Once upon a time, there was a government so paranoid about its hold on power that it treated everyone and everything as a threat and a reason to expand its powers. Unfortunately, the citizens of this nation believed everything they were told by their government, and they suffered for it.

When terrorists attacked the country, and the government passed massive laws aimed at paving the way for a surveillance state, the people believed it was done merely to keep them safe. The few who disagreed were labeled traitors.

When the government waged costly preemptive wars on foreign countries, insisting it was necessary to protect the nation, the citizens believed it. And when the government brought the weapons and tactics of war home to use against the populace, claiming it was just a way to recycle old equipment, the people believed that too. The few who disagreed were labeled unpatriotic.

When the government spied on its own citizens, claiming they were looking for terrorists hiding among them, the people believed it. And when the government began tracking the citizenryโ€™s movements, monitoring their spending, snooping on their social media, and surveying them about their habitsโ€”supposedly in an effort to make their lives more efficientโ€”the people believed that, too. The few who disagreed were labeled paranoid.

When the government allowed private companies to take over the prison industry and agreed to keep the jails full, justifying it as a cost-saving measure, the people believed them. And when the government started arresting and jailing people for minor infractions, claiming the only way to keep communities safe was to be tough on crime, the people believed that too. The few who disagreed were labeled soft on crime.

When the government hired crisis actors to take part in disaster drills, never alerting the public to which โ€œdisastersโ€ were staged, the people genuinely believed they were under attack. And when the government insisted it needed greater powers to prevent such attacks from happening again, the people believed that too. The few who disagreed were told to shut up or leave the country.

When the government started carrying out covert military drills around the country, insisting it was necessary to train the troops for foreign combat, most of the people believed them. The few who disagreed, fearing that perhaps all was not what it seemed, were shouted down as conspiracy theorists and quacks.

When government leaders locked down the nation, claiming it was the only way to prevent an unknown virus from sickening the populace, the people believed them and complied with the mandates and quarantines. The few who resisted or voiced skepticism about the governmentโ€™s edicts were denounced as selfish and dangerous and silenced on social media.

When the government expanded its war on terrorism to include domestic terrorists, the people believed that only violent extremists would be targeted. Little did they know that anyone who criticizes the government can be considered an extremist.

By the time the government began using nationalized police and the military to routinely lockdown the nation, the citizenry had become so acclimated to such states of emergency that they barely even noticed the prison walls that had grown up around them.

Now every fable has a moral, and the moral of this story is to beware of anyone who urges you to ignore your better instincts and blindly trust that the government has your best interests at heart.

In other words, if it looks like trouble and it smells like trouble, you can bet thereโ€™s trouble afoot.

Unfortunately, the government has fully succeeded in recalibrating our general distaste for anything that smacks too overtly of tyranny.

After all, like the proverbial boiling frogs, the government has been gradually acclimating us to the specter of a police state for years now: Militarized police. Riot squads. Camouflage gear. Black uniforms. Armored vehicles. Mass arrests. Pepper spray. Tear gas. Batons. Strip searches. Surveillance cameras.ย Kevlar vests.ย Drones.ย Lethal weapons.ย Less-than-lethal weapons unleashed with deadly force.ย Rubber bullets. Water cannons. Stun grenades. Arrests of journalists.ย Crowd control tactics.ย Intimidation tactics. Brutality.

This is how you prepare a populace to accept a police state willingly, even gratefully.

You donโ€™t scare them by making dramatic changes. Rather, you acclimate them slowly to their prison walls. Persuade the citizenry that their prison walls are merely intended to keep them safe and danger out. Desensitize them to violence, acclimate them to a military presence in their communities, and persuade them that only a militarized government can alter the seemingly hopeless trajectory of the nation.

Itโ€™s happening already.

The sight of police clad in body armor and gas masks, wielding semiautomatic rifles and escorting an armored vehicle through a crowded street, a scene likened to โ€œa military patrol through a hostile city,โ€ no longer causes alarm among the general populace.

Weโ€™ve allowed ourselves to be acclimated to the occasional lockdown of government buildings, military drills in small towns so that special operations forces can get โ€œrealistic military trainingโ€ in โ€œhostileโ€ territory, and ย Live Active Shooter Drillย training exercises, carried out at schools, in shopping malls, and on public transit, which can and do fool law enforcement officials, students, teachers and bystanders into thinking itโ€™s a real crisis.

Still, you canโ€™t say we werenโ€™t warned.

