<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A brief legal (and mildly political) analysis of the NDAA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:42:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A brief legal (and mildly political) analysis of the NDAA &#187; Olivia X. LaRosa, J.D.</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/comment-page-1/#comment-926521</link>
		<dc:creator>A brief legal (and mildly political) analysis of the NDAA &#187; Olivia X. LaRosa, J.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 04:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=11870#comment-926521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] lawyer terms, the dudes on the Supreme Court reversed the passage of the 10th Amendment in 1931.   http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.    &#8592; Newt Gingrich may have [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lawyer terms, the dudes on the Supreme Court reversed the passage of the 10th Amendment in 1931.   <a href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/" rel="nofollow">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/</a>    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.    &larr; Newt Gingrich may have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judicial Juggling: NDAA vs. Fundamental Rights &#8211; Tenth Amendment Center</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/comment-page-1/#comment-924346</link>
		<dc:creator>Judicial Juggling: NDAA vs. Fundamental Rights &#8211; Tenth Amendment Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 23:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=11870#comment-924346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] written extensively about the emptiness of this NDAA section 1021 purported preservation provision (http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/). We must remember that the Senate specifically rejected an amendment that would have banned the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] written extensively about the emptiness of this NDAA section 1021 purported preservation provision (<a href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/" rel="nofollow">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/</a>). We must remember that the Senate specifically rejected an amendment that would have banned the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judicial Juggling: NDAA vs. Fundamental Rights &#8211; Tenth Amendment Center</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/comment-page-1/#comment-924347</link>
		<dc:creator>Judicial Juggling: NDAA vs. Fundamental Rights &#8211; Tenth Amendment Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 23:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=11870#comment-924347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] written extensively about the emptiness of this NDAA section 1021 purported preservation provision (http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/). We must remember that the Senate specifically rejected an amendment that would have banned the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] written extensively about the emptiness of this NDAA section 1021 purported preservation provision (<a href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/" rel="nofollow">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/</a>). We must remember that the Senate specifically rejected an amendment that would have banned the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marianne E Ruiz</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/comment-page-1/#comment-910541</link>
		<dc:creator>Marianne E Ruiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 05:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=11870#comment-910541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PLEASE READ AND FORWARD WITHOUT CHANGING OR ADDING A SINGLE WORD. 

Yes, he told us in advance what he planned to do. Few were listening. 

The following is a narrative taken from a 2008 Sunday morning televised &quot;Meet The Press&#039;. 

From Sunday&#039;s 07 Sept. 2008 11:48:04 EST, Televised &quot;Meet the Press&quot; THE THEN Senator Obama was asked about his stance on the American Flag. 

General Bill Ginn&#039; USAF (ret.) asked Obama to explain WHY he doesn&#039;t follow protocol when the National Anthem is played. 

The General stated to Obama that according to the United States Code, Title 36, Chapter 10, Sec. 171... 

During rendition of the national anthem, when the flag is displayed, all present (except those in uniform) are expected to stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart. Or, at the very least, &quot;Stand and Face It&quot;. 

NOW GET THIS !! 

&#039;Senator&#039;Obama replied: 

&quot;As I&#039;ve said about the flag pin, I don&#039;t want to be perceived as taking sides&quot;.. &quot;There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression..&quot; &quot;The anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all that sort of thing.&quot; 

(ARE YOU READY FOR THIS???) 

Obama continued: &quot;The National Anthem should be &#039;swapped&#039; for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song &#039;I&#039;d Like To Teach the World To Sing&#039;. If that were our anthem, then, I might salute it. In my opinion, we should consider reinventing our National Anthem as well as &#039;redesign&#039; our Flag to better offer our enemies hope and love.  It&#039;s my intention, if elected, to disarm America to the level of acceptance to our Middle East Brethren. If we, as a Nation of waring people, conduct ourselves like the nations of Islam, where peace prevails - - - perhaps a state or period of mutual accord could exist between our governments ....&quot;
When I become President, I will seek a pact of agreement to end hostilities between those who have been at war or in a state of enmity, and a freedom from disquieting oppressive thoughts. We as a Nation, have placed upon the nations of Islam, an unfair injustice which is WHY my wife disrespects the Flag and she and I have attended several flag burning ceremonies in the past&quot;. 

&quot;Of course now, I have found myself about to become the President of the United States and I have put my hatred aside. I will use my power to bring CHANGE to this Nation, and offer the people a new path..My wife and I look forward to becoming our Country&#039;s First black Family. Indeed, CHANGE is about to overwhelm the United States of America &quot; 

WHAAAAAAAT, the Hell is that??? 

Yes, you read it right. 

I, for one, am speechless!!! 

