<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: States&#8217; Rights Hypocrites Emerge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/15/states-rights-hypocrites-emerge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/15/states-rights-hypocrites-emerge/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/15/states-rights-hypocrites-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-254602</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 07:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1310#comment-254602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steven,

Maybe it depends on what you think an American is. What common ground do Americans have in their freedom of speech (arguing/debate/disagreement/protests, marches/petitions/Courts)?

If there is nothing common to the USA Citizenry then there are no Americans. Americans common ground is the Duty in Citizenship. Do you know what that Duty is? 

Article I, Section 2.of the Constitution and Amendments 5, 6, and 7, of the Bill of Rights explains â€œAmericansâ€ Duty in Citizenship which is Americans common ground.

Have you considered who is obligated to protect you from government abuse under the color of law? Check out FIJA

Also check out: http://www.kickthemallout.com/

Allan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven,</p>
<p>Maybe it depends on what you think an American is. What common ground do Americans have in their freedom of speech (arguing/debate/disagreement/protests, marches/petitions/Courts)?</p>
<p>If there is nothing common to the USA Citizenry then there are no Americans. Americans common ground is the Duty in Citizenship. Do you know what that Duty is? </p>
<p>Article I, Section 2.of the Constitution and Amendments 5, 6, and 7, of the Bill of Rights explains â€œAmericansâ€ Duty in Citizenship which is Americans common ground.</p>
<p>Have you considered who is obligated to protect you from government abuse under the color of law? Check out FIJA</p>
<p>Also check out: <a href="http://www.kickthemallout.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.kickthemallout.com/</a></p>
<p>Allan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BK Campbell</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/15/states-rights-hypocrites-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-254592</link>
		<dc:creator>BK Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 01:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1310#comment-254592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Lytle, The &quot;Amnerican People&quot; is a graduated term for &quot;We the People&quot;. We the people are not constrained by any principals other than our founding documents. These documents make The American People subject to the rule of law and that makes us united in that we all live in a Republic. If my explanation is unclear to you perhaps Allan or another poster with better word skills can express the concept more clearly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Lytle, The &#8220;Amnerican People&#8221; is a graduated term for &#8220;We the People&#8221;. We the people are not constrained by any principals other than our founding documents. These documents make The American People subject to the rule of law and that makes us united in that we all live in a Republic. If my explanation is unclear to you perhaps Allan or another poster with better word skills can express the concept more clearly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven W. Lytle</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/15/states-rights-hypocrites-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-254591</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven W. Lytle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1310#comment-254591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I take exception with the term &quot;the American people&quot;, as if Americans were somehow monolithic.  There is no issue on which all, perhaps even most, Americans agree.  Saying &quot;the American people&quot; is misleading, if not outright deceptive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take exception with the term &#8220;the American people&#8221;, as if Americans were somehow monolithic.  There is no issue on which all, perhaps even most, Americans agree.  Saying &#8220;the American people&#8221; is misleading, if not outright deceptive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/15/states-rights-hypocrites-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-254545</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1310#comment-254545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BK,

You said exactly my position â€“ the People must, are obligated, to enforce the law of the Constitution on all USA governments, Local, State, and Federal. 

Political issues are like carrots dangling in front of a donkey citizenry. If you know any political issue the People can resolve and have the power to resolve please post the issue and power?

I know of but one, the Oath of Office.

Gay marriage â€“ My opinion on the constitutionality of that matter is it is none of my, or governments, business. Licensing a â€œcontractâ€ (marriage between people) by government is unconstitutional; reference Article I, Section 10. Licensing a Right â€œinfringesâ€ that Right and therefore unconstitutional. 

The People allow unconstitutional legislation to remain on the books (enforceable by government when stupefying Jurors) by reelecting Lawmakers that enact such laws. 

