It’s Going To Take “We The People”

Bookmark and Share
Posted by

  • Share on Tumblr

by Chuck Baldwin

Writing for World Net Daily, Bob Unruh reports a refreshing story of how individual sovereign states are beginning to push back against federal overreach. Unruh writes, “State and local officials in surging numbers are telling Washington they simply won’t cooperate with any plans to detain Americans the federal government may choose to describe as ‘belligerents.’

“The issue centers on provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, signed by President Obama, for the indefinite and rights-free detention of those Washington cites as belligerents, whether American citizens or not.

“WND reported when Rep. Daniel P. Gordon Jr. immediately drafted a resolution in the Rhode Island legislature to express opposition to the sections of the NDAA ‘that suspend habeas corpus and civil liberties.’

“Now the Tenth Amendment Center confirms that the resistance to the federal bureaucracy is catching on.”

Unruh continues, “‘Sources close to the Tenth Amendment Center say as many as 10 states will consider legislation or resolutions in response to the detention provisions in section 1021 and 1022 of the NDAA,’ the organization is reporting. ‘Lawmakers in Rhode Island and Washington will likely introduce resolutions authored by the Rhode Island Liberty Coalition within the next week. Additionally, local governments, including Fremont County, Colo. and El Paso County, Colo., have passed resolution condemning the detention provisions.’

“Tenth Amendment Center executive director Michael Boldin commented that ‘federal politicians never seem to repeal federal law.

“‘It’s going to take “We the People” in our states to stand up and say, “No!” to this unconstitutional monster,’ he said.”

Unruh goes on to report, “Already, Virginia Delegate Bob Marshall, R-Manassas, has introduced HB 1160, which would prevent ‘any agency, political subdivision, employee, or member of the military of Virginia from assisting an agency or the armed forces of the United States in the investigation, prosecution, or detainment of a United States citizen in violation of the Constitution of Virginia.’”

“Mike Maharrey, communications director for the TAC, said the fight is shaping up like the conflict in the 1850s when northern states refused to cooperated with fugitive slave laws that required them to capture and return escaping slaves.

“‘It is clear to me, and I am far from alone in this view, that the detention provisions in the NDAA are vague, overbroad and open to interpretation,’ he said. ‘That leaves me to trust in the good character and moral clarity of Barack Obama, Rick Santorum or whoever happens to reside at the White House, to protect me and my fellow Americans from abuse of his power. No thanks.’

“Maharrey noted that during the latter days of slavery, ‘state and local governments in northern states stepped in and thwarted the enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Acts, which allowed the federal government to arrest and detain black people, and send them back into slavery with little or no due process.

“‘We laud these men and women as heroes,’ he said. ‘I have no doubt that history will prove equally kind to those standing up for the most basic rights of Americans today.’”

See Bob Unruh’s report at:

http://www.wnd.com:80/2012/02/states-prepare-brakes-on-citizen-detention-option/

As I have said repeatedly in this column, the only hope for the preservation of liberty and freedom in America is for individual sovereign states to do what they were created to do: protect the rights and liberties of the citizens of their states from the overreach and despotic propensities of those miscreants in Washington, D.C. If freedom-loving people in the body politic truly intend to see to it that their rights and liberties are preserved, they will pay much more attention–and be much more attuned–to electing State governors, legislators, attorney generals, etc., than they are electing US congressmen, senators, and even electing the President.

With the exception of Ron Paul, there is not a major party Presidential candidate who will make a dime’s worth of difference in protecting the liberties and freedoms of the American citizenry. Both Republicans and Democrats in Washington, D.C., are all about empire-building, foreign interventionism, and expanding the Welfare and Warfare states. Furthermore, none of them (with the exception of Ron Paul) would do anything to thwart or reverse the burgeoning police state that is currently being rapidly constructed in this country. That means, as Michael Boldin said, “It’s going to take ‘We the People’ in our states to stand up and say, ‘No!’”

And quite frankly, that’s about the only thing that the power-elite in Washington, D.C., are worried about. They aren’t worried about Afghanistan, Iraq, or Iran. Those are all orchestrated conflicts to keep our troops fighting endless wars, to have an excuse to print more and more fiat currency, to satisfy the international bankers who are making trillions of dollars off the military-industrial complex, and to give them an excuse of “national security” in order to strip away more and more freedoms from the American citizenry. But State governors, legislators, and attorney generals who actually believe the Constitution and who have the courage to defend it, now THAT scares them to death! Why? Because they know that the real power in this country rests with “We the People” who, through their state governments, have the ability to actually stop their quest for globalism and feudalism.

America’s Founding Fathers clearly understood that the states are the ultimate guardians of the peoples’ liberties. James Madison (and even Alexander Hamilton) spoke to this eloquently in the Federalist Papers.

