Concordia res Parvae Crescunt
Politics in America typically takes the form of warfare waged across a great political chasm. Left against right. Republicans versus Democrats. Liberals facing down conservatives. We divide up and lob grenades across the aisle, hoping to destroy, or at least maim our adversary, ever maneuvering to move in for the political kill.
But every once in a while, an issue bridges the gap and brings together traditional adversaries. In the face of something particularly heinous, Americans from across the political spectrum will stand together and fight as one. It takes something ominous, an act James Madison might describe as “palpable and dangerous.” The detention provisions without due process written into sections 1021 and 1022 of the Defense Authorization Act serve as just such a catalyst.
Section 1021 affirms the military’s authority to detain “covered persons,” which includes, “a person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners.” Many legal experts find the vagueness of terms such as “associated forces,” “coalition partners” and “hostilities” troubling and open to abuse.
Under 1021, a qualifying person, “may be detained under the law of war, without trial, until the end of hostilities.”
An amendment was added to section 1021 stipulating that “Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.” (Emphasis added) This language also proves problematic. What about a U.S. citizen captured outside of the United States? Or a non-citizen captured on American soil? Does the basic right of due process in the United States only extend to citizens within the country’s borders? More troubling, both President Bush and Obama argued that the original Authorization of Military Force passed by Congress after 9-11 already grants the power to detain citizens, even on American soil. So the words “affect existing law or authorities” may not provide the protection proponents of the bill claim.
In fact, an earlier amendment specifically stating section 1021, “does not include the authority to detain a citizen of the United States without trial until the end of hostilities,” went down to defeat by a 55-45 vote in the Senate.
Section 1022 requires that “a member of, or part of, al-Qaeda or an associated force” and who “participated in the course of planning or carrying out an attack or attempted attack against the United States or its coalition partners.” be held “in military custody pending disposition under the law of war,” absent a Presidential waiver. Lawmakers pulled a sneaky trick in section 1022, titling it “Military Custody for Foreign al Qaeda Terrorists.” But nothing in the actual language of the section excludes American citizens or resident aliens. And many civil libertarians argue holding any person without due process violates basic human rights.
The disclaimer NDAA supporters point to as a protection for Americans reads, “The requirement of military detention does not apply to U.S. citizens.” But notice that the language does not preclude the option of military detention.
“It authorizes the president to employ the military to show up on any of our doorsteps and say, ‘Well, we think based upon secret facts, you’re connected in some way, linked, with some kind of associated power with al Qaeda that’s fighting against our coalition partners, whoever they are. You can’t challenge any of our evidence, and you can go to Guantanamo Bay and rot for the rest of your life.’ And that’s the end of the matter,” Bruce Fein said.
On Thursday, the Tenth Amendment Center partnered with the Bill of Rights Defense Committee and Demand Progress to host a press conference call highlighting state and local action against NDAA detention provisions. The call featured both Democratic and Republican Party officials, along with two well-known civil liberties activists normally considered to frequent opposite sides of the political aisle.
Author and journalist Naomi Wolf served as an adviser to Vice Pres. Al Gore during his presidential campaign. She set the tone for the afternoon, humanizing an issue that often gets wrapped up in complicated legalese.
“I am delighted that organizations from across the political spectrum are uniting on this, and it’s our only hope really, because this is pretty much the worst thing I’ve seen in my lifetime, and as a mother it frightens me very much for my children’s future. And of course, it’s completely antithetical to the very meaning of the word America.”
Wolf wrote a book about 10 steps to a closed society. She asserts that NDAA detention gets close to the end-game.
“Step number 10 is this one – suspend the rule of law. History shows once you hit this tipping-point where a law is passed to suspend the law, which is exactly how Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933; they did absolutely nothing without the rule of law, until the rule of law undermined the rule of law; once you reach that point, history shows that that is the point of no return,” she said. “Once government can take people in without charge, or trial, then, you know, journalists aren’t safe, union leaders aren’t safe, clergy aren’t safe, activists aren’t safe – nobody is safe.”
Fein also champions civil liberties, but from the opposite side of the political spectrum. A lawyer and constitutional attorney, Fein served in the Reagan Justice Department. He echoed Wolf’s warning, pointing out the Sen. Lindsey Graham said the NDAA would bring the battlefield from abroad into the United States.
“Just think about that. How many times did we hear from the neo-cons that we had to fight in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and elsewhere? We had to fight six, seven, eight thousand miles away to prevent fighting these terrorists at home. Now we have Lindsey Graham, who is probably the greatest megaphone on that point, and now saying; ‘Now the battlefield is at home.’”
Fein pointed out that Congress passed the detention provisions in the NDAA without any public outcry demanding Congress grant the president additional powers, no plea for protection, no demonstrations in the streets asking for it and very little support for such powers outside of the ruling class.
“And yet President Obama signed it with his infamous statement, ‘I’ll only use it on the bad people.’ How many times have we heard that? Now we have a rule of men rather than a rule of law.”
Fein called it the ultimate corruption of due process and everything that America stands for.
“We’ve turned into the mirror image of King George the Third or worse,” he said. “Just think of that. We now are worse than the tyranny we fought to establish our birth certificate in 1776.”
Wolf and Fein both called on Congress to repeal the detention provisions, but Wolf in particular expressed frustration with the political climate on Capitol Hill.
“Democracy isn’t working the way it’s supposed to right now. You know, there’s this massive, massive transpartisan outpouring of citizen horror at this legislation,” she said. “It isn’t moving the dial. So I’m just saying on the record, I’m entirely baffled because it doesn’t seem as if the usual forms of citizen pressure that should be initiating – I mean this is a winner.”
Washington State Rep. Matt Shea said that since the federal government won’t limit its own power, the responsibility falls upon the shoulders of state and local officials, pointing out they swear an oath to protect and defend both the United States Constitution and their state constitutions.
“That means in these types of cases, where something is very clearly unconstitutional, and we believe the unlawful and indefinite detention provision of the NDAA is unconstitutional, it is our duty not to comply.”
To that end Shea, along with fellow Republican Rep. Jason Overstreet and three other lawmakers, introduced HB 2759. The act condemns unlawful detention of United States citizens and lawful resident aliens under the National Defense Authorization Act, and forbids “any state employee, member of the Washington National Guard or any agent of a corporation doing business with the state” to cooperate in the federal detainment or investigation of a U.S. citizen or resident alien.
Shea said legal analysts found at least 11 violations of the U.S. Constitution and 13 violations of the Washington State Constitution in sections 1021 and 1022 of the NDAA, and he said he found it difficult to understand how the men and women in Congress, with a few exceptions, didn’t see it. He went on to assert that since Washington seems oblivious and unresponsive, state level action becomes imperative.
“Very clearly, this needs to be a state level issue. I think very clearly this is a Tenth Amendment issue,” Shea said. “Our bill, House Bill 2759 in Washington, is not a non-binding resolution. It would actually be a law that would prohibit any government official, from the National Guard on down to local law enforcement, from participating in any way, shape or form, for implementing the unlawful and indefinite detention provisions of the NDAA. So I think that’s really where it needs to start is the state level.”
Washington lawmakers join legislatures in six other states considering bills in opposition to NDAA detention. Last week, the Virginia House of Delegates overwhelmingly passed its version of the legislation 96-4.
North Carolina State Sen. Ellie Kinnaird says lawmakers in the Tar Heel State continue to look at ways to combat NDAA, despite procedural hurdles in their legislature.
“There’s a very activist community in our area, very alarmed over this,” the Democratic lawmaker said. “What I will do is try to find a way to bring this to our legislature in a form that will tell our legislative delegation that we feel that this country is really threatened.”
