Federal Health Insurance Mandates: Why You Canâ€™t Oppose them and Support Federal Marijuana Bans at the Same Time.
Is there any limit to what the Commerce Clause allows Congress to do?Â Â Letâ€™s take a look at the Commerce Clause, which states, â€œTo regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;â€
Though the clause has been extended by the U.S. Supreme Court in an almost continuous fashion since the Constitution was ratified, its 1942 decision in Wickard v. Filburn was a monumental extension.Â In issue in Wickard was the ability of Congress to regulate how much wheat a farmer could grow, when the wheat was not going to be traded in the market and would be used for the farmerâ€™s own consumption.Â Filburn was prosecuted for growing 23 acres of wheat in the face of a federal statute allowing only 11.1 acres to be grown.Â Â Filburn argued Congress had no authority to restrict how much wheat he could grow because the excess wheat he was growing was for his own use on his farm and not for sale on the market.Â Thus, he claimed the excess wheat would never become involved in interstate commerce.
In holding that Congress did not exceed its authority, the Supreme Court stated:
One of the primary purposes of the Act in question was to increase the market price of wheat, and to that end to limit the volume thereof that could affect the market. It can hardly be denied that a factor of such volume and variability as home-consumed wheat would have a substantial influence on price and market conditions. This may arise because being in marketable condition such wheat overhangs the market and, if induced by rising prices, tends to flow into the market and check price increases. But if we assume that it is never marketed, it supplies a need of the man who grew it which would otherwise be reflected by purchases in the open market. Home-grown wheat in this sense competes with wheat in commerce.
Above, it is seen that regulating commerce has been interpreted to mean regulating things that â€œcould affectâ€ interstate commerce.Â Â The Court ruled that excess wheat â€œtendsâ€ to find its way into interstate commerce, without any proof that the wheat in question actually does â€“ much like assuming that since black markets tend to arise when government limits supply, Filburn was already in that class of persons who trade in black market