to take over local control of communities here. I have seen imports from Florida (Jeb Bush country), Texas (George Bush country) and Chicago (Obama country) come into our county with tons of cash attached and immediately run for office and then begin work on taking over our water etc. We must pay much more attention at election time to the local races for sheriff and country governance. Watch the campaign contributions and who they are from and vote based on that. If you take back local control, they are screwed at the fed level.
It's all well and good,but it's not like you could actually stop the feds for executing a raid on your organic dairy farm. they will come in with guns drawn and their isnt anything you can do to stop them.
they would laugh at a county ordinance prohibiting their actions. And would arrest anyone who tried to interfear.
There are examples where county sheriffs have made feds back off. If there's enough of them willing to resist, then it can be done.
The county sheriffs are the most powerful people in their counties ~ hopefully we can all get Constitutionally-minded sheriffs that will uphold their oaths. Getting rid of the criminal acts of the FDA is a true miracle for our health and welfare and hopefully other counties across the country will wake up to their abuse. It would just be icing on the cake if their were made to reimburse every loss from every illegal raid and every harm done to the farmers they caused so much damage to ~ money from their coffers from being in bed with big pharma…
Michael, your county sheriff could stop the federal agents. Google Sheriff Tony Demeo to see a true story of that happening. Bureau of Land Management agents were illegally seizing cattle from family ranches and the sheriff stopped them. D.C. called the sheriff and said if he interfered with the federal agents he would be arrested. Sheriff Demeo told the feds "your SWAT team will be met with my SWAT team." The feds backed down, and the state of Nevada backed up Sheriff Demeo with new legislation that says no federal agent may execute warrants, seize property, or anything else without written permission from the county sheriff and the sheriff must accompany them. The county Sheriff''s job is to protect the constitution and the rights of the people in his county.
Oh, yes you can. All the sheriff has to do is bulk deputize the entire population of the county who are armed and that takes care of that. A handful of agents won't be able to take on the 4,000 armed citizens and then throw their butts in jail after a trial for violating the local laws. Remember, women buying guns and taking lessons has increased over 500%, so its not going to be just the men, its going to be damn near everyone. Also local police are residents, neighbors, relatives etc to the local population. If we stand united they will stand with us. I am sure of it.
Not so, enough resistance and they will fold. They have no Jurisdiction on private property. Only in
Interstate commerce and home rule is lawful. They should be sued individually if they trespass in
an area where they have no Jurisdiction. Then liens should be placed on their propertys for violating
the laws and ordinances of that county. Most agencys are operating illegally because they are not
in compliance with the Administrative Procedures Act. That should be checked into.
Well, good for them! I, for one, am sick of the federal government trying to control our lives. It's nobody's business but yours if you eat food that may not be good for you. It's about time we citizens started standing up to these arrogant jerks!
Lots of good people up in Stevens County WA. – - – plenty of independent minded folks there who just want to go about living their lives. It would be great if Sherrif Richard Mack gave a lecture up there. He talks about the role of the citizens and their county Sherrifs in defending the Liberty of the people. http://www.sheriffmack.com
Rob. I live in Stevens County and a member of the Assembly. Thanks for the kind words. Sheriff Mack was here last fall in support of our Assembly Chairman Russell Bolton who was running for Sheriff of Stevens. Please visit our web site http://www.stevenscountyassembly.com
P.S. – - – I hope these moves are obvious to everyone. They try to control food for big agri-biz profit, but also because they use that as a lever to control You. Everyone sees this, don't they ? (Do a web search on Henry Kissinger and youll find the following quote by him: "Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people.")
When the sheriff arrests the Feds he should do as they do: take everything of value including weapons, ammo, vehicles, clothes (strip them naked) and retain them as "evidence". They will think twice before any more illegal raids. Convicting them may not even be necessary because it will mean a long expensive court fight.
I fully support the citizens of Stevens County, Washington for striking against the Foolish Drug Addicts and their Gestapo tactics. I also support anyone else in their quest to purchase and consume raw milk, which is much healthier than the Pasteurized white liquid that is available in most grocery stores.
Its not about consumer safety, it's about the profits of Archer Daniels Midland & Monsanto. Their Government subsidized healthy grain products appear to make people sick & fat. Grain is fed to livestock to increase the fat content of the carcase. It is hard to believe that it would have the opposite effect on the humane carcase.
Clearly, the problem is NOT that large corporations use the power of the federal goivernment to bring us under control, but rather, that we have relinquished so much of our liberty and responsibility that it has given the government this amount of power over us to be used. Maybe we can rally the food freaks here in CA.
Get off your knees and STAND for Liberty!
Rand Corporation just completed and published a White House commissioned feasibility study on creation of a NATIONAL FEDERAL POLICE FORCE. The new "federal officers" will be run out of the U.S. Marshals' and Secret Service division and they will have authority to sequester local police agencies in the execution of their duties. Interfering with a federal police action will result in the arrest and prosecution at a federal level, of local police, town council or sheriffs. This will be in addition to current federal actions already taken against counties through interaction with State's Governors whereby federal matching funding for police and transportation funds in those States which do not comply are cut off completely. You tell me….what State Governor will risk hundreds of millions if not billions of dollars for one city council ordinance?
