<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why we have a Tenth Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:02:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Boldin</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-230215</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boldin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/#comment-230215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jordan - excellent point, and this is even more specific on how Congressional powers are strictly limited.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jordan &#8211; excellent point, and this is even more specific on how Congressional powers are strictly limited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-229197</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/#comment-229197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To whoever wrote this, &quot;to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into executionâ€¦powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States,&quot; you left out a few things:

&quot;To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the &lt;strong&gt;foregoing powers&lt;/strong&gt;, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.&quot;

Foregoing meaning: : &quot;listed, mentioned, or occurring before&quot;.

So Congress has &quot;implied powers&quot; to carry into execution the powers that were previously listed in Article 1 Section 8. But this clause limits Congress by stating that these laws made in pursuance of executing the forgoing powers must be &lt;strong&gt;&quot;necessary and proper&quot;&lt;/strong&gt; to executing those powers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To whoever wrote this, &#8220;to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into executionâ€¦powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States,&#8221; you left out a few things:</p>
<p>&#8220;To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the <strong>foregoing powers</strong>, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.&#8221;</p>
<p>Foregoing meaning: : &#8220;listed, mentioned, or occurring before&#8221;.</p>
<p>So Congress has &#8220;implied powers&#8221; to carry into execution the powers that were previously listed in Article 1 Section 8. But this clause limits Congress by stating that these laws made in pursuance of executing the forgoing powers must be <strong>&#8220;necessary and proper&#8221;</strong> to executing those powers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-177968</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 06:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/#comment-177968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeferson thought we should have a new constitutional convention every 20 years to clear up problems and corruption that might arise.  I like the idea in theory, but with today&#039;s politicians who knows what would happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeferson thought we should have a new constitutional convention every 20 years to clear up problems and corruption that might arise.  I like the idea in theory, but with today&#8217;s politicians who knows what would happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Limited or Unlimited Government? Â» Tenth Amendment Center</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-112510</link>
		<dc:creator>Limited or Unlimited Government? Â» Tenth Amendment Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/#comment-112510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Why We Have a 10th Amendment [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why We Have a 10th Amendment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Reale</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-82087</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Reale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/#comment-82087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iâ€™m glad I came back and checked out some of the feedback. A lot of it was insightful, but some of it leads me to believe the point was missed. Allow me to elaborate. 

The point of the article was that government decided to just do whatever. Weâ€™ve just forgone the very necessary and very legal process of simply amending the document. The idea behind amending the Constitution is to prevent the exact type of situation we see today. 

The Constitution is a very specific administrative document that consists of interlocking if/then statements. It seems vague for three reasons â€“ 

1)	Education has failed. The Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalist Papers are no longer required reading. 
2)	Society is now operating on a whole series of assumptions that simply arenâ€™t true. For example, America being a â€œdemocracyâ€. Article Four, Section Four says weâ€™re guaranteed â€œa republican form of governmentâ€. And no, thatâ€™s not the insane neocons version of republican.
3)	A lot of moneyed interests across the entire industrial and political spectrum went on the mother of all PR blitzes to change the definition of wording and terminology. Theyâ€™ve parsed the whole subject of the Constitution to erode its value to get what they wanted. 

Rickâ€™s painted a very broad brush when it comes to what libertarians think. Maybe I disagree with Friedman. Rick doesnâ€™t know because he didnâ€™t ask. He assumed. But he did assume correctly that weâ€™re all about using our own consumption power to take our proverbial ball home â€“ which I do. I found that big media used the FCC to monopolize the airwaves and cheapen the content, so I canceled it years ago. I also cut up my credit card. Iâ€™m not about to ask Rick to do these things because itâ€™s not my place. Itâ€™s just the way we approach monopolies once their abuse makes them a pariah. In fact, thatâ€™s why they fail eventually. If anything, the internet is doing that to mainstream media.

To T., he needs to cite which powers are vested. A lot of people use the general welfare clause the same way. Again, thatâ€™s why we have a process of amending the document. Also, the Ninth Amendment forbids the enumeration of certain rights to the government from being construed so as to deny rights retained by the people. 

