Comments on: Nullification: Firearms Freedom Act Introduced in Ohio

By: Rep. Espinoza introduces bill barring enforcement of gun laws | New Mexico Telegram

Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:30:52 +0000

[...] laws, such as the one in Ohio, have specifically cited the 10th Amendment in their attempts to make themselves exempt from gun [...]

By: Another State Introduces Firearms Freedom Act « Locust blog

Another State Introduces Firearms Freedom Act « Locust blog — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:37:17 +0000

[...] See the report here. [...]

By: The Growing Movement to Nullify Federal Gun Laws | The Ruthless Truth blog

The Growing Movement to Nullify Federal Gun Laws | The Ruthless Truth blog — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:47:58 +0000

[...] See the report here. [...]

By: The Growing Movement to Nullify Federal Gun Laws | Tenth Amendment Center

Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:56:41 +0000

[...] See the report here. [...]

By: Ohio House introduces the ‘Firearms Freedom Act’ (HB-315) | Red Pills

Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:07:25 +0000

[...] See the report here. [...]

By: republic

republic — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:46:10 +0000

Yes, you may still keep your guns, and unless the BATF retaliates, you will still be able to purchase guns from your local FFL, or if you have a C&R, from thos who are allowed to sell and ship to C&R holders. It probably is not in the BATFs interest to retaliate, because it would bring a major challenge against the Firearms Act on clearly constitutional grounds of due process and equal protection.

republic

By: republic

republic — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:42:30 +0000

The Articles are still in effect and they provide your remedy. Basically if its your property, you can take it wherever you please. The states cant start making laws forcing you to leave your property behind, and the federal commerce clause does not effect one's personal property during a move.

"The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different States in this Union, the free inhabitants of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds, and fugitives from justice excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States; and the people of each State shall free ingress and regress to and from any other State, and shall enjoy therein all the privileges of trade and commerce, subject to the same duties, impositions, and restrictions as the inhabitants thereof respectively, provided that such restrictions shall not extend so far as to prevent the removal of property imported into any State, to any other State, of which the owner is an inhabitant; provided also that no imposition, duties or restriction shall be laid by any State, on the property of the United States, or either of them."

republic

By: The Right Side of Life » Healthcare Update: TX May Opt Out of ObamaCare; Rep. Intros Bill to Privatize Medicare

Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:08:39 +0000

[...] Nullification: Firearms Freedom Act Introduced in Ohio (TenthAmendmentCenter) [...]

By: Messianic Panarchist

Messianic Panarchist — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:08:19 +0000

I agree – it should have said "the Constitution of the United States has not" instead of "the congress of the United States has not"

By: Ol' Grey Ghost

Ol' Grey Ghost — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:06:49 +0000

I was using the term, "resolutions," in the generic sense to describe the activities of several of the States, including "The Republic," over the last few years but I appreciate the clarification, Michael, over what is going on in Ohio. May the Buckeyes give hell to the BATFEenks.

"The 'shot heard round the world' came from the barrel of a privately owned firearm that belonged to a British citizen who happened to be an American colonist who had joined with his neighbors to form a militia to resist the British army in its efforts to confiscate the musket, ball, and powder that were the physical components of the 'shot heard round the world.' Will we ever hear such a shot again?"