<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On General Welfare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/20/on-general-welfare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/20/on-general-welfare/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:02:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; On General Welfare</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/20/on-general-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-904802</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; On General Welfare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 23:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=10214#comment-904802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] On General Welfare [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On General Welfare [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidblivefyre</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/20/on-general-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-902329</link>
		<dc:creator>davidblivefyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=10214#comment-902329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s make it simple.  Who could believe that the Founders could have POSSIBLY meant, no matter  how we try to prove it by their written words ....that they were  advocating and implementing INCREASED controls by a Authority (federal  govt)?

 

These, who fought and (many) died in order to remove the shackles of just such an &#039;authority&#039;?  It stretches belief to think so.

 

Their actions and lives prove that  their every intent was to Unite the states by Federal power in order to  present a united front to the rest of the world but in NO way become  another &#039;monarchy&#039; against either the individuals of a state or the  states themselves.

 

The &#039;general welfare&#039; clause has simply been lifted out of context (with  history and common sense) in order that SOME might control the few with  micro-management insanity.  Their motive? Nothing more spectacular than a easier life,  respect,  power and wealth - by controlling the business and wealth of the people  rather than protecting it. Which is their only justifiable purpose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s make it simple.  Who could believe that the Founders could have POSSIBLY meant, no matter  how we try to prove it by their written words &#8230;.that they were  advocating and implementing INCREASED controls by a Authority (federal  govt)?</p>
<p>These, who fought and (many) died in order to remove the shackles of just such an &#8216;authority&#8217;?  It stretches belief to think so.</p>
<p>Their actions and lives prove that  their every intent was to Unite the states by Federal power in order to  present a united front to the rest of the world but in NO way become  another &#8216;monarchy&#8217; against either the individuals of a state or the  states themselves.</p>
<p>The &#8216;general welfare&#8217; clause has simply been lifted out of context (with  history and common sense) in order that SOME might control the few with  micro-management insanity.  Their motive? Nothing more spectacular than a easier life,  respect,  power and wealth &#8211; by controlling the business and wealth of the people  rather than protecting it. Which is their only justifiable purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas McConnell</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/20/on-general-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-901609</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas McConnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 04:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=10214#comment-901609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly. If the government could do anything they wanted under the &quot;general welfare&quot; clause, there would be no need for the enumerated powers. And yes, progressive taxation is illegal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. If the government could do anything they wanted under the &#8220;general welfare&#8221; clause, there would be no need for the enumerated powers. And yes, progressive taxation is illegal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold Thomas Leonard III</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/20/on-general-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-901607</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold Thomas Leonard III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 04:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=10214#comment-901607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Everitt - That&#039;s why they had to ammend the constitutuion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Everitt &#8211; That&#8217;s why they had to ammend the constitutuion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tridus Drakthorn</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/20/on-general-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-901608</link>
		<dc:creator>Tridus Drakthorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 04:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=10214#comment-901608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blogged about the recent TRX radio episode 15 &quot;Unlimited Submission to Washington D.C.?&quot; at http://missouritenth.wordpress.com/2011/10/13/god-or-washington-d-c/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogged about the recent TRX radio episode 15 &#8220;Unlimited Submission to Washington D.C.?&#8221; at <a href="http://missouritenth.wordpress.com/2011/10/13/god-or-washington-d-c/" rel="nofollow">http://missouritenth.wordpress.com/2011/10/13/god-or-washington-d-c/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Chapman</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/20/on-general-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-901605</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 04:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=10214#comment-901605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://williamdbailey.wordpress.com/2011/10/04/the-general-welfare-clause-explained-by-the-framers-of-the-constitution/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://williamdbailey.wordpress.com/2011/10/04/the-general-welfare-clause-explained-by-the-framers-of-the-constitution/" rel="nofollow">http://williamdbailey.wordpress.com/2011/10/04/the-general-welfare-clause-explained-by-the-framers-of-the-constitution/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everitt Mickey</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/20/on-general-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-901606</link>
		<dc:creator>Everitt Mickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 04:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=10214#comment-901606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty much makes &quot;progressive&quot; taxation illegal and &#039;tax the rich&quot; doesn&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty much makes &#8220;progressive&#8221; taxation illegal and &#8216;tax the rich&#8221; doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Vaughan</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/20/on-general-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-901603</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Vaughan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 04:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=10214#comment-901603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent and very educational article. I think the key to reading the Constitution ins like reading Scripture. It must be taken in context. Since the Constitution limits in almost every way the role and power of the Federal government, an interpretation of this clause must be one which most severely limits the power of our government.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent and very educational article. I think the key to reading the Constitution ins like reading Scripture. It must be taken in context. Since the Constitution limits in almost every way the role and power of the Federal government, an interpretation of this clause must be one which most severely limits the power of our government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Chapman</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/20/on-general-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-901604</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 04:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=10214#comment-901604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Add this reading as well]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add this reading as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Lee Horton</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/20/on-general-welfare/comment-page-1/#comment-901601</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Lee Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 04:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=10214#comment-901601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the recipient of &#039;the general welfare&#039; is the various STATES of the union, not the citizens of the states.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the recipient of &#8216;the general welfare&#8217; is the various STATES of the union, not the citizens of the states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