Local officials have also joined the battle. In fact, El Paso County, Colo. Board of County Commissioners was the first government body to denounce NDAA detention without due process. The commission passed the resolution before Pres. Obama even signed the act into law. The El Paso County Sheriff’s Department also supports the resolution, providing teeth should an actual attempt to detain a person in the county arise.
“I felt it incumbent on us to be proactive, and I had no idea we were going to be the vanguard,” commissioner Peggy Littleton (R) said.
The El Paso County resolution asserts that NDAA detention and other civil liberty crushing acts in the name of the “War on Terror” hands victory to the enemy.
“Undermining our own constitutional rights serves only to concede to the terrorist demands of changing the fabric of what made the United States of America a country of freedom, liberty and opportunity.”
Six other local governments have also passed resolutions opposing sections 1021 and 1022 of the NDAA. Most recently, the Northampton, Mass. city council unanimously passed its version. Counselor Bill Dwight (D) said the body discussed the value of a small town of 29,000 passing such a resolution, asking, what difference will it make?
“The argument that we advanced was that we’re witnessing, essentially, an easy accommodation of the death of a thousand cuts of the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights actually affects the 29,000 people who live in this city, who dwell in this city. That’s our province. These are the people we were elected to represent,” he said. “And then we spoke with a unified voice and said, ‘This is unacceptable.’”
Dwight lamented that we have “made this easy accommodation” and the fact that we have by-and-large allowed fear to manipulate us.
“We’ve reacted cont
rary to our oaths, as Matt Shea said. I mean, our first oath of office is to protect the Constitution of our states and the Constitution of the United States. And we have no greater obligation beyond, you know, fixing potholes and all the other sundry things we’re assigned to do, we have no greater obligation, no higher calling than to protect the Constitution, which is clearly in jeopardy.”
Dwight said he hopes other cities and counties will join his town’s admittedly small effort and come together to create a larger movement.
“Northampton originally stood…I believe the first community in the United States to stand up against the tenants of the U.S. A. Patriot Act. And at the time, it seemed like just a little, teeny whining sound from the little spot in Northampton, Massachusetts. But it actually snowballed, and communities all over the country, including large cities like Los Angles and New York and Chicago, followed our lead. We hope that’s replicated, and we hope that’s reflected in the pressure that we’re trying to exert here.”
Overstreet reflected Dwight’s faith in the ability of state and local governments to initiated change, despite the unlikelihood of Washington simply relinquishing power it now has within its grasp. But he added that garnering support and educating people who don’t fully comprehend the issue and the danger is imperative.
“They may not understand it, which is why resolutions starting at the local level are so important, on up to the county level and then to the state level. That’s how we create a critical mass,” he said.
Fein said facing down the threat of NDAA detention goes beyond that single issue, placing it in the context of a larger battle for freedom and liberty in the United States.
“The NDAA is part of this larger culture of seeking a risk-free existence by destroying freedom and liberty everywhere. And having juvenile thrill of a nation able to tell anybody anytime, anyplace that they’ve got to do whatever the United States tells them to do at the point of a bayonet, or at the end of a Predator Drone. It’s really quite disgusting and wretched.”
Michael Maharrey [send him email] is the Communications Director for the Tenth Amendment Center. He proudly resides in the original home of the Principles of '98 - Kentucky. See his blog archive here and his article archive here. He also maintains the blog, Tenther Gleanings.
If you enjoyed this post:
Click Here to Get the Free Tenth Amendment Center Newsletter,
But we have the opportunity here, to make history. In the 2nd part of the 13th Amendment, it states, that Congress of this great nation, has the power to enforce this Amendment, against such acts, just as the U.S. Congress has the power, to charge anyone who is not an American, for Sedition, Heresy, and Treason against the people, our Constitution, and this great nation, The United States of America.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the secretary of state shall cause
notice of this resolution to be published at least four 31 times during the four weeks next preceding the scheduled session in every legal newspaper in the state.
If we can win World War II; the other wars that followed, and the Cold War: we CAN win the INFOWARS, and the attack on the American People’s Civil Rights and Liberties, before its too late.
SSPOT-1X, if approved, will make histry once again; that “WE will not go quietly in the night, we will fight! We will survive, and go on, cause WE THE PEOPLE, are patriots of this great nation, The United States of America.” And by coming together as a Nation, we will be removing such Political Temptations, from the powers that be, who are in as it is foreseen by The People, the real Domestic Terrorists, running the government. Not all are as this is in by no means, a promotion to anti-government. BUT, is a promotion, to rectify that, which should have never been allowed without proper analyzation, and by the votes and rights of U.S. Citizens; for whom have the same
rights that put YOU the reader, and/or recipient into office by such votes.
And if we do protests, under religious, or otherwise; its our God given rights, as allowed to do so, by the U.S. Constitution. God Bless America. Wherefore, the ones wanting a new World Order, that claims WE THE PEOPLE are the domestic terrorists, (because it interferes with their evil plans)WE THE PEOPLE shout back; “Look Who’s Calling The Kettle Black.”
In conclusion, when the New World Order has made their foot hold, and those chosen to live, in the 500,000,000 have been implanted with the RFID Chips, (Mark Of The Beast as the huge computer is called also) they will work in the largest of the FEMA Camps, in either Anchorage or Fairbanks, Alaska, for either 34-35c per hour, of wages, while the corporations can live off murdered peoples lands, and property, and living for all time in luxury and wealth. That in itself, is a violation of the 13th Amendment.
Amendment 6 - Right to Speedy Trial, Confrontation of Witnesses. Ratified 12/15/1791.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
Amendment 10 - Powers of the States and People. Ratified 12/15/1791.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Amendment 14 - Citizenship Rights. Ratified 7/9/1868.
1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Now is the time that we as a great nation need to “Think Outside The Box” for once. Now is the time, as a nation, we need to come together, as we were founded by our, founding forefathers, when they developed the United States Constitution, and the Bill Of Rights. This petition, known as Sovereign States Petition Of Termination (SSPOT)-1X, is at best, the works of several organizations, who represent the best interests of the people. SSPOT-1X, if approved, wipe out the American Embarrassment Spot, of accepting REX-84 from a convicted Traitor of the United States Of America, and the spot of evil plotting against the U.S. Citizens, to lower Earths population Issues.
Those portions of the articles highlighted and/or in bold print are violated by Operation REX-84. Thus, the individual who claimed the U.S. Constitution, is guilty of sedition and heresy, and for making false testimony under oath, that the Constitution supported the development of REX-84; for which endorses Sub-Operation Garden Plot & Sub-Operation Cable Splicer, is a traitor to the U.S. National Security, and is to be arrested and tried in much the same manner as former Colonel Oliver North.
The Amendments
The following are the Amendments to the Constitution. The first ten Amendments collectively are commonly known as the Bill of Rights. Those that pertain to SSPOT-1X will be shown below.
Amendment 1 - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment 2 - Right to Bear Arms. Ratified 12/15/1791. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment 5 - Trial and Punishment, Compensation for Takings. Ratified 12/15/1791.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Section 2- State citizens, Extradition
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.
(No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, But shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due.)
(This clause in parentheses is superseded by the 13th Amendment.)
Article. VI. - Debts, Supremacy, Oaths
All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be
the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary
notwithstanding.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
Those portions of the articles highlighted and/or in bold print are violated by Operation REX-84. Thus, the individual who claimed the U.S. Constitution, is guilty of sedition and heresy, and for making false testimony under oath, that the Constitution supported the development of REX-84; for which endorses Sub-Operation Garden Plot & Sub-Operation Cable Splicer, is a traitor to the U.S. National Security, and is to be arrested and tried in much the same manner as former Colonel Oliver North.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
Article III. - The Judicial Branch
Section 2- Trial by Jury, Original Jurisdiction, Jury Trials
(The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; to Controversies between two or more States; between a State and Citizens of another State; between Citizens of different States; between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.)
