<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Any Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/09/04/in-any-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/09/04/in-any-case/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:41:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Buy ambien online cod.</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/09/04/in-any-case/comment-page-1/#comment-64617</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy ambien online cod.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/09/04/in-any-case/#comment-64617</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Buy ambien online cod....&lt;/strong&gt;

Ambien buy ambien online starting from per. Buy ambien online order cheap ambien now. Buy ambien online. Buy ambien online cod....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Buy ambien online cod&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Ambien buy ambien online starting from per. Buy ambien online order cheap ambien now. Buy ambien online. Buy ambien online cod&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Effexor xr photo.</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/09/04/in-any-case/comment-page-1/#comment-62059</link>
		<dc:creator>Effexor xr photo.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 07:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/09/04/in-any-case/#comment-62059</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Effexor generic....&lt;/strong&gt;

Effexor xr 37.5. Effexor xr. Effexor serious side effects....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Effexor generic&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Effexor xr 37.5. Effexor xr. Effexor serious side effects&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Order xanax with prescription.</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/09/04/in-any-case/comment-page-1/#comment-53919</link>
		<dc:creator>Order xanax with prescription.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 10:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/09/04/in-any-case/#comment-53919</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Order xanax online no prescription....&lt;/strong&gt;

Order xanax online. 2mg xanax order. Order xanax with prescription. Xanax mail order. Order prescriptions generic xanax. Order xanax overnight....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Order xanax online no prescription&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Order xanax online. 2mg xanax order. Order xanax with prescription. Xanax mail order. Order prescriptions generic xanax. Order xanax overnight&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: niggapuhleez</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/09/04/in-any-case/comment-page-1/#comment-30399</link>
		<dc:creator>niggapuhleez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/09/04/in-any-case/#comment-30399</guid>
		<description>&quot;reality&quot; seems too anxious to call other commenters facts into question. Thankfully, Joel tries to help &quot;reality&quot; understand the difference between voting to &quot;authorize the executive&#039;s use of military force&quot;, and voting for a &quot;declaration of war&quot;. A HUGE difference!

  Many &quot;intelligent&quot; Americans (such as &quot;reality&quot; and his ilk) today are totally satisfied to make moronic claims, assertions, and assumptions with limited facts and specious &quot;statistics&quot;. Unfortunately, such intellectual laziness is part of what has allowed our nation to slide into the quagmire in which we currently find ourselves floundering.

  I fully agree with comments that Congress has abdicated its duties, but not only regarding declarations of war; specific language on apportionment in the Constitution says Congress should have one representative for &quot;X&quot; number of citizens. Decades ago, the Congress agreed to &quot;disregard&quot; that guidance, hence, we have 435 representatives in congress. If the Constitution were &quot;obeyed&quot; today, we&#039;d have 1000 or more representatives. But these are the 2 most egregious offenses that rankle me most. 

  And by the way, Ron Paul wouldn&#039;t improve any of this with his &quot;libertarian&quot; ideology. However, he is the most innocuous of the Re-puke-lican candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;reality&#8221; seems too anxious to call other commenters facts into question. Thankfully, Joel tries to help &#8220;reality&#8221; understand the difference between voting to &#8220;authorize the executive&#8217;s use of military force&#8221;, and voting for a &#8220;declaration of war&#8221;. A HUGE difference!</p>
<p>  Many &#8220;intelligent&#8221; Americans (such as &#8220;reality&#8221; and his ilk) today are totally satisfied to make moronic claims, assertions, and assumptions with limited facts and specious &#8220;statistics&#8221;. Unfortunately, such intellectual laziness is part of what has allowed our nation to slide into the quagmire in which we currently find ourselves floundering.</p>
<p>  I fully agree with comments that Congress has abdicated its duties, but not only regarding declarations of war; specific language on apportionment in the Constitution says Congress should have one representative for &#8220;X&#8221; number of citizens. Decades ago, the Congress agreed to &#8220;disregard&#8221; that guidance, hence, we have 435 representatives in congress. If the Constitution were &#8220;obeyed&#8221; today, we&#8217;d have 1000 or more representatives. But these are the 2 most egregious offenses that rankle me most. </p>
<p>  And by the way, Ron Paul wouldn&#8217;t improve any of this with his &#8220;libertarian&#8221; ideology. However, he is the most innocuous of the Re-puke-lican candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/09/04/in-any-case/comment-page-1/#comment-30345</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/09/04/in-any-case/#comment-30345</guid>
		<description>*sigh* ... reality.  nobody&#039;s saying there wasn&#039;t a vote.  the vote that you are referring to, however, was not a vote to go to war.  