Dale Lindsborg , Washington Post]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PLEASE READ AND FORWARD WITHOUT CHANGING OR ADDING A SINGLE WORD. </p>
<p>Yes, he told us in advance what he planned to do. Few were listening. </p>
<p>The following is a narrative taken from a 2008 Sunday morning televised &#8220;Meet The Press&#8217;. </p>
<p>From Sunday&#8217;s 07 Sept. 2008 11:48:04 EST, Televised &#8220;Meet the Press&#8221; THE THEN Senator Obama was asked about his stance on the American Flag. </p>
<p>General Bill Ginn&#8217; USAF (ret.) asked Obama to explain WHY he doesn&#8217;t follow protocol when the National Anthem is played. </p>
<p>The General stated to Obama that according to the United States Code, Title 36, Chapter 10, Sec. 171&#8230; </p>
<p>During rendition of the national anthem, when the flag is displayed, all present (except those in uniform) are expected to stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart. Or, at the very least, &#8220;Stand and Face It&#8221;. </p>
<p>NOW GET THIS !! </p>
<p>&#8216;Senator&#8217;Obama replied: </p>
<p>&#8220;As I&#8217;ve said about the flag pin, I don&#8217;t want to be perceived as taking sides&#8221;.. &#8220;There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression..&#8221; &#8220;The anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all that sort of thing.&#8221; </p>
<p>(ARE YOU READY FOR THIS???) </p>
<p>Obama continued: &#8220;The National Anthem should be &#8216;swapped&#8217; for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song &#8216;I&#8217;d Like To Teach the World To Sing&#8217;. If that were our anthem, then, I might salute it. In my opinion, we should consider reinventing our National Anthem as well as &#8216;redesign&#8217; our Flag to better offer our enemies hope and love.  It&#8217;s my intention, if elected, to disarm America to the level of acceptance to our Middle East Brethren. If we, as a Nation of waring people, conduct ourselves like the nations of Islam, where peace prevails &#8211; - &#8211; perhaps a state or period of mutual accord could exist between our governments &#8230;.&#8221;<br />
When I become President, I will seek a pact of agreement to end hostilities between those who have been at war or in a state of enmity, and a freedom from disquieting oppressive thoughts. We as a Nation, have placed upon the nations of Islam, an unfair injustice which is WHY my wife disrespects the Flag and she and I have attended several flag burning ceremonies in the past&#8221;. </p>
<p>&#8220;Of course now, I have found myself about to become the President of the United States and I have put my hatred aside. I will use my power to bring CHANGE to this Nation, and offer the people a new path..My wife and I look forward to becoming our Country&#8217;s First black Family. Indeed, CHANGE is about to overwhelm the United States of America &#8221; </p>
<p>WHAAAAAAAT, the Hell is that??? </p>
<p>Yes, you read it right. </p>
<p>I, for one, am speechless!!! </p>
<p>Dale Lindsborg , Washington Post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen Wyatt</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/comment-page-1/#comment-910542</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen Wyatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 05:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=11870#comment-910542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Sharie, he lied.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sharie, he lied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Bailey Wolf</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/comment-page-1/#comment-910539</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Bailey Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 05:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=11870#comment-910539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin, there is no evidence anywhere to believe anything this man ever says he &#039;will do&#039;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, there is no evidence anywhere to believe anything this man ever says he &#8216;will do&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Loffredo</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/comment-page-1/#comment-910540</link>
		<dc:creator>David Loffredo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 05:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=11870#comment-910540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The exact same thing is true for 3 of the 4 Republican candidates, you can not beleive anything they say.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The exact same thing is true for 3 of the 4 Republican candidates, you can not beleive anything they say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A brief legal (and mildly political) analysis of the NDAA &#124; HOME &#8211; World Info &#8211; We need to ACT NOW!</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/comment-page-1/#comment-910361</link>
		<dc:creator>A brief legal (and mildly political) analysis of the NDAA &#124; HOME &#8211; World Info &#8211; We need to ACT NOW!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 23:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=11870#comment-910361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/" rel="nofollow">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIPatriot</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/comment-page-1/#comment-910348</link>
		<dc:creator>MIPatriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=11870#comment-910348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;belligerent actions against the United States&quot;  In this context,  what are belligerent actions?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;belligerent actions against the United States&#8221;  In this context,  what are belligerent actions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Vee</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/03/02/a-brief-legal-and-mildly-political-analysis-of-the-ndaa/comment-page-1/#comment-910340</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Vee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=11870#comment-910340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82Rl0RFJdVA&amp;feature=share&amp;fb_source=message]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82Rl0RFJdVA&#038;feature=share&#038;fb_source=message" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82Rl0RFJdVA&#038;feature=share&#038;fb_source=message</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
