<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Taxes&#8221; are for Revenue. SCOTUS is Wrong.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/07/06/taxes-are-for-revenue-scotus-is-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/07/06/taxes-are-for-revenue-scotus-is-wrong/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:48:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Linda Manchester</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/07/06/taxes-are-for-revenue-scotus-is-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-931455</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Manchester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12981#comment-931455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please America, wake up!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please America, wake up!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Maharrey</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/07/06/taxes-are-for-revenue-scotus-is-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-931450</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Maharrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 17:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12981#comment-931450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ @onetenther One more...shorter.
http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/07/06/taxes-are-for-revenue-scotus-is-wrong/
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> @onetenther One more&#8230;shorter.<br />
<a href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/07/06/taxes-are-for-revenue-scotus-is-wrong/" rel="nofollow">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/07/06/taxes-are-for-revenue-scotus-is-wrong/</a><br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Maharrey</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/07/06/taxes-are-for-revenue-scotus-is-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-931449</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Maharrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 17:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12981#comment-931449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ @onetenther If you&#039;re in the mood to do some reading, this is a great scholarly  article on the meaning of &quot;commerce.&quot; It touches on the tariff/taxation  issue toward the end.http://constitution.i2i.org/sources-for-constitutional-scholars/legal-meaning-of-commerce-in-clause/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> @onetenther If you&#8217;re in the mood to do some reading, this is a great scholarly  article on the meaning of &#8220;commerce.&#8221; It touches on the tariff/taxation  issue toward the end.<a href="http://constitution.i2i.org/sources-for-constitutional-scholars/legal-meaning-of-commerce-in-clause/" rel="nofollow">http://constitution.i2i.org/sources-for-constitutional-scholars/legal-meaning-of-commerce-in-clause/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Maharrey</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/07/06/taxes-are-for-revenue-scotus-is-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-931447</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Maharrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 16:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12981#comment-931447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ @onetenther Natelson spends a lot of time in his book explaining the distinction and the historical basis for understanding tariffs and taxes. Quite honestly, I don&#039;t have time to get into it here.
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> @onetenther Natelson spends a lot of time in his book explaining the distinction and the historical basis for understanding tariffs and taxes. Quite honestly, I don&#8217;t have time to get into it here.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VinB</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/07/06/taxes-are-for-revenue-scotus-is-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-931446</link>
		<dc:creator>VinB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 15:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12981#comment-931446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ @Bob Greenslade Bob,  Thank you for the answer.
 
-vin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> @Bob Greenslade Bob,  Thank you for the answer.<br />
 <br />
-vin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onetenther</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/07/06/taxes-are-for-revenue-scotus-is-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-931445</link>
		<dc:creator>onetenther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 14:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12981#comment-931445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ @MikeMaharrey-TenthAmendment Do you have something to back that up?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> @MikeMaharrey-TenthAmendment Do you have something to back that up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Shuford</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/07/06/taxes-are-for-revenue-scotus-is-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-931442</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Shuford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 21:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12981#comment-931442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Emmmm..... It&#039;s Revenue... to pay into the HC Subsidy System. So: WRONG!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emmmm&#8230;.. It&#8217;s Revenue&#8230; to pay into the HC Subsidy System. So: WRONG!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine Langford</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/07/06/taxes-are-for-revenue-scotus-is-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-931441</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine Langford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 19:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12981#comment-931441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what does a country do when the leader does not follow the law but rather just declares what he will do? Intimidates the Supreme Court Chief Justice into ruling against the constitution he is sworn to uphold? What recourse does the nation have as nothing stops the FORWARD march of this unlawful regime?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what does a country do when the leader does not follow the law but rather just declares what he will do? Intimidates the Supreme Court Chief Justice into ruling against the constitution he is sworn to uphold? What recourse does the nation have as nothing stops the FORWARD march of this unlawful regime?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jefferson A Sweet</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/07/06/taxes-are-for-revenue-scotus-is-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-931440</link>
		<dc:creator>Jefferson A Sweet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 19:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12981#comment-931440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...and for the truth about the &#039;Federal Income Tax&#039;...

http://www.losthorizons.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and for the truth about the &#8216;Federal Income Tax&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.losthorizons.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.losthorizons.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EyeAmSMF</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/07/06/taxes-are-for-revenue-scotus-is-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-931437</link>
		<dc:creator>EyeAmSMF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 18:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12981#comment-931437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@TenthAmendment The losing side has 25 days from ruling to petition the Supreme Court for a rehearing of the #Obamacare case. Will they?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@TenthAmendment The losing side has 25 days from ruling to petition the Supreme Court for a rehearing of the #Obamacare case. Will they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