In Federalist #46, Madison said, “Were it admitted, however, that the Federal government may feel an equal disposition with the State governments to extend its power beyond the due limits, the [states] would still have the advantage in the means of DEFEATING SUCH ENCROACHMENTS” (emphasis added). By “defeating such encroachments,” Madison included “opposition,” “refusal to cooperate,” “frowns of the [State] executive,” “obstructions,” and “plans of resistance.”

Did you see that? America’s fourth President and Father of the Constitution said that it was the duty of the states to obstruct, oppose, resist, and otherwise refuse to cooperate with any federal policy or mandate that runs counter to the principles of liberty. And, remember, this is from the man who authored the so-called “supremacy clause” of the US Constitution!

In Federalist #45, Madison said, “Thus, each of the principal branches of the federal government will owe its existence more or less to the favor of the State governments, and must consequently feel a dependence, which is much more likely to beget a disposition too obsequious than too overbearing towards them. On the other side, the component parts of the State governments will in no instance be indebted for their appointment to the direct agency of the federal government, and very little, if at all, to the local influence of its members.”

Did you get that? In the mind of America’s founders, the federal government would be dependent upon the State governments, not the other way around! But what do we hear today? Even these so-called “conservative” politicos and talking heads say just the opposite. They keep insisting that the states are dependent upon, and subservient to, the federal government.

Even the colonists’ biggest proponent of central government, Alexander Hamilton, had it right on the power of the states to resist federal encroachment. In Federalist #26, Hamilton said, “Independent of … the national legislature itself … the State legislatures, who will always be not only vigilant but suspicious and jealous guardians of the rights of the citizens against encroachments from the federal government, will constantly have their attention awake to the conduct of the national rulers, and will be ready enough, if any thing improper appears, to sound the alarm to the people, and not only to be the voice, but, if necessary, the arm of their discontent.”

Wow! Did you catch that? Hamilton said that the states held the right and duty to resist federal encroachment with their “voice” and with their “arm.”

Does any of this sound like America’s Founding Fathers expected the states to be lap dogs for federal usurpation of power? They fully recognized that it would take the individual states standing against any potential federal overreach to protect and secure the rights and liberties of the American people.

I will say it again: it is far more important who is elected as your governor than who is elected President. It is far more important who is elected as your State attorney general than who is appointed US attorney general. It is far more important who is elected to your State legislature than who is elected to the US House and Senate. It is far more important who is elected as your sheriff than who is appointed as the Director of the FBI. But if all you watch is FOX News, CNN, NBC, CBS, and ABC, you will be mesmerized with national politics, and you will forget about that which is the most important defender of our liberties: our individual state governments. In fact, in many cases today, our State and local governments are as abusive of our liberties as is the federal government. This is mainly due to the inattention and misunderstanding of the People as to the importance of electing local and State leaders who will accept, as their first responsibility, the maintenance of liberty for the people they represent. And by nature, that means being a faithful watchdog to the incursions of the federal government against our freedoms.

Become a member and support the TAC!

It is encouraging to read that at least ten states are pushing back against the monstrously unconstitutional NDAA. If all fifty states would act as courageously as these tenacious ten–and not just against the NDAA, but also against EVERY assault of the federal government against our liberties–America could be restored to the “land of the free” very quickly. As it is, however, the protectors and guardians of our liberties (our State leaders and county sheriffs) are being bribed, coerced, cajoled, harangued, and intimidated into cowardly submission by these belligerent bullies in Washington, D.C.

Thank you Representative Daniel P. Gordon, Jr. of Rhode Island. Thank you Delegate Bob Marshall of Virginia. Thank you to all of you State legislators, State senators, and county sheriffs across our great land who truly understand the oath you took to the Constitution and who are willing to stand as the watchdogs of our liberties. It is a truism that if your tribe does not increase, our freedoms are surely lost.

(c) Chuck Baldwin

If you enjoyed this post:
Click Here to Get the Free Tenth Amendment Center Newsletter,

Or make a donation to help keep this site active.

Support the Tenth Amendment Center!
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
dujaa74 5 pts

Great article - it is key we educate all 308 million Americans about this issue. #NDAA is flat unconstitutional and a real danger to America's Freedom!

On Twitter -

NDAA 2012@NDAA2012

Section 1021 and 1022 have been called a violation of constitutional principles and of the Bill of Rights - Curated by Randy L. Dixon Rivera

Guantánamo Bay, Cuba ·

WilliamSchooler 41 pts

This is very true, but ask yourself which idea does the Constitution actually support, limited Government in A Republic? Doesn’t the declaration of Independence support this idea of a Republic as well?