Thats simple, they cut off the return flow dribbled to the states then the states and citizens cut off all their flow to the FED and start a state owned bank which would put it in the black in less than a year. Then the states do a beat down and say we're gonna appoint the Senators like it was supposed to be and we get back control by the people! 1st rule term limits, 2nd rule no contributions by corps individual max 100.00. No private funds allowed. Equal time on media paid for by requiring prime time slots during the election cycle as part of FCC licence agreement. 3rd rule A govt entity cannot be incorporated, all officials must be bonded and can be held personally responsible for their actions.
This will only work if the state or local governments, sheriffs and law enforcement fail to uphold and defend the constitution. I believe if there are enough sheriffs with enough people to back him up, the feds can be stopped. We just have to wake them up and educate them. And like Sheriff Richard Mack said " If the federal government stops giving the states money, THANK GOD FOR THAT. Cause the feds get their money from states. So stop giving them money. Of course it will take some education in that area as well.
And if this all fails the Govenor should call the National Guard to put these jerks under arrest or designate a state malitia ,which is allowed by the constitution,to put them away or escort them to the stte line minus their weapons which will be used as evidence,then kept for future use by the malitia,also take their vehicles and make them walk to the nearist place to call their superiors
we need to do this in California, the feds have bribed most sheriffs and city governments with tax payer dollars, masked as bailouts, good news to know people are getting tired of all the government corruption and control.
“I still can’t believe they took our yogurt,” Rawesome volunteer Sea J. Jones told the LA Times a few days after the raid. “There’s a medical marijuana shop a couple miles away, and they’re raiding us because we’re selling raw dairy products?”
EXPLAIN TO THIS VOLUNTEER WHAT UNITY MEANS!
Hi Folks,
A friend sent this article to me just this evening.
I am familiar with what is happening in Stevens County, Washington.
The Stevens County Assembly (stevenscountyassembly.com) is not part of county government. It did pass the ordinance that will be presented to the county commissioners.
It will not be a county ordinance until it is passed by the county commissioners.
The Stevens County Assembly is working hard to make that a reality.
The FFO is a starting point, a template for others to pick up, improve, and enact at their local level.
Awesome! Power to the people!!!
Check out the Dr Benjamin Rush Amendment at rush2013.com.
It cover health, medical, and farming practices and protects you natural rights and freedom of choice. It is the next step up from this level of action.
The residents of Illinois need to do this as well and help get these passed, these ordinances need to be passed by not only We The People but our state legislatures as well. It is the duty of the states to take a stand on behalf of the citizens of those respective states against the encroachments of the Federal Government,and if the state legislatures won't TAKE A STAND AGAINST THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, THEN THE STATE LEGISLATURES NEED TO BE RECALLED.
Ha Ha, really?!?!? So you want to arrest the law enforcement agents, who are enforcing laws, by other law enforcement agents enforcing different laws and place them in law enforcement funded correctional institutions and run them through the judicial system for enforcing laws?? Has anyone thought this through??
First the correctional institutions are not funded by law enforcement they are funded by the people as are the law enforcement and the laws that they would be enforcing are laws voted on by the people the people they would be arresting have no right to be in the state or county enforcing laws that have been illegaly passed because the people did not vote for them the depts that are sending these people out are not legal and should be removed
Name one law that has been illegally passed, ever. Every law that has been passed has been voted on by members of your local, state or federal government. Just because it isn't what you want or doesn't follow your ideology does not make it illegal. And to say that depts sending in employees to make sure that people are adhering to those laws or regulations, as set forth by your elected government ,is illegal is not very bright.
The Federal Reserve Act. The Patriot Act. The ____ Act of ____. The list is HUNDREDS of acts long!!!
Any Act of Congress that granted powers and authorities not already an enumerated power or authority held by the Congress was an unlawful act. The Congress is limited to the powers they are granted in the Constitution, and cannot invent new ones for themselves or other people, nor can they co-opt the powers granted to other branches of the government and then assign them off as well.
Law is not to be "enforced" in a free society. Peace Officers respond in defence of the first use of force on behalf of the people. The justice system then tries the case to determine if the act of force used was in defence of first use of force or not. It determines if the Law, the Constitution, supports the act(s) and assumes the defendent is not guilty of any crime until the crime itself can be proven.
Law "enforcement" is the assumption by the enforcing body or person that the one acted upon is already guilty. Law "enforcement" is NOT Constitutional. Peaceful defense is.
What, you lost me with this one.
Just so I can understand your point, you believe that law enforcement officers should not act until a law has allegedly been violated?
Peace Officers can only act to prevent harm or to arrest when harm is done. Law "enforcement" is first use of force by the state and is antithetical to free society. First use of force by the state is a criminal act that has been "legalized" through legislation. The Constitution was written to prevent the state from the use of "first use of force" by insisting on such things as warrants for searches, habeas corpus, innocent until proven guilty, jury by peers, etc.
Automateandvalidate a medical device company focused on developing and commercializing innovative interventional treatment systems for vascular disease, today announced that it intends to offer and sell shares of its common stock, subject to market and other conditions, in an underwritten public offering.vvvvvvvvvvv