Allan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BK,</p>
<p>You said exactly my position â€“ the People must, are obligated, to enforce the law of the Constitution on all USA governments, Local, State, and Federal. </p>
<p>Political issues are like carrots dangling in front of a donkey citizenry. If you know any political issue the People can resolve and have the power to resolve please post the issue and power?</p>
<p>I know of but one, the Oath of Office.</p>
<p>Gay marriage â€“ My opinion on the constitutionality of that matter is it is none of my, or governments, business. Licensing a â€œcontractâ€ (marriage between people) by government is unconstitutional; reference Article I, Section 10. Licensing a Right â€œinfringesâ€ that Right and therefore unconstitutional. </p>
<p>The People allow unconstitutional legislation to remain on the books (enforceable by government when stupefying Jurors) by reelecting Lawmakers that enact such laws. </p>
<p>Allan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BK Campbell</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/15/states-rights-hypocrites-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-254543</link>
		<dc:creator>BK Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1310#comment-254543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For my part and I encourage all supporters to do the same, I will visit as many political news boards and blogs as possible and direct people to this site so they may become informed. As Americans we will have disagreements but the one thing we should all agree on is the wisdom of our founders in making our land a Republic. Governed by laws and not people. Until now the task seemed too overwhelming for an individual to have any meaningful impact. The states rights movement breaks it down into managable bites. Each state has only their legislators to convince and if they cannot be convinced then it provides opportunity for new blood. This will also mean supporting some idea&#039;s many are against such as gay marriage and abortion. This is where the media as been able to divide us by making these type things the issue while ignoring the Constitution. They are in control of the battleground whether we like it or not. It is a pandora&#039;s box to debate interpertation of our rights. The tenants of the Constitution and Bill of Rights are stated quite clearly and on these things we must agree and then we will be united.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For my part and I encourage all supporters to do the same, I will visit as many political news boards and blogs as possible and direct people to this site so they may become informed. As Americans we will have disagreements but the one thing we should all agree on is the wisdom of our founders in making our land a Republic. Governed by laws and not people. Until now the task seemed too overwhelming for an individual to have any meaningful impact. The states rights movement breaks it down into managable bites. Each state has only their legislators to convince and if they cannot be convinced then it provides opportunity for new blood. This will also mean supporting some idea&#8217;s many are against such as gay marriage and abortion. This is where the media as been able to divide us by making these type things the issue while ignoring the Constitution. They are in control of the battleground whether we like it or not. It is a pandora&#8217;s box to debate interpertation of our rights. The tenants of the Constitution and Bill of Rights are stated quite clearly and on these things we must agree and then we will be united.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/15/states-rights-hypocrites-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-254542</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1310#comment-254542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BK,

From the bottom of my heart I thank you and the Tenth Amendment advocates for your efforts in citizenship. I support the â€œPeopleâ€ making any effort attempting to correct government but do not necessarily support their method. And I reserve the Right to disagree, I try to encourage disagreement, letâ€™s talk about it. 

In the beginning and the end the maintenance of America, the Constitutional Republic, rests squarely on the shoulders of the People, Americans and no one else or any other entity. 

It is perfectly clear to me, and history is my witness, that the Republic cannot be maintained by relying on political parties, professional politicians, political rhetoric, and arguing political issues, legislation (legalese), Supreme Court decisions, and gossip. 

Americans, the People, must enforce the Constitution on government and whatever he said she said does not change the Constitution, no matter who s/he is. 

Itâ€™s a tough cruel world and getting meaner daily and Americans canâ€™t do anything to correct the world but they sure can correct their government, clean their own house. 

I try to express the â€œconstitutionalâ€ power Americans have to correct government and try to deflate nonsense on that subject. 

Allan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BK,</p>
<p>From the bottom of my heart I thank you and the Tenth Amendment advocates for your efforts in citizenship. I support the â€œPeopleâ€ making any effort attempting to correct government but do not necessarily support their method. And I reserve the Right to disagree, I try to encourage disagreement, letâ€™s talk about it. </p>
<p>In the beginning and the end the maintenance of America, the Constitutional Republic, rests squarely on the shoulders of the People, Americans and no one else or any other entity. </p>
<p>It is perfectly clear to me, and history is my witness, that the Republic cannot be maintained by relying on political parties, professional politicians, political rhetoric, and arguing political issues, legislation (legalese), Supreme Court decisions, and gossip. </p>
<p>Americans, the People, must enforce the Constitution on government and whatever he said she said does not change the Constitution, no matter who s/he is. </p>
<p>Itâ€™s a tough cruel world and getting meaner daily and Americans canâ€™t do anything to correct the world but they sure can correct their government, clean their own house. </p>
<p>I try to express the â€œconstitutionalâ€ power Americans have to correct government and try to deflate nonsense on that subject. </p>
<p>Allan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BK Campbell</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/15/states-rights-hypocrites-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-254541</link>
		<dc:creator>BK Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1310#comment-254541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allan I may be slow but I eventually get there. In reading back over the post I can see that you like playing the devils advocate. I have no disagreement with that as there will surely be many that will not embrace states rights. They prefer the comfort and security of having a big brother even though it is a false security. I am not the one to be a spokesman for this movement. I am not a Constitutional scholar. A good wordsmith such as yourself would have me chasing my tail to prove my point with no problem. I do not believe we are in disagreement on the importance and benefits of the Tenth Amendment to the states. I am a registered Independant and know that way too much is made of one party or another by the media. The liberals are actually out front of the conservatives in promoting individual rights but the media will portray this as a right wing movement. It is up to those of us who support this movement to get the message out correctly and not let the media decide how it is portrayed. I will leave those finer details to people such as yourself and others on this board who can make the message coherent and bipartisian.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allan I may be slow but I eventually get there. In reading back over the post I can see that you like playing the devils advocate. I have no disagreement with that as there will surely be many that will not embrace states rights. They prefer the comfort and security of having a big brother even though it is a false security. I am not the one to be a spokesman for this movement. I am not a Constitutional scholar. A good wordsmith such as yourself would have me chasing my tail to prove my point with no problem. I do not believe we are in disagreement on the importance and benefits of the Tenth Amendment to the states. I am a registered Independant and know that way too much is made of one party or another by the media. The liberals are actually out front of the conservatives in promoting individual rights but the media will portray this as a right wing movement. It is up to those of us who support this movement to get the message out correctly and not let the media decide how it is portrayed. I will leave those finer details to people such as yourself and others on this board who can make the message coherent and bipartisian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pages tagged "submissive"</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/15/states-rights-hypocrites-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-254540</link>
		<dc:creator>Pages tagged "submissive"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1310#comment-254540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] bookmarks tagged submissive Statesâ€™ Rights Hypocrites Emerge&#160;saved by 10 others  &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;jua5hotmailcom bookmarked on 04/16/09 &#124; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bookmarks tagged submissive Statesâ€™ Rights Hypocrites Emerge&nbsp;saved by 10 others  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;jua5hotmailcom bookmarked on 04/16/09 | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/15/states-rights-hypocrites-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-254529</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1310#comment-254529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trouble,

