by Ron Ewart
For centuries, a six-foot tall biped, who walked out of the jungles and grasslands of yesteryear, some 20,000 years ago, has been on a torturous path to go ever farther and faster and to even defy the chains of gravity that binds him to the Earth.  Over the last five millennium, each of his decisions for war or peace, has driven him towards an unseen goal, a need to explore and to fulfill his insatiable desire to learn more about himself and his universe. But that drive made an exponential leap into the future, when a small band of men on a new continent, decided that freedom had a greater value than life itself. They were committed to risk their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor in the defense of liberty. From that fateful decision and the resulting struggle, individual freedom was born.Â
Along the way man has made many mistakes, but along the way he has made great strides as well ….. ever since his creativity, industriousness, ambition and generosity were unleashed under that greatest of all symbols of freedom, the American flag. It is that individual freedom that has brought man to the edge of jumping off this once infinitely large planet and to reach his outstretched ”hand” into the secrets and mysteries of an infinite Universe.  The question is, can he keep up the pace of this quest, if he allows freedom to slip from his grasp ….. that very freedom that has allowed him to reach such unimaginable heights, in just a short 233 years.
It is said by many that America is a free country and many come here because of the perception that it is a free country. However, by any measure, it is anything but a free country because without individual freedom, there is no freedom and individual freedom has been trashed, as the first 10 Amendments of the U. S. Constitution, (the original Bill of Rights) that guarantee our individual freedom, have been, or will be repealed, one by one. Oh sure, there is still freedom of speech, sort of. And the freedom to worship in a religion of one’s choice is still pretty much intact. The Third Amendment about soldiers being quartered in private residences during time of war has not been breached since the civil war, as far as we know. But the Second amendment and the Fourth, Fifth, the Eighth, the Ninth, the Tenth and the Fourteenth have been badly bruised, if not outright repealed by actions of the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of government, that operate in concert with each other to entrench their power over the states and the people. The “Separation of Powers†doctrine, as enshrined in the Constitution by the Founding Fathers, is essentially dead, or in its final death throes.
The Fourth Amendment requiring “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violatedâ€, is being violated every day by government, in its pursuit to make you secure, at the expense of your liberty.
The Fifth Amendment stating that: No person shall……….”be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensationâ€, is all but irrelevant. Government takes, reduces your right-of-use, or decreases the value of your property consistently, by act, law, regulation, restriction, ordinance and eminent domain abuse, without due process and without just compensation. U. S. Supreme Court decisions have aided and abetted the destruction of the Fifth Amendment, by sanctioning government police powers, way beyond the limits of the constitution.
The Eighth Amendment stating that: “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted†has been rendered meaningless, as the penalty for violating some draconian environmental regulation mounts into thousands upon thousands of dollars in fines and can even be criminalized that can result in lengthy incarceration.  Woe be to the man who violates an environmental regulation, for he shall be crucified on the altar of the enviro-viper.
The Ninth and Tenth Amendments stating respectively that: “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people”  and “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the peopleâ€, are no longer relevant. The Federal Government has so exceeded its enumerated powers contained in the Constitution, as to render “states rights†and the “rights of the people†virtually non-existent. The Feds write federal mandates, forcing the states to comply and if they don’t, the Feds withhold federal money for other federal programs run by the states. So the states capitulate to the rising power of the Feds with their ”beaks” pointing skyward for federal dollars, like baby birds in a nest, waiting for their federal “mother†to deliver their next meal.
The sanctity and dignity of human life and the human spirit (or soul if you will) only has meaning when there is “free choiceâ€. That human spirit has a driving force to survive first and then express itself through its individual wants and desires second. Creativity, industriousness, ingenuity and compassion are the expression of those individual wants and desires. Such expression is different in every human being. Some expressions are good, while others are evil. Some of those wants and desires complement each other. Nevertheless, it is from these wants and desires, tempered with a large dose of morality, from which most human achievement and advances in the human condition occur. These characteristics are most abundant when the individual has free choice.
In the book, â€Atlas Shrugged†by Ayn Rand, her philosophy of the individual and individual freedom was embodied in one chapter in the book entitled, â€This is John Galt Speakingâ€.   We have excerpted a few lines from this chapter, as they are relevant to individual freedom and free choice.
