Writing for World Net Daily, Bob Unruh reports a refreshing story of how individual sovereign states are beginning to push back against federal overreach. Unruh writes, โState and local officials in surging numbers are telling Washington they simply wonโt cooperate with any plans to detain Americans the federal government may choose to describe as โbelligerents.โ
โThe issue centers on provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, signed by President Obama, for the indefinite and rights-free detention of those Washington cites as belligerents, whether American citizens or not.
โWND reported when Rep. Daniel P. Gordon Jr. immediately drafted a resolution in the Rhode Island legislature to express opposition to the sections of the NDAA โthat suspend habeas corpus and civil liberties.โ
โNow the Tenth Amendment Center confirms that the resistance to the federal bureaucracy is catching on.โ
Unruh continues, โโSources close to the Tenth Amendment Center say as many as 10 states will consider legislation or resolutions in response to the detention provisions in section 1021 and 1022 of the NDAA,โ the organization is reporting. โLawmakers in Rhode Island and Washington will likely introduce resolutions authored by the Rhode Island Liberty Coalition within the next week. Additionally, local governments, including Fremont County, Colo. and El Paso County, Colo., have passed resolution condemning the detention provisions.โ
โTenth Amendment Center executive director Michael Boldin commented that โfederal politicians never seem to repeal federal law.
โโItโs going to take โWe the Peopleโ in our states to stand up and say, โNo!โ to this unconstitutional monster,โ he said.โ
Unruh goes on to report, โAlready, Virginia Delegate Bob Marshall, R-Manassas, has introduced HB 1160, which would prevent โany agency, political subdivision, employee, or member of the military of Virginia from assisting an agency or the armed forces of the United States in the investigation, prosecution, or detainment of a United States citizen in violation of the Constitution of Virginia.โโ
โMike Maharrey, communications director for the TAC, said the fight is shaping up like the conflict in the 1850s when northern states refused to cooperated with fugitive slave laws that required them to capture and return escaping slaves.
โโIt is clear to me, and I am far from alone in this view, that the detention provisions in the NDAA are vague, overbroad and open to interpretation,โ he said. โThat leaves me to trust in the good character and moral clarity of Barack Obama, Rick Santorum or whoever happens to reside at the White House, to protect me and my fellow Americans from abuse of his power. No thanks.โ
โMaharrey noted that during the latter days of slavery, โstate and local governments in northern states stepped in and thwarted the enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Acts, which allowed the federal government to arrest and detain black people, and send them back into slavery with little or no due process.
โโWe laud these men and women as heroes,โ he said. โI have no doubt that history will prove equally kind to those standing up for the most basic rights of Americans today.โโ
See Bob Unruhโs report at:
https://www.wnd.com:80/2012/02/states-prepare-brakes-on-citizen-detention-option/
As I have said repeatedly in this column, the only hope for the preservation of liberty and freedom in America is for individual sovereign states to do what they were created to do: protect the rights and liberties of the citizens of their states from the overreach and despotic propensities of those miscreants in Washington, D.C. If freedom-loving people in the body politic truly intend to see to it that their rights and liberties are preserved, they will pay much more attentionโand be much more attunedโto electing State governors, legislators, attorney generals, etc., than they are electing US congressmen, senators, and even electing the President.
With the exception of Ron Paul, there is not a major party Presidential candidate who will make a dimeโs worth of difference in protecting the liberties and freedoms of the American citizenry. Both Republicans and Democrats in Washington, D.C., are all about empire-building, foreign interventionism, and expanding the Welfare and Warfare states. Furthermore, none of them (with the exception of Ron Paul) would do anything to thwart or reverse the burgeoning police state that is currently being rapidly constructed in this country. That means, as Michael Boldin said, โItโs going to take โWe the Peopleโ in our states to stand up and say, โNo!โโ
And quite frankly, thatโs about the only thing that the power-elite in Washington, D.C., are worried about. They arenโt worried about Afghanistan, Iraq, or Iran. Those are all orchestrated conflicts to keep our troops fighting endless wars, to have an excuse to print more and more fiat currency, to satisfy the international bankers who are making trillions of dollars off the military-industrial complex, and to give them an excuse of โnational securityโ in order to strip away more and more freedoms from the American citizenry. But State governors, legislators, and attorney generals who actually believe the Constitution and who have the courage to defend it, now THAT scares them to death! Why? Because they know that the real power in this country rests with โWe the Peopleโ who, through their state governments, have the ability to actually stop their quest for globalism and feudalism.