please spend some time on wikipedia looking up AUMF and the Iraq Resolution and then come back and read this article, and it will hopefully make sense then.  there was never a vote to declare war against Iraq by congress.

Paul... I think you&#039;re getting your facts skewed as well.  Do you honestly believe what you just said?  Let&#039;s say I own a pet grooming store.  Even under a libertarian government, do you think this would entitle me to declare war on, say, Mauritania on behalf of the united states?  

Libertarians do argue for a great deal of personal and economic freedom, however one of the cornerstones of the party is the non-aggression principle.  Please at least do some research before posting false truths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*sigh* &#8230; reality.  nobody&#8217;s saying there wasn&#8217;t a vote.  the vote that you are referring to, however, was not a vote to go to war.  </p>
<p>please spend some time on wikipedia looking up AUMF and the Iraq Resolution and then come back and read this article, and it will hopefully make sense then.  there was never a vote to declare war against Iraq by congress.</p>
<p>Paul&#8230; I think you&#8217;re getting your facts skewed as well.  Do you honestly believe what you just said?  Let&#8217;s say I own a pet grooming store.  Even under a libertarian government, do you think this would entitle me to declare war on, say, Mauritania on behalf of the united states?  </p>
<p>Libertarians do argue for a great deal of personal and economic freedom, however one of the cornerstones of the party is the non-aggression principle.  Please at least do some research before posting false truths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul -V-</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/09/04/in-any-case/comment-page-1/#comment-30333</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul -V-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/09/04/in-any-case/#comment-30333</guid>
		<description>Mark: Ron Paul would make the situation worse. He&#039;s a Libertarian at heart - that means he doesn&#039;t have a problem with corporations acquiring armies to enforce policies that benefit them.

As of now, the government has a monopoly on force. A Ron Paul presidency would allow private capital to declare war without the annoying middlemen we call &quot;congress.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark: Ron Paul would make the situation worse. He&#8217;s a Libertarian at heart &#8211; that means he doesn&#8217;t have a problem with corporations acquiring armies to enforce policies that benefit them.</p>
<p>As of now, the government has a monopoly on force. A Ron Paul presidency would allow private capital to declare war without the annoying middlemen we call &#8220;congress.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/09/04/in-any-case/comment-page-1/#comment-30315</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/09/04/in-any-case/#comment-30315</guid>
		<description>Epic Fail.

Show proof that there was no vote.

As far as I was aware Congress DID vote to go to war. Most of the Republicans voted for it, and I think the number was some 60% of Democrats also voted.


Next time, get your facts straight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Epic Fail.</p>
<p>Show proof that there was no vote.</p>
<p>As far as I was aware Congress DID vote to go to war. Most of the Republicans voted for it, and I think the number was some 60% of Democrats also voted.</p>
<p>Next time, get your facts straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/09/04/in-any-case/comment-page-1/#comment-30284</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/09/04/in-any-case/#comment-30284</guid>
		<description>Exactly why we need Ron Paul in 2008!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly why we need Ron Paul in 2008!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Politics: 2008 HQ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; In Any Case</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/09/04/in-any-case/comment-page-1/#comment-30230</link>
		<dc:creator>Politics: 2008 HQ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; In Any Case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 04:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/09/04/in-any-case/#comment-30230</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Tenth Amendment [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by Tenth Amendment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