“Man’s mind is his basic tool of survival. Life is given to him, survival is not. His body is given to him, its sustenance is not. His mind is given to him, its content is not. To remain alive, he must act, and before he can act he must know the nature and purpose of his action. He cannot obtain his food without a knowledge of food and of the way to obtain it. He cannot dig a ditch–or build a cyclotron–without a knowledge of his aim and of the means to achieve it. To remain alive, he must think.â€
“But to think is an act of choice. The key to what you so recklessly call ‘human nature,  the open secret you live with, yet dread to name, is the fact that man is a being of volitional consciousness. Reason does not work automatically; thinking is not a mechanical process; the connections of logic are not made by instinct. The function of our stomach, lungs or heart is automatic; the function to think or to evade that effort is an act of free choice. But you are not free to escape from your nature, from the fact that reason is your means of survival–so that for you, who are a human being, the question ‘to be or not to be’ is the question ‘to think or not to think’â€
“There is only one fundamental alternative in the universe; existence or non-existence–and it pertains to a single class of entities: to living organisms. The existence of inanimate matter is unconditional, the existence of life is not: it depends on a specific course of action. Matter is indestructible, it changes its forms, but it cannot cease to exist. It is only a living organism that faces a constant alternative: the issue of life or death. Life is a process of self-sustaining and self-generated action. If an organism fails in that effort, it ceases to exist. It is only the concept of “Life’ that makes the concept of ‘Value’ possible. It is only to a living entity that things can be good or evil.â€
“A plant must feed itself in order to live; the sunlight, the water, the chemicals it needs are the values its nature has set it to pursue; its life is the standard of value directing its actions. But a plant has no choice of action; there are alternatives in the conditions it encounters, but there is no alternative in its function: it acts automatically to further its life, it cannot act for its own destruction.â€
Man, on the other hand, can act for his own survival, or his own destruction.  He can either choose life or death, or he can choose freedom, or enslavement. If the power of government rises, man can choose either to resist that power, or capitulate to that power.
In America, we have a foundation of law, our Constitution, that allows us to not only resist government’s rising power, but to reduce the power of government without having to resort to revolution. But to do so, man must choose individual freedom and be willing to pay the price required for the preservation, protection and defense of that freedom.
To do otherwise, is to be condemned to be an indentured slave to others who own his life, his liberty and his property as well as the fruits of his labors. To do otherwise, is worse than death.
Ron Ewart [send him email] is President of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RURAL LANDOWNERS, an organization dedicated to re-establish, preserve, protect and defend property rights.
If you enjoyed this post:
Click Here to Get the Free Tenth Amendment Center Newsletter,
I am sorry to anounce that the ''Tree of liberty'' has been fallen by loggers.I am told however that those same loggers have planted in the place of that tree three more trees.It seems those trees are the tree of ''profit seeking'',the tree of ''financial succsess'' and the tree of ''global security''.There is also an un-confirmed report that either a tree or a Bush of corperate rule may also be planted very soon.A spokesman from the forest of corruption is quoted as saying that the new trees unlike the tree of liberty, will require the blood of patriates but not that of tyrants in order to grow.----And now this message from our corperate masters..
The revolution will not be televised simply because there will be no revolution ! I know this to be true as a large portion of the population finds no injustice nor indignity in the fact that most persons in these modern times are forced to pay even for the land needed to live upon and the water needed to sustain life.A people who will without question pay for what nature has given freely area people incapable of rebellion.
Just because a fox is able to chew off a foot in order to escape a trap,in no way means the trap offers the fox freedom.Those persons who readily endorse free market capitalism should consider the gravity of what I am saying.
The more one must pay in order to live the less free one is.Free market capitalism assures that the things nature offers freely, will no longer be so.
In order to be free the individual must be allowed to engage in risky behavior,that is as long as that behavior does not arbitrarly endanger the wellbeing of others.
In matters of law we would do well to understand that we in fact have only one planet to reside upon therfore our laws should facilitate the common sharing of the earth.The earth despite the thinking of some, is not nor should not be the private property of anyone.
While all humans must in fact share the same planet,each individual is endowed with a physical body that is or at least should be the exclusive domain of the individual.While we must share the same earth, no person under normal circumstances must arbitrarly share their body with another.
While not a perfect or complete basis for the formalation of just legislation,any legislation contrary to these simple but indisputable facts is likely to be contrary to both the cause of freedom and justice.
Why? Lawyers tend to look for legal solutions. Engineers teend to look for engineering solutions. Doctors tend to look for medical solutions. It only stands to reason that politicians think revising government is the answer.
Individual liberties really are at the center of this debate. DC apologists agree that government is not functioning properly and is in many cases corrupted, yet they still believe that state solutions to their social problems are on the way...but why?
"We the People" have fallen into a drunken stuper. Drunk with wealth, drunk with prosparity, drunk with our own importance. We have forgotten the nature of our existence and the freedom of our minds and souls. It is only now when we are on the brink of falling into the darkness of becoming "just another country" that we are starting to wake up. Man! what a hang-over!
There is a cycle that exists in nature that allows "freedom" to continue. Freedom gives to us free choice, choice begets consequence and consequence demands responsibility. If you negate responsibility then you coincidentily negate freedom.
