It is all perfectly logical and predictable why you would have runaway cost when you removal all practical cost selection from the healthcare market.

We can therefore guarantee that Obama’s healthcare plain will have exactly the same results as the practically identical plans already tried. as Einstein said it is a mark of insanity to keep trying the same thing and expecting a different result, particularly when all market mechanic tell you why.

The only way they are going to reduce or control the price of healthcare is by reintroducing price selection which they along with insurance took out.

Unfortunately in a government controlled plain that price selection is not yours but theirs. and thus the individual can only lose a most vital liberty from this.

The only thing a government plan introduces besides loss in individual liberty is the further usurpation of making you pay for the medical consequences of other people’s choices.

Even if government run healthcare were constitutional, wise, and feasible. it still wouldn’t be ethical or consistent with a people that values their liberty.

I see no possible necessity to justify imposing the will of the majority to the exclusion of the rights of the minor(individual) in this regard.

The fact that health care is not in the constitution further means that we did not consent to the possibility of this usurpation making it tyranny.
The US government does not have the right to impose this upon the people and if we are to respect the constitution we must nullify such actions due to their being beyond the scope of their legitimate (and thus respectable/enforceable) powers. I see no other way to maintain the republic then to up hold it’s constitution and not permit such usurpation. That being said the united state government and thus it’s constitution is not the agent of the people directly but rather the peoples states and thus it falls upon the state governments individual to uphold it’s constitutional limitations.

Gotta love it! http://www.viddler.com/explore/PalmettoScoop/videos/10/

one-size-fits all solutions are bad, not only because they create a constant state of divisiveness, but also because if you don’t like the politicians who are in charge, you’ll likely end up with just the opposite of what you want.

To think that you can write a multi-paragraph article without realizing this is sad, and says much about your ability.

That is, unless you have some alterior motive… which I suspect you do since you only list what the insurance companies did (raised rates) rather than how the people of the state (the same people you pretend to look out for) actually benefited. Here’s a hint, *they received good healthcare from the state at a very decent price!*

Why you say this as it’s a fact. You don’t know what the outcome is so please don’t say it as if it’s a fact. The only fact is that the current system doesn’t work good enough and in need of repair/ change/ overhaul. Offer suggestions to fix the problems but please don’t state your opinion as a fact.