(This section in parentheses is modified by the 11th Amendment.)
Section 2
(This section in parentheses is modified by the 11th Amendment.)
-Trial by Jury, Original Jurisdiction, Jury Trials(The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; to Controversies between two or more States; between a State and Citizens of another State; between Citizens of different States; between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a
State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.)
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both
as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.
The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.
So, the question then, is what does this all mean? DOOM for the Citizens of this great nation. It is understandable, that there is over population, which is the CDC, and International counterpart, and what could become a serious problem. Murdering American Citizens, (though its written in such a fashion, as to politically make it an excuse to plot such a horrific plot against the people; known as FEMA Detention Facility, or processing Center.) If you believe that, then I am the former President, Abraham Lincolns, greatest Cousin by decent of birth. By returning the NASA Space Program, that President Barrack Obama had closed, then WE can find the resolve to lower Earth Population, by Migrating populations to Planet Mars, And thus, problem is solved. FEMA Camps, is NOT the answer.
Henceforth, the question then, is would the government enact a new policy from a man, who is a rapist of women, a child molester of children, a robber of banks or armored cars, or of someone found guilty of aiding the Al-Kadah, or Taliban? If the obvious answer is no, then why contradict your self, and allow such a policy to be devised by a traitor of the U.S. National Security, and in violation of the U.S. Constitution, and Federal Laws, and thus be in disgrace to the corp. of which he represented as a Colonel? No excuses; if you wouldn’t accept a plan or policy from someone common who is on death row, or doing a life sentence, then why allow the same from a convicted traitor of The United States of America?
UPDATE: FEMA was granted power to act as a military force, by endorsement of former President George Bush, Jr. and thereby allows FEMA to put U.S. Citizens, on Lists; Red List, Blue List, & Yellow Lists: without due process or legally served notice of the U.S. Supreme court, with given explanations or reasons for such listing of U.S. Citizens, nor allows the U.S. Citizens to exercise their Civil and/or Constitution Rights, to a fair hearing for such actions by FEMA, AND allows FEMA to execute by Gas Chamber or imported guillotines, (that the FEMA, and U.S. government deemed Classified, and Top Secret) 2 weeks PRIOR to the actual announcement by the U.S. President, for any U.S. Citizen found to be on the FEMA Red List; be they Men, Women, and Children; Christians, Saints, and Jews.
So, in review, of the first U.S. Constitutional Violations, lets look at REX-84, and compare this pending operation, to the allowed laws of the land, set by our forefathers, with the U.S. Constitution, and the Amendments thereof, that protect our great nation, from such evil futuristic sadistic plots against the American people of the United States. This is the basics of REX-84, of which stems the other endorsed operations, known as Operation Garden Plot, and Operation Cable Splicer, that was not made public for the U.S. Citizens of this great nation to exercise their rights, to vote on:
*Section-I:
REX-84
Note:
The document, known as REX-84 Program, is devised by a former convicted Colonel Oliver North, who was convicted of Treason against the United States of America, and against the U.S. Constitution, and the Nations National Security. Furthermore, he was most likely, following orders for devising this plan himself, from such secret societies, known as Free Masons, Bohemian Club, and Illuminati, to name a few, who are well known and notorious, to having a hand in the operations of the U.S. Government for conspiracies, and cover-ups, against the U.S. Citizens of this great nation; in order to achieve their evil agenda, known as the RFID Chip, and the Evil New World Order, whereby a one world religion, allows the burning of the Holy Bible, Church of Sex, and worshipping Satan, with a Lucifer Bible: otherwise known as, the Luciferian Religion.
This Operation, endorses the sub-operations, known as Operation Garden Plot and Operation Cable Splicer, of detaining American Citizens, on NAZI Style FEMA Concentration Camps.
*Section-I: REX-84
Note:
This Operation, endorses the sub-operations, known as Operation Garden Plot and Operation Cable Splicer, of detaining American Citizens, on NAZI Style FEMA Concentration Camps.The document, known as REX-84 Program, is devised by a former convicted Colonel Oliver North, who was convicted of Treason against the United States of America, and against the U.S. Constitution, and the Nations National Security. Furthermore, he was most likely, following orders for devising this plan himself, from such secret societies, known as Free Masons, Bohemian Club, and Illuminati, to name a few, who are well known and notorious, to having a hand in the operations of the U.S. Government for conspiracies, and cover-ups, against the U.S. Citizens of this great nation; in order to achieve their evil agenda, known as the RFID Chip, and the Evil New World Order, whereby a one world religion, allows the burning of the Holy Bible, Church of Sex, and worshipping Satan, with a Lucifer Bible: otherwise known as, the Luciferian Religion.
In review of the U.S. Constitution and the proper role of Federal Government, it stems from the very foundations our forefathers set, to avoid and protect the Nation, and each and every state of the Union.
Thus, the constitution of The united States of America, makes it quite clear, as it is selected as appropriately applied in response to REX-84, enacted by former Colonel; Oliver North, a convicted Traitor of The United States Of America and thus enacted prior to and after, his Senatorial Hearings, fir Treason against the U.S. for which was due to his crimes against the nations National Security by which he sold the Contras Military Secrets, and weapons of mass destruction. Further more, unless the congress wakes up and sees the plot that created the whole notion of a NZI Style Concentration Camp against the “People”, then with the illegally approved, Section 1021 & 1022, that President Barrack Obama claimed he wouldn’t sign, then lied to the American people and in counter diction to the U.S. Congress, and by deception tactics, signed it anyways; could conceivably make REX-84 active, in violation of the Amendments of the U.S. Constitution.
This also applies, and is in review of the Adopted Acts, for which REX-84 has power to enact at the Presidents Command, and thus are as follows:
National Security Act of 1947~allows for the strategic relocation of industries, services, government and other essential economic activities, and to rationalize the requirements for manpower, resources and production facilities.
1950 Defense Production Act~gives the President sweeping powers over all aspects of the economy.
Act of August 29, 1916~authorizes the Secretary of the Army, in time of war, to take possession of any transportation system for transporting troops, material, or any other purpose related to the emergency.
International Emergency Economic Powers Act~enables the President to seize the property of a foreign country or national. These powers were transferred to FEMA in a sweeping consolidation in 1979.
Note: That is like saying, we can invade any country we want without consequence. Sound familiar; like Adolf Hitler???
Good morning everyone!
This is the next pending petition pending Nullification and to be enacted upon law. Thisis like the otehr Nullifications, and as before, you will have to enter the correct segments, based on teh meetings, and state for which you reside. This next Nullification, is on REX-84, devised by a convicted Traitor of the United Stes of America, former Colonel Oliver North. The next nullifications is in 3 parts and is as follows:
Part 1: SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION SSPOT-1X
State of Washington 61st Legislature 2012 Regular Session
BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE
STATE OF WASHINGTON, IN LEGISLATIVE SESSION ASSEMBLED:
THAT, it be reviewed as to what the proper role of the federal government under the U.S. Constitution should be and also the role of the State Government in sending such actions. It is believed by both the few of WA State and the citizens of The united States of America, that we should follow suit, as did the first state to exercise constitutional rights, and protect the citizens from REX-84; for which violates several US Constitutional Amendments, U.S. Citizens Civil Rights, as in accordance to the ACLU, and the Constitution of the U.N. and the freedoms and rights of the American people as a whole. In the opinion of the “people”, it appears that this state is one of many states, whose awareness of such duties is lacking or is low.