Are we focused on the idea, that objective of A Republic by where Life, people, public, politic, communities and Republics support? Where are we learning this activity to act as the idea we say we are supposedly living in this nation, in this country we so proudly call ours?

We the people are we the life, we the public, we the politic with we in our communities as we as a Republic practice the acts of delivering the idea of A Republic do we not?

If one idea is comprised of many other ideas to support its stance wouldn’t we want to know all the ideas that support the primary idea?

So what is the idea of A Republic comprised of to be able to deliver such an idea and where oh where is it we are practicing this idea because I want to go look for myself because I cannot seem to find it.

Just sayin.

call me mom 5 pts

I've read and agree that the provisions of the objectionable sections of the NDAA are overly broad. what I am concerned about is a bill called the Enemy Expatriation Act ( HR 3166 and S 1698 ) that may also be twisted to strip people of their citizenship, possibly in order to utilize those sections of the NDAA without objection, because it wouldn't be being used against citizens if their citizenship has been stripped from them-right? Any comments on that? It is not yet law. It was proposed by Sen. Leiberman. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-3166&tab=summary

Conversation from Facebook

Christine Shrock
Christine Shrock

Amen... this is the year to change our direction, or we just might not get to.

Don Throckmorton
Don Throckmorton

With the advent of the NDAA, what used to be group "venting" could now be construed as conspiracy. It is a reminder to us all how very important state's rights are to us, especially now.

Grant Warren
Grant Warren

let me know when "We the people" decide that the most important thing in life isn't having a beer in the fridge and sitting in their recliner at the end of the day.

Paul Rutledge
Paul Rutledge

I love the " We have to decide that we WANT to be free....then act like it whether the government wants us to or not." I have refused to signed the secrecy act, I've also ignored many "law" enforcement that have given me orders that would break laws. I'm descendant of Constitutional heritage Edward Rutledge NC, his brother Howard was in the Who's Who's as one of the most famous Constitutional attorneys. There grand nephew Richard I believe it was from Virgina wrote more laws that are still on the books then anyone else in history. Freedom is in my Blood just like everyone else in the world.

Jeff Moses
Jeff Moses

But you think its ok for the Gov. to do anything they want Gov does violence to us every day its ok not with me you go ahead and let them walk on you take your homes and do as they please to you ok not

Tenth Amendment Center
Tenth Amendment Center

Like the way you put that - about puppets! We just wanted to make sure, because often times the opposition likes to send in trolls to agitate - which gives them an excuse to attack. We appreciate your understanding of our strict policy on this....and your input as well.

Paul Rutledge
Paul Rutledge

I don't disagree or else I wouldn't of joined the page. I was simply stating an observation, twice. I learned to heal way before I ever learned to harm. I don't plan on harming any government puppets and would not condone anyone doing so.

Tenth Amendment Center
Tenth Amendment Center

Agreed, Dorothy Slattery - that's what Chuck Baldwin talks about in his article, in essence. We have to decide that we WANT to be free....then act like it whether the government wants us to or not.

Tenth Amendment Center
Tenth Amendment Center

Paul Rutledge - we aren't asking anyone anything. But to be clear, talk of violence is not welcome and will result in a quick banning. We don't want it, it's not part of our movement, and you're welcome to disagree....just do it elsewhere.

Dorothy Slattery
Dorothy Slattery

Trampling doesn't mean we can't pick them up again and dust them off and get back tothe business at hand.

Paul Rutledge
Paul Rutledge

Kind of hard to ask criminals to peacefully remove themselves from power. Have you ever heard of any that have?

Paul Rutledge
Paul Rutledge

Yeah sorry about that I'm not trying to insist, I do feel they themselves have tried that mode.

Tenth Amendment Center
Tenth Amendment Center

Paul Rutledge - talk of using violence is not welcome on this page in support of peaceful nullification.

Paul Rutledge
Paul Rutledge

It's in the Constitution that "We the People" have more then enough power and rights to bear arms and overthrow our own government. Bottom line thats what the new world order aka Soviet America is begging to have done to them. I know of no rights left worth defending. They have trampled them all.

Dorothy Slattery
Dorothy Slattery

Now tell me how to get education back to local control We are going to vote on a new bond to the tune of ONE HUNDRED FIFTY EIGHT MILLION. most of that will go to fixing the things they let slide like plumbing, seems to me we vote on that all the time. Don't think they will get any money from o tho most of the board (all) are democrats as is the super and most all teachers & principles. Not sure who they think will pay.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] prevent ‘any agency, political subdivision, employee, or memberRead the rest of this article at: http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/02/14/its-going-to-take-we-the-people/ Click "Home" to find this article in English. Clic "Inicio" para encontrar este artículo en [...]