While the federal government maintains a complete prohibition on cannabis, it’s mostly a lot of bark with less and less bite. Federal marijuana prosecutions have steadily decreased as more and more states legalize marijuana.

There were 1,005 federal marijuana trafficking offenders prosecuted in fiscal 2021, according to data compiled by the U.S. Sentencing Commission. That was a 10.9 percent decrease from 1,128 offenders in 2020. The precipitous drop in federal marijuana trafficking cases becomes even starker when you go back further in time. In 2015, there were 3,494 offenders. Between 2015 and 2021, the number of federal cannabis cases fell by 71.2 percent.

Going back to 2012, the year voters in Colorado and Washington State approved recreational marijuana, there were over 7,000 marijuana trafficking offenders charged by federal prosecutors. At that time, cannabis was the most prosecuted federal drug offense. Today, it is the least prosecuted federal drug offense, with meth taking the top spot.

There has been an even sharper drop in federal marijuana possession cases over the last several years.

In 2021, there were just 141 offenders charged under federal marijuana possession laws. That was down 49.6 percent from the 280 offenders charged for cannabis possession in 2021. Going back to 2015, there were 2,096 offenders charged in federal cases involving marijuana possession. That represents a 93.3 percent decline over the last six years.

NORML political director Justin Strekal said legalization at the state level is driving the decrease in federal prosecutions.

“The continued decrease in federal criminal charges is correlated both to the increasing number of states that have legalized marijuana possession, manufacturing and distribution, and the evolutionary nature of federal agents recognizing the increasing political liability associated with enforcing prohibition.”

Under the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) passed in 1970, the federal government maintains the complete prohibition of marijuana. Of course, the federal government lacks any constitutional authority to ban or regulate cannabis within the borders of a state, despite the opinion of the politically connected lawyers on the Supreme Court. If you doubt this, ask yourself why it took a constitutional amendment to institute federal alcohol prohibition.

But as more and more states legalize marijuana and end state and local enforcement of marijuana laws, the federal government finds it more and more difficult to maintain prohibition. In a nutshell, the feds have a resource problem.

Figures indicate it would take 40 percent of the DEA’s yearly budget just to investigate and raid all of the dispensaries in Los Angeles – a single city in a single state. That doesn’t include the cost of prosecution. Given this data, it becomes clear that the feds lack the resources to enforce marijuana prohibition without state assistance.

In fact, FBI statistics show that law enforcement makes approximately 99 of 100 marijuana arrests under state, not federal law. When states stop enforcing marijuana laws, they sweep away most of the basis for 99 percent of marijuana arrests.

Even the FBI has loosened its marijuana policy. Under the old policy, “candidates for employment cannot have used marijuana or cannabis in any form (natural or synthetic) and in any location (domestic or foreign) within the one (1) year preceding the date of their application for employment.” Last summer, the FBI lowered that requirement from three years to one year. It also changed its policy for marijuana use as a minor, saying cannabis consumption “before the candidate’s 18th birthday is not a disqualifier for FBI employment.”

Marijuana Moment said, “This is a significant development at one of the highest levels of law enforcement in a country where marijuana remains strictly federally prohibited,” and speculated that, “This might be more of a practical decision than one that necessarily reflects shifting opinions on cannabis within the agency.”

With marijuana legal in so many states, it’s likely the agency is finding it more and more difficult to find candidates that have not used cannabis within the last three years.

As Ryan McMaken reported in an article published last year by the Mises Wire, nullification works.

“While opponents of this strategy claimed that the federal government would never tolerate states ignoring federal drug laws, the opposite has happened. Rather than renew federal efforts to crack down on states that don’t play along with the cannabis drug war, the federal government has instead retreated and grown increasingly permissive, moving closer toward formal legalization.”

 

The 10th Amendment

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

LEARN MORE

01

Featured Articles

On the Constitution, history, the founders, and analysis of current events.

featured articles

02

Tenther Blog and News

Nullification news, quick takes, history, interviews, podcasts and much more.

tenther blog

03

State of the Nullification Movement

108 pages. History, constitutionality, and application today.

get the report

01

Path to Liberty

Our flagship podcast. Michael Boldin on the constitution, history, and strategy for liberty today

path to liberty

02

maharrey minute

The title says it all. Mike Maharrey with a 1 minute take on issues under a 10th Amendment lens. maharrey minute

Tenther Essentials

2-4 minute videos on key Constitutional issues - history, and application today

TENTHER ESSENTIALS

Join TAC, Support Liberty!

Nothing helps us get the job done more than the financial support of our members, from just $2/month!

JOIN TAC

01

The 10th Amendment

History, meaning, and purpose - the "Foundation of the Constitution."

10th Amendment

03

Nullification

Get an overview of the principles, background, and application in history - and today.

nullification