Comments on: Judiciary Failure: Upholding Medicaid Expansion

By: factchecker

factchecker — Sat, 10 Sep 2011 09:01:21 +0000

Your logic would also prohibit money being spent for a lot of programs, the 16th amendment allowed congress to collect income taxes which gave the feds a lot of power, I am not sure what the general welfare could be interpreted is, after all would the us marshalls qualify, why should they get funds, and not have states have their own police forces, driver's licenses are not federal for instance, states are allowed to opt out of medicaid, however the complaints have to do with many red states being welfare states getting back more from washington then they receive.

By: The Courts Should Strike Down Medicare Mandates | GrassrootsHeadlines.com

The Courts Should Strike Down Medicare Mandates | GrassrootsHeadlines.com — Sat, 03 Sep 2011 08:55:51 +0000

[...] mandate that individuals buy insurance, but upheld the Medicaid mandates imposed on states.Â As I already have explained, the Medicaid ruling was wrong under the Constitutionâ€™s original meani…Â In this post, I explain why the ruling also is incorrect even under the modern Supreme Courtâ€™s [...]

By: The Courts Should Strike Down Medicare Mandates – Florida Tenth Amendment Center

Fri, 02 Sep 2011 23:58:57 +0000

[...] mandate that individuals buy insurance, but upheld the Medicaid mandates imposed on states. As I already have explained, the Medicaid ruling was wrong under the Constitutionâ€™s original meani… In this post, I explain why the ruling also is incorrect even under the modern Supreme Courtâ€™s [...]

By: The Courts Should Strike Down Medicare Mandates – Tenth Amendment Center

The Courts Should Strike Down Medicare Mandates – Tenth Amendment Center — Fri, 02 Sep 2011 21:25:23 +0000

By: Don

Don — Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:48:33 +0000

We all know the Fed is usurping power and has been since ratification. That's why Jefferson and Madison wrote the nullification analyses. They wanted to show an implied remedy which acted as another "check and balance". My point is: Every discovered usurpation should call for state nullification. It is irrational to expect the Supremes to check Federal power. If the state fails also, jury nullification is next.

By: Buck

Buck — Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:33:35 +0000

Please unsuscribe me .

By: Buck

Buck — Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:32:35 +0000

These judges aren't stupid , they are communists at heart if not open and above board about it . We need a constitutional amenment prohibiting any progressives , socialists , marxists , communists , fascists ,and all other non-constitutionalists serving in the federal government in ANY capacity that might conflicl with our constitutional republic and constitutional law . When your founding fathers provided the besst government constitution in the world there is no reason for tampering with it . You can't fix what isn't broken .

By: BTL Update 2011 August 29

BTL Update 2011 August 29 — Mon, 29 Aug 2011 23:11:15 +0000

[...] Judiciary Failure: Upholding Medicaid Expansion Related Posts:Reality Zone Unfiltered News 2011 January 15-21Reality Zone Unfiltered News 2010 December 25-31Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura: Police StateCollectivism in American PoliticsThe Future is Calling (Part 2) – Secret Organizations and Hidden Agendas [...]

By: West Texan

West Texan — Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:55:13 +0000

On the surface article 1, section 8, clause 1, where it states " … provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States … ", appears to facilitate the domestic sovereignty of independent states. In other words, by providing a secure environment and overseeing fair interstate and foreign trade, states can enjoy internal prosperity while offering desired public services to their individual residents. As a lay person, that's the way I see it.