Well, I’m no fan of Dr. Paul’s brand of ‘libertarianism,’ but he’s been consistent ‘on this’ as always. And that consistency is laudable.

My problems with Dr. Paul have more to do with his inability to distinguish between his libertarianism and … everyone else’s. Whether he likes it or not, some people don’t adhere to his worldview. Period. It doesn’t matter whether his is the correct worldview or not. The facts are the facts. End of story. My own opinion is that pure libertarians should start (with our assistance) their own, self-governing, independent society. When we check in on them ten years down the road, that they’ve dropped their libertarianism in large measure should not surprise us. …

This is a 52 year old man who has never held a job longer then a couple of months AT BEST.. His current “career” is telemarketing, selling insurance.. he has been there since the beginning of June so he is almost ready for retirement. It is situations like this that make labor camps look appealing, if a perfectly healthy man of sound mind refuses to eek out a living, he should be either cut off from social programs, or volunteer for social programs..What sucks about this answer is I am totally against that kind of oppressive government.. But I am even more against the mentality of sucking off the hard working public in the way of free handouts without any oversight…The next option would be banishment.. “devils island”.. give them a plot of land, and a some live stock and let them live or die on their own merits, review their progress annually for consideration back to society…My imagination sometimes runs wild…

Uhh, I have a sister of the same caliber. Believe me when I say that were it up to me he would, quite literally, be begging for my indulgence.

Now, I try my best to operate within the law. But if it comes down to protecting my own, he’s going to come up on the short end of it, end of story. I’ve also transmistted this opinion to the local ‘powers that be’ as both a warning and a commonsensical approach. They have responded in a manner consistent with my view, i.e., the D.A. is going to take this and ‘run with it.’ She may not think it appropriate, but I personally will not allow him to murder her at his own discretion. In other words, he’ll go down first. And I’ll personally see to it.

Come get me.

If that’s somehow considered advocating “violence,” then so be it.

I would venture to say that the majority of people who fall into the category of “Need” are of the same caliber of my Sister and her winner of a husband.

I’m not talking about a panel assigned by a government agency or whatever. As I said above, I’d first put an end to ALL government “charity,” and turn the job over to private charitable organizations where it should have been left to begin with. The ‘panel’ (or ‘board’ or whatever you want to call it) would be formed of members thereof. Since they would be residents of the same towns and districts and neighborhoods as the aforementioned ‘needy,’ they would be wholly better equipped to determine between cases. There would be “government” or “governing” involved, of course, but that’s purely necessary to any functioning entity right down to the family and individual levels.