<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nullification: Firearms Freedom Act Introduced in Ohio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/21/nullification-firearms-freedom-act-introduced-in-ohio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/21/nullification-firearms-freedom-act-introduced-in-ohio/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:41:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Another State Introduces Firearms Freedom Act &#171; Locust blog</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/21/nullification-firearms-freedom-act-introduced-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-292255</link>
		<dc:creator>Another State Introduces Firearms Freedom Act &#171; Locust blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3475#comment-292255</guid>
		<description>[...] See the report  here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See the report  here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Growing Movement to Nullify Federal Gun Laws &#124; The Ruthless Truth blog</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/21/nullification-firearms-freedom-act-introduced-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-292197</link>
		<dc:creator>The Growing Movement to Nullify Federal Gun Laws &#124; The Ruthless Truth blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3475#comment-292197</guid>
		<description>[...] See the report here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See the report here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Growing Movement to Nullify Federal Gun Laws&#160;&#124;&#160;Tenth Amendment Center</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/21/nullification-firearms-freedom-act-introduced-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-291392</link>
		<dc:creator>The Growing Movement to Nullify Federal Gun Laws&#160;&#124;&#160;Tenth Amendment Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3475#comment-291392</guid>
		<description>[...] See the report here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See the report here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ohio House introduces the &#8216;Firearms Freedom Act&#8217; (HB-315) &#124; Red Pills</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/21/nullification-firearms-freedom-act-introduced-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-291326</link>
		<dc:creator>Ohio House introduces the &#8216;Firearms Freedom Act&#8217; (HB-315) &#124; Red Pills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3475#comment-291326</guid>
		<description>[...] See the report here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See the report here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: republic</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/21/nullification-firearms-freedom-act-introduced-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-291012</link>
		<dc:creator>republic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3475#comment-291012</guid>
		<description>Yes, you may still keep your guns, and unless the BATF retaliates, you will still be able to purchase guns from your local FFL, or if you have a C&amp;R, from thos who are allowed to sell and ship to C&amp;R holders.  It probably is not in the BATFs interest to retaliate, because it would bring a major challenge against the Firearms Act on clearly constitutional grounds of due process and equal protection. 
 
republic </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you may still keep your guns, and unless the BATF retaliates, you will still be able to purchase guns from your local FFL, or if you have a C&amp;R, from thos who are allowed to sell and ship to C&amp;R holders.  It probably is not in the BATFs interest to retaliate, because it would bring a major challenge against the Firearms Act on clearly constitutional grounds of due process and equal protection. </p>
<p>republic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: republic</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/21/nullification-firearms-freedom-act-introduced-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-291009</link>
		<dc:creator>republic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3475#comment-291009</guid>
		<description>The Articles are still in effect and they provide your remedy.  Basically if its your property, you can take it wherever you please.  The states cant start making laws forcing you to leave your property behind, and the federal commerce clause does not effect one&#039;s personal property during a move. 
 
&quot;The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different States in this Union, the free inhabitants of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds, and fugitives from justice excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States; and the people of each State shall free ingress and regress to and from any other State, and shall enjoy therein all the privileges of trade and commerce, subject to the same duties, impositions, and restrictions as the inhabitants thereof respectively, provided that such restrictions shall not extend so far as to prevent the removal of property imported into any State, to any other State, of which the owner is an inhabitant; provided also that no imposition, duties or restriction shall be laid by any State, on the property of the United States, or either of them.&quot; 
 
