<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Longer Will We Stand Idly By</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/10/26/no-longer-will-we-stand-idly-by/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/10/26/no-longer-will-we-stand-idly-by/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:57:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: okar</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/10/26/no-longer-will-we-stand-idly-by/comment-page-1/#comment-369635</link>
		<dc:creator>okar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7019#comment-369635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We here in Missouri have told the Feds what they can do with their health care law by 71%. If any state needed a &quot;Tenth Amendment Center it&#039;s Missouri. They say it&#039;s coming soon, we&#039;ll see. Lt. Governor Peter Kinder has filed suit with other states on this but he is in between a rock and a hard place with a Democrat Gov. and Sec. of state.  We the Citizens are behind Peter Kinder but it&#039;s hard to fight &quot;City Hall&quot;. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We here in Missouri have told the Feds what they can do with their health care law by 71%. If any state needed a &quot;Tenth Amendment Center it&#039;s Missouri. They say it&#039;s coming soon, we&#039;ll see. Lt. Governor Peter Kinder has filed suit with other states on this but he is in between a rock and a hard place with a Democrat Gov. and Sec. of state.  We the Citizens are behind Peter Kinder but it&#039;s hard to fight &quot;City Hall&quot;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: okar</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/10/26/no-longer-will-we-stand-idly-by/comment-page-1/#comment-369626</link>
		<dc:creator>okar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7019#comment-369626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A little commedy.   --JAY LENO: &quot;This Sunday is Halloween, the scariest day of the year. Unless you&#039;re a Democrat. Then that would be next Tuesday.&quot;  
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little commedy.   &#8211;JAY LENO: &quot;This Sunday is Halloween, the scariest day of the year. Unless you&#039;re a Democrat. Then that would be next Tuesday.&quot;  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Boldin</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/10/26/no-longer-will-we-stand-idly-by/comment-page-1/#comment-368373</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boldin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7019#comment-368373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it absolutely is!  And state, as you alluded to - and was defined by Madison in his famous report of 1800 - means the people of that state.

