PP,

I stick with my opinion. All the candidates have, at one time or another, erred. Newt has certainly erred, but on this subject he is absolutely dead on, and I commend him.

Newt also voted for the Dept. of Ed. in 79. I could go on about his clear unfamiliarity with the USC, but Newt is only giving sound bites for shallow thinkers to swallow. Also, a judicial position is not to be eliminated because the judge is bad, but because it is unnecessary, so he’s clearly spinning the bull.

The supreme court is listed as supreme law of the land instead of the supreme Rule of Law and these two differ greatly by results, also the identifier.

The law of the land is not decided upon by the basis of the Declaration of Independence it is the deciding factor the supports you and without it is the corruption because now man is left to make up his own laws based on what? A Democracy? Could this apply in a supreme court? Absolutely and is. It is what is popular amongst the supposed supreme powers of the land who hold no principals of you because these are in the Declaration of Independence and are again the deciding factor for you.

All present law in made up in the minds of men with no moral judgment by the Declaration of Independence. This means I can make up any law I want and all I have to do is get acceptance and it can be implemented. Man is only authority over the man of the mind and no other authority is given, taken yes but not given.

Add the word supreme, convince people they are above the rule of law and look what we have, supremacy. Some thinking they are above all others when they are not at all. But who defies them? Who is supposed to defy them?

What does the Declaration of Independence say about defying based on what?

Now who is lost? The supreme court judges or all the acceptance? All the above because no basis is used by either, no good argument exists because no basis exist by USE.

Political correctness lay in a Republic as a public or politic in a public arena to speak and to be heard and not to be told.

Does the rule of law support life when applied? Does the Declaration of Independence support life when it is applied? Does the constitution support Liberty if applied?

So which part am I missing or am I, then what part are you missing or are you? Do you apply these last 3? Why not?

Now you have the ingredients for corrections for all who decide. Who are those who decide? Has anything taken place on this earth by man himself that was brought about without decision? NO! Who decides? Who has this capability to decide? Based on what? Has anything by man happened without a choice? NO! What then will YOU decide and based on WHAT?

Authority can truly be defined as the acts in support of all life by the results they bare that supports such a life. Since life is of its own authority it would be good to understand this fully. All life has been granted the will to decide and it is you that will decide informed or uniformed will make no difference because you will decide to support you or to decline you because by rule of law these are the only two living choices their are.

Supreme is an example of all life support by all acts and all achievement and nothing else is this supreme unless you decide it. Watch what you decide, you just may get it because nothing will happen without it. It would be good to really recognize yourself in that mirror, you may be far more superior than you know. Independence is the roote cause of all things and informed or uninformed are the deciding factors of you. Investigate it fully yourself because it is undeniable should you actually discover you.