Comments on: Counting on the Courts: A Dangerous Precedent http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/09/13/counting-on-the-courts-a-dangerous-precedent/ Concordia res Parvae Crescunt Mon, 20 May 2013 19:11:35 +0000 hourly 1 By: JMifiti http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/09/13/counting-on-the-courts-a-dangerous-precedent/comment-page-1/#comment-798952 JMifiti Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:32:37 +0000 http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=9795#comment-798952 It is chilling that this court singled out the "insurance mandate" as the only unconstitutional facet of a totally corrupt 2,000+ page tome when in fact every page of this document is filled with unconstitutional mandates for unchecked power given to unelected bureaucrats in mysterious high level positions – I prefer sirs that my laws be consistent with the Constitution.

]]> By: Counting on the Courts: A Dangerous Precedent – Florida Tenth Amendment Center http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/09/13/counting-on-the-courts-a-dangerous-precedent/comment-page-1/#comment-786976 Counting on the Courts: A Dangerous Precedent – Florida Tenth Amendment Center Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:08:27 +0000 http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=9795#comment-786976 [...] Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Close Follow   Tenth Amendment CenterCounting on the Courts: A Dangerous PrecedentIs it a “tax” or not a “tax”? The Original UnderstandingNullification: A Matter of Life and [...]

]]> By: Majestic_One http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/09/13/counting-on-the-courts-a-dangerous-precedent/comment-page-1/#comment-784730 Majestic_One Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:33:28 +0000 http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=9795#comment-784730 I thought Marshall in Gibbons said commerce is commercial intercourse "between" different powers? The language of the clause suggests this, the custom and practice of the power suggests this. Finest explanation of the power to regulate commerce ever written can be found here:

http://www.federalistblog.us/2011/06/how_commerce…

]]>