The bill of rights - you should read its preamble - is applicable to the federal government, and not some magical grant or protection of liberty for everyone, everywhere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it absolutely is!  And state, as you alluded to &#8211; and was defined by Madison in his famous report of 1800 &#8211; means the people of that state.</p>
<p>The bill of rights &#8211; you should read its preamble &#8211; is applicable to the federal government, and not some magical grant or protection of liberty for everyone, everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timothy.reeves</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/10/26/no-longer-will-we-stand-idly-by/comment-page-1/#comment-368153</link>
		<dc:creator>timothy.reeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7019#comment-368153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You said &quot;the north essentially rewrote the Constitution by adding the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments. One could believed that nullification will serve as a check on the national government,but that issue has been settled and those who believe otherwise are deluding themselves&quot; You overlook the fact that the 10th amendment is still in force, it has not been repealed, and take precedence over the Supremacy, Commerce, Necessary and proper, and &quot;general Welfare&quot; clauses by construction.  The Federal government has not been granted any vast new powers by these (fraudulently passed) amendments, they certainly have not been made master over their principles.  The Supreme Court is still just a branch of the Federal Government, and does not have any jurisdiction over the Constitution at all (it is a creature of it).  State Nullification never has been, and never will be supported by the Supreme Court, nor does it need to be.  If a state opts out of an unconstitutional Federal law, they are simply opting out for a small portion of the country (the rest of the sheep are free to be herded).  This is the peacefull way of allowing withdrawing of consent to govern, without a huge nasty war. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said &quot;the north essentially rewrote the Constitution by adding the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments. One could believed that nullification will serve as a check on the national government,but that issue has been settled and those who believe otherwise are deluding themselves&quot; You overlook the fact that the 10th amendment is still in force, it has not been repealed, and take precedence over the Supremacy, Commerce, Necessary and proper, and &quot;general Welfare&quot; clauses by construction.  The Federal government has not been granted any vast new powers by these (fraudulently passed) amendments, they certainly have not been made master over their principles.  The Supreme Court is still just a branch of the Federal Government, and does not have any jurisdiction over the Constitution at all (it is a creature of it).  State Nullification never has been, and never will be supported by the Supreme Court, nor does it need to be.  If a state opts out of an unconstitutional Federal law, they are simply opting out for a small portion of the country (the rest of the sheep are free to be herded).  This is the peacefull way of allowing withdrawing of consent to govern, without a huge nasty war. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timothy.reeves</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/10/26/no-longer-will-we-stand-idly-by/comment-page-1/#comment-368152</link>
		<dc:creator>timothy.reeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7019#comment-368152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You said &quot;The 13 American colonies rebelled against England, won the war and became an independent country.&quot;.  You are incorrect, they formed 13 independant nations, according to the treaty of Paris, all 13 were spelled out individually as victorS.   
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said &quot;The 13 American colonies rebelled against England, won the war and became an independent country.&quot;.  You are incorrect, they formed 13 independant nations, according to the treaty of Paris, all 13 were spelled out individually as victorS.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HBrebel</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/10/26/no-longer-will-we-stand-idly-by/comment-page-1/#comment-367656</link>
		<dc:creator>HBrebel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7019#comment-367656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yes, they pulled it for their own diabolical reasons. I remember having to read and memorize all of it but never had a teacher go thru and really teach the meaning of it all. Now they don&#039;t even pledge allegiance to the flag, but they cater to the muslims every need. go figure. It is entirely up to you to teach your children the truth and meanings of these important papers. the price of freedom is eternal vigilance. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, they pulled it for their own diabolical reasons. I remember having to read and memorize all of it but never had a teacher go thru and really teach the meaning of it all. Now they don&#039;t even pledge allegiance to the flag, but they cater to the muslims every need. go figure. It is entirely up to you to teach your children the truth and meanings of these important papers. the price of freedom is eternal vigilance. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pensacola10</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/10/26/no-longer-will-we-stand-idly-by/comment-page-1/#comment-367588</link>
		<dc:creator>Pensacola10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7019#comment-367588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I home schooled our children, now have a Marine and a daughter who births at home and an activist for Natural; health, birth, and  childcare!  Wish I knew then all I know now! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I home schooled our children, now have a Marine and a daughter who births at home and an activist for Natural; health, birth, and  childcare!  Wish I knew then all I know now! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Mercer</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/10/26/no-longer-will-we-stand-idly-by/comment-page-1/#comment-367479</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7019#comment-367479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great point!  I think I needed to hear that.  Having trouble with a difficult person in my life. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point!  I think I needed to hear that.  Having trouble with a difficult person in my life. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Bessell</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/10/26/no-longer-will-we-stand-idly-by/comment-page-1/#comment-367442</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Bessell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7019#comment-367442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1785: Thomas Jefferson dispatched to Europe as Minister to France 
 
1786: John Adams dispatched to Europe as Minister to the Court of St. James 
 
January 25, 1787: Shays&#039; Rebellion - Daniel Shays and other armed farmers from western Massachusetts, protesting incarceration for inability to pay exorbitant taxes and foreclosures, are defeated in their attempt to conquer an arsenal of weapons in Springfield, Massachusetts. The Federal Government&#039;s inability to put down the rebellion or force other states to help became their excuse to change the Articles of Confederation. 
 
Early 1787: Finding the Articles of Confederation too restrictive, and in response to Shay&#039;s Rebellion, the Congress met clandestinely at Carpenter&#8217;s Hall to amend the Articles, in the engineered absence of Thomas Jefferson and John Adams. The Nationalists and the Federalists soon discovered they were not getting an amendment but a total rewrite and relabeled it: the Constitution of the United States of America. The first writing calling for a Monarchy was later reversed in favor of a Limited Federal Government. The new Constitution was amendable without need of a Constitutional Convention. 
 
September 17, 1787: Constitution completed, signed by delegates to constitutional convention 
 
Upon the signing of the Constitution, the Nationalists formed the Federalist Party, and began writing the Federalist Papers to oppose the Federalist faction of the Convention, and to undermine the Constitution. A few significant contributors to the Federalist Papers would be: Supreme Court Justice John Jay, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and George Washington.  
 
September 17, 1789: Constitution ratified, conditioned on amendment protecting the People&#8217;s sovereignty. 
 