Mr. Carlson correctly assesses that, yes, things are bad. I myself call our department of defense a department of offense the way it is being used. However, he forgets that the whole point, and a lot of the history behind that point, involves not asking permission and using other powers not granted to the government. Again, we should go through the process of amending the Constitution if we want a central bank of issue. That is the very source of the power our â€œoppressorsâ€ wield. Instead of asking for money for oppressing the world and sacrificing soldiers, they just go ahead and extort an inflation tax â€“ then lie about how much they counterfeited. Remember, we had actual growth, growth shared according to oneâ€™s contribution. Today, that growth depends upon how close you can position yourself to the money spigot. Unfortunately, Carlson is dead in assuming everything is so dramatically different that human nature no longer applies. In fact, Jefferson, Franklin and many others fought the same evil out of necessity. The Bank of England ordered Parliament to forbid the issuance of colonial script, which led to the real causes of the revolution. If anything, our founders would have most of Congress in jail were they alive today. 

David Smith hit the nail on the head. 

I think James is right that the 10th Amendment reassured statesâ€™ fears. However, it included individuals purposefully. Again, the thoughts and clarifications of our founders are well documented. The document is, again, precise. For example, the writ of habeus corpus shall not be suspended unless in cases of rebellion and insurrection the public safety may require it. Then, the neocons rammed the Military Commissions Act through. Iâ€™m not sure if someone else saw it, but I didnâ€™t see an invasion or a rebellion going on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iâ€™m glad I came back and checked out some of the feedback. A lot of it was insightful, but some of it leads me to believe the point was missed. Allow me to elaborate. </p>
<p>The point of the article was that government decided to just do whatever. Weâ€™ve just forgone the very necessary and very legal process of simply amending the document. The idea behind amending the Constitution is to prevent the exact type of situation we see today. </p>
<p>The Constitution is a very specific administrative document that consists of interlocking if/then statements. It seems vague for three reasons â€“ </p>
<p>1)	Education has failed. The Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalist Papers are no longer required reading.<br />
2)	Society is now operating on a whole series of assumptions that simply arenâ€™t true. For example, America being a â€œdemocracyâ€. Article Four, Section Four says weâ€™re guaranteed â€œa republican form of governmentâ€. And no, thatâ€™s not the insane neocons version of republican.<br />
3)	A lot of moneyed interests across the entire industrial and political spectrum went on the mother of all PR blitzes to change the definition of wording and terminology. Theyâ€™ve parsed the whole subject of the Constitution to erode its value to get what they wanted. </p>
<p>Rickâ€™s painted a very broad brush when it comes to what libertarians think. Maybe I disagree with Friedman. Rick doesnâ€™t know because he didnâ€™t ask. He assumed. But he did assume correctly that weâ€™re all about using our own consumption power to take our proverbial ball home â€“ which I do. I found that big media used the FCC to monopolize the airwaves and cheapen the content, so I canceled it years ago. I also cut up my credit card. Iâ€™m not about to ask Rick to do these things because itâ€™s not my place. Itâ€™s just the way we approach monopolies once their abuse makes them a pariah. In fact, thatâ€™s why they fail eventually. If anything, the internet is doing that to mainstream media.</p>
<p>To T., he needs to cite which powers are vested. A lot of people use the general welfare clause the same way. Again, thatâ€™s why we have a process of amending the document. Also, the Ninth Amendment forbids the enumeration of certain rights to the government from being construed so as to deny rights retained by the people. </p>
<p>Mr. Carlson correctly assesses that, yes, things are bad. I myself call our department of defense a department of offense the way it is being used. However, he forgets that the whole point, and a lot of the history behind that point, involves not asking permission and using other powers not granted to the government. Again, we should go through the process of amending the Constitution if we want a central bank of issue. That is the very source of the power our â€œoppressorsâ€ wield. Instead of asking for money for oppressing the world and sacrificing soldiers, they just go ahead and extort an inflation tax â€“ then lie about how much they counterfeited. Remember, we had actual growth, growth shared according to oneâ€™s contribution. Today, that growth depends upon how close you can position yourself to the money spigot. Unfortunately, Carlson is dead in assuming everything is so dramatically different that human nature no longer applies. In fact, Jefferson, Franklin and many others fought the same evil out of necessity. The Bank of England ordered Parliament to forbid the issuance of colonial script, which led to the real causes of the revolution. If anything, our founders would have most of Congress in jail were they alive today. </p>
<p>David Smith hit the nail on the head. </p>
<p>I think James is right that the 10th Amendment reassured statesâ€™ fears. However, it included individuals purposefully. Again, the thoughts and clarifications of our founders are well documented. The document is, again, precise. For example, the writ of habeus corpus shall not be suspended unless in cases of rebellion and insurrection the public safety may require it. Then, the neocons rammed the Military Commissions Act through. Iâ€™m not sure if someone else saw it, but I didnâ€™t see an invasion or a rebellion going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-68633</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/#comment-68633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first thing is you have to look at the ROOT cause to all of our problems.
Before the war of Independence, who controlled the new found land. the Kings &amp; Queens of mainly England, France, Spain.
Well then after the war, did these kings &amp; queens abandon there investments in this new found gold mind, no they did not.
So that great piece of paper we hold so dearly is only useful as long as it is granted to by the predecessors of mainly old King George of England. 
What is Fee Simple, answer a deed to a property that is allowed to possess but must maintain TAX to keep possession of. It belongs to the KING.
This site listed below has really made me think for myself  why the USA is as it is and why it will be directed by the predecessors of the King   http://www.civil-liberties.com/books/index.html
It truly opened my eyes to the possibilities of why we think the illusions of freedom rings, but at they same time it opened my eye to the lies our families have lived and taught us to believe the illusions and therefore we are just not aware of the horror .
Thanks for letting comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first thing is you have to look at the ROOT cause to all of our problems.<br />
Before the war of Independence, who controlled the new found land. the Kings &amp; Queens of mainly England, France, Spain.<br />
Well then after the war, did these kings &amp; queens abandon there investments in this new found gold mind, no they did not.<br />
So that great piece of paper we hold so dearly is only useful as long as it is granted to by the predecessors of mainly old King George of England.<br />
What is Fee Simple, answer a deed to a property that is allowed to possess but must maintain TAX to keep possession of. It belongs to the KING.<br />
This site listed below has really made me think for myself  why the USA is as it is and why it will be directed by the predecessors of the King   <a href="http://www.civil-liberties.com/books/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.civil-liberties.com/books/index.html</a><br />
It truly opened my eyes to the possibilities of why we think the illusions of freedom rings, but at they same time it opened my eye to the lies our families have lived and taught us to believe the illusions and therefore we are just not aware of the horror .<br />
Thanks for letting comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-65262</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/#comment-65262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The founders left the Constitution intentionally vague so that it would last; they had no idea what issues would face the new government. The 10th amendment was designed to ensure that the state representatives who had to ratify the document would not see the Federal government as a threat to the states&#039; primacy. 

