<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is DC Serious About The War On Terror?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/22/is-dc-serious-about-the-war-on-terror/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/22/is-dc-serious-about-the-war-on-terror/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:11:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DerekSheriff</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/22/is-dc-serious-about-the-war-on-terror/comment-page-1/#comment-303168</link>
		<dc:creator>DerekSheriff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4532#comment-303168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For whatever it&#039;s worth, I found this interesting quote from an article called: 
 
&quot;The War Over the War Powers&quot; by Joseph M. Bessette who the Tuohy Professor of Government and Ethics at Claremont McKenna College and Associate Director of the Henry Salvatori Center. He wrote: 
 
&quot;..Congress is also given the power to &#039;grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal,&#039; by which government may authorize private parties to use force in limited ways against foreign nations or individuals under the color of law. If captured, those using force would be treated as prisoners of war, rather than as pirates, murderers, or robbers. Many scholars take the assignment of this power to Congress as further evidence that the framers expected Congress to authorize all military conflicts, from full-fledged wars down to limited reprisals.&quot; 
 
So I assume that each and every private individual authorized by Congress to use force in limited ways against foreign nations or individuals under the color of law would have to have their own letter, contrary to what I wrote in my previous comment. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For whatever it&#039;s worth, I found this interesting quote from an article called: </p>
<p>&quot;The War Over the War Powers&quot; by Joseph M. Bessette who the Tuohy Professor of Government and Ethics at Claremont McKenna College and Associate Director of the Henry Salvatori Center. He wrote: </p>
<p>&quot;..Congress is also given the power to &#039;grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal,&#039; by which government may authorize private parties to use force in limited ways against foreign nations or individuals under the color of law. If captured, those using force would be treated as prisoners of war, rather than as pirates, murderers, or robbers. Many scholars take the assignment of this power to Congress as further evidence that the framers expected Congress to authorize all military conflicts, from full-fledged wars down to limited reprisals.&quot; </p>
<p>So I assume that each and every private individual authorized by Congress to use force in limited ways against foreign nations or individuals under the color of law would have to have their own letter, contrary to what I wrote in my previous comment. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is DC Serious About The War On Terror? &#124; The Ruthless Truth blog</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/22/is-dc-serious-about-the-war-on-terror/comment-page-1/#comment-303158</link>
		<dc:creator>Is DC Serious About The War On Terror? &#124; The Ruthless Truth blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4532#comment-303158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/22/is-dc-serious-about-the-war-on-terror/       Easy AdSense by Unreal  Bookmark It                    Hide Sites [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/22/is-dc-serious-about-the-war-on-terror/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/22/is-dc-serious-about-the-war-on-terror/</a>       Easy AdSense by Unreal  Bookmark It                    Hide Sites [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DerekSheriff</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/22/is-dc-serious-about-the-war-on-terror/comment-page-1/#comment-303077</link>
		<dc:creator>DerekSheriff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4532#comment-303077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very good article. Very well done!  
One question though, how would Congress prevent holders of letters of Marque and Reprisal from violating innocent people&#039;s natural rights? I imagine that they could have them sign an agreement and revoke their letter if the terms were violated. But from what I&#039;ve read about this issue, the original understanding was that Congress would still be responsible for the actions of the letter holders.  
 
However, it&#039;s almost certain that most of the people actually doing the tracking  would be local nationals working under the charter of letter holders and would not be directly accountable to the US government. This might not present a problem in some failed states, but in others, they would be subject to the laws and regulations of the host nation.  
This idea needs to be developed, refined and systematized. Even though I don&#039;t see Congress using this power anytime soon, it presents a reasonable alternative to both declared and undeclared wars and can be used as a talking point by Constitutionalists.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good article. Very well done!<br />
One question though, how would Congress prevent holders of letters of Marque and Reprisal from violating innocent people&#039;s natural rights? I imagine that they could have them sign an agreement and revoke their letter if the terms were violated. But from what I&#039;ve read about this issue, the original understanding was that Congress would still be responsible for the actions of the letter holders.  </p>
<p>However, it&#039;s almost certain that most of the people actually doing the tracking  would be local nationals working under the charter of letter holders and would not be directly accountable to the US government. This might not present a problem in some failed states, but in others, they would be subject to the laws and regulations of the host nation.<br />
This idea needs to be developed, refined and systematized. Even though I don&#039;t see Congress using this power anytime soon, it presents a reasonable alternative to both declared and undeclared wars and can be used as a talking point by Constitutionalists.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bo Asciu</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/22/is-dc-serious-about-the-war-on-terror/comment-page-1/#comment-303012</link>
		<dc:creator>Bo Asciu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4532#comment-303012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the term &quot;war&quot; is added to any proposal to congress that congress would surely turn down. But when the proposal has the term &quot;War On...&quot; in it, congress has to accept that as a necessary proposal and thus authorize funding for it. 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the term &quot;war&quot; is added to any proposal to congress that congress would surely turn down. But when the proposal has the term &quot;War On&#8230;&quot; in it, congress has to accept that as a necessary proposal and thus authorize funding for it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/22/is-dc-serious-about-the-war-on-terror/comment-page-1/#comment-302891</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4532#comment-302891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[agreed!! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/22/is-dc-serious-about-the-war-on-terror/comment-page-1/#comment-302890</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4532#comment-302890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[no  just serious about getting more power! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no  just serious about getting more power! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/22/is-dc-serious-about-the-war-on-terror/comment-page-1/#comment-302888</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 06:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4532#comment-302888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by RonPaul_2012: Is DC Serious About The War On Terror? http://bit.ly/61yuwo #tlot #tcot #RonPaul...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by RonPaul_2012: Is DC Serious About The War On Terror? <a href="http://bit.ly/61yuwo" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/61yuwo</a> #tlot #tcot #RonPaul&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Paul Fan</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/22/is-dc-serious-about-the-war-on-terror/comment-page-1/#comment-302839</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Paul Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=4532#comment-302839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice article.  Makes a lot of sense.  Bring the troops home. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.  Makes a lot of sense.  Bring the troops home. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
