The Practical Implementation of Constitutional Tender

  • Share on Tumblr

Support Sound Money with a TAC Medallion!

by Doug Tjaden

Get ready. It’s coming.

Now it gets interesting. For several months I have been writing on the issue of honest money and its return to America, via the states. Judging from the response (or lack thereof), the issue is still very much off of the radar of the average American, including many hard asset advocates. Honest money is, however, quietly – and quickly – making its way into the main stream discussion.

Having attended the ceremonial signing of HB317 on June 2nd, I can assure you that the people of Utah are serious about providing the protection this law offers to their citizens. Rep. Brad Galvez, sponsor of the bill stated, “The law is not merely symbolic. Our intention is to strengthen the existing law and implement it.”

The speed at which this is all moving has caught the attention of the mainstream media. Both the New York Times and Los Angeles Times have published articles recently asking questions about the movement toward honest money. Not necessary the right questions, however the discussion has to begin somewhere.

The idea of using gold and silver as money has been in and out of the main stream press over the past several years. Relegated to what today’s economists would call “the realm of wacko, archaic, economic dinosaurs,” it hasn’t gained traction in the hearts and minds of the American people. This despite the tireless work of such dedicated individuals as Dr. Larry Parks, Dr. Edwin Vieira, Rep. Ron Paul, and dozens of others who had the audacity to read, study and understand the Constitution for the United States of America.

Let me go out on a limb and say those famous last words… “This time it is different.”

1) The United States is moving toward a debt/currency crisis of immense magnitude.

2) The American people are becoming increasingly aware of it, thanks to the tireless work of the above mentioned heroes.

3) There two new variables that make this latest iteration of the decades long sound/honest money debate different.

First of all, Utah has made gold and silver money once again. It is this anomaly – this “disturbance in the force” if you will – that has captured the attention of two of the largest newspapers in the nation. Why would a state actually pass a law to make constitutional money legal again? They are confused about the issue, as is evidenced by comments made by the reporters.

Nathaniel Popper of the LA Times opined. “The ultimate goal is to return the nation to a gold standard, in which every dollar would be backed by a fixed amount of precious metal.” This is a common misconception. Making gold and silver legal tender does not instate the gold standard, if we use that term in its proper historical context.

Enacting the “gold standard” would mean the gold (and silver if we use Utah’s law as a basis) is held by a central bank. Paper money (or electronic digits) would circulate and act as legal tender. The paper/digit money would derive its value by the precious metals held by, and owned by, the central banks. There would be no opportunity for the people to “demand” specie (physical metals) in exchange for their paper/digits.

With gold and silver as legal tender, the people own the metal. Thus, we the people own the money, not paper ticket (or digital) tokens that represent “value” based on someone else’s ownership of gold and silver. One doesn’t have to ponder too long to understand the ramifications of that very important differentiation. “He who owns the gold makes the rules.” Well… with the system put in place in Utah, the people are in a position to make the rules – not the central bankers.

The second issue that makes this time different is that unlike the past, there is now a practical means to implement a system where gold and silver can be used as legal tender alongside Federal Reserve Notes – and with the same convenience. The free market is combining 21st century technology with Utah’s law, and surprise, surprise – the result is that a solution is very close to being unveiled.

So what does the Federal Reserve think of all of this? You can bet your bottom “dollar” that they are watching for any vulnerability with which to attack this system. However, unlike what happened with the Liberty Dollar and its founder Bernard Von NotHaus, what if there is no legal recourse for the Fed? What if state law is on solid constitutional grounds? What if free market implementation solutions have the backing of the state(s)? What if those solutions operate legally within the confines of the existing finanical system?

In the past, legal and constitutional support has not been an obstacle to those who are in control of the monetary system. At a minimum, roadblocks will be leveraged to their full advantage (including leaving the Federal capital gains tax in place as long as possible). Beyond that, one needs only look at history to see their playbook. It isn’t pretty.

Only this time – things are different. “We the people” are awakening to the fact that there is an opportunity to take back control of our monetary future. States are beginning to step up and implement legislation meant to give us a fighting chance.

And a fight it will be.

While it has been a very long time, there is precedent for “we the people” winning in a battle with the central bankers. Andrew Jackson led the last charge to “root out the den of vipers.” It nearly cost him his life. In the end, it was he who “killed the bank” – an epitaph written on his tombstone.

Who will lead the charge this time? Rep. Ron Paul needs help. If he is to get it, it will not come from Washington, but rather from the legislators and Governors of the confederated states. Gov. Herbert of Utah was the first to step into the fray. Who will be next? We may not have to wait long to find out.

