Is there a way to attach it here in PDF?

Much discussion has evolved around the question of whether the various state sovereignty declarations are meaningful legislation, or merely symbolic statements. I would submit to you, (with out going into a lengthy discussion of similarities and differences), the state sovereignty declarations and the Declaration Of Independence are basically the same. Both documents put a usurping, overreaching, and abusive authority on notice that they the colonies/state are going to assert their independence, and no longer comply with the mandates of said authority. Both documents are statements of intent, but without the force of action carry no authority on their own. As we all know the Declaration Of Independence turned out to be an awesome document by force of action of the Revolutionary war.

In order to put force of action into our state sovereignty declaration, we are sending a petition throughout the state via the teaparty movement requesting the Governor and Legislators enforce their statements as set forth in their sovereignty declaration. The petition also carries a clause requesting that the state refuse all federal funding with mandates and spending guidelines that encroach on the state’s 10th Amendment rights.

The petition serves several purposes. 1. It gives the people a chance for active participation in the fight against the “Feds” 2. It is a vehicle for uniting the various state Teaparty groups into a potential coalition of political action. 3. And as the petition gains exposer throughout the state, it is putting pressure on the Governor and Legislators to respond to the “Feds” unconstitutional mandates by preemptive legislation, which I would describe as “Nullification”.

I would be pleased to share this petition with any of you in other states, as perhaps it could serve as a template for a proactive movement in your state. I firmly believe our only chance for survival as a nation is for the states to put this Federal monster back into it’s original constitutional cage, and the more states that join this movement, the better our chance for survival as the Republic intended by our founders.

Certainly,if the production of goods and services are allowed to proceed without the current level of federal intervention, guidelines, tax, and oversight. this would promote the growth needed. But as it is now, companies that are required to pay federal income tax every month, are required to submit to federal regulations, are limited by guidelines are effectively hamstrung..
Savings to States would include
Environmental taxes,
Communications and air transportation taxes,
Fuel taxes,
Tax on the first retail sale of heavy trucks, tractors and trailers,
Luxury tax on passenger cars, and
Manufacturers’ taxes on the sale or use of a variety of different products.

This is of coarse a very short list, But as you can see, eliminating the federal equation would promote growth in a number of sectors.

That said, it would be unwise for a state to “create a bubble” so to speak, an open market in which the unrestricted flow of goods and services is healthy for the economy.

In light of this projected poverty, my next question is: Is it possible to form a bubble of economic stability within the borders of an individual state by the use of very wise legislation and cooperation of the citizens? The success of this concept would vary depending on the resources of each individual state, thus the need for commerce between states. All this speculation on my part is predicated on the assumption that the state has successfully asserted it’s 10th Amendment rights, and will ignore the Commerce clause of section 8.

I LOVE IT!!!

If you get the chance, see what Gerald Celente has to say about the state of the economy, and where it is heading. To some he may seem like an alarmist. But he abhors politics, and has a knack of saying exactly what he thinks. Refreshing while others are tip toeing around the obvious train wreck-in-a-tunnel that we are in.

I understand your concern, and I admit it is a legitimate concern as I said in reply to Pete. It’s going to be tough medicine to swallow for many seniors who have actually paid social security taxes on the promise of receiving benefits when they come of age. For all the rest (people who haven’t actually paid net social security taxes), I literally have no sympathy whatsoever. But it doesn’t change the fact that social security is in a state of irrecoverability. Nonetheless, being a Bible believer myself I harken back to when the children of Israel were wandering around in the desert preparing to go into the promised land. At one point in the story God announced to them that everyone above twenty years old would first have to die out before he would allow them to occupy ‘the land of milk and honey.’ Hmm.