This constitution was approved by the legislatures of the several States, but conditioned on the addition of a Bill of Rights to protect the people&#8217;s sovereignty from the Federal Government. 
 
NOMOMECPA (No Mommy See Pa): The requirements of a Constitution &#8211; Name, Objective, Members, Officers, Meetings, Executive Board, Committees, Parliamentary Authority, Amendment.  
 
The Members of the Union, the 13 States, and the definition of Citizen, found in the Articles of Confederation Article 4, were combined and eliminated with addition of the meaningless, undefined phrase &#8220;We the People.&#8221; Does this phrase mean any person who should happen to read the Constitution? 
 
September 24, 1789: The Judiciary Act of 1789, written by Oliver Ellsworth, Chief Justice of the supreme Court, Sections 1 - 26 remove sovereignty of the people as exercised through their respective Republican State Governments, establishing the Supreme Court of the United States as Absolute Authority and the Supreme Law of the Land, supplanting the entire U.S. Constitution; and sections 27 &#8211; 33 provide for a police unit to enforce supreme Court rulings. 
 
This was the first Constitutional Amendment by Act of Congress, bypassing Ratification by the States, in violation of the provisions and procedures in the US Constitution. Nullifying the Constitution. 
 
September 25, 1789: 12 amendments proposed to the 13 States, as a Bill of Rights to satisfy the required condition of the conditional signing of the Constitution. 
 
1790: Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton introduced his &#8220;Doctrine of Implied Powers,&#8221; stating, any power the Constitution does not forbid the federal government is implied as granted to the federal government. 
 
This &#8220;Doctrine&#8221; was in opposition to the proposed 12th Amendment which became the Ratified 10th Amendment in December of 1791. 
 
March 03, 1791: Alexander Hamilton&#8217;s Whiskey Tax - 6 Cents per gallon for large producers - 9 Cents per gallon for small producers, showing an alliance between government and big business. 
 
December 15, 1791: The Bill of Rights, 10 of the 12 proposed amendments ratified and added to the Constitution. 
 
May 02, 1792: Militia Act authorizing the President to mobilize Government troops against Citizens to enforce the Government&#8217;s wishes. 
 
1861-1864: the war of Southern Rebellion/Northern Aggression clarified the Militia Act of 1792/1795 and initiated the Executive War Powers, providing for dictatorial government in time of war, and nullified the 10th Amendment. 
 