I do agree with your frustration though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The founders left the Constitution intentionally vague so that it would last; they had no idea what issues would face the new government. The 10th amendment was designed to ensure that the state representatives who had to ratify the document would not see the Federal government as a threat to the states&#8217; primacy. </p>
<p>I do agree with your frustration though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Smith</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-64933</link>
		<dc:creator>David Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/#comment-64933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Author:  Your words are pretty close to accurate, though the list at the end of your article shows the absurd extent to which Libertarians extend their beliefs.  Where I believe that there &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; a role for both State &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; Federal government in our system, the Libertarian mindset is much more erring on the side of no government.  Oversimplification, I know, but not far from reality.

Respondents:  The author&#039;s intent is to show how far we have swung from original intent to contemporary practice.  To the one of you that quoted the Necessary and Proper Clause, many of the items that the author listed are neither necessary nor are the proper as instituted.  He made the very good, very accurate point that Congress has not the Power to expand its own Powers.  I believe we would all agree that this is neither necessary nor proper under the original intentions of the Framers.  Agreed?  A national government that is able to institute such programs as have been instituted since FDR is not found in our Constitution.  However, a government where the &lt;em&gt;States&lt;/em&gt; are able to amend the Constitution, delegating further Powers and responsibilities to the Federal Government, &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; a concept not foreign to our Constitution.  So, then, where is &#039;retirement planning&#039; in the Constitution?  Or &#039;healthcare&#039; or &#039;healthcare insurance&#039;?  Or &#039;education,&#039; as the author mentioned?  They are absent because these would be items left to the States, or to the People.  And if we now desire them to be Federal items, Article 5 provides the &quot;necessary and proper&quot; method of delegating such authority.