Larry Hilton was instrumental in helping nurture Utah’s law through to its ultimate passage. When I asked what the most important issue was facing Utah’s sound money initiative, he did not hesitate. “We need as many legislators as possible in as many states as possible to pick up the torch. Implementation of a simple bill in multiple states will strengthen support for sound money across the nation.”

To that end, he is planning a Sound Money Summit to be held in Deer Valley, Utah on September 26th and 27th. The purpose of the summit is to craft a “declaration of principles” that various states can agree upon regarding sound money. “The declaration will then form the foundation for model legislation.” stated Mr. Hilton. “If the summit can accomplish those two objectives – agreement on a declaration and model legislation – will put state legislators in good shape going into 2012.”

Here’s to the Sound Money Summit. Mark your calenders. September 26th and 27th promise to be the next quantum leap forward as the states move to return to honest money.

EDITOR’S NOTE: You can track the progress of state-based Constitutional Tender legislation at THIS LINK

*******

Doug Tjaden is the Director of Business Development for MassMetal, LLC, a company dedicated to helping put physical precious metals into the hands of “the masses.” (www.silversaver.com) Doug is also an author, pastor and father of five and is a speaker on economics, politics and religion. He is passionate about helping people understand history, and how it can help us identify trends in place which will affect our lives. Doug is currently overseeing the Honest Money Center, a project dedicated to educating people on the merits of constitutional, honest/sound money. The site also provides a place for state honest money committees to collaborate and share ideas and garner grass roots support for their initiatives.

Enjoyed This Post?

We cannot succeed without your help, as we will never accept government grants or handouts. Please help us by investing in the Constitution and freedom today!

Enjoyed This Post?
21 comments
MR W.J.I.
MR W.J.I.

DDearborn, you are correct!
Fed "dollars" are nothing but debt reciepts or debt instruments (ref. first post). The central banks of the world would not mind too much to return to a gold standard because they hold most of the gold. The Federal Reserve Bank needs to be exposed (audited) as the private institution that has taken control of what used to be "our" government. The faster we the people trade our Fed Dollars for silver, gold or anything else of real value (our neighbor's labor) the faster the value of that fiat debt instrument will go down, as it must. Don't save/hold fiat debt reciepts (Fed dollars) rather save/hold things of REAL value!
Make it a legal option in every state to pay state taxes using gold and silver coins. The state treasurers will establish daily posted exchange rates between Fed dollars and gold and silver coins. End game? No, Begining Game! Yes, the U.S. Treasury Dept. should take over management of the paper/digit monitary system, ending the fed and beginning a return to the free market.

matt
matt

The states are legally operating as corporations and this is how they avoid the constitutional clause of requirement to pay only in gold or silver. It is how all the gov'ts. have avoided that clause. See the actual truth in this whole scheme is that the thing you think is our gov't., really is not our gov't. It is a corporation operating under the color of law. And what is the purpose of incorporating class? To turn a profit for the corporations board and owners. Is the reason they keep raising taxes and over regulating everything starting to make sense? They just want to profit in their endeavors. Heck, we the people elect them to their board seats every election. They run a company/corporation with only the best interests of the corporations board members at hart. Are we waking up even more now? There is so much more to this grand lie they are perpetrating it gets called conspiracy theory. The thing is though, all those theories are turning out to be real.

Kevin
Kevin

Thanks for the article. I worked on the original State sound money bill with Dr. Edwin Vieira and Henry Mcelroy. The website is http://www.goldmoneybill.org

Mr. M
Mr. M

Excellent Article, Jeff Matthews.

Silver is going Viral. Very good foresight, observation and prediction. There is a movement slowly brewing, it has been finally released last Saturday, and is gaining meme-mentum as we speak. In reaction to the financial insanity, the Gods of your favorites have introduce Silver Virality: Project Awareness to the world through the clever minds of the Silver Doctors.

It's not a movement per-say, a revolution is too kind,

It is.

-SilverDoctors.com

-Mr. M

ProjectAwareness@Ymail.com

DDearborn
DDearborn

Hmmm

Why would the American people wish to forsake the dollar which was intentional debased by the FED/Rothchild banking cartels? Just who do you think now owns/controls over 80% of the worlds gold
and silver? And who do you think would get massive profits from a world wide precious metals based currency? The American People? working class people anywhere on the planet? Of course not. The working class would see what little is left of their "wealth" evaporate instantly. This would hand over TOTAL control of the planet to these scumbags. All the American people need to do is renounce ALL THE DEBT incurred by the FED/Banks. Terminate the FED's charter and return control of our currency to the Treasury. Oh and institue a 10 year ban of anyone working on wall street or any major world bank from working for the treasury department. And institute a ban on working for these same entities for 10 years after leaving government.

matt
matt

What happens that you in your reply did get right is that the personal wealth of individuals would indeed vanish instantly if this was implemented without guidlines. But the actual wealth you speak of is nonexistent for the average person because most people carry a debt load higher than any amount they hold in currency issued by the federal reserve. What also occurs instantly when the wealth no one has disappears is that their debt disappears too. After an exhange of notes into real silver has been finished(this can be done, they did it with the Euro) the price of silver is established and maintained and everything you get paid will be done in silver/gold Hard assets representing true wealth. Not some fantasy land idea that value is present in paper just because those who own it say it does. This way no one really loses their wealth, they start gaining it for the first time.