This is the proposed Resolution; 1st of 2 parts: known as Sovereign States Petition Of Termination (SSPOT)-1X. SSPOT-1X, is based on the U.S. Constitutional Amendments, that expose the violations of the rights of U.S. Citizens, as specified in REX-84, which was enacted without U.S. Citizen Voter Approval. And SSPOT-1X for the 2nd part, countermands, based on exposed U.S. Constitutional Violations, that REX-84 would otherwise allow against U.S. Citizens and their inalienable Civil Rights, as protected by the US Constitution.
SECTION 5. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the (Revised Codes of Washington) Statutes as Section (37) of Title (23), unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
1. Any public officer, employee, or agent of the State of (WASHINGTON), or any employee of a corporation providing services to the State of (WASHINTON) that enforces or attempts to enforce an act, order, law, statute, rule or regulation of the government of the United States in violation of Section 4 of this act shall be guilty of a class A misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than six (6) months or by a fine not exceeding Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) or both such fine and imprisonment;
2. Any official, agent, or employee of the government of the United States, or employee of a corporation providing services to the government of the United States that enforces or attempts to enforce an act, order, law, statute, rule, or regulation of the government of the United States in violation of Section 4 of this act shall be guilty of a class B felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than one (1) year, or a fine of not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00), or by both such fine and imprisonment.
SECTION 6. This act shall take effect immediately upon approval by the Governor.
Note: Be sure to put in the propert Senate Bill numbers that are current, and your respective state, as you did the last nullification process for Sections 1021 & Sections 1022. COMING SOON! The petition for Ban-02/Removal~Operation Cable Splicer. God Bless America, the States of the Union, and our Constituti9on and members here tonight.
SECTION 4. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the (Washington State) Statutes as Section (36) of Title (1023), unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
1 The State of (WASHINGTON) shall not provide material support or participate in any way with the implementation of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 within the boundaries of this state;
2. The Department of Public Safety is hereby directed to report to the Governor and the Legislature any attempt by agencies or agents of the United States Federal Government to secure the implementation of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 through the operations of that or any other state department;
3. The indefinite detention, prosecution according to the law of war, and transfer to a foreign jurisdiction of citizens of the United States as provided for by Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 are in direct contravention to the limits on federal power as specified in Section 2 of this act and are illegal within the boundaries of the state of (WASHINGTON);
SECTION 3. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the (State Of Washington) Statutes as Section (36) of Title (1022X), unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
The Legislature finds that:
1. Section 1021 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 purports to assert the President’s authority to not only arrest suspected terrorists, but also to determine whether or not a trial, including what type of trial, will be held for those arrested;
2. Section 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 requires detention without trial by the military for a certain class of terrorist and authorizes but does not require the same for citizens of the United States;
3. The exemption for citizens of the United States in Section 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 only exempts citizens from a requirement and reads as follows, “The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States”;
4. The enactment into law by the United States Congress of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, Public Law Number 112-81, is inimical to the liberty, security and well-being of the people of (WASHINGTON), and was adopted by the United States Congress in violation of the limits of federal power in United States Constitution, including but not limited to, those listed in Section 2 of this act.
The Legislature declares that the authority for this act is the following:
1. The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that the United States Federal government is authorized to exercise only those powers delegated to it in the Constitution and nothing more. The guaranty of those limitations on federal power is a matter of contract between the state and people of (WASHINGTON) and the United States at of the time that the Constitution was agreed upon and adopted by (WASHINGTON) and the United States;
2. Article VI, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States provides that laws of the United States are the supreme law of the land provided that they are made in pursuance of the powers delegated to the federal government in the Constitution;
3. Article I Section 9, Clause 2 of the Constitution provides that the Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it;
4A. The First Amendment provides that the Congress of the United States shall make no law prohibiting the right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of grievances;
4B. The Fourth Amendment provides that the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated;
5. The Fifth Amendment provides that the People have a right to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without Due Process of law;
6. The Sixth Amendment provides that the people have a right in criminal prosecutions to enjoy a speedy trial by an impartial jury in the State and District where the crime shall have been committed; to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to confront witnesses; to Counsel;
7. The Fourteenth Amendment provides that the people are to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without Due Process of law.
This is Part 3A:
SENATE JOINT Constitution Preservation Act~Nullification
AN ACT relating to detainment without charge, military tribunals, and transfer to foreign jurisdictions of United States Citizens and legal resident aliens residing in the State of (STATE); creating the Liberty Preservation Act; providing legislative findings and declarations of authority; prohibiting state from providing material support for certain acts; prohibiting state participation in the implementation of certain acts; making certain acts unlawful; providing penalties; and providing an effective date. Be it Enacted by the People of the State of (WASHINGTON):
For: Nullification Of S510, or the future re-attempts thereof, FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010.
SECTION 1. NEW LAW A new section of law not to be codified in (WASHINTON) Statutes reads as follows: This act shall be known and may be cited as the “(WASHINGTON) Liberty Preservation Act”
SECTION 2. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the (WASHINGTON) Statutes as Section (36) of Title (1021X), unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
NOW BE IT RESOLVED THAT,
that the Legislature finds that the enactment into law by the United States Congress of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, Public Law Number 112-81 Ban-01, is inimical to the liberty, security and well-being of the people of (WASHINGTON), and was adopted by the United States Congress in violation of the limits of federal power in United States Constitution; and
C. Any public officer, employee, or agent of the State of (WASHINGTON), or any employee of a corporation providing services to the State of (WASHINGTON) that enforces or attempts to enforce an act, order, law, statute, rule or regulation of the government of the United States in violation of Subsection 1 B of this act shall be guilty of a class A misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six (6) months or by a fine not exceeding Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) or both such fine and imprisonment;
SECTION 2.
This act takes effect immediately upon approval by the Governor.
WHEREAS, the Office of the President of the United States, under both the administrations of George W. Bush and Barak H. Obama, has asserted the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Terrorists allows the Office of the President to indefinitely detain without charge United States Citizens and lawful resident aliens captured in the United States;
WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has not decided whether the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Terrorists allows the Office of the President to indefinitely detain without charge United States Citizens and lawful resident aliens captured in the United States;
WHEREAS,
unlike Section 1022 of the 2012 NDAA, Section 1021 makes no specific exclusion for United States citizens and lawful resident aliens for conduct occurring within the United States;
WHEREAS, United States Senator Carl Levin declared in colloquy on the floor of the United States Senate that the original 2012 NDAA provided that section 1021 (then section 1031 prior to final drafting) specifically would not apply to United States citizens, but that the Office of the President of the United States had requested that such restriction be removed from the 2012 NDAA;
WHEREAS, United States Senator John McCain and United States Senator Lindsey Graham declared in colloquies on the floor of the United States Senate that S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010; authorizing search and seizure without warrant, or in violation of the U.S. Constitutional Amendment, regarding the deprivation of persons personal effects, property, and pursuit of happiness;
WHEREAS, undermining our own Constitutional rights serves only to concede to the terrorists’ demands of changing the fabric of what made the United States of America a country of freedom, liberty and opportunity.
BE IT RESOLVED
, that the Legislature finds that the enactment into law by the United States Congress of S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010, Public Law Number 112-82 Ban-01, is inimical to the liberty, security and well-being of the people of (WASHINGTON), and was adopted by the United States Congress in violation of the limits of federal power in United States Constitution; and
BE IT RESOLVED,
A. That copies of this Resolution be immediately transmitted to the Honorable Barack Obama, President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, each member of Congress from the State of (WASHINGTON) to the Honorable John Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court; each justice on the United States Supreme Court; and the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives of each state’s legislature.
B. The State of (WASHINGTON) shall not provide material support or participate in any way with the implementation of S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010 within the boundaries of this state. The Department of Public Safety is hereby directed to report to the Governor and the Legislature any attempt by agencies or agents of the United States Federal Government to secure the implementation of S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010through the operations of that or any other state department.
