Comments on: Yet another “progressive” argument for an unlimited Commerce Power doesn’t add up http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/23/yet-another-progressive-argument-for-an-unlimited-commerce-power-doesnt-add-up/ Concordia res Parvae Crescunt Sat, 18 May 2013 03:27:07 +0000 hourly 1 By: West Texan http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/23/yet-another-progressive-argument-for-an-unlimited-commerce-power-doesnt-add-up/comment-page-1/#comment-880720 West Texan Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:47:14 +0000 http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=10241#comment-880720 If what you mean by "union state" is relative to the Wyoming Governor's proclamation at http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/07/28/wy… then I stand corrected. Apology given.

]]> By: West Texan http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/23/yet-another-progressive-argument-for-an-unlimited-commerce-power-doesnt-add-up/comment-page-1/#comment-880538 West Texan Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:26:45 +0000 http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=10241#comment-880538 I'm not sure what you mean by "union state", but please confine it to the People's Republic of California. As a Texan-American, I support our founders' dual sovereign design under our republic's federalism. Wherein the national government is limited to foreign affairs, defense and interstate commerce. All domestic concerns belong solely to the respective states.

]]> By: Ken Creamer http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/23/yet-another-progressive-argument-for-an-unlimited-commerce-power-doesnt-add-up/comment-page-1/#comment-880446 Ken Creamer Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:06:54 +0000 http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=10241#comment-880446 Surely you jest. The issue isn’t that the President uses executive orders to bypassed Congress (federal legislation) to institute programs in a Union States. The issue is that NEITHER EXECUTIVE ORDERS or CONGRESS has any jurisdiction within the boundaries of any Union State territory. You need to read my book, The Reformation of Union State Sovereignty. Also something very educational would be for you to get a bunch of pamphlets for Gerald Brown, % Distress Publishing Trust, 1040 S. Mt. Vernon Ave., #G-118, Colton, California 92324, at 6.00 each for 10 or less. I will send you a copy of my manuscript upon request. You need to really get your Constitutional act together before you end up inciting and internal armed conflict. You have a lot of attention in the movement but your information is WRONG.

]]> By: West Texan http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/23/yet-another-progressive-argument-for-an-unlimited-commerce-power-doesnt-add-up/comment-page-1/#comment-880393 West Texan Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:29:39 +0000 http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=10241#comment-880393 Rob's assessment is absolutely on target. American citizens today can be penalized under U.S. criminal statues for committing heinous acts overseas, regardless of a country's lack of law or enforcement. Americans are held to their own state and/or country's legal standards regardless of where they're visiting. As a side note, when in the People's Republic of California, I must follow Texas law like handing my concealed carry license to a peace officer if pulled over. I've had this happen on a curiosity stop, no traffic violation. They ask why I handed it to them and/or If I'm carrying a loaded weapon. They're downright scary about it. But as a Texan-American, I'm required to obey my state's law wherever I'm driving.

]]> By: Cicerone http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/23/yet-another-progressive-argument-for-an-unlimited-commerce-power-doesnt-add-up/comment-page-1/#comment-879365 Cicerone Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:12:47 +0000 http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=10241#comment-879365 This topic and other related unconstitutional federal activities reminds me of the incrementalism and goals of the Nazi Party in 1930's Germany.

]]> By: Freeman http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/23/yet-another-progressive-argument-for-an-unlimited-commerce-power-doesnt-add-up/comment-page-1/#comment-878629 Freeman Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:27:37 +0000 http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=10241#comment-878629 It may prove to be simpler to attack this on the basis of free travel, as we are all travelors which is protected by the constitution, etc.
There are no regulations other than for commercial drivers, etc.
This has already been adjudicated and travel won.
It might be easier to offer the precedent to a federal judge for an action/motion to show cause.
Thus allowing the system to take it from there.

]]> By: Fred Marsico http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/23/yet-another-progressive-argument-for-an-unlimited-commerce-power-doesnt-add-up/comment-page-1/#comment-878599 Fred Marsico Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:02:08 +0000 http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=10241#comment-878599 It would appear that :necessary and proper" in relative to what is necessary for the government to perform its Constitutional mandates, not to stretch beyond them. Same thing with the "general welfare" debate. That seems to be explicit in regards to the general welfare of the union, and not the States or We the People.

The founders in their wisdom, knew that what the People wanted was to be self-sufficient and responsible for themselves. They revolted against a government that impeded their prosperity with high taxes, just as the federal government is doing today.

Elect Ron Paul as President and surround him with like-minded representative in Congress that will stand by their oaths and defend and protect the Constitution.

]]> By: Yet another “progressive” argument for an unlimited Commerce Power doesn’t add up | TaJnB | TheAverageJoeNewsBlogg http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/23/yet-another-progressive-argument-for-an-unlimited-commerce-power-doesnt-add-up/comment-page-1/#comment-877361 Yet another “progressive” argument for an unlimited Commerce Power doesn’t add up | TaJnB | TheAverageJoeNewsBlogg Tue, 25 Oct 2011 23:20:13 +0000 http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=10241#comment-877361 [...] Natelson Tenth Amendment CenterOctober 25, [...]

]]> By: Submitted by SwamySez: Yet another “progressive” argument for an unlimited Commerce Power doesn’t add up – SwamySez http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/23/yet-another-progressive-argument-for-an-unlimited-commerce-power-doesnt-add-up/comment-page-1/#comment-877349 Submitted by SwamySez: Yet another “progressive” argument for an unlimited Commerce Power doesn’t add up – SwamySez Tue, 25 Oct 2011 23:14:34 +0000 http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=10241#comment-877349 [...] http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/23/yet-another-progressive-argument-for-an-unlimited-com… [...]

]]> By: Yet another “progressive” argument for an unlimited Commerce Power doesn’t add up – WNYTruthers http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/10/23/yet-another-progressive-argument-for-an-unlimited-commerce-power-doesnt-add-up/comment-page-1/#comment-876870 Yet another “progressive” argument for an unlimited Commerce Power doesn’t add up – WNYTruthers Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:11:12 +0000 http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=10241#comment-876870 [...] Natelson Tenth Amendment Center October 25, [...]

]]>