Back inย 2008, an Army War Collegeย report revealed that โ€œwidespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security.โ€ The 44-page report went on to warn that potential causes for such civil unrest could include another terrorist attack, โ€œunforeseen economic collapse,ย loss of functioning political and legal order, purposeful domestic resistance or insurgency,ย pervasive public health emergencies, and catastrophic natural and human disasters.โ€

In 2009, reports by the Department of Homeland Security surfaced that called on the government to subjectย right-wing and left-wing activists and military veteransย to full-fledged, pre-crime surveillance.

Meanwhile, theย government has been amassing an arsenal of military weapons, including hollow point bullets, for use domesticallyย and equipping and training their โ€œtroopsโ€ for war. Even government agencies with largely administrative functions such as the Food and Drug Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Smithsonian have been acquiring body armor, riot helmets and shields, cannon launchers and police firearms and ammunition. In fact, there are now at leastย 120,000 armed federal agents carrying such weaponsย who possess the power to arrest.

Rounding out this profit-driven campaign to turn American citizens into enemy combatants (and America into a battlefield) is a technology sector that has been colluding with the government to create a Big Brother that isย all-knowing, all-seeing and inescapable. Itโ€™s not just the drones,ย fusion centers, license plate readers, stingray devices and the NSA that you have to worry about. Youโ€™re also being tracked by theย black boxes in your cars, your cell phone, smart devices in your home, grocery loyalty cards, social media accounts, credit cards, streaming services such as Netflix, Amazon, and e-book reader accounts.

And then there are theย military drills that have been taking place on American soilย in recent years.

In the latest โ€œunconventional warfare exercise,โ€ dubbed โ€œRobin Sage,โ€ special forces soldiers will battle seasoned โ€œfreedom fightersโ€ in a โ€œrealisticโ€ guerrilla war across two dozen North Carolina counties.

Robin Sageย follows on the heels ofย other such military drills, including Jade Helm, which involved U.S. Army Special Operations Command, the Navy Seals, Air Force Special Operations, Marine Special Operations Command, Marine Expeditionary Units, the 82ndย Airborne Division, and other interagency partners.

According to the government,ย these planned military exercises are supposed to test and practice unconventional warfareย including, but not limited to, guerrilla warfare, subversion, sabotage, intelligence activities, and unconventional assisted recovery.

The training, known as Realistic Military Training (RMT) because it will be conducted outside of federal property, are carried out on both public and private land, with locations marked as โ€œhostile territory,โ€ permissive, uncertain (leaning friendly), or uncertain (leaning hostile).

This is psychological warfare at its most sophisticated.

Add these military exercises onto the list of other troubling developments that have taken place over the past 30 years or more, and suddenly, the overall picture seems that much more sinister: the expansion of the military industrial complex and its influence in Washington DC, the rampant surveillance, the corporate-funded elections and revolving door between lobbyists and elected officials, the militarized police, the loss of our freedoms, the injustice of the courts, the privatized prisons, the school lockdowns, the roadside strip searches, the military drills on domestic soil, the fusion centers and the simultaneous fusing of every branch of law enforcement (federal, state and local), the stockpiling of ammunition by various government agencies, the active shooter drills that are indistinguishable from actual crises, the economy flirting with near collapse, the growing social unrest, the socio-psychological experiments being carried out by government agencies, etc.

And then you have the governmentโ€™s Machiavellian schemes for unleashing all manner of dangers on an unsuspecting populace, then demanding additional powers in order to protect โ€œwe the peopleโ€ from the threats. Almost every national security threat that the government has claimed greater powers in order to fightโ€”all the while undermining the liberties of the American citizenryโ€”has been manufactured in one way or another by the government.

What weโ€™ve seen play out before us is more than mere totalitarian paranoia run amok.

What has unfolded over the past few years has been a test to see how well โ€œwe the peopleโ€ have assimilated the governmentโ€™s lessons in compliance, fear and police state tactics; a test to see how quickly โ€œwe the peopleโ€ will march in lockstep with the governmentโ€™s dictates, no questions asked; and a test to see how little resistance โ€œwe the peopleโ€ will offer up to the governmentโ€™s power grabs when made in the name of national security.

Most critically of all, this has been a test to see whether the Constitutionโ€”and our commitment to the principles enshrined in the Bill of Rightsโ€”could survive a national crisis and true state of emergency.

We have failed the test abysmally.

We have also made it way too easy for a government that has been working hard to destabilize to lockdown the nation.

Mark my words, thereโ€™s trouble brewing.

Better yet, take a look at โ€œMegacities: Urban Future, the Emerging Complexity,โ€ aย Pentagon training video created by the Army for U.S. Special Operations Command.

