Rematch: Texas takes on the TSA Again

  • Share on Tumblr

AUSTIN, Texas (Nov. 12, 2012) – On Monday, Texas Rep. David Simpson (R-Longview) pre-filed a bill to stop aggressive TSA groping in the Lone Star State.

The Texas Travel Freedom Act, House Bill 80, would make it a criminal act to intentionally touch “the anus, breast, buttocks, or sexual organ of the other person, including touching through clothing,” without probable cause in the process of determining whether to grant someone access to a public venue or means of public transportation.

The act also provides additional protection for minors.

A public servant acting under color of his office or employment commits an offense if he…removes a child younger than 18 years of age from the physical custody or control of a parent or guardian of the child or a person standing in the stead of a parent or guardian of the child.

If passed, the law would prevent TSA agents from carrying out the most intrusive pat-down searches at airports across Texas. Tenth Amendment Center communications director Mike Maharrey said it only makes sense to put limits on these types of personal searches.

“If you walk up to somebody and grab their crotch out on the street, it will land you in jail. Blue uniforms and federal badges don’t grant some goon the power to sexually assault you, or at least they shouldn’t. A person doesn’t forfeit her or his personal dignity with the purchase of an airline ticket.”

Simpson said that since the federal government won’t back off of these intrusive and unconstitutional searches, the responsibility of protecting its citizens falls to the states, and ultimately the people themselves.

“Abel Upshur’s words are pertinent to our cause. ‘It is indispensably necessary to maintain the States in their proper position. If their people suffer them to sink into the insignificance of mere municipal corporations, it will be in vain to invoke their protection against the gigantic power of the Federal Government,’” he said. “Note his emphasis: it is the people through the states – under God’s favor – that must ultimately protect the people of our states from federal encroachments.”

Simpson sponsored a similar bill in the 2010 legislative session. HB1937 unanimously passed the Texas House. A week later, the bill passed favorably out of the Senate Transportation and Homeland Security Committee. But a letter delivered to key senators from U.S. Attorney John E. Murphy ultimately stopped the bill dead in its tracks. With the pressure on, Gov. Rick Perry placed the bill on a special session agenda, but political wrangling ultimately torpedoed the bill.

Maharrey says more Texas lawmakers need to grow a spine and stand up to the feds.

“Last time around, leadership in the Texas legislature failed miserably at its most basic duty – protecting its citizens. Basically, they said, ‘Sorry, we’re afraid. So we are going to go ahead and let strangers feel up our wives, sons, daughters and grandparents.’ This will continue and get worse until somebody puts their foot down and says, ‘No!’” Maharrey said. “The feds say they will shut down the skies over Texas? Let them. And then let them explain to America that they are doing it because they want to continue molesting innocent people at the airport. Americans hate this crap, and I think it’s pretty obvious who they will stand behind.”

ACTION ITEMS:

If you live in Texas, begin contacting your representative and senator and let them know you want them to pass the Texas Travel Freedom Act. You can find contact information for your legislators HERE.

If you don’t live in Texas, contact your lawmakers and encourage them to introduce travel freedom legislation in your state. You can find model legislation HERE.

You can track travel freedom legislation across the U.S. HERE.

Get the New Documentary Today!

FULL TEXT OF THE LEGISLATION (HERE). An excerpt:

(a) A public servant acting under color of his office or employment commits an offense if he:

(1) intentionally subjects another to mistreatment or to arrest, detention, search, seizure, dispossession, assessment, or lien that he knows is unlawful;
(2) intentionally denies or impedes another in the exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power, or immunity, knowing his conduct is unlawful; [or]
(3) intentionally subjects another to sexual harassment; or
(4) as part of a determination of whether to grant another person access to a publicly accessible venue or form of transportation, intentionally and without probable cause:
(A) touches the anus, breast, buttocks, or sexual organ of the other person, including touching through clothing;
(B) removes a child younger than 18 years of age from the physical custody or control of a parent or guardian of the child or a person standing in the stead of a parent or guardian of the child;
(C) otherwise engages in conduct constituting an offense under Section 22.01(a)(3); or
(D) harasses, delays, coerces, threatens, intimidates, or effectively denies or conditions access to the other person because of the other person’s refusal to consent to (A), (B), or (C).

A public servant acting under color of his office or employment commits an offense if he…removes a child younger than 18 years of age from the physical custody or control of a parent or guardian of the child or a person standing in the stead of a parent or guardian of the child.

(c-1) For purposes of Subsection (a)(4), “public servant” includes:
(1) an officer, employee, or agent of:
(A) the United States;
(B) a branch, department, or agency of the United States; or
(C) another person acting under a contract with a branch, department, or agency of the United States to provide a security or law enforcement service; or
(2) any other person acting under color of federal law.

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?
26 comments
texliberty
texliberty

This may be the first and only time I've ever seen someone quote Abel Upshur.  Amusing.

Currahee101st
Currahee101st

Texas collectively pissed their pants last time when the Feds stomped their foot and say"Boo!" What will be different this time?

