<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All Legislative Powers Herein Granted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/31/all-legislative-powers-herein-granted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/31/all-legislative-powers-herein-granted/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:07:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stormytime</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/31/all-legislative-powers-herein-granted/comment-page-1/#comment-426122</link>
		<dc:creator>stormytime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7618#comment-426122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[would Mr. Boldin please comment:  debate today on senates fillibuster rule, interesting.  Under the original constitution, prior to the 17th amendment, it is my understanding that senators were the representative of the State Legislatures in the federal government; by and through their senator, a State Legislature had the power, among others, to halt or nullify federal legislation it was opposed to through the use of a fillibuster--is that historically accurate?  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>would Mr. Boldin please comment:  debate today on senates fillibuster rule, interesting.  Under the original constitution, prior to the 17th amendment, it is my understanding that senators were the representative of the State Legislatures in the federal government; by and through their senator, a State Legislature had the power, among others, to halt or nullify federal legislation it was opposed to through the use of a fillibuster&#8211;is that historically accurate?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/31/all-legislative-powers-herein-granted/comment-page-1/#comment-425814</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7618#comment-425814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An additional note on this subject:   
 
In Article II we find this stipulation. 
 
&#039;He [the President] shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient....&#039; 
 
If the executive branch possessed the power to enact on its own anything possessing the colour of law, why would the Constitution include this language requiring the President to present legislation to Congress? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An additional note on this subject:   </p>
<p>In Article II we find this stipulation. </p>
<p>&#039;He [the President] shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient&#8230;.&#039; </p>
<p>If the executive branch possessed the power to enact on its own anything possessing the colour of law, why would the Constitution include this language requiring the President to present legislation to Congress? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrvlSEA</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/31/all-legislative-powers-herein-granted/comment-page-1/#comment-422136</link>
		<dc:creator>TrvlSEA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 18:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7618#comment-422136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please post the recommended reading because I see both sides to this issue although I am not a fan of delegated duties by Congress.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please post the recommended reading because I see both sides to this issue although I am not a fan of delegated duties by Congress.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMB</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/31/all-legislative-powers-herein-granted/comment-page-1/#comment-421655</link>
		<dc:creator>JMB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 02:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7618#comment-421655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good dictatorship understands how to best nourish its own siblings.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good dictatorship understands how to best nourish its own siblings.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelBoldin</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/31/all-legislative-powers-herein-granted/comment-page-1/#comment-421335</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelBoldin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 20:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7618#comment-421335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this view of the necessary and proper clause is wholly incorrect.  sad, though, its a pretty common view....although not generally from regular readers of this site.  
 
if anyone wants some recommended reading on this clause, let me know. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this view of the necessary and proper clause is wholly incorrect.  sad, though, its a pretty common view&#8230;.although not generally from regular readers of this site.  </p>
<p>if anyone wants some recommended reading on this clause, let me know. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Walker</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/31/all-legislative-powers-herein-granted/comment-page-1/#comment-421266</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 17:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7618#comment-421266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The author quotes then ignores the Constitution. Congress is empowered to pass all laws &quot;necessary and proper&quot; to effect powers described in the Constitution. He fails to appreciate history and acts as if he has just discovered there are agencies in the United States government that pass regulations. While I cannot argue with his complaint regarding them, I can bet dollars to doughnuts that if I took the time to study U.S. law already passed by Congress, it granted such authority to the agency in question. This grant may be several decades old. It may be recent but I guarantee it is there authorized by the necessary and proper clause.  In short his complaint is a legitimate one that should be addressed by amendment and indeed can only be addressed by that means. 
 
Congress has for years &quot;passed the buck&quot; in regards to the hard decisions of legislation to the courts or to other parts of the government. In this way, they avoid the political heat associated with, for example, closing bases. Clearly the Constitution designates that Congress regulates the military. Closure of bases is a form of such regulation. But instead a commission created by Congress makes the decision and Congress merely rubber stamps it. If there is complaint, the answer is the commission made the decision, not us. This is one of literally thousands of possible examples. 
 