Foreign Respondent:  Nice not having to have your own military, is it not?  Oh, and 50% of our budget does not go to the military, national defense, or as you put it, offense.  Quoting such figures when you obviously don&#039;t know what the true figure is makes you appear totally, irrefutably a dunce.  Get the right figure, include a term like &quot;approximately,&quot; or stick to the devil you know.  How&#039;s your healthcare system, btw?  I can walk into any local hospital today and have my spleen removed if I desire...how long is &lt;em&gt;your&lt;/em&gt; waiting list?  The idea of government running hospitals and schools should make us all wince and cause flashbacks of Hitler and Stalin to pass through our collective memories.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author:  Your words are pretty close to accurate, though the list at the end of your article shows the absurd extent to which Libertarians extend their beliefs.  Where I believe that there <em>is</em> a role for both State <em>and</em> Federal government in our system, the Libertarian mindset is much more erring on the side of no government.  Oversimplification, I know, but not far from reality.</p>
<p>Respondents:  The author&#8217;s intent is to show how far we have swung from original intent to contemporary practice.  To the one of you that quoted the Necessary and Proper Clause, many of the items that the author listed are neither necessary nor are the proper as instituted.  He made the very good, very accurate point that Congress has not the Power to expand its own Powers.  I believe we would all agree that this is neither necessary nor proper under the original intentions of the Framers.  Agreed?  A national government that is able to institute such programs as have been instituted since FDR is not found in our Constitution.  However, a government where the <em>States</em> are able to amend the Constitution, delegating further Powers and responsibilities to the Federal Government, <em>is</em> a concept not foreign to our Constitution.  So, then, where is &#8216;retirement planning&#8217; in the Constitution?  Or &#8216;healthcare&#8217; or &#8216;healthcare insurance&#8217;?  Or &#8216;education,&#8217; as the author mentioned?  They are absent because these would be items left to the States, or to the People.  And if we now desire them to be Federal items, Article 5 provides the &#8220;necessary and proper&#8221; method of delegating such authority.</p>
<p>Foreign Respondent:  Nice not having to have your own military, is it not?  Oh, and 50% of our budget does not go to the military, national defense, or as you put it, offense.  Quoting such figures when you obviously don&#8217;t know what the true figure is makes you appear totally, irrefutably a dunce.  Get the right figure, include a term like &#8220;approximately,&#8221; or stick to the devil you know.  How&#8217;s your healthcare system, btw?  I can walk into any local hospital today and have my spleen removed if I desire&#8230;how long is <em>your</em> waiting list?  The idea of government running hospitals and schools should make us all wince and cause flashbacks of Hitler and Stalin to pass through our collective memories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-64080</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/#comment-64080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes! It is the right of the American people to abolish any government which becomes destructive of their safety and happiness, but &quot;right does not make might.&quot; Corrupt power is almost absolute and the American citizen is almost helpless to determine the course of his life, let alone his country. He is, from birth, indoctrinated to salute and work ever more and harder and inundated with propaganda he does not even know exists. He is taught that he can &quot;be anything he can dream&quot; and to blame himself if he fails. Even what he chooses to dream is carefully constructed by the powers that be. His access to information is media-controlled, his activities are monitored, and his dreams are carefully developed so as to sustain an ever increasing greed and dissatisfaction with who he is, what he has done, and most importantly, what he has. During World War II, everyone heard the mantra, &quot;Use it up, wear it out, do without.&quot; See how the mantras have changed! They are not only spoken by the President in the aftermath of 9-11 and touted as a means to forestall recession, but also are proudly sported on bumper stickers on cars headed to the mall. &quot;He who dies with the most toys wins.&quot; &quot;When the going gets tough, the tough go shopping.&quot; Consumption and blind loyalty have become virtues, even while common sense tells us they are dangerous. As an educator of 30 years, I have seen curriculum including critical thinking skills (especially that of propaganda techniques) almost disappear. Now the highest court in our land has ruled that the First Amendment does not apply to teachers, since we might have undue influence. Thus far, we have not been ordered to take hemlock, but those of us who question do not feel safe and are probably not safe. Worse though is the grief felt for the nation we love.