<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rule of Law vs Rule by Lawyers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/05/30/rule-of-law-vs-rule-by-lawyers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/05/30/rule-of-law-vs-rule-by-lawyers/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:56:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rule of Law vs Rule by Lawyers &#124; Libertarios of America</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/05/30/rule-of-law-vs-rule-by-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-918275</link>
		<dc:creator>Rule of Law vs Rule by Lawyers &#124; Libertarios of America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 20:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12811#comment-918275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Court rulings, in the philosophyRead the rest of this article at: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/05/30/rule-of-law-vs-rule-by-lawyers/     Click &quot;Home&quot; to find this article in English. Clic &quot;Inicio&quot; para encontrar este artículo en [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Court rulings, in the philosophyRead the rest of this article at: <a href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/05/30/rule-of-law-vs-rule-by-lawyers/" rel="nofollow">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/05/30/rule-of-law-vs-rule-by-lawyers/</a>     Click &quot;Home&quot; to find this article in English. Clic &quot;Inicio&quot; para encontrar este artículo en [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amaroq</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/05/30/rule-of-law-vs-rule-by-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-931017</link>
		<dc:creator>Amaroq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 15:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12811#comment-931017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s this even about? Sounds like somebody&#039;s just mad that the court might actually protect our inalienable individual rights for once by striking down Obamacare and Obama&#039;s other blatant violations of our rights and the Constitution.
 
You fail to actually mention any examples of the Supreme Court being tyrannical like you say it is. But I&#039;m pretty sure that&#039;s what the root is here. An attempt to portray the protection of our inalienable rights as a violation of rights. Because every liberal knows that the needy have the &quot;right&quot; to have the able slave away to give them things.
 
From those according to ability, to those according to need, by &quot;right&quot;, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s this even about? Sounds like somebody&#8217;s just mad that the court might actually protect our inalienable individual rights for once by striking down Obamacare and Obama&#8217;s other blatant violations of our rights and the Constitution.<br />
 <br />
You fail to actually mention any examples of the Supreme Court being tyrannical like you say it is. But I&#8217;m pretty sure that&#8217;s what the root is here. An attempt to portray the protection of our inalienable rights as a violation of rights. Because every liberal knows that the needy have the &#8220;right&#8221; to have the able slave away to give them things.<br />
 <br />
From those according to ability, to those according to need, by &#8220;right&#8221;, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Poindexter</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/05/30/rule-of-law-vs-rule-by-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-931016</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Poindexter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 03:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12811#comment-931016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great piece! But I&#039;d argue we&#039;ve reached the point where even stuff that isn&#039;t percieved to be important is decided by the Feds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great piece! But I&#8217;d argue we&#8217;ve reached the point where even stuff that isn&#8217;t percieved to be important is decided by the Feds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ara Lohan</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/05/30/rule-of-law-vs-rule-by-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-931015</link>
		<dc:creator>Ara Lohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12811#comment-931015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All states won&#039;t, but all should, never ever construct the insurance mandated &quot;exchanges&quot; and see if the feds can do a damn thing about it! If they are lawless, then..............................................]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All states won&#8217;t, but all should, never ever construct the insurance mandated &#8220;exchanges&#8221; and see if the feds can do a damn thing about it! If they are lawless, then&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rule of Law vs Rule by Lawyers (Tenth Amendment Center) - Peace, Love &#38; Apple Pie &#124; Peace, Love &#38; Apple Pie</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/05/30/rule-of-law-vs-rule-by-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-916980</link>
		<dc:creator>Rule of Law vs Rule by Lawyers (Tenth Amendment Center) - Peace, Love &#38; Apple Pie &#124; Peace, Love &#38; Apple Pie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 19:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12811#comment-916980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/05/30/rule-of-law-vs-rule-by-lawyers/#more-12811 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/05/30/rule-of-law-vs-rule-by-lawyers/#more-12811" rel="nofollow">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/05/30/rule-of-law-vs-rule-by-lawyers/#more-12811</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WilliamSchooler</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/05/30/rule-of-law-vs-rule-by-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-931011</link>
		<dc:creator>WilliamSchooler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 10:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12811#comment-931011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corporate versus We the People, but who wants to admit this truth. Since present law is built upon such concepts please don’t look there and hide it.
 
Since corporate is very united in its destination and We the People are not united on any front Corporate prevails. Choice being the cause of all things is backed by the deciding.
 
Deciding to be Life, deciding to have Liberty and decide We as Life shall pursue our ideas and our dreams only comes when We the People stand up for such an activity. To let corporate decide for us is very poor choice on our part. But most of us prefer denial so we don’t have to instill effort towards Republics. Republics being the creation by We the People and Rule being the creation from the corporate financial elite.
 
In the beginning was a Decision to BE INDEPENDENT of Corporate RULE, since that time the ideas do not back up this decision and the results themselves the verification this is no lie.
 
When enough decide we shall once again be Independent “Free from Corporate Financial elite” will we be, until then their own united decision is the force residing against us. And we call them ignorant, HA!
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corporate versus We the People, but who wants to admit this truth. Since present law is built upon such concepts please don’t look there and hide it.<br />
 <br />
Since corporate is very united in its destination and We the People are not united on any front Corporate prevails. Choice being the cause of all things is backed by the deciding.<br />
 <br />
Deciding to be Life, deciding to have Liberty and decide We as Life shall pursue our ideas and our dreams only comes when We the People stand up for such an activity. To let corporate decide for us is very poor choice on our part. But most of us prefer denial so we don’t have to instill effort towards Republics. Republics being the creation by We the People and Rule being the creation from the corporate financial elite.<br />
 <br />
In the beginning was a Decision to BE INDEPENDENT of Corporate RULE, since that time the ideas do not back up this decision and the results themselves the verification this is no lie.<br />
 <br />
When enough decide we shall once again be Independent “Free from Corporate Financial elite” will we be, until then their own united decision is the force residing against us. And we call them ignorant, HA!<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malloryahkhk</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/05/30/rule-of-law-vs-rule-by-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-931010</link>
		<dc:creator>Malloryahkhk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 09:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=12811#comment-931010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@StevenGPoyzer http://t.co/5RJnerhO]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@StevenGPoyzer <a href="http://t.co/5RJnerhO" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/5RJnerhO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