Until "We the People" are willing not only to espouse freedom, but live a life of accepting responsibility for the choices we have made, and demand of others(this includes our family and friends)that they do likewise, we will be irrevocably stuck in a system of government that will see freedom slip away each year.
Jenni - you make an excellent point about people being virtually drunk. The economic troubles that confront us today and in the future will be bringing people face to face with the consequences of all this. It's my hope that the people will choose a new path....liberty.
I cannot comment on the beginning of your post re "nature" and freedom, but have a question about, "and demand of others(this includes our family and friends)that they do likewise,..." Isn't "demanding" preemptory? Is it not a negation of freedom? My thinking is that we can anticipate accountibility, as personal actions effect the whole, but each man, woman, or even child, must become "personally" responsible as an individual enjoying freedoms, though they can be held responsible by consensus and judgment; else it may be seen as indoctrination of dogma only. Just asking. Forgive me if this sounds confused. The word "demand" in the context of the above quoted with respect to individual freedom and responsibility threw me a curve.
Like Patrick Henry Lives,will too incorporate boiler plate reply. Except all my past posts are incorporated herein by reference to subject matter hereto. Sorry,Patrick. Couldn't resist. LoL.
Jeffersonian is right. It's ALL about INDIVIDUAL rights. And the most important is the right to be FREE from a TYRANNICAL government.
I want to encourage all TEA Partiers not to waste time focusing on issues like repealing the 16th Amendment or income tax. These things aren’t going to happen. And even if they did, they would not make significant change. Even without the income tax, the federal government is taxing us indirectly through depreciation of the dollar and “print and spend” Keynesian economics. And it is this that is ruining the country.
Commodity money (gold/silver) is the only true money and since government cannot create wealth, to get real money government must levy taxes, which there is a definite limit political realities will allow. Witness California. The voters refused to be taxed more and because California cannot print money, it was forced to cut back on the size and expense of govenrment. The same is true of Washington: Shut down the printing presses and government will be returned to WE THE PEOPLE. However, once money is divorced from gold or silver, the government can do ANYTHING it wants by borrowing monetized debt into circulation. This is what has been happening in the US for decades under the Federal Reserve System, and it is this, not the income tax, that has brought our nation to the brink of ruin.
If we want to get our nation on sound financial and monetary basis, we must abolish the Federal Reserve and reinstitute a gold or silver standard, as called for by the Constitution.
“No State shall coin money, emit Bills of Credit [paper money], make nay thing but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts” Art. I, Sec. 9.
The federal government can emit bills of credit (sometimes a necessary evil in times on war when money and credit are tight), but to make paper money a “legal tender” unbacked by gold or silver it has no legal authority to do. Moreover, since the Federal Reserve is a consortium of private banks and not part of the government, it violates the Constitution which gives Congress alone power to “coin money and regulate the value thereof.” (Notice that “money” is ultimately coin - gold & silver coin, not irredeemable paper.)
One useful thing we can all do to help this process along is to ask our Congressman to be a co-sponsor of Ron Paul’s HR 1207 to audit the Federal Reserve. There are 186 co-sponsors right now from both parties. There will never be another opportunity like now to make a fundamental change in our system. Please ask your congressman to co-sponsor HR 1207.
Next, we should realize that Washington is almost certainly beyond reform. The fix is in at the top for presidential campaigns. No true conservative who is serious about restoring Constitutional government to America will ever get near the White House. The last presidential campaign was a perfect example. Out of the available candidates, not one (except Ron Paul) even talked about restoring the Constitution. Huckabee, Giuliani, Romney, McCain are all establishment, politicians who would only have continued “business as usual” in Washington: More government, more print & spend fiat money, more loss of reserved States’ Rights.
Moreover, the idea that a Republican Congress can save us is pretty wishful thinking. Most republican candidates don’t have a clue about economics or the printing press money. Most Republican candidates are little better than “soft” Democrats, “moderates” who would compromise principle to broaden their appeal and win control. In short, more George Bush Sr.’s and George Bush Jr.’s who together have destroyed the Republican Party and delivered the White House to a radical socialist (who does not even appear to be a Natural Born citizen of the U.S. or at least is resisting all attempts to see his long form birth certificate which alone can settle the question) - a radical socialist, we say, who only the day before yesterday declared June “Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, and Transgender Pride Month.” Thanks George!
No. We must demand a Constitutional Convention called by the States to propose Amendments. A Constitutional Convention cannot enact Amendments, it can only propose them. Any Amendment to the Constitution - whether proposed by Congress or by the States in a Convention - can ONLY be ratified by 3/4 of the State Legislatures. Hence there is no danger from a Convention. Just the opposite: certain ruin lies ahead if we do nothing.
