<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Georgia Should Declare Sovereignty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/03/01/why-georgia-should-declare-sovereignty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/03/01/why-georgia-should-declare-sovereignty/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:41:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: VINNY PATEL</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/03/01/why-georgia-should-declare-sovereignty/comment-page-1/#comment-254210</link>
		<dc:creator>VINNY PATEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 21:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=332#comment-254210</guid>
		<description>GA SR 632 is passed!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GA SR 632 is passed!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Boldin</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/03/01/why-georgia-should-declare-sovereignty/comment-page-1/#comment-253417</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boldin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 04:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=332#comment-253417</guid>
		<description>Jonathan, you&#039;re right about that!  As editor here, I&#039;ll take responsibility for an error that seems to come up quite often.  Fixed.

As far as the NH resolution - it&#039;s not necessarily saying that they&#039;ll secede, they&#039;re calling on the nullification principle - which means they believe that if the Federal Government continues to violate the constitution, the feds have nullified the contract - the constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan, you&#8217;re right about that!  As editor here, I&#8217;ll take responsibility for an error that seems to come up quite often.  Fixed.</p>
<p>As far as the NH resolution &#8211; it&#8217;s not necessarily saying that they&#8217;ll secede, they&#8217;re calling on the nullification principle &#8211; which means they believe that if the Federal Government continues to violate the constitution, the feds have nullified the contract &#8211; the constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Hale</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/03/01/why-georgia-should-declare-sovereignty/comment-page-1/#comment-253416</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Hale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 04:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=332#comment-253416</guid>
		<description>&quot;Last summer, Oklahoma declared its state sovereignty, and New Hampshire has introduced legislation that claims that if the Federal government oversteps its bound, it will succeed from the Union.&quot;

I think you mean &#039;secede&#039; ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Last summer, Oklahoma declared its state sovereignty, and New Hampshire has introduced legislation that claims that if the Federal government oversteps its bound, it will succeed from the Union.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you mean &#8216;secede&#8217; <img src='http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