PeoplePower
PeoplePower like.author.displayName 1 Like

Get rid of the TSA, DHS, CIA, FED RES, IRS and any other alphabet government org that is in direct violation of the Constitution, Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence, and Personal Liberties of a US Citizen.

 

ChrisSharer
ChrisSharer like.author.displayName 1 Like

How about this.  Sheriffs everywhere, enforce the law!  It is already a crime to molest people without their consent.  It is a crime to molest children with or without their or anyone else's consent.  It is a crime without any statute, ordinance, proclamation of an executive, judge, magistrate, referee, commisar, tsar, king, queen, prince, librarian, or dog catcher saying so.  Next time a TSA goon molests someone, he should find himself in a cage.  Plain and simple.

WilliamSchooler
WilliamSchooler

@ChrisSharer

Very good point, without permission. But you are speaking of natural law and not these made up laws of protection right?

 

The crime is Life has no authority to impose on another life. The idea of authority the crime period.

Getting assistance to stand up for your life is what act? Life support?

 

danw21
danw21 like.author.displayName 1 Like

The way to deal with the TSA employees is to strip search them before they can retrieve their vehicles from airport parking lots. If they begin using taxicabs, the driver should perform a strip search prior to allowing them transportation to the jobsite.Dan

LNeilSmith
LNeilSmith

That reply wassupposed to beginwith the words, "Very weak,"

 

LNeilSmith
LNeilSmith like.author.displayName 1 Like

 

OffWithTheirHeads, especially from someone who lacks the guts to sign his own name.Yes,I have proposed capital punishment for politicians who violate the Bill of Rights. Yes, it must be public -- in a nation like ours, we all have a hand on the rope.What you fail to understand is the the Bill of Rights is a law, the highest law of the land. A law without a penalty is a joke. You want to live free? Well it _costs_ something. There must be Bill of Rights _enforcement_ or our rights will erode away ... sort of exactly as they have.I suggest you read my book _Down With Power_ which is available at Amazon, B&N, and other such places, on paper or in electronic format.Then we can have another conversation. Be sure to use your real name, though. That's what grownups do.

piolenc
piolenc like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

Quite right. The threat to shut the skies over Texas is an empty bluff. The Union needs Texas FAR more than Texas needs the Union. If the US government cuts off air commerce with Texas, it has in effect sanctioned secession - something I think even the most rabid Federal control freak might shy away from.

LNeilSmith
LNeilSmith like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

The great trouble with the Fourth Amendment, along with the rest of te Bill of Rights, is that the Founders neglected to include a stringent penalty clause. If a bureaucrat or politician's  punishment for violating a citizen's rights was life at hard labor, or death by public hanging, we might still have a free country today.

OffWithTheirHEADS
OffWithTheirHEADS

 @LNeilSmith That is right! If there were STRICT penalties for their DEVIANT behavior, there would be a lot less problems in this country.

 

The so-called DO-GOODERS are what has caused such a decline in our great form of government. Public hangings on Pennsylvania Avenue would sure go a long way towards stopping the loss of our FREEDOMS ! ! ! !

 

People just want to LIVE FREE without every little thing being blown out of proportion by elites trying to scare the bejesus out of everyone.

MattWilliams06
MattWilliams06 like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

The 4th Amendment already make search and seizure without probable cause illegal.

 

That's the government for you. They need legislation to declare illegal behavior illegal.

LNeilSmith
LNeilSmith like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

The fact that airports and aircraft are private when it suits the government and not private when that suits them better is at the heart of this problem. Since corporations are, in essence, branches of the government, enjoying powers and immunities special to their class, they must be made to bear the full weight of he Bill of Rights, even if it's necessary to pass a state Constitutional amendment to that effect.

 

One trouble with your bill is that it fails to specify remedies and penalties for having violated it. They must be absolutely draconian.

 

Finally, since TSA;s mission is creeping into bus stations, train stations and into private cars in the streets, states must pass laws restricting it to airports -- before it's abolished altogether.

a_shipley
a_shipley

as part of a determination of whether to grant another person access to a publicly accessible venue or form of transportation"  So, big problem here: the secure area inside an airport IS NOT a publicly accessible venue.  And airlines ARE NOT a form of public transportation. 

Michael Boldin
Michael Boldin moderator like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @a_shipley publicly accessible fits, legally, what the airports are.

ClintonCarroll
ClintonCarroll like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 5 Like

 @Michael Boldin  @a_shipley whether it is private, public , or government still does not give anyone the right to violate your rights and assault you, and no contract, including a purchase of a ticket or entry into an area can grant that without probable cause and a warrant, the fact that they are doing it does not make it legal

a_shipley
a_shipley

 @Michael Boldin  Right.  Go to the TSA checkpoint and tell them to let you in.  See how far you get.  The area past the checkpoint IS NOT public.  You can get in if you have a boarding pass, or gate pass, but that still does not make it open to the public.  It's a fine distinction, for sure, but it is what it is.

Michael Boldin
Michael Boldin moderator like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @a_shipley either way, welcome to our website.  I hope you get involved to help nullify....something.