Philosopherking
Philosopherking

whenever i type the word soTialist my comment gets banned.

DaveGillie
DaveGillie

Tenth Amendment has been run roughshod over for a long time, what makes anyone think it can save Constitutional Tender now? Liberty Dollar was on sound legal footing too, a technicality like that does NOT stop the Feds.

Philosopherking
Philosopherking

I personally got into the tenth amendment simply because it is the strongest tool to defeating socialism which is something I detest for many reasons. The first is that once you control the means of production either through intense regulation or just declaring all products made state property (I believe that is how the soviet union did it) then the people then are controlled by the state.

I believe it was Rosseiu that said that the first kings were foolish in that they declared themselves the king of the spaniards but later got smart and declared that they were the king of spain. They knew that there was far more power over controlling the territory of the people since the people used it for their means. The king could declare that the people will farm beats and they will then do the kings bidding that way.

It is not possible to do such economic control under a federal system since no government can control the whole thing. Economic planning of the whole is impossible to do.

Philosopherking
Philosopherking

I personally got into the tenth amendment simply because it is the strongest tool to defeating socialism which is something I detest for many reasons. The first is that once you control the means of production either through intense regulation or just declaring all products made state property (I believe that is how the soviet union did it) then the people then are controlled by the state.

I believe it was Rosseiu who said that the first kings declared themselves king of the spanards but latter got smart and called themselves the king of spain. They knew that controlling territory allowed them to pass laws over the usage of land which forever binded them to the king's will because if he wanted the people to farm beats versus potatoes then he passed a law banning the farming of potatoes. The farmer now had to work at the command of the king since it was the king who determined what products are to made and how. The people then had to do his bidding and were more under his control than if he just said he was the king of the Spaniards. The latter says that he ruled the people while the former declared he ruled the people's land.

Anyways, it is not possible to orchestrate any control if the political authority is broken up into fifty different parts. The king of california has very little power over the people of Arizona so attempting to gain control of the entire economy is pointless since it is not possible.

Joe M
Joe M

Because for a long time people were asleep or were not educated properly. But as more people awaken, this will spread and get things rolling. Yes, the feds will fight this. Being attacked is part of the game when it comes to pursuing Freedom. But if people and the states remain persistent and strong just like they do in medical marijuana states, like Michael Boldin says "there's not much DC can do"

Philosopherking
Philosopherking

Since I can't use the word soKilism in my post I will replace it with obamaism since they are identical with each other.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I personally got into the tenth amendment simply because it is the strongest tool to defeating obamaism which is something I detest for many reasons. The first is that once you control the means of production either through intense regulation or just declaring all products made state property (I believe that is how the soviet union did it) then the people then are controlled by the state.

I believe it was Rosseiu that said that the first kings were foolish in that they declared themselves the king of the spaniards but later got smart and declared that they were the king of spain. They knew that there was far more power over controlling the territory of the people since the people used it for their means. The king could declare that the people will farm beats and they will then do the kings bidding that way.

It is not possible to do such economic control under a federal system since no government can control the whole thing. Economic planning of the whole is impossible to do.

Philosopherking
Philosopherking

You seem to think that CA has the best economies. Is that because of planning of the whole or their own economic policies? I doubt it was planning of the whole thing because if that was true every state in the union would have similar economies since, according to you, every state's economy is planned the same way.

Philosopherking
Philosopherking

"first do no harm" is a requirement to not act and to act in a negative manor towards others since doing harm is a positive action. I wish government would do no harm and take no positive action towards the people's property by telling them what to do with it. Do no harm means government does nothing against the property of others.

Philosopherking
Philosopherking

Why not apply such logic to the entire world? Why not allow every state on the earth to have their economies managed by a single head? You seem to think that centralization of the economy works so why not allow every nation to surrender its power to decide for itself and allow a world body to do that?

First, do no harm is a good policy but unfortunately you do not practice that. A government that does no harm does no harm to a person's property. It does not decide what to do with their property but simply protects from others. Do no harm has to apply to the individual and every individual equally since do no harm to others but harming others would mean that the government has violated this rule. The property of both rich and poor are protected equally by the law both from the government and from each other. That is the only way do no harm can really be implemented.

