by Rob Natelson, Electric City Weblog
Governor Rick Perry of Texas is getting some nice national press for endorsing a state â€œTenth Amendmentâ€ resolution stating, among other things, that â€œThat the 81st Legislature of the State of Texas hereby claim sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States.â€
Everyone seems to have forgotten that we went down this road not too long ago, and it didnâ€™t lead anywhere. In the early and mid-1990s, many states (including Montana) passed similar resolutions.
In fact, the Texas resolution is almost a word-for-word duplication of those passed in the 1990s â€“ including even the gross historical error that â€œthe federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states.â€
The resolutions of the â€™90s had littleÂ long-termÂ effect. One reasonÂ was the non-binding effect of mere resolutions. AnotherÂ was that you can say the states have all powers not delegated to the federal government, but that means nothing unless you define the powers of the federal government more narrowly than they are currently being defined.
At a time when states have become deeply dependent on federal revenue, state officials have strong incentives to cooperate with the source of that revenue.Â So when state legislaturesÂ did follow up in the â€™90s with more substantive legislation, governors and attorneys general often ignored it. A case in point was Governor Marc Racicotâ€™s failure to enforce the Montana Mandates Act.
Perry may be more serious than most: He was willing to turn down part of the Congressional stimulus plan. If he is really serious, heâ€™ll oppose any state budget that includes spending for other constitutionally-suspect programs.
If tea party advocates want anything more than resolutions, the way to start is to ensure thatÂ between now and the next election, they swarm all over our state and federal elected officials, giving them no peace until those officials begin to respect the Constitutionâ€™s limits on federal power.
Cross-posted from Electric City Weblog
Rob Natelson is Professor of Law and David Mason scholar at the University of Montana, where he teaches constitutional law and constitutional history.Â He is currently seeking a publisher for his latest book, The Original Constitution.
- The Meaning of “Regulate Commerce” to the Constitution’s Ratifiers: An Update - February 7, 2024
- Why It May be Impossible to Disqualify Trump from the Presidency - January 8, 2024
- What Does the Constitution Mean by “Natural Born Citizen?” - December 9, 2023