Comments on: Obama’s Libyan Operations are Unconstitutional

By: L:ock

L:ock — Sat, 18 Jun 2011 19:39:41 +0000

Obama has created a Constitutional Crisis by avoiding the War Powers act and the Constitution Article I section 8 clause 10 requirements. The law suit will take this to the Supreme Court. Add this to the Nullification actions going through the courts now that will also end up in the Supreme Court challenging the use of the Commerce Clause, the Necessary and Proper clause and the General Welfare statement.

This could place the Supreme court in the middle of a angry citizenry and a usurping executive and legislative branch. The States 34 now have some form of legal action regarding Federal unconstitutional laws and/or regulations. Many are joined in the healthcare issue [26?]. Now we all know how important the appointment of Judges have become.

By: Richard Ahern

Richard Ahern — Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:36:51 +0000

The President doesn't take an oath to defend the American Flag or the Statue'

The Prsident takes an oath to defend something even more important than a majestic symbol of our country. The President takes an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States. A document that has been described as the gtreat leap forward for freedom in human history. A document that is the foundation of our country. And the means by which we achieve the rule of law and protecr our freedom.

As we commemorate the Bicentennial of the U.S. reaffirm the principles for which our country stands than to learn more about the Constitution'

President Obama has not lived up to his Oath of office
All three Braches of government have this problem. http://www.judgenap.com

THE CONSTITUTION
The words we live by

By: Feds vs Feds: Obama Sued for Unconstitutional War | GrassrootsHeadlines.com

Feds vs Feds: Obama Sued for Unconstitutional War | GrassrootsHeadlines.com — Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:16:13 +0000

[...] Jr., Timothy V. Johnson and Ron Paul are filing suit against Barack Obama and Robert Gates for violating the U.S. Constitution in connection with military actions and [...]

By: Feds vs Feds: Obama Sued for Unconstitutional War – Tenth Amendment Center

Feds vs Feds: Obama Sued for Unconstitutional War – Tenth Amendment Center — Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:41:55 +0000

[...] Jr., Timothy V. Johnson and Ron Paul are filing suit against Barack Obama and Robert Gates for violating the U.S. Constitution in connection with military actions and [...]

By: Slideguitar777

Slideguitar777 — Mon, 04 Apr 2011 18:00:17 +0000

Good work, Rick. I hadn't done the research myself but knew we were signatories. However, all laws and treaties must be in harmony with the Constitution. Of course they would have to be challenged by some other branch of government to be repealed. But Constitutional trumps all. Then, as another post mentioned, all Amendments since the 13th will have to be re-voted by the entire Congress (not just the North's). We have a long way to go.

By: Rick Reeser

Rick Reeser — Mon, 04 Apr 2011 09:22:38 +0000

This writer, armed with these facts, drafted a Resolution, presented it, got it passed at the local Post, District, and Colorado Department of the American Legion Conventions (with 80% vote); carried it to the National Convention, seeking adoption by the Delegates of all 50 States (August, 2008, Phoenix, AZ) for America's largest veterans organization to press Congress to Repeal, then re-write our role and relationship with the U.N.; it got derailed in a Committee, short of reaching the floor of the Convention!
That's in-house politics! Xin-Loi!

By: Rick Reeser

Rick Reeser — Mon, 04 Apr 2011 09:07:05 +0000

Barely 5 years later Pres. Truman sent American Armed Forces to the Korean Pennisula, calling it a "Police Action" 12 Presidents (6 of each Party) since 1945 have participated in various "U.N. Peace-keeping" activities; they had to have relied on that Act of Dec. 20, 1945; they have never asked Congress for a 'Declaration of War', after FDR made such request in December 1941.
Evidence of this is Article 44 of the U.N. Charter, and the Act of Dec. 20, 1945; after learning of this from a John Birch Society publication, this writer obtained confirmation of the documents, through American Legion national H.Q., in 2007. Check the sources, then complain to Congress, with a Demand they re-write their prior SURRENDER, done by a Session of Congress 65 yrs. ago!

By: Rick Reeser

Rick Reeser — Mon, 04 Apr 2011 09:03:36 +0000

Section 6 of that U.N. Participation Act, says, in pertinent part, that a President shall be deemed to have authority to engage American Forces… in response to such U.N. Security Council request…! A Congresswoman from Michigan, one of 16 'Nay' votes, claimed that "this Act would give a President king-like Powers…"

By: Rick Reeser

Rick Reeser — Mon, 04 Apr 2011 09:02:11 +0000

All of you are unaware of a little known 'change' to your thinking. most members of Congress got down on their knees, hands over their heads, fingers interlocked – in the classic position of SURRENDER, regarding their Exclusive Art. I, Sec. 8 Power to issue Declarations of War! It was December 1945, in a world weary of War; the Congress adopted the "United Nations Participation Act" (on Dec. 20, 1945), within which they Surrendered their exclusive authority to the United Nations Security Council.

By: Who says? – Tenth Amendment Center

Who says? – Tenth Amendment Center — Sat, 02 Apr 2011 23:47:07 +0000

[...] the Constitution delegated the power to declare war to Congress [...]