WHEREAS, S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010 requires the Armed Forces of the United States to detain, pending disposition according to the Law of War, any person involved in, or whom provided substantial support to, stock piling rations, food, or growing in open public, or in green houses of private, terrorism or belligerent acts against the United States, and whom is a member of Al-Qaeda or an associated force;
WHEREAS,
S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010 can easily be backed by Section 1022 of the 2012 NDAA specifically excludes United States citizens, and lawful resident aliens for conduct occurring within the United States, from its mandatory detention provisions;
WHEREAS, this (Legislature, Town Council, County Government, etc..) opposes any and all rules, laws, regulations, bill language or executive orders, which amount to an overreach of the federal government and which effectively take away civil liberties;
WHEREAS,undermining our own Constitutional rights serves only to concede to the terrorists’ demands of changing the fabric of what made the United States of America a country of freedom, liberty and opportunity.it is indisputable that the threat of terrorism is real, and that the full force of appropriate and constitutional law must be used to defeat this threat; however, winning the war against terror cannot come at the great expense of mitigating basic, fundamental, constitutional rights;
WHEREAS, it is indisputable that the threat of terrorism is real, and that the full force of appropriate and constitutional law must be used to defeat this threat; however, winning the war against terror cannot come at the great expense of mitigating basic, fundamental, constitutional rights;
NOW BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the (Legislature, City Council, etc…) of the (State Of Washington), condemns in no uncertain terms S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010 as it purports to 1) repeal Posse Comitatus and authorize the President of the United States to utilize the Armed Forces of the United States to police United States Citizens and lawful resident aliens within the United States of America, for growing and stocking up food, rations, or agriculturally grown legal products: be it outdoors, or in a confined private green house, 2) indefinitely detain United States citizens and lawful resident aliens captured within the United States of America without charge until the end of hostilities authorized by the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, with the supported Section 1021 & Section 1022 that is now signed; 3) subject American Citizens and lawful resident aliens captured within the United States of America to military tribunals, and 4) transfer American Citizens and lawful resident aliens captured within the United States of America to a foreign country or foreign entity; and
Article I Section 23’s No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligations of contracts shall ever be passed.
Article I Section 24’s
Treason against the state shall consist only in levying war against the state, or adhering to its enemies, or in giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or confession in open court.The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.Article I Section 27’s
Article I Section 30’s The enumeration in this Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny others retained by the people.
Article I Section 31’s
No standing army shall be kept up by this state in time of peace, and no soldier shall in time of peace be quartered in any house without the consent of its owner, nor in time of war except in the manner prescribed by law.Article I Section 32’s
A frequent recurrence to fundamental principles is essential to the security of individual right and the perpetuity of free government.
WHEREAS, the members of this (Legislature, Town Council, County Government, etc..) have taken an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the State of (WASHINGTON);
Article I Section 14’s
Excessive bail shall not be required, excessive fines imposed, nor cruel punishment inflicted.
Article I Section 15’s No conviction shall work corruption of blood, nor forfeiture of estate.
Article I Section 16’s Private property shall not be taken for private use, except for private ways of necessity, and for drains, flumes, or ditches on or across the lands of others for agricultural, domestic, or sanitary purposes. No private property shall be taken or damaged for public or private use without just compensation having been first made, or paid into court for the owner, and no right-of-way shall be appropriated to the use of any corporation other than municipal until full compensation therefore be first made in money, or ascertained and paid into court for the owner, irrespective of any benefit from any improvement proposed by such corporation, which compensation shall be ascertained by a jury, unless a jury be waived, as in other civil cases in courts of record, in the manner prescribed by law. Whenever an attempt is made to take private property for a use alleged to be public, the question whether the contemplated use be really public shall be a judicial question, and determined as such, without regard to any legislative assertion that the use is public: Provided, That the taking of private property by the state for land reclamation and settlement purposes is hereby declared to be for public use. [AMENDMENT 9, 1919 p 385 Section 1. Approved November, 1920.]
Article I Section 17’s
There shall be no imprisonment for debt, except in cases of absconding debtors.
Article I Section 18’s The military shall be in strict subordination to the civil power.
Article I Section 21’s The right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate, but the legislature may provide for a jury of any number less than twelve in courts not of record, and for a verdict by nine or more jurors in civil cases in any court of record, and for waiving of the jury in civil cases where the consent of the parties interested is given thereto.
Article I Section 22’s
In criminal prosecutions the accused shall have the right to appear and defend in person, or by counsel, to demand the nature and cause of the accusation against him, to have a copy thereof, to testify in his own behalf, to meet the witnesses against him face to face, to have compulsory process to compel the attendance of witnesses in his own behalf, to have a speedy public trial by an impartial jury of the county in which the offense is charged to have been committed and the right to appeal in all cases: Provided, The route traversed by any railway coach, train or public conveyance, and the water traversed by any boat shall be criminal districts; and the jurisdiction of all public offenses committed on any such railway car, coach, train, boat or other public conveyance, or at any station or depot upon such route, shall be in any county through which the said car, coach, train, boat or other public conveyance may pass during the trip or voyage, or in which the trip or voyage may begin or terminate. In no instance shall any accused person before final judgment be compelled to advance money or fees to secure the rights herein guaranteed. [AMENDMENT 10, 1921 p 79 Section 1. Approved November, 1922.]
WHEREAS,
S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010 as it purports to authorize, 1) confiscation of any stocked up Food, Emergency Rations, or Home Grown Agricultural Products, in violation of S510 Law; 2) Search & Seizure without Warrant, by support of Section 1021 & 1022; 3) the transfer of United States Citizens and legal resident aliens captured within the United States of America to foreign jurisdictions, is repugnant to the following rights enshrined in the (STATE) Constitution: (NOTE – AS WRITTEN FOR THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND. ENTER RELEVANT SECTIONS FROM YOUR STATE BELOW)
Article I Section 2’s
The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land.
Article I Section 3’s No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.
Article I Section 4’s The right of petition and of the people peaceably to assemble for the common good shall never be abridged.
Article I Section 5’s Every person may freely speak, write and publish on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right.
Article I, Section 7’s
Justice in all cases shall be administered openly, and without unnecessary delay.No person shall be disturbed in his private affairs, or his home invaded, without authority of law.Article I Section 10’s
Article I Section 12’s No law shall be passed granting to any citizen, class of citizens, or corporation other than municipal, privileges or immunities which upon the same terms shall not equally belong to all citizens, or corporations.
Article I Section 13’s The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless in case of rebellion or invasion the public safety requires it.
WHEREAS, S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010; purports to authorize, but does not require, the President of the United States to utilize the armed forces of the United States to detain persons the President suspects were part of, or substantially supported, violations of S510 Law.
WHEREAS, S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010; and confiscation of any home grown agricultural products, that otherwise, defined by Federal Law as banned; such as Contraband, Tobacco requiring Licenses, or proof of Native American Status, to name a few: or any other stocked up emergency survival supplies, in the event of Martial Law being declared, and/or a natural disaster.