Michael Boldin
Michael Boldin moderator

 @a_shipley I understand what you're saying.  But a legal definition is often different than a practical one.  If you want to worry about that, go ahead, but that issue is not what's going to stop texas from nullifying the TSA.  Not in a million years. 

 

There are other things to worry about to get this thing passed.  That includes the current house speaker and the governor.

WilliamSchooler
WilliamSchooler like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 4 Like

My understanding is there are several 1000 citizens of Texas working to secede from the United States which they should and would abolish these made up laws. Perpetuating more laws for bad laws is how much of this nonsense was created.

 

When we speak of nullify we don’t speak of making new laws we mean to eliminate these laws that do not support the life in these states. It is an act of standing up and putting authority where it belongs in the hands of the people who reside in this state. How much energy do we expel on how many directions and objectives? How much do you have?

 

Yes everyone of you disagree with this law as I and I see no reason to then create more laws that allows to keep this law in place. Remove the law, be bold about it and know who are the deciding. We waste a vast amount of time reacting to all the bad ideas that those who have not one other objective but to create them and then watch you react and spend all your energy imposing more bad ideas in reaction.

 

Why not nullify, why not secede from these bad idea makers, poor decision makers and very bad managers. Honesty to ourselves becomes the paramount and our focus of energy should be well targeted for the necessary actions of resolve.

 

I believe in Independence by working to live in this manner and this has no conformity to their system in any manner so may we focus and work wisely in the correct direction?

 

Isn’t it ironic we even have to have this discussion?

 

Trackbacks

  1. [...] whether to grant someone access to a public venue or means of public transportation…  Read More… Like this:LikeBe the first to like [...]

  2. [...] are pertinent to our cause. ‘It is indispensably necessaryRead the rest of this article at: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/11/12/rematch-texas-takes-on-the-tsa-again/ Click "Home" to find this article in English. Clic "Inicio" para encontrar este artículo en [...]

  3. [...] A person doesn’t forfeit her or his personal dignity with the purchase of an airline ticket,” commented the Tenth Amendment Center’s Mike Maharrey in response to the [...]

  4. [...] A person doesn’t forfeit her or his personal dignity with the purchase of an airline ticket,” commented the Tenth Amendment Center’s Mike Maharrey in response to the [...]

  5. [...] A person doesn’t forfeit her or his personal dignity with the purchase of an airline ticket,” commented the Tenth Amendment Center’s Mike Maharrey in response to the [...]

  6. [...] A person doesn’t forfeit her or his personal dignity with the purchase of an airline ticket,” commented the Tenth Amendment Center’s Mike Maharrey in response to the [...]

  7. [...] A person doesn’t forfeit her or his personal dignity with the purchase of an airline ticket,” commented the Tenth Amendment Center’s Mike Maharrey in response to the [...]

  8. [...] Texas is ready for Round Two against the TSA by Concerned Citizen window.fbAsyncInit = function() { FB.init({appId: "214987638512043", status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true}); }; (function() { var e = document.createElement("script"); e.async = true; e.src = document.location.protocol + "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js"; document.getElementById("fb-root").appendChild(e); }()); This press release was posted by the Tenth Amendment Center today: [...]

  9. [...] A person doesn’t forfeit her or his personal dignity with the purchase of an airline ticket,” commented the Tenth Amendment Center’s Mike Maharrey in response to the [...]

  10. [...] Rematch: Texas takes on the TSA Again [...]

  11. [...] the Tenth Amendment Center also announced that Texas Rep. David Simpson (R-Longview) pre-filed a bill to stop aggressive TSA groping in the [...]

  12. [...] the Potomac | a Chron.com blogGuest Post: U.S. Shale Goes Boom, Rest Of World Goes Bust | ZeroHedgeRematch: Texas takes on the TSA Again – Tenth Amendment CenterPetitions seeking White House approval to ‘secede’ now come from 47 states | The Daily CallerIs [...]

  13. [...] A person doesn’t forfeit her or his personal dignity with the purchase of an airline ticket,” commented the Tenth Amendment Center’s Mike Maharrey in response to the [...]

  14. [...] to the Tenth Amendment Center, the bill “would make it a criminal act to intentionally touch ‘the anus, breast, buttocks, or [...]

  15. [...] to the Tenth Amendment Center, the bill “would make it a criminal act to intentionally touch ‘the anus, breast, buttocks, or [...]

  16. [...] Source Share this:TwitterFacebookEmailPrintPlusDiggLinkedInStumbleUponRedditGoogle +1J'aime ceci:J'aimeSoyez le premier à aimer ceci. [...]

  17. [...] to the Tenth Amendment Center, the bill “would make it a criminal act to intentionally touch ‘the anus, breast, buttocks, or [...]

  18. [...] If passed, the law would prevent TSA agents from carrying out the most intrusive pat-down searches at airports across Texas. (Read more) [...]

  19. [...] (HB 2175), Washington (HB 1454) and Texas (HB 80) all have bills in their legislatures that would remove TSA’s immunity from criminal [...]

  20. [...] A person doesn’t forfeit her or his personal dignity with the purchase of an airline ticket,” commented the Tenth Amendment Center’s Mike Maharrey in response to the [...]