Don&#039;t you think the government will send their enforcement arm (the U.S. Military) against you to enforce their will? Are you prepared to die for Nullification?  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1785: Thomas Jefferson dispatched to Europe as Minister to France </p>
<p>1786: John Adams dispatched to Europe as Minister to the Court of St. James </p>
<p>January 25, 1787: Shays&#039; Rebellion &#8211; Daniel Shays and other armed farmers from western Massachusetts, protesting incarceration for inability to pay exorbitant taxes and foreclosures, are defeated in their attempt to conquer an arsenal of weapons in Springfield, Massachusetts. The Federal Government&#039;s inability to put down the rebellion or force other states to help became their excuse to change the Articles of Confederation. </p>
<p>Early 1787: Finding the Articles of Confederation too restrictive, and in response to Shay&#039;s Rebellion, the Congress met clandestinely at Carpenter&rsquo;s Hall to amend the Articles, in the engineered absence of Thomas Jefferson and John Adams. The Nationalists and the Federalists soon discovered they were not getting an amendment but a total rewrite and relabeled it: the Constitution of the United States of America. The first writing calling for a Monarchy was later reversed in favor of a Limited Federal Government. The new Constitution was amendable without need of a Constitutional Convention. </p>
<p>September 17, 1787: Constitution completed, signed by delegates to constitutional convention </p>
<p>Upon the signing of the Constitution, the Nationalists formed the Federalist Party, and began writing the Federalist Papers to oppose the Federalist faction of the Convention, and to undermine the Constitution. A few significant contributors to the Federalist Papers would be: Supreme Court Justice John Jay, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and George Washington.  </p>
<p>September 17, 1789: Constitution ratified, conditioned on amendment protecting the People&rsquo;s sovereignty. </p>
<p>This constitution was approved by the legislatures of the several States, but conditioned on the addition of a Bill of Rights to protect the people&rsquo;s sovereignty from the Federal Government. </p>
<p>NOMOMECPA (No Mommy See Pa): The requirements of a Constitution &ndash; Name, Objective, Members, Officers, Meetings, Executive Board, Committees, Parliamentary Authority, Amendment.  </p>
<p>The Members of the Union, the 13 States, and the definition of Citizen, found in the Articles of Confederation Article 4, were combined and eliminated with addition of the meaningless, undefined phrase &ldquo;We the People.&rdquo; Does this phrase mean any person who should happen to read the Constitution? </p>
<p>September 24, 1789: The Judiciary Act of 1789, written by Oliver Ellsworth, Chief Justice of the supreme Court, Sections 1 &#8211; 26 remove sovereignty of the people as exercised through their respective Republican State Governments, establishing the Supreme Court of the United States as Absolute Authority and the Supreme Law of the Land, supplanting the entire U.S. Constitution; and sections 27 &ndash; 33 provide for a police unit to enforce supreme Court rulings. </p>
<p>This was the first Constitutional Amendment by Act of Congress, bypassing Ratification by the States, in violation of the provisions and procedures in the US Constitution. Nullifying the Constitution. </p>
<p>September 25, 1789: 12 amendments proposed to the 13 States, as a Bill of Rights to satisfy the required condition of the conditional signing of the Constitution. </p>
<p>1790: Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton introduced his &ldquo;Doctrine of Implied Powers,&rdquo; stating, any power the Constitution does not forbid the federal government is implied as granted to the federal government. </p>
<p>This &ldquo;Doctrine&rdquo; was in opposition to the proposed 12th Amendment which became the Ratified 10th Amendment in December of 1791. </p>
<p>March 03, 1791: Alexander Hamilton&rsquo;s Whiskey Tax &#8211; 6 Cents per gallon for large producers &#8211; 9 Cents per gallon for small producers, showing an alliance between government and big business. </p>
<p>December 15, 1791: The Bill of Rights, 10 of the 12 proposed amendments ratified and added to the Constitution. </p>
<p>May 02, 1792: Militia Act authorizing the President to mobilize Government troops against Citizens to enforce the Government&rsquo;s wishes. </p>
<p>1861-1864: the war of Southern Rebellion/Northern Aggression clarified the Militia Act of 1792/1795 and initiated the Executive War Powers, providing for dictatorial government in time of war, and nullified the 10th Amendment. </p>
<p>Don&#039;t you think the government will send their enforcement arm (the U.S. Military) against you to enforce their will? Are you prepared to die for Nullification?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pepe LaGonda</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/10/26/no-longer-will-we-stand-idly-by/comment-page-1/#comment-367408</link>
		<dc:creator>Pepe LaGonda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=7019#comment-367408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From those Treasons against our Constitution, they began minimizing Congress as the lawful GOV&#039;T and, as we see today, have built a 4th branch of unelected, unaccountable bureaucracies to run the Country from the top down, with only lip-service to our Founding Principles, &amp; only when it suits the needs, or posturing of the Insiders.  Understanding the theft of the original 13th Amendment is a starting point toward restoring its purpose, to prevent lawyers from holding elected offices of &quot;trust or profit&quot;, because it stripped them of citizenship, upon taking an oath of loyalty/title of nobility from a foreign power - the Barrister Accreditation Regency [B.A.R.] in London, England! Learn the Truth! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From those Treasons against our Constitution, they began minimizing Congress as the lawful GOV&#039;T and, as we see today, have built a 4th branch of unelected, unaccountable bureaucracies to run the Country from the top down, with only lip-service to our Founding Principles, &amp; only when it suits the needs, or posturing of the Insiders.  Understanding the theft of the original 13th Amendment is a starting point toward restoring its purpose, to prevent lawyers from holding elected offices of &quot;trust or profit&quot;, because it stripped them of citizenship, upon taking an oath of loyalty/title of nobility from a foreign power &#8211; the Barrister Accreditation Regency [B.A.R.] in London, England! Learn the Truth! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
