<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Nullification Unconstitutional?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/02/07/is-nullification-unconstitutional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/02/07/is-nullification-unconstitutional/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:17:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Woods: Is Nullification Unconstitutional? &#124; Liberty Hall</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/02/07/is-nullification-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-927459</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Woods: Is Nullification Unconstitutional? &#124; Liberty Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=21149#comment-927459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The logic of sovereignty.     Now on some level, we shouldn’t care: resisting violent people who claim the right to expropriate you and force you around is a natural right, and doesn’t rely on any parchment guarantee. But I for one prefer to address my opponents from every angle I can, including their own. These days we’re seeing a lot of      &#8230; MORE [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The logic of sovereignty.     Now on some level, we shouldn’t care: resisting violent people who claim the right to expropriate you and force you around is a natural right, and doesn’t rely on any parchment guarantee. But I for one prefer to address my opponents from every angle I can, including their own. These days we’re seeing a lot of      &#8230; MORE [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federal laws are valid and are supreme, only to the extent that those laws were adopted in pursuance of—that is, consistent with—the Constitution. &#171; Family Survival Protocol</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/02/07/is-nullification-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-927258</link>
		<dc:creator>Federal laws are valid and are supreme, only to the extent that those laws were adopted in pursuance of—that is, consistent with—the Constitution. &#171; Family Survival Protocol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 02:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=21149#comment-927258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Is Nullification Unconstitutional? (tenthamendmentcenter.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Nullification Unconstitutional? (tenthamendmentcenter.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