WHEREAS,
S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010, seeks to preserve existing law and authorities pertaining to the productions of food produced in the United States, but does not specify what such existing law or authorities are, if it failed, was passed, or will be passed;
WHEREAS,
the Office of the President of the United States, under both the administrations of George W. Bush and Barak H. Obama, has asserted the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Terrorists allows the Office of the President to indefinitely detain without charge United States Citizens and lawful resident aliens captured in the United States, for stocking up on Emergency Supplies, and growing legal agricultural products in Green houses, etc. or in Gardens, Flower Beds, and fields;
WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court (one Justice of the peace in particular) has stated clearly in arbitration that they do not feel sympathetic to the people, or the U.S. Constitution, in regards to S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010;
Article I Section 9, Clause 2’s right to seek Writ of Habeas Corpus;
The First Amendment’s right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances;
The Fourth Amendment’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures;
The Fifth Amendment’s right to be free from charge for an infamous or capitol crime until presentment or indictment by a Grand Jury;
The Fifth Amendment’s right to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without Due Process of law;
The Sixth Amendment’s right in criminal prosecutions to enjoy a speedy trial by an impartial jury in the State and District where the crime shall have been committed;
The Sixth Amendment’s right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation;
The Sixth Amendment’s right confront witnesses;
The Sixth Amendment’s right to Counsel;
The Eighth Amendment’s right to be free from excessive bail and fines, and cruel and unusual punishment;
The Fourteenth Amendment’s right to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without Due Process of law;
SECTION 1. NEW LAW
This Act shall be known and may be cited as the “Liberty Preservation Act: Ban-01.”
A. 1. The Legislature finds that the enactment into law by the United States Congress of S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Of 2010, Public Law Number 112-81, is inimical to the liberty, security and well-being of the people of (WASHINGTON), and was adopted by the United States Congress in violation of the limits of federal power in United States Constitution.
2. The Legislature finds that, S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Of 2010, as they purport to authorize 1) detainment of United States Citizens and legal resident aliens captured within the United States of America without charge, as result for exercising rights in violation of S510’s Unconstitutional Law 2) military tribunals for United States Citizens and legal resident aliens captured within the United States of America, and 3) the transfer of United States Citizens and legal resident aliens captured within the United States of America to foreign jurisdictions, are violative of the following rights enshrined in the Constitution of the United States of America;
Article I Section 9, Clause 2’s right to seek Writ of Habeas Corpus;
The First Amendment’s right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances;
The Fourth Amendment’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures;
The Fifth Amendment’s right to be free from charge for an infamous or capitol crime until presentment or indictment by a Grand Jury;
The Fifth Amendment’s right to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without Due Process of law;
The Sixth Amendment’s right in criminal prosecutions to enjoy a speedy trial by an impartial jury in the State and District where the crime shall have been committed;
The Sixth Amendment’s right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation;
The Sixth Amendment’s right confront witnesses;
The Sixth Amendment’s right to Counsel;
The Eighth Amendment’s right to be free from excessive bail and fines, and cruel and unusual punishment;
The Fourteenth Amendment’s right to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without Due Process of law;
3. (VIOLATIONS OF STATE CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS – ENTER SPECIFICS HERE)
Resolution: Liberty Preservation
This is Part 2A:
SENATE JOINT Constitution Preservation Act Noncompliance
GENERAL DESCRIPTION:
This bill prohibits all public officers, agents, and employees of the State of (STATE) from providing material support or participating in the implementation of S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Of 2010.
HIGHLIGHTED PROVISIONS
prohibits all public officers, agents, and employees of the State of (WASHINGTON) from providing material support or participating in the implementation of S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Of 2010; and makes it a class A misdemeanor for a person to provide material support or participate in the implementation of S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Of 2010.
Be it enacted by the People of the State of (WASHINGTON):
This bill:
Part 1B Continued:
Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against
unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but
upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the
place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010, violates this Amendment, so to disarm the American people and the citizens of WA State, in the event of Civil War; and/or self defense against tyranny of being broken into without due process, without Miranda Rights being read, without Writ Of Habeous Corpus and/or Search Warrant being required, and thus taken into custody, and transported at approx. 4:30AM on the first 2 weeks, PRIOR to the actual announcement of Martial Law, to a FEMA Detention Center. And furthermore, to be that of a form of punishment for growing crops, flowers, or a garden, and even having an orchard, etc.
In conclusion, when the New World Order has made their foot hold, and those chosen to live, in the 500,000,000 have been implanted with the RFID Chips, (Mark Of The Beast as the huge computer is called also) they will work in the largest of the FEMA Camps, in either Anchorage or Fairbanks, Alaska, for either 34-35c per hour, of wages, while the corporations can live off murdered peoples lands, and property, and living for all time in luxury and wealth. That in itself, is a violation of the 13th Amendment.
But we have the opportunity here, to make history. In the 2nd part of the 13th Amendment, it states, that Congress of this great nation, has the power to enforce this Amendment, against such acts, just as the US Congress has the power, to charge anyone who is not an American, for Sedition, Heresy, and Treason against the people, our Constitution, and this great nation, The United States of America.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the secretary of state shall cause
notice of this resolution to be published at least four 31 times during the four weeks next preceding the scheduled session in every legal newspaper in the state. And that by no means, shall the U.S. Citizens be forced into suffrage, or as wanted refugees, for exercising their rights to grow crops, lest they agree to taking an RFID Chip in the Head, or any part of the left/right arm or hand, in order to purchase food for the American family that each U.S. Citizen supports within their respective household‘s.
If we can recall the mistreatment of those held in concentration camps in WWII, then there should not be a repeat of history, like the Jews, Gypsies, etc. who were detained, and STARVED TO DEATH.
Greetings Everyone:
This is the first adress of banned unconstitutional laws, that go further back prior to Section 1021 & Section 1022. However, with the illegal laws o theses sections in place, it is important that these be made viral to every state of the union. Wherefore, this is Ban-01 Proposal whther it failed in the past, is in effect, and now supported by Section 1021 & Section 1022; or would be considered for a new attempt by the Obama Administration.
SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION Termination S510 FDA-Ban 01 Part 1A
BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE
STATE OF WASHINGTON, IN LEGISLATIVE SESSION ASSEMBLED:
THAT, it be reviewed as to what the proper role of the federal
government under the U.S. Constitution should be and also the role of the State Government in sending such actions. It is believed by both the few of WA State and the citizens of The united States of America, that we should follow suit, as did the first state to exercise constitutional rights, and protect the citizens from S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Of 2010; for which violates several US Constitutional Amendments, and the freedoms and rights of the American people as a whole. In the opinion of the “people”, it appears that this state is one of many states, whose awareness of such duties is lacking or is low.
This is the proposed Resolution; 1st of 2: known as Resolution FDA-Ban 01. Ban-01, refers to removal and not complying with any type of dictatorial practices, for which would otherwise violate the citizens rights of Due Process, Miranda Rights, Search Warrants prior to seizures, speed trial with legal rights for arraignments where as the accused can enter a plea of guilty or not guilty, and the Writ Of Habeous Corpus.
In review of the US Constitution and the proper role of Federal Government, it stems from the very foundations our forefathers set, to avoid and protect the Nation, and each and every state of the Union.
Thus, the constitution of The united States of America, makes it quite clear, as it is selected as appropriately applied in response to the S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010, for which President Barrack Obama has not done his duty in reviewing, as it is a part of his job, as is the Economy, the National Deficit, and the Security Of This Nation, the United State Of America.
No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.
Section 9 - Limits on Congress
Attainder
In the context of the Constitution, a Bill of Attainder is meant to mean a bill that has a negative effect on a single person or group (for example, a fine or term of imprisonment). Originally, a Bill of Attainder sentenced an individual to death, though this detail is no longer required to have an enactment be ruled a Bill of Attainder.