For my part I hope this site is for open and honest discussion among Americans because the subject matter is of the most importance to all Americans. And IMO sticking to the subject matter is not taking sides.

Yes, you found one guarantee to the States, good for you, thanks.

It is my understanding the 1787 Constitution is not about the people or their Rights but about a government of a country. Even the Bill of Rights is not about the People, if it were about the People it would be unconstitutional. The Bill of Right forbids U.S. governments any jurisdiction over the people. The Constitution makes no demands on the People except those elected to government positions and then only in their official capacity (shall make no law, shall not infringe, etc.). 

The Constitution creates a federal government to protect the physical USA, settle squabbles between the States, and domestically very little else. In this context the People might consider the USA as their playground of freedom.

The federal government, with the aid of the States, has completely destroyed Americans playground of freedom. The only way the people can restore and maintain their playground of freedom is to keep government out of it and I know the only â€œconstitutionalâ€ way to do that is to vote to not reelect â€œLawmakersâ€ that enact legislation allowing government police and aliens to invade it. 

Will the People restore the constitutional Republic and playground of freedom? It looks very doubtful to me because the People are divided on and by political issues. Think about that one a moment â€“ what political issue do the People have the Right and Power so resolve? I think honoring, or not, the Oath of Office is the only political issue the people have the Right and Power to resolve and that only with the ballot box. How much more power do a free people need over government than hiring (or firing by not rehiring) Lawmakers every two years?

Allan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trouble,</p>
<p>For my part I hope this site is for open and honest discussion among Americans because the subject matter is of the most importance to all Americans. And IMO sticking to the subject matter is not taking sides.</p>
<p>Yes, you found one guarantee to the States, good for you, thanks.</p>
<p>It is my understanding the 1787 Constitution is not about the people or their Rights but about a government of a country. Even the Bill of Rights is not about the People, if it were about the People it would be unconstitutional. The Bill of Right forbids U.S. governments any jurisdiction over the people. The Constitution makes no demands on the People except those elected to government positions and then only in their official capacity (shall make no law, shall not infringe, etc.). </p>
<p>The Constitution creates a federal government to protect the physical USA, settle squabbles between the States, and domestically very little else. In this context the People might consider the USA as their playground of freedom.</p>
<p>The federal government, with the aid of the States, has completely destroyed Americans playground of freedom. The only way the people can restore and maintain their playground of freedom is to keep government out of it and I know the only â€œconstitutionalâ€ way to do that is to vote to not reelect â€œLawmakersâ€ that enact legislation allowing government police and aliens to invade it. </p>
<p>Will the People restore the constitutional Republic and playground of freedom? It looks very doubtful to me because the People are divided on and by political issues. Think about that one a moment â€“ what political issue do the People have the Right and Power so resolve? I think honoring, or not, the Oath of Office is the only political issue the people have the Right and Power to resolve and that only with the ballot box. How much more power do a free people need over government than hiring (or firing by not rehiring) Lawmakers every two years?</p>
<p>Allan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trouble</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/04/15/states-rights-hypocrites-emerge/comment-page-1/#comment-254520</link>
		<dc:creator>Trouble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=1310#comment-254520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just for clarity as I am not picking side in this discussion as of yet.

Article IV Section 2:
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Priveleges and Immunities of Citizens of the several States.

Article IV Section 4
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government...

There&#039;s at least one guarantee there.  Seems to me that our Lower (aka Federal) Government is most certainly in violation of Section 4 with all of the &quot;Do it or loose funding&quot; programs they&#039;ve pushed over the years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for clarity as I am not picking side in this discussion as of yet.</p>
<p>Article IV Section 2:<br />
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Priveleges and Immunities of Citizens of the several States.</p>
<p>Article IV Section 4<br />
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government&#8230;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s at least one guarantee there.  Seems to me that our Lower (aka Federal) Government is most certainly in violation of Section 4 with all of the &#8220;Do it or loose funding&#8221; programs they&#8217;ve pushed over the years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
