<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just Say &#8220;NO!&#8221; to Unconstitutional Federal Acts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/04/16/just-say-no-to-unconstitutional-federal-acts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/04/16/just-say-no-to-unconstitutional-federal-acts/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:03:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Just Say “NO!” to Unconstitutional Federal Acts &#124; Fist A Goat.com</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/04/16/just-say-no-to-unconstitutional-federal-acts/comment-page-1/#comment-907357</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Say “NO!” to Unconstitutional Federal Acts &#124; Fist A Goat.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=8441#comment-907357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] For more information, log on towww.nullifynow.com/austin/ andwww.nullifynow.com/losangeles/   http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/04/16/just-say-no-to-unconstitutional-federal-acts/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For more information, log on towww.nullifynow.com/austin/ andwww.nullifynow.com/losangeles/   <a href="http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/04/16/just-say-no-to-unconstitutional-federal-acts/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/04/16/just-say-no-to-unconstitutional-federal-acts/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roscoe</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/04/16/just-say-no-to-unconstitutional-federal-acts/comment-page-1/#comment-537416</link>
		<dc:creator>Roscoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=8441#comment-537416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RTB  The first question in your post is the answer to the question of health care.  Providing health care for all breathing persons in this country is out of the scope of Federal Government power and responsibility.  What Massachusetts did with their health care system is OK because it was the state that did it.  Nullification or not, it is an unconstitutional overstepping of the enumerated powers. 
 
So if you want that single payer health care with a mandate, move to Massachusetts or work to get it in your own state.  At least that way those of us who don&#039;t want it can move where they don&#039;t have to put up with all of the negatives of socialized medicine and still stay in the US to get our health care.    ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RTB  The first question in your post is the answer to the question of health care.  Providing health care for all breathing persons in this country is out of the scope of Federal Government power and responsibility.  What Massachusetts did with their health care system is OK because it was the state that did it.  Nullification or not, it is an unconstitutional overstepping of the enumerated powers. </p>
<p>So if you want that single payer health care with a mandate, move to Massachusetts or work to get it in your own state.  At least that way those of us who don&#039;t want it can move where they don&#039;t have to put up with all of the negatives of socialized medicine and still stay in the US to get our health care.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Egils Egilsson</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/04/16/just-say-no-to-unconstitutional-federal-acts/comment-page-1/#comment-537310</link>
		<dc:creator>Egils Egilsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 19:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=8441#comment-537310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Howdy, RTB. Just  as one &#039;bot to another, I&#039;ll respond; 
 
First, the T.E.A. and T.A.C. bill will be 100 pages and no more. 
Second, it will be published on the Internet for 72 hours before ANY committee or floor vote. 
Third, Obamacare did nothing to correct the high costs of  &quot;health litigation&quot;. It could have easily, and the new bill will, by simply stating that ANY health care dispute automatically goes to mediation for 30 days, and then to binding arbitration.  NO EXCEPTIONS. Trial lawyers can also act as mediators and as arbitrators.  Any lawyer who challenges this loses his/her license to practice law. This one change should cut medical dispute costs, and medical liability insurance costs, by 50% .  
Fourth, health insurers will be permitted to cross state lines and compete with each other. Competition encouraged, collusion or rate setting punished!  
Fifth, States will be permitted to either self-administer, or join by compact with an adjoining State program , or join into a competitive corporate insurance program, or default to the national program. 
Sixth, all contentious emotional issues ( aborticide, end of life counselling, etc)  will be omitted and NOT be a public or tax payer funded item. 
Seventh, all medical decisions will be left to the patient and doctor. 
Eighth, only natural born or naturalized citizens will be eligible. Illegal aliens will be specifically excluded by public notices posted on all clinic, hospital, and practitioners&#039; doors. In 5 States, that will cut healthcare costs by 50%  
Ninth, every federal employee including Member of Congress, White House, and court employee will be REQUIRED to participate in the default national program. 
Tenth, there will be NO WAIVERS. 
( BTW , bots like you &amp; me don&#039;t need health coverage so we won&#039;t get it. )  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howdy, RTB. Just  as one &#039;bot to another, I&#039;ll respond; </p>
<p>First, the T.E.A. and T.A.C. bill will be 100 pages and no more.<br />
Second, it will be published on the Internet for 72 hours before ANY committee or floor vote.<br />
Third, Obamacare did nothing to correct the high costs of  &quot;health litigation&quot;. It could have easily, and the new bill will, by simply stating that ANY health care dispute automatically goes to mediation for 30 days, and then to binding arbitration.  NO EXCEPTIONS. Trial lawyers can also act as mediators and as arbitrators.  Any lawyer who challenges this loses his/her license to practice law. This one change should cut medical dispute costs, and medical liability insurance costs, by 50% .<br />
Fourth, health insurers will be permitted to cross state lines and compete with each other. Competition encouraged, collusion or rate setting punished!<br />
Fifth, States will be permitted to either self-administer, or join by compact with an adjoining State program , or join into a competitive corporate insurance program, or default to the national program.<br />
Sixth, all contentious emotional issues ( aborticide, end of life counselling, etc)  will be omitted and NOT be a public or tax payer funded item.<br />
Seventh, all medical decisions will be left to the patient and doctor.<br />
Eighth, only natural born or naturalized citizens will be eligible. Illegal aliens will be specifically excluded by public notices posted on all clinic, hospital, and practitioners&#039; doors. In 5 States, that will cut healthcare costs by 50%<br />
Ninth, every federal employee including Member of Congress, White House, and court employee will be REQUIRED to participate in the default national program.<br />
Tenth, there will be NO WAIVERS.<br />
( BTW , bots like you &amp; me don&#039;t need health coverage so we won&#039;t get it. )  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RTB</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/04/16/just-say-no-to-unconstitutional-federal-acts/comment-page-1/#comment-531244</link>
		<dc:creator>RTB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 12:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=8441#comment-531244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There must be an extremely well-written algorithm monitoring this website. My comment, which took issue with nullification of the federal health care law, was gone in a nanosecond. My compliments to the programmers! 
 