Ex post facto
In U.S. Constitutional Law, the definition of what is ex post facto is more limited. The first definition of what exactly constitutes an ex post facto law is found in Calder v Bull (3 US 386 [1798]), in the opinion of Justice Chase:
1st. Every law that makes an action done before the passing of the law, and which was innocent when done, criminal; and punishes such action. 2d. Every law that aggravates a crime, or makes it greater than it was, when committed. 3d. Every law that changes the punishment, and inflicts a greater punishment, than the law annexed to the crime, when committed. 4th. Every law that alters the legal rules of evidence, and receives less, or different, testimony, than the law required at the time of the commission of the offense, in order to convict the offender.
ex post facto adj. Formulated, enacted, or operating retroactively. [Med Lat., from what is done afterwards] Source: AHDattainder n. The loss of all civil rights by a person sentenced for a serious crime. [< OFr. attaindre, to convict] Source: AHD
This applies to the S510 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010; for which if passed, or a 2nd attempt to pass: or if in effect, violates the US Citizens rights to grow a garden, flowers, raise harvest, and sell crops, etc. And as such, would give the government informing this unconstitutional law, the right to falsely arrest, and imprison a citizen for their civil rights to grow what they please, other than the forbidden agricultural products, as defined by Federal Law: for example, Cannabis, Poppy Plants, Etc. As long as a US Citizen is not in violation of the Federal laws, and is NOT growing the defined forbidden vegetation, that otherwise is required by special licenses, or being proven a Native American, or is defined as illegal drug contraband, then the US Citizen has the right to enjoy their civil liberties, backed and protected by the U.S. Constitution, to grow what they choose, be it for their own consumption and pleasure, or to stimulate the Economy, for the prevention of Food Shortages, in present and future generations to come.
No Bill of
Attainder or ex post factoLaw shall be passed.
Section 9 - Limits on Congress Attainder
Ex post facto
1st. Every law that makes an action done before the passing of the law, and which was innocent when done, criminal; and punishes such action. 2d. Every law that aggravates a crime, or makes it greater than it was, when committed. 3d. Every law that changes the punishment, and inflicts a greater punishment, than the law annexed to the crime, when committed. 4th. Every law that alters the legal rules of evidence, and receives less, or different, testimony, than the law required at the time of the commission of the offense, in order to convict the offender.
ex post facto adj. Formulated, enacted, or operating retroactively. [Med Lat., from what is done afterwards] Source: AHD In U.S. Constitutional Law, the definition of what is ex post facto is more limited. The first definition of what exactly constitutes an ex post facto law is found in Calder v Bull (3 US 386 [1798]), in the opinion of Justice Chase:attainder n. The loss of all civil rights by a person sentenced for a serious crime. [< OFr. attaindre, to convict] Source: AHD In the context of the Constitution, a Bill of Attainder is meant to mean a bill that has a negative effect on a single person or group (for example, a fine or term of imprisonment). Originally, a Bill of Attainder sentenced an individual to death, though this detail is no longer required to have an enactment be ruled a Bill of Attainder.
Greetings everyone!
First off, I extend my deepest appologies, for not being in contact for so long. I had some Internet Provider issues, but have recently got that rectified. As to the volunteer mission, the mission is accomplished at Phase-II: listing all House of Representative-Speakers. Some of the House Speakers in each respective state, coulnt be found. So, either the Lt. Gov. or each Governor of the states in our country, will be recieving the Petition of Impeachment, for discussion and voteing on, to pass to the House speakers, when the time comes.
Speaking of that, once the votes after debate has been completed, then its the responsability of the State Governor in each respective state, to sign on, or ignore, the results; their choice, based on facts and evidence, of a Non-American President, with fraudulent Identity Documents, and crimes agiainst the people, based on the US Constitution and the Amendments there of, that show proof of the violations committed. Whereby the Final Phase now pending, is the US House of Representatives.
That 3rd and final phase, is where they must prove, they uphold the US Constitution and Federal Law, by recognizing and exerciseing the Rules Of Impeachment Federal Document with Petition (once sent). And thereby, installing the US Vice-President, into office, while the trial and subpoenad evidence, is brought before the House, for a major Impeachment Hearing.
The only question that remains now, is when do I submit the Impeachment Petition with Rules Of Impeachment Document Copy, to each State House; of the Senate, and House Of Representatives?
Again, its an honor to be a member, and to bravely face off the evil, New World Order attempts, and to serve my country, even if it be through the political means, and as backed by the rights guarenteed; by the US Constitution. I shall wait for a response, from the Chairman of this organization with his/her blessing, as to when this is to be initiated. God bless you all, our great nation; The United States of America, and the Citizens of our Free Country.
Sherry Anne68;
Of coursse, since he isnt an Ameircian citizen, and the forged documents taht no one wants to own up to , except Georgia SSA and the Courts, knows the truth like we do.
That is why Obama and others need to be impeached and charged for Treason. If the ones in congress dont do their job, under the rules of Impeachment, then they get impeached. Or the true Americans, become allies of the persecuted countries, that Obama feels, no need for permission is needed, and togethrer we and those countries face off with the US traitors, and Political Terrorists that have taken over our country, and the Koreans, Vietnamese, and Germans training on US Soil to murder us, if we stand for our rights to Civil War and Oppose New World Order. Remember the wise ole saying; "We either stand together, or FALL forever". Can you smell it? Smells like WAR, is not far away. Perhaps, back in the time of President Abraham Lincoln, they smelled that same
A Republic a political system in which the supreme power lies in a body of citizens who can elect people to represent them.
For this is what we are fighting freedom oldest enemy the passion of the few to rule the many that`s what is at steak it`s us or them one must die one must live.
Good evening everyone!
As of todate, all Senatorial Presidents, of each State of the Union with email addresses, have been accounted for. Out of the total accounted for, 85-90% had direct email addresses, where the others, expect a message, before any attachments to an email, will be expected.
So, as of tomorrow, we will OFFICIALLY move into Phase-III; Part A.
Phase III; Part A is where a Federal Level of Repeal, Nullification, and Petitiion of Abolishment (or all the above) will be researched, and used as a proper template, to abolish, nullify, or repeal all Executive Orders, FEMA Camps, Etc. to name a few. This could take awhile, and all I ask, is that you please bear with me. Once I have the research done, I'll give an update, as each Nullification document at the Federal Level is formed, and completed.
Then Part B, is simular to Phase II, where all House Speakers of each States Congress, aka House Of Representatives, will be accounted for, by lagit email addresses.
All that would remain, is the send off for Phase IV; which includes Impeachment to the Senate to vote on, in regards to the Non-American Citizen, Obama. The House will recieve the same and with additional attachments, of the Federal Nullifications, for each offensive, illegal acts, against the US Constitution. God Bless America, and my thoughts are with you all, and our great nation.
Our Senators and Representatives are for the most part blind to the threat of NDAA. If we cannot convince them of the danger then the only avenue is for the States to adopt counter legislation making it illegal to enforce. National Guard units nationwide need to be loyal to the people of their respective States taking orders only from their Governor, unless that Governor is a traitor. Nullification is the only way to fix this problem at the moment.
I agree. That is why this Impeachment Project is in 4 Phases. Currently were still in Phase II, where all State Senate Presidential Email Addresses are being accounted for, for the TBA Presentation ofImpeaching the Trojan Horse, that falsified his claims of being an American so he could be president of our great nation. Phase III, will be in 2 parts for the House of represenatitves, or as some refer to them as, State House of Congress, for each and every respected State.
Part A: Is simular to the Sneate House President~Email Accessability Information.
Part B: Will be a multiple version of the Section 1021 & 1022; Nullification process. BUT, will be for each Constitutional Issue that is otherwise a violation; at the FEDERAL Level. For example:
*Nullification of ALL Executive OPrders that cannot be found or otherwise referred to in the US Constitution, Bill Of Rights, Ammendments, & Declaration Of Independance
*Nullification of given powers to Dept. of Homeland Security and FEMA, and returning said powers back where they belong; the US President
*Nullification of ALL HR Orders, Bills, and includeing the Section 1021 & 1022; just to name a few examples. Once these have been drawn up individually, so they make sense, they will be attached to the Petition Of Impeachment, for each State of the Union's House Speaker, to address. All that remains, is for the Both Senate and house of Representatitves, to have support signed by a State Governor who is NOT a traitor, and present it to the Speaker of the House, in Washington, D.C. So, for the record, WE THE PEOPLE, (whether you believe it or not) are making history. God bless you and all Ameirican Citizens, and America.
