Comments on: 10th Amendment Lawsuits Filed Against Feds in California

By: Dallas Mills

Dallas Mills — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:17:03 +0000

The Whole Thing Is A Load Of CRAP !!, The Only Reason MJ Is Not Legal, Is That You Can’t Patent A “Natural Plant”, There Have Been Many Studies On MJ, It’s Has Been Proven That A Person Who Uses It Has A 73% Less Chance Of Developing Cancer !, Not To Mention All The money Spent On The “War Against Drugs”, That Could Go To Other Specific Needs In This Country, Like Maybe Feeding Hungry Children, Or Rebuilding Our Infrastructure, JMHO…

By: Ann Rhoades

Ann Rhoades — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:17:02 +0000

Look up Rick Simpson’s “Run from the Cure” on YouTube and tell me how “dangerous” marijuana is. The hemp plant is very good for you but not to smoke. Hemp oil cures cancer & many other diseases but we can’t have it.

By: Paul Smith

Paul Smith — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:17:01 +0000

@Vanessa: “They prohibit possession of a potentially dangerous substance, and teh states should enforce the same type laws.”
———————–
You mean like bleach and lye and caustic soda. Stuff like that?

By: Paul Smith

Paul Smith — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:17:00 +0000

I know of no law, John, that requires you to buy chips for a junkie. Bless you, however, for caring.

By: John Cervi

John Cervi — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:16:57 +0000

I couldn’t agree more. I would never use any mind altering substance, but as a retired cop (28yrs.) I will say I never had to fight an arrested person high on marajuana, though I did have to stop and pick them up potato chips on the way to jail. But as a taxpayer I don’t think my tax dollar should be used to assist those in medical need after using such substances.

By: Shawn Rayburn

Shawn Rayburn — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:16:55 +0000

I think it infringes on my “pursuit of happiness” which is addressed in the Declaration of Independence…And don’t the Feds have better things to deal with? Like creating jobs instead of trying to get rid of them like this?

By: Raymond Chilensky

Raymond Chilensky — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:16:54 +0000

You speak truth about the 14th amendment, which it needs to be challenged and, hopefully, modified one day. The 14th amendment should be called the Federal Tyranny Act.

By: Tim L. Smith

Tim L. Smith — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:16:52 +0000

I wish people understood that the Federal Government can virtually do what it wants through the 14th Amendment, as it relates to “persons.” That’s how we have a federal income tax on individuals. The Commerce, Necessary and Proper and General Welfare Clause are just legal fronts up against the 14th AMENDMENT.

By: Spyrogyrick Zbindahlopolis

Spyrogyrick Zbindahlopolis — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:16:50 +0000

Oh, are unconstititutional DEA raids significantly increasing under the stewardship of our constitution law scholar, ex-pot smoking president? Who would’ve thought??

By: Roy Munson

Roy Munson — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:16:49 +0000

Nullify now!