The same is being used in his example. The commission made the rules, not us. Blame them. This is wrong and an amendment is needed to redress it and force Congress to make a lot more decisions that just &quot;pass the buck.&quot; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The author quotes then ignores the Constitution. Congress is empowered to pass all laws &quot;necessary and proper&quot; to effect powers described in the Constitution. He fails to appreciate history and acts as if he has just discovered there are agencies in the United States government that pass regulations. While I cannot argue with his complaint regarding them, I can bet dollars to doughnuts that if I took the time to study U.S. law already passed by Congress, it granted such authority to the agency in question. This grant may be several decades old. It may be recent but I guarantee it is there authorized by the necessary and proper clause.  In short his complaint is a legitimate one that should be addressed by amendment and indeed can only be addressed by that means. </p>
<p>Congress has for years &quot;passed the buck&quot; in regards to the hard decisions of legislation to the courts or to other parts of the government. In this way, they avoid the political heat associated with, for example, closing bases. Clearly the Constitution designates that Congress regulates the military. Closure of bases is a form of such regulation. But instead a commission created by Congress makes the decision and Congress merely rubber stamps it. If there is complaint, the answer is the commission made the decision, not us. This is one of literally thousands of possible examples. </p>
<p>The same is being used in his example. The commission made the rules, not us. Blame them. This is wrong and an amendment is needed to redress it and force Congress to make a lot more decisions that just &quot;pass the buck.&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimkey01</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/31/all-legislative-powers-herein-granted/comment-page-1/#comment-420801</link>
		<dc:creator>kimkey01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 08:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7618#comment-420801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
 
The first new rule says you HAVE to have insurance. Both my husband and I have pre-existing conditions, and although the new bill says we can&#039;t be denied coverage because of it. So far, the cheapest health insurance we&#039;ve been able to find is called &quot;Wise Health Insurance&quot; search for it online if you are pre-existing conditions. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The first new rule says you HAVE to have insurance. Both my husband and I have pre-existing conditions, and although the new bill says we can&#039;t be denied coverage because of it. So far, the cheapest health insurance we&#039;ve been able to find is called &quot;Wise Health Insurance&quot; search for it online if you are pre-existing conditions. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Prather</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/31/all-legislative-powers-herein-granted/comment-page-1/#comment-420604</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Prather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 04:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7618#comment-420604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You raise a great issue here. Thanks! A corollary issue is the quasi-judicial powers that are exercised by the executive branch, usually tasked with interpreting the very regulations the overseeing agency has implemented -- conflict of interest, anyone? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You raise a great issue here. Thanks! A corollary issue is the quasi-judicial powers that are exercised by the executive branch, usually tasked with interpreting the very regulations the overseeing agency has implemented &#8212; conflict of interest, anyone? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention 10th: All Legislative Powers Herein Granted #constitution #tlot #teaparty #tcot -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/31/all-legislative-powers-herein-granted/comment-page-1/#comment-420214</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention 10th: All Legislative Powers Herein Granted #constitution #tlot #teaparty #tcot -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 19:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7618#comment-420214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter, MS, William Jones, Ron Paul and others. Ron Paul said: All Legislative Powers Herein Granted http://bit.ly/hBeIRj #tlot #tcot #RonPaul [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TenthAmendmentCenter, MS, William Jones, Ron Paul and others. Ron Paul said: All Legislative Powers Herein Granted <a href="http://bit.ly/hBeIRj" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/hBeIRj</a> #tlot #tcot #RonPaul [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philosopherking</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/12/31/all-legislative-powers-herein-granted/comment-page-1/#comment-420065</link>
		<dc:creator>Philosopherking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 15:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7618#comment-420065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FCC, FDA, and all other extra congressional organizations need to be eliminated completely.    ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FCC, FDA, and all other extra congressional organizations need to be eliminated completely.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