Either we get this nullified, or history may repeat itself in Civil War; which can then become world war. We need to Impeach the President
ruxpen4u
I agree with you. Nullification is THE answer but most of the Governors, Senators and Representatives are either too 'dumbed down' to realize what they signed or are totally Complicit with this UnConstitutional Monstrosity!
The Current Administration is already plotting to dismantle the Second Amendment with a UN-backed Small Gun Ban. They will keep attacking The Constitution and Bill of Rights until it is completely gone.
If it means another Revolution to put a stop to this and Restore our Beautiful Republic so be it!
Red
If the states do not nullify executive orders the boat is being missed....
"RED HOT ALERT VIRGINIANS!!!! DELEGATE BOB MARSHALL'S HB1160 PROTECTING VIRGINIANS FROM THE NDAA IS UP FOR A VOTE TODAY, MONDAY, FEB 27. GOVERNOR MCDONNELL IS TRYING TO KILL THIS BILL BECAUSE HE IS NOTHING BUT AN OBAMA SOCK PUPPET!!!! YOU MUST SPREAD THIS WORD AND CALL YOUR STATE SENATOR NOW! ALSO CALL THE GOVERNOR AND LET HIM KNOW HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT HIS PROMOTION OF A FASCIST POLICE STATE! 804.786.2211" http://conview.state.va.us/whosmy.nsf/main?openform
This is great. I'm so glad and relieved that opposition to this treasonous law is starting to pick up. We need to send a clear message to Congress that they can't keep trying to tell us that this law doesn't apply to US citizens. I wrote to Marco Rubio and Allen West and they both say it doesn't apply to us and we KNOW it does. The wording is meant to confuse people and it's working because many people I've spoken to parrot the words of Congress that it only applies to foreign terrorists who are actively involved in terrorism. LIES.
When I get in an interview situation where I don't have time to get into the minutia of NDAA, I simply point out that the fact so many credible people see potential problems with it, and so many people have such divergent points of view on what it means should be troubling in and of itself. That means we are leaving it up to a Pres. Obama or Rick Santorum or whoever happens to get elected to office to protect my best interests. No thanks! SherryAnn68
MikeMaharrey-TenthAmendment
I agree. But we've got to get people to understand that our government is using this fear of terrorism in order to get us on board for taking away all our Constitutional liberties. My gosh, people listen to the media all day telling them they have to protect themselves from the big, bad terrorists and the next thing you know, we have the Patriot Act and now NDAA 2012. And no one in the media is even talking about NDAA 2012. It's like Twilight Zone...
SherryAnn68 I have been really frustrated trying to get signatures on my petition at change.org. The media is guilty of treason for their lack of coverage on such an important issue. When I ask people I meet if they know about this, not one has even heard of it. Most of them are very well versed in the election process, jobs, economy, and most other topics. But the NDAA? NADA. Notice how rearranging the letters translates into our civil rights?
My petition would have little impact and was written before it was passed by Congress and signed by the president, so the sections I enumerated have changed. Sign it and spread it where you can if you will.
Petition: Congress: Repeal SB 1867 Section 1031 | Change.org
SherryAnn68
Hi Sherry:
I too have written to my Senators Marco Rubio and Bill Nelson. I have also sent the Liberty Preservation Act to Governor Scott. I have made calls as well-all to no avail.
I also sent a Resolution to the County Commissioner (Mayor) and my Representative in the County I live in--they were ignored.
Rubio's Response was exactly as you stated-parroting the Words of Congress that it does not apply to All American Citizens. Absolutely Outrageous and an Insult to our Intelligence!
My sense is that they are 'AFRAID' if Americans Wake Up and Realize that it does indeed apply to them there would be major Civil Unrest.
I have been handing our Fliers and empowering people as I can to ask them to write to these Senators and their Representatives as well.
The Constitution is THE Law of the Land--EVERY Time, EACH Time!
RepublicRed
I agree with you, that Rubio and Allen West and others are insulting our intelligence. And what is really infuriating is that I keep reading these posts fro people who have heard some of them speak at Town Hall meetings and they're saying how great they are, etc., never once mentioning the fact that they voted for this treasonous law. The media isn't speaking about NDAAA so people are not informed about it so it's just being pushed under the rug. I just saw the YouTube senate hearing with Panetta and Senator Sessions and it was beyond shocking. Did you see that? Panetta admitted that he and Obama do not feel that they need Congress' authority to go into another country militarily; he said there are other ways to accomplish it, like the U.N., etc. This is really getting scary... This administration doesn't respect our Constitution at all...
SherryAnn68 My Senator is Roger Wicker and he does not see the danger either.
DrifanwulfUnbelievable. Maybe we should tell them that they need to inform Obama that it doesn't apply to US citizens because Obama knows it does.
www.pnsr.org Project on National Security Reform
http://econclubny.com/trusteesandofficers.asp Economic Club of New York
Fein to replace Holder!
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
Subscribe to entries
Subscribe to comments
All content © 2012 by Tenth Amendment Center
[...] Last Thursday, the Tenth Amendment Center, in partnership with the Bill of Rights Defense Committee and Demand Progress held a media conference with experts and legislators from across the political spectrum. On hand were a former Al Gore advisor and a former Reagan administration member. (full report here) [...]
[...] Last Thursday, the Tenth Amendment Center, in partnership with the Bill of Rights Defense Committee and Demand Progress held a media conference with experts and legislators from across the political spectrum. On hand were a former Al Gore advisor and a former Reagan administration member. (full report here) [...]
[...] Last Thursday, the Tenth Amendment Center, in partnership with the Bill of Rights Defense Committee and Demand Progress held a media conference with experts and legislators from across the political spectrum. On hand were a former Al Gore advisor and a former Reagan administration member. (full report here) [...]
[...] Last Thursday, the Tenth Amendment Center, in partnership with the Bill of Rights Defense Committee and Demand Progress held a media conference with experts and legislators from across the political spectrum. On hand were a former Al Gore advisor and a former Reagan administration member. (full report here) [...]
[...] Last Thursday, the Tenth Amendment Center, in partnership with the Bill of Rights Defense Committee and Demand Progress held a media conference with experts and legislators from across the political spectrum. On hand were a former Al Gore advisor and a former Reagan administration member. (full report here) [...]
[...] spectrum. On hand were a former Al Gore advisor and a former Reagan administration member. (full report here) The message was resounding, and echoed by the Jr. Senator from Loudoun Virginia on the floor [...]
[...] Last Thursday, the Tenth Amendment Center, in partnership with the Bill of Rights Defense Committee and Demand Progress held a media conference with experts and legislators from across the political spectrum. On hand were a former Al Gore advisor and a former Reagan administration member. (full report here) [...]
[...] Battle Against NDAA Crosses Party Lines Share this:ShareEmailPrintFacebook This entry was posted in News by admin. Bookmark the permalink. [...]
[...] Passes Virginia Senate by a Veto-Proof 39-1 VoteJames Madison and the Making of AmericaBattle against NDAA kidnapping provisions cross party linesThe Tenthers are Coming!Leaders unite across party lines to defend Constitution from [...]
[...] spectrum. On hand were a former Al Gore advisor and a former Reagan administration member. (full report here) The message was resounding, and echoed by the Jr. Senator from Loudoun Virginia on the floor [...]