Comments on: Reject the Patriot Act: The Constitution Demands it

By: ianellis

ianellis — Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:54:27 +0000

About the governments power to intrude into any of our lives with no real reason or proof of wrong doing. (Other than Mrs. Snoop next door wanting to know if your up to no good) Any laws or acts to keep the government or any other private security Co. limited to an absolute unbending definition of what they can and can not do as well as criteria for preemptively taking a person basic rights from them and well analyzed proof regarding any and all of the unconstitional acts (snooping) engaged by the government to gather and compiled on and from both sides of the investigation. A third party with little or no bias should be established prohibiting the miss use or corruption of the authority and oppressive use on U.S. citizens or any other country in order to defend our national security and the security and freedom of the rest of the globe. I feel if we do not fix this very UnAmerican problem soon it will be too late. If we cant fix and monitor audit Intelligence and Surveillance used in Court to obtain proof of criminal action of the person before the investigation was subject and the person being detained. Valid law-enforcement must be encouraged world wide not just in the U.S. but we can be the first and lead the way for others. Or we can band together to end this oppressive UnAmerican Act for good! But I fear that might be slipping away every day. Please try with me to get this Act OUT of the U.S. Now! If left to the powers that be we will lose what we have killed and died for, for what we still fight and die for, our Free way of life. Help me free America before its too late!

By: ianellis

ianellis — Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:53:45 +0000

About the governments power to intrude into any of our lives with no real reason or proof of wrong doing. (Other than Mrs. Snoop next door wanting to know if your up to no good) Any laws or acts to keep the government or any other private security Co. limited to an absolute unbending definition of what they can and can not do as well as criteria for preemptively taking a person basic rights from them and well analyzed proof regarding any and all of the unconstitional acts (snooping) engaged by the government to gather and compiled on and from both sides of the investigation. A third party with little or no bias should be established prohibiting the miss use or corruption of the authority and oppressive use on U.S. citizens or any other country inorder to defend our national security and the security and freedom of the rest of the globe. I feel if we do not fix this very UnAmerican problem soon it will be too late. If we cant fix and monitor audit Intelligence and Surveillance used in Court to obtain proof of criminal action of the person before the investigation was subject and the person being detained. Valid law-enforcement must be encouraged world wide not just in the U.S. but we can be the first and lead the way for others. Or we can band together to end this oppressive UnAmerican Act for good! But I fear that might be slipping away every day. Please try with me to get this Act OUT of the U.S. Now! If left to the powers that be we will lose what we have killed and died for, for what we still fight and die for, our Free way of life. Help me free America before its too late!

By: The Patriot Act; How to Flout the Constitution

The Patriot Act; How to Flout the Constitution — Mon, 14 Mar 2011 01:36:06 +0000

[...] of the Patriot act that were due to expire on the 28th of February. Â Some of these aspects are blatantly unconstitutional and bear need for closer examination on why they were passed. Â First, section 206 of the Patriot [...]

By: Vic Fedorov

Vic Fedorov — Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:30:05 +0000

I protested against both these wars many times. I recognize the Arabs can live without using money, tribally, and that makes me more their friend than you may know. The way to end terror is logic and honest talk, not accepting all the lies as given. Any spiritual person knows a great degree of what is made up. I would get every gitmo prisoner off on an insanity defense. I would. I also have to ask, what percentage of the gitmo prisoners have renounced, honestly, Islam. I would also swiftly ransom them off, so that a party is responsible for them. I am much kinder than any government because I am just one man offering an alternative to what I perceive is ignorance.

By all means poke around my blogsite. Disturbance may be temporary and transitional.
http://vicfedorov.wordpress.com/2010/12/16/happy-…

By: Vic Fedorov

Vic Fedorov — Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:29:35 +0000

As for being hated, it’s no way to go through life, nor proper for anyone to hate anyone. That is why I have to believe in logic. And listen, believing in logic makes me one hundred percent against war. So I don’t know how you so easily color my beliefs, other than your assumption that I am a pro war person who is entirely satisfied with Christianity. I’m anti-war and belief Christianity has to get its act together to deliver its promise.