Your version of history is wrong. In your version, fascism is the natural state of affairs and freedom is some knew 'quackery' that has been introduced. Progressive style socialism is a new trend in the 20th century which only exist to take away the liberty of each individual. It is a trend we plan on ending.

The Starfish
The Starfish

One other thing...if the Feds cannot control "the whole thing" who will? and how? Issuing money in 50 districts, P.R. and some islands in the far Pacific Ocean, will protect no one.

And when you use the President' name as if it were a philosophy or political theory, then the least you should do is set out the definitions of the deeds and thoughts which form the basis of your criticism. My parents taught me to not "call names"; and that well meant and well founded criticism deserves, indeed, requires elaboration. When you use the word "socialism" as you do, you show the rest of us who have the ability to think, that your path is not merely hollow, but actually harmful. The best criticism is set forth clearly and without snide and smarmy implications which evidence the absence of a rational foundation for your name calling. And lastly, if you think Rousseau was the author, perhaps you should Google him for his best quotes and then use them...rather than use his name as the front for the rest of your absurd posting. Either grow up or shut up.

The Starfish
The Starfish

Your "reply" is as insane and inane as the the idea that the states can become the economic engines and the protectors of the people of the USA. States which have industrialized economies like NY and PA and states which have economies based on socialization like MA and CA will always - ALWAYS - dominate the national economy and states like UT and NE and the entire farm belt will not be able to equalize the well-fare of their residents. That will cause population shifts which will wreak additional financial havoc on the poorer, smaller, less financially solvent populations and states they live in. Bring one economist with national or international recognition to the table & let him/her speak to an audience who can listen AND understand the fundamentals of the economic system in which this nation was born and evolved, indeed, bring one who agrees with you and the quackery behind trhis idea and your movement will end an inglorious death, while many thousands of people will become even more disillusioned than they have become due to those who spearhead this craziness. "FIRST, DO NO HARM" , the watchwords of medicine should apply to politics, and the national conversation.

Jeff Matthews
Jeff Matthews

This is an interesting development. It will not be an easy course.

Sound money advocates point to the ease with which fiat money is made to appear. Fiat money, they say, enables the feds to print our way into inflation, exposing us to a potential currency crisis.

Is the problem we are confronting a result of too much money or too much debt? These are entirely different, and if debt is the issue, some consideration needs to be given as to whether restricting the form and supply of currency will adequately curtail the use of debt instruments.

A currency crisis is typically a concern expressed in terms of fear of out of control inflation. So far, we are not even close to that. Some sectors are moderately inflating, while others are inflating more rapidly, and still others are stagnant and even deflating.

It is interesting to see the desire to control the money supply by tying it to a scarce resource, but the scarcity does not mean we cannot experience wide shifts in terms of how quickly they can continue to locate and produce gold in relation to population growth.

If gold production does not keep pace with population growth, then, its value will inflate. If it outpaces population growth, its value will deflate. It's much like oil and gas is as a commodity. Look at the price swings for gas. What would our normal routines look like if we paid in little jars of oil or gas?

I am just not so sure "sound money" is much of a fix for anything. I think the issue is with our high standard of living compared to third-world nations, what it costs us to maintain that standard, the debt we take on to do it, and how to enact policies that will allow Americans to comfortably deal with a transition which reduces debt and brings our standard of living down to a more sustainable level. Free market equilibrium might just look like Mexico, with the U.S. at the top and Zimbabwe at the bottom. We "lived richly" on credit, and the credit limit is being reached. Now, it's time to give up so many big screen TV's, eating out, nice cars, etc. So much for the American dream..... Looks like we might be headed toward a Mexican reality.

We need another fraud bubble. That'll get things going again for a while.

Nayrb
Nayrb

The Federal Reserve Dollar is a debt instrument, and that is a large part of the money problem we have today. If the federal government were simply printing funny pieces of paper with pictures of dead people on them, and declaring it money, that would be bad.

The reality is far worse. Every 'dollar' in circulation is basically a receipt for an IOU that we use as money. Instead of writing out a long dull explanation of how this works, here's a link to an entertaining cartoon that explains the gist of it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPWH5TlbloU

Trackbacks

  1. [...] actu­ally dis­gusted with the reports findings.The Tenth Amendment Center dis­cusses Constitutional ten­der and Utah’s very real solu­tion to the problem.Daniel Mitchell at CATO com­pares Obamacare waivers to “Atlas Shrugged”.Barton [...]

  2. [...] Click here for more on this story. [...]