republic </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Articles are still in effect and they provide your remedy.  Basically if its your property, you can take it wherever you please.  The states cant start making laws forcing you to leave your property behind, and the federal commerce clause does not effect one&#039;s personal property during a move. </p>
<p>&quot;The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different States in this Union, the free inhabitants of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds, and fugitives from justice excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States; and the people of each State shall free ingress and regress to and from any other State, and shall enjoy therein all the privileges of trade and commerce, subject to the same duties, impositions, and restrictions as the inhabitants thereof respectively, provided that such restrictions shall not extend so far as to prevent the removal of property imported into any State, to any other State, of which the owner is an inhabitant; provided also that no imposition, duties or restriction shall be laid by any State, on the property of the United States, or either of them.&quot; </p>
<p>republic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Right Side of Life &#187; Healthcare Update: TX May Opt Out of ObamaCare; Rep. Intros Bill to Privatize Medicare</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/21/nullification-firearms-freedom-act-introduced-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-290266</link>
		<dc:creator>The Right Side of Life &#187; Healthcare Update: TX May Opt Out of ObamaCare; Rep. Intros Bill to Privatize Medicare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3475#comment-290266</guid>
		<description>[...] Nullification: Firearms Freedom Act Introduced in Ohio (TenthAmendmentCenter) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nullification: Firearms Freedom Act Introduced in Ohio (TenthAmendmentCenter) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messianic Panarchist</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/21/nullification-firearms-freedom-act-introduced-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-290216</link>
		<dc:creator>Messianic Panarchist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3475#comment-290216</guid>
		<description>I agree - it should have said &quot;the Constitution of the United States has not&quot; instead of &quot;the congress of the United States has not&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; it should have said &quot;the Constitution of the United States has not&quot; instead of &quot;the congress of the United States has not&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ol&#039; Grey Ghost</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/21/nullification-firearms-freedom-act-introduced-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-290195</link>
		<dc:creator>Ol&#039; Grey Ghost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3475#comment-290195</guid>
		<description>I was using the term, &quot;resolutions,&quot; in the generic sense to describe the activities of several of the States, including &quot;The Republic,&quot; over the last few years but I appreciate the clarification, Michael, over what is going on in Ohio.  May the Buckeyes give hell to the BATFEenks. 
 
&quot;The &#039;shot heard round the world&#039; came from the barrel of a privately owned firearm that belonged to a British citizen who happened to be an American colonist who had joined with his neighbors to form a militia to resist the British army in its efforts to confiscate the musket, ball, and powder that were the physical components of the &#039;shot heard round the world.&#039;  Will we ever hear such a shot again?&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was using the term, &quot;resolutions,&quot; in the generic sense to describe the activities of several of the States, including &quot;The Republic,&quot; over the last few years but I appreciate the clarification, Michael, over what is going on in Ohio.  May the Buckeyes give hell to the BATFEenks. </p>
<p>&quot;The &#039;shot heard round the world&#039; came from the barrel of a privately owned firearm that belonged to a British citizen who happened to be an American colonist who had joined with his neighbors to form a militia to resist the British army in its efforts to confiscate the musket, ball, and powder that were the physical components of the &#039;shot heard round the world.&#039;  Will we ever hear such a shot again?&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelBoldin</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/21/nullification-firearms-freedom-act-introduced-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-290188</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelBoldin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3475#comment-290188</guid>
		<description>Richard, as I noted to Ghost below, this is not a &quot;sovereignty resolution&quot; it&#039;s a bill - which if passed, will become law.  
 
And as far as defying states, the last time the states defied the feds in massive numbers, there was NO war.   
 
14 states are currently defying federal law on medical marijuana - and now the feds are backing off even more. 
 
25 states have defied the feds on Real ID - and there were no threats about funding or money - the fact that the IRS collects taxes doesn&#039;t matter either.  there were no troops or threats - the law is virtually null and void at this point.  It&#039;s not fully dead, but pretty darn close. 
 
So what happens when states defy the feds?  Your liberty has a better chance. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, as I noted to Ghost below, this is not a &quot;sovereignty resolution&quot; it&#039;s a bill &#8211; which if passed, will become law.  </p>
<p>And as far as defying states, the last time the states defied the feds in massive numbers, there was NO war.   </p>
<p>14 states are currently defying federal law on medical marijuana &#8211; and now the feds are backing off even more. </p>
<p>25 states have defied the feds on Real ID &#8211; and there were no threats about funding or money &#8211; the fact that the IRS collects taxes doesn&#039;t matter either.  there were no troops or threats &#8211; the law is virtually null and void at this point.  It&#039;s not fully dead, but pretty darn close. </p>
<p>So what happens when states defy the feds?  Your liberty has a better chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