Oh, I shall not trouble this website again...fear not!  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There must be an extremely well-written algorithm monitoring this website. My comment, which took issue with nullification of the federal health care law, was gone in a nanosecond. My compliments to the programmers! </p>
<p>Oh, I shall not trouble this website again&#8230;fear not!  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RTB</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/04/16/just-say-no-to-unconstitutional-federal-acts/comment-page-1/#comment-531235</link>
		<dc:creator>RTB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=8441#comment-531235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still waiting for an explanation ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still waiting for an explanation </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RTB</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/04/16/just-say-no-to-unconstitutional-federal-acts/comment-page-1/#comment-531232</link>
		<dc:creator>RTB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=8441#comment-531232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m waiting. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m waiting. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RTB</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/04/16/just-say-no-to-unconstitutional-federal-acts/comment-page-1/#comment-531230</link>
		<dc:creator>RTB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=8441#comment-531230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And my comment was deleted why? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And my comment was deleted why? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RTB</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/04/16/just-say-no-to-unconstitutional-federal-acts/comment-page-1/#comment-531451</link>
		<dc:creator>RTB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=8441#comment-531451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does the constitution have to do with providing affordable health care for all Americans? Forgive me, maybe I&#039;m a little dense. 
 
OK...so the radical right is against what they refer to as Obamacare. I get that. What I DO NOT get is their alternative solution which is conspicuous by it&#039;s absence. They seem to have none. Does this mean that they are satisfied with the status quo? Let me assure you...I am not. Am I unique? Not on your life. 
 
So...explain to me the &quot;right&quot; way to provide affordable health care....PLEASE TELL ME...I&#039;m waiting. Oh...maybe you think there is no right way. That the government should stay out of health care altogether. It should be left up to that most benevolent corporate sector...The Insurance Companies. Forgive me....ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  
 
&quot;Obamacare&quot; is far from perfect. It doesn&#039;t go far enough. We needed a single-payer option which the president lacked the guts to insist upon. 
 
OMG! Socialist!! Communist!! Yeah...that&#039;s what your thinkin&#039;...right? Go ahead...I can take it. 
 
Oh...I&#039;m still waiting. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does the constitution have to do with providing affordable health care for all Americans? Forgive me, maybe I&#039;m a little dense. </p>
<p>OK&#8230;so the radical right is against what they refer to as Obamacare. I get that. What I DO NOT get is their alternative solution which is conspicuous by it&#039;s absence. They seem to have none. Does this mean that they are satisfied with the status quo? Let me assure you&#8230;I am not. Am I unique? Not on your life. </p>
<p>So&#8230;explain to me the &quot;right&quot; way to provide affordable health care&#8230;.PLEASE TELL ME&#8230;I&#039;m waiting. Oh&#8230;maybe you think there is no right way. That the government should stay out of health care altogether. It should be left up to that most benevolent corporate sector&#8230;The Insurance Companies. Forgive me&#8230;.ROFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  </p>
<p>&quot;Obamacare&quot; is far from perfect. It doesn&#039;t go far enough. We needed a single-payer option which the president lacked the guts to insist upon. </p>
<p>OMG! Socialist!! Communist!! Yeah&#8230;that&#039;s what your thinkin&#039;&#8230;right? Go ahead&#8230;I can take it. </p>
<p>Oh&#8230;I&#039;m still waiting. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Burnett</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2011/04/16/just-say-no-to-unconstitutional-federal-acts/comment-page-1/#comment-530384</link>
		<dc:creator>R Burnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 00:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=8441#comment-530384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whomever wrote this is at least half wrong, probably more than that. California as a State that nullifies? Hardly-it is one of the most &quot;progressive&quot; States--look at its record regarding environmental laws, welfare policies and much more--not to include the liberal 9th Circuit sits in SF and that State has produced Boxer, Feinstein, Nixon and many others who have promoted federal power. And Madison did not say those words-in his letters to Trist, written during the  SC nullification crisis of the late 1820&#039;s, he stated that the nullifiers had been making clever interpretations, wrong interpretations, of his words. And the record for Texas and Jefferson is at least, mixed--anyone want to defend Jefferson&#039;s illegal Louisiana Purchase(which kicked the Tenth in the teeth)? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whomever wrote this is at least half wrong, probably more than that. California as a State that nullifies? Hardly-it is one of the most &quot;progressive&quot; States&#8211;look at its record regarding environmental laws, welfare policies and much more&#8211;not to include the liberal 9th Circuit sits in SF and that State has produced Boxer, Feinstein, Nixon and many others who have promoted federal power. And Madison did not say those words-in his letters to Trist, written during the  SC nullification crisis of the late 1820&#039;s, he stated that the nullifiers had been making clever interpretations, wrong interpretations, of his words. And the record for Texas and Jefferson is at least, mixed&#8211;anyone want to defend Jefferson&#039;s illegal Louisiana Purchase(which kicked the Tenth in the teeth)? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