If there were soldiers I’d try to talk to them. Of course army intelligence has warned me not to write any more letters to soldiers. But that is because I scare the army. They are running things wrong, because they don’t invoke the christian term “the kingdom of god”

By: Vic Fedorov

Vic Fedorov — Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:28:39 +0000

Perhaps my only prophecy is that in five years, Judeasm, Christianity and Islam will be replaced by more effective and relevant and puissant religions. I relish all religions, except for Islam I haven’t found one I didn’t like. And I am amazed at the lack of sympathy for the Arabs oppressed by Islam. Without Islam, there may be no propped up cruel tyrants, but tribal ways and pagan religions that wouldn’t sell us oil or even use money. It is the belief that every culture around the earth must use money, can not be self-sustaining without it, or simple only trade; that arrogance of western concentration coupled with the lack of sympathy for the Arabs undergoing islam, amazes me. Where do you people get off. When is it your responsibility to actually ask Arabs themselves if they want to be Islamic? Why do you so accept things at face value? Is there no sophistication or obligation to overcome lies? And have you read the Koran? I have. It is bloodthirsty and oppressive and no one should wish it on anyone, or accept a homogeneity among cultures that isn’t so.

By: Vic Fedorov

Vic Fedorov — Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:27:47 +0000

As for the shameful history of Christianity; another thing the devil has slighted, is the awareness of just about all the many wars in the last two centuries, have been by governments, not religions, certainly in my lifetime: except when Islam is involved.

Moreover, while I like 3 of the 4 gospels and Acts, I feel Christianity is an inadequate religion, which I try to combine with paganism, and believe in the plethora of pagan and diverse religions that existed before Constantine The Great. http://vicfedorov.wordpress.com/2011/02/28/an-asc… http://vicfedorov.wordpress.com/2010/11/10/we-the…

By: Vic Fedorov

Vic Fedorov — Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:27:09 +0000

As for being disturbing, ascetics do disturb some people who fail to understand something; and when the failure to understand or agree with something is compelled like a pagan sacrifice; the prohibition of laws abridging free speech, expressly shows the difference between “abridgement” and “respecting”; because undoubtedly had the founders not meant what I said, they would have written like with the other rights, “Congress shall make no law abridging religion” And yet that specifically would have given no option to protect the people from religions that oppress them, in the trust and consent of people and government, should that exist. Moreover that the word “respecting” been so low in America, only indicates how strong the metaphysical influence of atheism has been in our history. An atheism engendered I believe in large part by the pagan practice of the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church turns off a lot of people from religion, thus rendering them default atheists.

By: Vic Fedorov

Vic Fedorov — Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:25:51 +0000

Now “respect” meaning “concerning” or “regarding”: this is the wordplay of our founders, not me. There may have been a real politic, or unknown metaphysic holding them back from a free embrace of religion, to this muted protection from a bad religion; (or prohibitions of the free exercise thereof).

I’m not sure I’d call the revolutionary war one of the more hellacious wars; war is hell I concede though. By making this protection from bad religions backhanded, it has never been used to proscribe any religions. And yet that just may be the reason for holding back the protection of the people by the state from bad religion; the fear it would be used on good religions. And yet these first amendments words also place a lot of stock and trust in congress to sincerely judge a religion honestly and simply. And so there is no history of abuse of the phrase; however a history of a compelling ignorance of the simple word “respect”, ironic in a literary way as that is.

By: Vic Fedorov

Vic Fedorov — Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:24:41 +0000

There could be and have been laws and acts of state respecting religion. Somehow the tailwind of Christianity came with a great atheistic interest slating America to be denied spiritual government.

It is completely logical for our founders to consider that there might be an evil religion oppressing its people, and seeking to oppress more. That’s a plausible scenario. And yes we are on the same page now regarding the constitution limiting (and I am against that) the esteem and respect government could give a religion from law.