About Rob Natelson

In private life, Rob Natelson is a long-time conservative/free market activist, but professionally he is a constitutional scholar whose meticulous studies of the Constitution's original meaning have been published or cited by many top law journals. (See: www.constitution.i2i.org/about/.) Most recently, he co-authored The Origins of the Necessary and Proper Clause (Cambridge University Press) and The Original Constitution (Tenth Amendment Center). After a quarter of a century as Professor of Law at the University of Montana, he recently retired to work full time at Colorado's Independence Institute.

Author Archive | Rob Natelson

Constitution 101: Necessary and Proper Clause

A Colonial Pamphlet Helps Show Why the Constitution’s Necessary and Proper Clause Granted No Power

Continue Reading Comments { 0 }

“Taxes” are for Revenue. SCOTUS is Wrong.

Defects in the Supremes’ holding that the Obamacare penalty is a “tax”

Continue Reading Comments { 1 }

Thank goodness for the First Amendment

even the version the courts apply today is a lot better than what some are threatening to do in Britain.

Continue Reading Comments { 2 }

Obamacare and “Commerce:” Does A Include Not-A?

Rob Natelson on the eve of the Supreme Court’s decision over Obamacare’s individual mandate

Continue Reading Comments { 4 }

Beware the Word “Extremist”

In modern politics, the “extremists” are usually those labeling others with that word

Continue Reading Comments { 1 }

Another Federal Real Estate Screw-Up

One of the clearest messages from the American Founding was that the Constitution left regulation of private land within state boundaries to the exclusive prerogative of the states. This was an area completely outside the sphere of the federal government.

Continue Reading Comments { 0 }

Original Intent, Original Understanding, Original Meaning

Rob Natelson on how to uncover the original legal force of the Constitution

Continue Reading Comments { 4 }

The Disastrous Student Loan Mess

The American Founders would have called this “corruption,” and they were keenly aware of the potential.

Continue Reading Comments { 1 }

The Constitution’s Officers

If you read the Constitution carefully, you’ll see that the document frequently uses the terms “officers” and “offices.”

Continue Reading Comments { 4 }

Did the Founders expect the Courts to Declare Laws Unconstitutional?

the Founders expected the courts to void laws they found unconstitutional.

Continue Reading Comments { 29 }

Republicans Pushing Mandates on State Courts

House Rules Committee: “Violate Your Oath No Matter How You Vote!” It’s a stunning betrayal of all those hardworking, pro-Constitution Americans who gave U.S. House Republicans their majority. Republicans controlling the House Rules Committee have added sweeping new mandates on the states to a bill repealing part of Obamacare. The result is revised H.R. 5. Just [...]

Continue Reading Comments { 9 }