Americaโs Founding Fathers clearly understood that the states are the ultimate guardians of the peoplesโ liberties. James Madison (and even Alexander Hamilton) spoke to this eloquently in the Federalist Papers.
In Federalist #46, Madison said, โWere it admitted, however, that the Federal government may feel an equal disposition with the State governments to extend its power beyond the due limits, the [states] would still have the advantage in the means of DEFEATING SUCH ENCROACHMENTSโ (emphasis added). By โdefeating such encroachments,โ Madison included โopposition,โ โrefusal to cooperate,โ โfrowns of the [State] executive,โ โobstructions,โ and โplans of resistance.โ
Did you see that? Americaโs fourth President and Father of the Constitution said that it was the duty of the states to obstruct, oppose, resist, and otherwise refuse to cooperate with any federal policy or mandate that runs counter to the principles of liberty. And, remember, this is from the man who authored the so-called โsupremacy clauseโ of the US Constitution!
In Federalist #45, Madison said, โThus, each of the principal branches of the federal government will owe its existence more or less to the favor of the State governments, and must consequently feel a dependence, which is much more likely to beget a disposition too obsequious than too overbearing towards them. On the other side, the component parts of the State governments will in no instance be indebted for their appointment to the direct agency of the federal government, and very little, if at all, to the local influence of its members.โ
Did you get that? In the mind of Americaโs founders, the federal government would be dependent upon the State governments, not the other way around! But what do we hear today? Even these so-called โconservativeโ politicos and talking heads say just the opposite. They keep insisting that the states are dependent upon, and subservient to, the federal government.
Even the colonistsโ biggest proponent of central government, Alexander Hamilton, had it right on the power of the states to resist federal encroachment. In Federalist #26, Hamilton said, โIndependent of โฆ the national legislature itself โฆ the State legislatures, who will always be not only vigilant but suspicious and jealous guardians of the rights of the citizens against encroachments from the federal government, will constantly have their attention awake to the conduct of the national rulers, and will be ready enough, if any thing improper appears, to sound the alarm to the people, and not only to be the voice, but, if necessary, the arm of their discontent.โ
Wow! Did you catch that? Hamilton said that the states held the right and duty to resist federal encroachment with their โvoiceโ and with their โarm.โ
Does any of this sound like Americaโs Founding Fathers expected the states to be lap dogs for federal usurpation of power? They fully recognized that it would take the individual states standing against any potential federal overreach to protect and secure the rights and liberties of the American people.
I will say it again: it is far more important who is elected as your governor than who is elected President. It is far more important who is elected as your State attorney general than who is appointed US attorney general. It is far more important who is elected to your State legislature than who is elected to the US House and Senate. It is far more important who is elected as your sheriff than who is appointed as the Director of the FBI. But if all you watch is FOX News, CNN, NBC, CBS, and ABC, you will be mesmerized with national politics, and you will forget about that which is the most important defender of our liberties: our individual state governments. In fact, in many cases today, our State and local governments are as abusive of our liberties as is the federal government. This is mainly due to the inattention and misunderstanding of the People as to the importance of electing local and State leaders who will accept, as their first responsibility, the maintenance of liberty for the people they represent. And by nature, that means being a faithful watchdog to the incursions of the federal government against our freedoms.
It is encouraging to read that at least ten states are pushing back against the monstrously unconstitutional NDAA. If all fifty states would act as courageously as these tenacious tenโand not just against the NDAA, but also against EVERY assault of the federal government against our libertiesโAmerica could be restored to the โland of the freeโ very quickly. As it is, however, the protectors and guardians of our liberties (our State leaders and county sheriffs) are being bribed, coerced, cajoled, harangued, and intimidated into cowardly submission by these belligerent bullies in Washington, D.C.
Thank you Representative Daniel P. Gordon, Jr. of Rhode Island. Thank you Delegate Bob Marshall of Virginia. Thank you to all of you State legislators, State senators, and county sheriffs across our great land who truly understand the oath you took to the Constitution and who are willing to stand as the watchdogs of our liberties. It is a truism that if your tribe does not increase, our freedoms are surely lost.
(c) Chuck Baldwin