We need Amendments radically down-sizing Washington DC and returning our Constitutional form of government back to the ORIGINAL INTENT of the founders, rather than the perverted thing 100-years of bad case law and federal usurpation have straddled us with. Anything less than this and we are just fooling ourselves and wasting our time.
If this doesn’t work, I believe our only remaining option is to work for State Secession from the Union. We simply have no interest in Washington’s agenda, its “new world order”, its print & spend economics, its anti-Christian policies, its abortion on demand, its “gay pride”, its trillion-dollar world empire, or its impending economic ruin and collapse.
States like Texas and others need to break away and gain their independence - for our CHILDREN’S SAKE - for it is they who will suffer most if we continue with “business as usual.”
God’s blessings,
I want to encourage all TEA Partiers not to waste time focusing on issues like repealing the 16th Amendment or income tax. These things aren’t going to happen. And even if they did, they would not make significant change. Even without the income tax, the federal government is taxing us indirectly through depreciation of the dollar and “print and spend†Keynesian economics. And it is this that is ruining the country.
Commodity money (gold/silver) is the only true money and since government cannot create wealth, to get real money government must levy taxes, which there is a definite limit political realities will allow. Witness California. The voters refused to be taxed more and because California cannot print money, it was forced to cut back on the size and expense of govenrment. The same is true of Washington: Shut down the printing presses and government will be returned to WE THE PEOPLE. However, once money is divorced from gold or silver, the government can do ANYTHING it wants by borrowing monetized debt into circulation. This is what has been happening in the US for decades under the Federal Reserve System, and it is this, not the income tax, that has brought our nation to the brink of ruin.
If we want to get our nation on sound financial and monetary basis, we must abolish the Federal Reserve and reinstitute a gold or silver standard, as called for by the Constitution.
“No State shall coin money, emit Bills of Credit [paper money], make nay thing but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts†Art. I, Sec. 9.
The federal government can emit bills of credit (sometimes a necessary evil in times on war when money and credit are tight), but to make paper money a “legal tender†unbacked by gold or silver it has no legal authority to do. Moreover, since the Federal Reserve is a consortium of private banks and not part of the government, it violates the Constitution which gives Congress alone power to “coin money and regulate the value thereof.†(Notice that “money†is ultimately coin - gold & silver coin, not irredeemable paper.)
One useful thing we can all do to help this process along is to ask our Congressman to be a co-sponsor of Ron Paul’s HR 1207 to audit the Federal Reserve. There are 186 co-sponsors right now from both parties. There will never be another opportunity like now to make a fundamental change in our system. Please ask your congressman to co-sponsor HR 1207.
Next, we should realize that Washington is almost certainly beyond reform. The fix is in at the top for presidential campaigns. No true conservative who is serious about restoring Constitutional government to America will ever get near the White House. The last presidential campaign was a perfect example. Out of the available candidates, not one (except Ron Paul) even talked about restoring the Constitution. Huckabee, Giuliani, Romney, McCain are all establishment, politicians who would only have continued “business as usual†in Washington: More government, more print & spend fiat money, more loss of reserved States’ Rights.
Moreover, the idea that a Republican Congress can save us is pretty wishful thinking. Most republican candidates don’t have a clue about economics or the printing press money. Most Republican candidates are little better than “soft†Democrats, “moderates†who would compromise principle to broaden their appeal and win control. In short, more George Bush Sr.’s and George Bush Jr.’s who together have destroyed the Republican Party and delivered the White House to a radical socialist (who does not even appear to be a Natural Born citizen of the U.S. or at least is resisting all attempts to see his long form birth certificate which alone can settle the question) - a radical socialist, we say, who only the day before yesterday declared June “Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, and Transgender Pride Month.†Thanks George!
No. We must demand a Constitutional Convention called by the States to propose Amendments. A Constitutional Convention cannot enact Amendments, it can only propose them. Any Amendment to the Constitution - whether proposed by Congress or by the States in a Convention - can ONLY be ratified by 3/4 of the State Legislatures. Hence there is no danger from a Convention. Just the opposite: certain ruin lies ahead if we do nothing.
We need Amendments radically down-sizing Washington DC and returning our Constitutional form of government back to the ORIGINAL INTENT of the founders, rather than the perverted thing 100-years of bad case law and federal usurpation have straddled us with. Anything less than this and we are just fooling ourselves and wasting our time.
If this doesn’t work, I believe our only remaining option is to work for State Secession from the Union. We simply have no interest in Washington’s agenda, its “new world orderâ€, its print & spend economics, its anti-Christian policies, its abortion on demand, its “gay prideâ€, its trillion-dollar world empire, or its impending economic ruin and collapse.
States like Texas and others need to break away and gain their independence - for our CHILDREN’S SAKE - for it is they who will suffer most if we continue with “business as usual.â€
God’s blessings,
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like