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! It is the right of the American people to abolish any government which becomes destructive of their safety and happiness, but &#8220;right does not make might.&#8221; Corrupt power is almost absolute and the American citizen is almost helpless to determine the course of his life, let alone his country. He is, from birth, indoctrinated to salute and work ever more and harder and inundated with propaganda he does not even know exists. He is taught that he can &#8220;be anything he can dream&#8221; and to blame himself if he fails. Even what he chooses to dream is carefully constructed by the powers that be. His access to information is media-controlled, his activities are monitored, and his dreams are carefully developed so as to sustain an ever increasing greed and dissatisfaction with who he is, what he has done, and most importantly, what he has. During World War II, everyone heard the mantra, &#8220;Use it up, wear it out, do without.&#8221; See how the mantras have changed! They are not only spoken by the President in the aftermath of 9-11 and touted as a means to forestall recession, but also are proudly sported on bumper stickers on cars headed to the mall. &#8220;He who dies with the most toys wins.&#8221; &#8220;When the going gets tough, the tough go shopping.&#8221; Consumption and blind loyalty have become virtues, even while common sense tells us they are dangerous. As an educator of 30 years, I have seen curriculum including critical thinking skills (especially that of propaganda techniques) almost disappear. Now the highest court in our land has ruled that the First Amendment does not apply to teachers, since we might have undue influence. Thus far, we have not been ordered to take hemlock, but those of us who question do not feel safe and are probably not safe. Worse though is the grief felt for the nation we love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R. Carlsen</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-64063</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R. Carlsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/02/08/why-we-have-a-tenth-amendment/#comment-64063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a couple og questions for the Author of this drivel, How do you explain the successes of the Social democratic Countries in North Western Europe, with massive govenment programs, and regulation of what capital can, and cannot do! these countries have a much average standard of living, lower infant mortality rates, less crime. lower unemployment, and higher life expectancy than the US. And why does these indicators grow worse for the US under Republican administrations.
I am not American, but the constitution were written in 1776, I read it as a revolutionary document.&quot;That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, â€” That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.&quot; I would submit to you that if the founding fathers of America were alive today, they would be appaled that their ideas and thoughts that were relevant in their day 1776, was still not modified to reflect the fact that the world is a much more complex place today. As for where the money goes, 50% of the federal budget goes to defence, or rather offence as most of the world sees your military. My fond hope is that the people of the US again revolt against their opressors, and if you look the opressors are not hard to find. look among the 1 % richest among you]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a couple og questions for the Author of this drivel, How do you explain the successes of the Social democratic Countries in North Western Europe, with massive govenment programs, and regulation of what capital can, and cannot do! these countries have a much average standard of living, lower infant mortality rates, less crime. lower unemployment, and higher life expectancy than the US. And why does these indicators grow worse for the US under Republican administrations.<br />
I am not American, but the constitution were written in 1776, I read it as a revolutionary document.&#8221;That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, â€” That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.&#8221; I would submit to you that if the founding fathers of America were alive today, they would be appaled that their ideas and thoughts that were relevant in their day 1776, was still not modified to reflect the fact that the world is a much more complex place today. As for where the money goes, 50% of the federal budget goes to defence, or rather offence as most of the world sees your military. My fond hope is that the people of the US again revolt against their opressors, and if you look the opressors are not hard to find. look among the 1 % richest among you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