The training videoย is only five minutes long, but it says a lot about the governmentโ€™s mindset, the way its views the citizenry, and the so-called โ€œproblemsโ€ that the government must be prepared to address in the near future through the use of martial law.

Even more troubling, however, is what this military video doesnโ€™t say about the Constitution, about the rights of the citizenry, and about the dangers of locking down the nation and using the military to address political and social problems.

The training video anticipates that all hell will break loose by 2030โ€”thatโ€™s barely eight short years awayโ€”but weโ€™re already witnessing a breakdown of society on virtually every front.

The danger signs are screaming out a message

The government is anticipating trouble (read: civil unrest), which is code for anything that challenges the governmentโ€™s authority, wealth and power.

According to theย Pentagon training video created by the Army for U.S. Special Operations Command, the U.S. government is grooming its armed forces to solve future domestic political and social problems.

What theyโ€™re really talking about is martial law, packaged as a well-meaning and overriding concern for the nationโ€™s security.

The chilling five-minute training video, obtained byย The Interceptย through a FOIA request and made availableย online, paints an ominous picture of the futureโ€”a future the military is preparing forโ€”bedeviled by โ€œcriminal networks,โ€ โ€œsubstandard infrastructure,โ€ โ€œreligious and ethnic tensions,โ€ โ€œimpoverishment, slums,โ€ โ€œopen landfills, over-burdened sewers,โ€ a โ€œgrowing mass of unemployed,โ€ and an urban landscape in which the prosperous economic elite must be protected from the impoverishment of the have nots.

And then comes the kicker. Three-and-a-half minutes into theย Pentagonโ€™s dystopian visionย of โ€œa world of Robert Kaplan-esque urban hellscapesโ€”brutal and anarchic supercities filled with gangs of youth-gone-wild, a restive underclass, criminal syndicates, and bands of malicious hackers,โ€ the ominous voice of the narrator speaks of a need to โ€œdrain the swamps.โ€

The government wants to use the military toย drain the swamps of futuristic urban American citiesย of โ€œnoncombatants and engage the remaining adversaries in high intensity conflict within.โ€ And who are these noncombatants, a military term that refers to civilians who areย notย engaged in fighting? They are, according to the Pentagon, โ€œadversaries.โ€ They are โ€œthreats.โ€

They are the โ€œenemy.โ€

They are people who donโ€™t support the government, people who live in fast-growing urban communities, people who may be less well-off economically than the government and corporate elite, people who engage in protests, people who are unemployed, people who engage in crime (in keeping with the governmentโ€™s fast-growing, overly broad definition of what constitutes a crime).

In other words, in the eyes of the U.S. military, noncombatants are American citizens a.k.a. domestic extremists a.k.a. enemy combatants who must be identified, targeted, detained, contained and, if necessary, eliminated.

In the future imagined by the Pentagon, any walls and prisons that are built will be used to protect the societal eliteโ€”the havesโ€”from the have-nots.

If you havenโ€™t figured it out already,ย we the peopleย are the have-nots.

Suddenly, the events of recent years begin to make sense: the invasive surveillance, the extremism reports, the civil unrest, the protests, the shootings, the bombings, the military exercises and active shooter drills, the color-coded alerts and threat assessments, the fusion centers, the transformation of local police into extensions of the military, the distribution of military equipment and weapons to local police forces, the government databases containing the names of dissidents and potential troublemakers.

The government is systematically locking down the nation and shifting us into martial law.

This is how you prepare a populace to accept a police state willingly, even gratefully.

As Nazi Field Marshal Hermann Goering remarked during the Nuremberg trials:

It is always a simple matter to drag people along whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country.

It does indeed work the same in every country.

Itโ€™s time to wake up and stop being deceived by government propaganda.

Mind you, by โ€œgovernment,โ€ Iโ€™m not referring to the highly partisan, two-party bureaucracy of the Republicans and Democrats.

As I make clear in my bookย Battlefield America: The War on the American Peopleย and in its fictional counterpartย The Erik Blair Diaries, Iโ€™m referring to โ€œgovernmentโ€ with a capital โ€œG,โ€ the entrenched Deep State that is unaffected by elections, unaltered by populist movements, and has set itself beyond the reach of the law. Iโ€™m referring to the corporatized, militarized, entrenched bureaucracy that is fully operational and staffed by unelected officials who are, in essence, running the country and calling the shots in Washington DC, no matter who sits in the White House.

Be warned: in the future envisioned by the government, we will not be viewed as Republicans or Democrats. Rather, โ€œwe the peopleโ€ will all be enemies of the state.

John Whitehead