One of the favorite Republican talking points is that tax cuts will โpay for themselvesโ by spurring economic growth. This seems plausible. But GOP talking heads underestimate just how much growth would be necessary to pay for the massive tax cuts and spending increases recently passed by Congress. In fact, the Congressional Budget Officeย released its analysis last weekย and said that the tax cut plan will โballoonโ the deficit over the next several years.
And the deficit was already huge to begin with.
According to the CBO, the budget deficit โ thatโs spending over revenue โ will expand to $804 billion in fiscal 2018. Thatโs up from $665 billion in fiscal 2017. By 2020, the deficit will cross the $1 trillion threshold. When the CBO extends those numbers out over the next decade, the non-partisan agency projects aย cumulative deficit of $11.7 trillion for 2018-2027.
Thatโs nearly $12 trillion more added to the current $21-plus current national debt.
And thatโs with pretty rosy growth estimates baked into the analysis. According to the CBO, real GDP will grow by 3.3% in 2018, 2.4% in 2019, and 1.8% in 2020. So, assuming relatively healthy growth with no big shocks to the economy and certainly no recession over the next three years (a pretty unlikely scenario), weโre still looking at trillions in deficit spending.
Now, the Republicans arenโt completely wrong. Tax cuts will, in fact, spur economic growth, according to the CBO. It analysis projects 0.7% growth in economic output over the next 10 years as a result of the tax reform bill. Thatโs good. But it doesnโt โpay forโ the tax cuts.
Of course, the problem isnโt that Congress cut taxes. The problem is that it didnโt cut spending.
On top of cutting taxes, the โfiscally responsibleโ Republicans just enacted a $1.3 trillion omnibus bill that increased military spending $66 billion over the 2017 level and upped nondefense spending $52 billion more than last year.ย As Peter Schiff put it, when the tax plan passed, we gotย tax relief without government relief.
The national debt currently stands over $21 trillion. The CBO estimated the federal debt will approach 100% of GDP by 2028. And the CBO number is likelyย understated, as it leaves out a number of factors. Trading Economicsย calculated the 2017 debt-to-GDP ratio at 105.4%.
This means we wonโt see the kind of economic growth Republicans expect. A high debt-to-GDP ratio stymies economic growth. Some studies have shownย a debt to GDP ratio of over 90% can retard growth by as much as 30%.ย Even using the more conservative CBO number flashes giant warning signs.ย Last year, the CBO issued a dire forecast, saying the number could skyrocket to 150% by 2047ย if the trend remains unchecked.
Peter G. Peterson Foundation Michael Peterson toldย Reutersย the CBO analysis โconfirms that major damage was doneโ by the tax and spending bills.
This high and rising debt matters because it harms our economy.ย During a time of low unemployment and economic expansion, we should be taking reasonable steps to put our debt on a sustainable path โ but instead we are piling up trillions of bills.โ
When you put the debt into a context of rising interest rates, things look even bleaker. If the Federal Reserve pushes forward with interest rate normalization, it will cost the US government even more money just to make its annual interest payments on the debt. That means Washington will have to borrow even more, creating a vicious cycle of skyrocketing debt and borrowing. And this doesnโt even take the bigger question into consideration:ย Who is going to buy all of this debt?
The Republicans have made promises they wonโt be able to deliver on. Tax reform was great in theory, but we need government reform. As Peter Schiff said after the tax bill passed, as long as the government keeps growing, weย areย going to have to pay for it โ either now or later.
Yeah, I want to lower the top rate of tax, but I also want to make government smaller. I want to reduce government spending so that we no longer need all that tax revenue. But of course, Iโve said that over and over again. This bill provides some people with tax relief, but no people with government relief. Government is getting bigger, government is getting more expensive, so how are we going to pay for it? If weโre not going to pay for it with taxes, well then weโre going to pay for it some other way. But pay for it we will.โ
Editor’s note: This article by Mike Maharrey was originally published at SchiffGold.ย
- Writs, Riots, and Redcoats: Hancock’s Spark of the Revolution - January 17, 2026
- The National Bank That Breached the Articles of Confederation - June 2, 2025
- Virginia Association of 1769: A Step Toward Continental Unity - May 12, 2025