<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Even those who disagreed agreed on federalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/20/even-those-who-disagreed-agreed-on-federalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/20/even-those-who-disagreed-agreed-on-federalism/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 13:15:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Census and the Triumph of Conservatism. - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/20/even-those-who-disagreed-agreed-on-federalism/comment-page-1/#comment-410353</link>
		<dc:creator>The Census and the Triumph of Conservatism. - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6616#comment-410353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Happened To States Rights? - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/20/even-those-who-disagreed-agreed-on-federalism/comment-page-1/#comment-405893</link>
		<dc:creator>What Happened To States Rights? - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6616#comment-405893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FB Archives &#124; Week of September 5, 2010 &#124; University of Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/20/even-those-who-disagreed-agreed-on-federalism/comment-page-1/#comment-344592</link>
		<dc:creator>FB Archives &#124; Week of September 5, 2010 &#124; University of Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6616#comment-344592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/20/even-those-who-disagreed-agreed-on-federalism/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/20/even-those-who-disagreed-agreed-on-federalism/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/20/even-those-who-disagreed-agreed-on-federalism/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FB Archives &#124; Week of August 29, 2010 &#124; University of Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/20/even-those-who-disagreed-agreed-on-federalism/comment-page-1/#comment-336254</link>
		<dc:creator>FB Archives &#124; Week of August 29, 2010 &#124; University of Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6616#comment-336254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/20/even-those-who-disagreed-agreed-on-federalism/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/20/even-those-who-disagreed-agreed-on-federalism/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/20/even-those-who-disagreed-agreed-on-federalism/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Boldin</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/20/even-those-who-disagreed-agreed-on-federalism/comment-page-1/#comment-330941</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boldin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6616#comment-330941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[no clue, Origanalist - if you have an email that says such a thing, forward it to us at info@tenthamendmentcenter.com

With the # of people visiting our site every day, such things are automated, and it takes research when the system makes a mistake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no clue, Origanalist &#8211; if you have an email that says such a thing, forward it to us at <a href="mailto:info@tenthamendmentcenter.com">info@tenthamendmentcenter.com</a></p>
<p>With the # of people visiting our site every day, such things are automated, and it takes research when the system makes a mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Origanalist</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/20/even-those-who-disagreed-agreed-on-federalism/comment-page-1/#comment-330931</link>
		<dc:creator>Origanalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6616#comment-330931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to know why my post was rejected. I said nothing offensive and I enjoy this site and enjoy the content in it very much. At any rate I will continue to read. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to know why my post was rejected. I said nothing offensive and I enjoy this site and enjoy the content in it very much. At any rate I will continue to read. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Origanalist</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/20/even-those-who-disagreed-agreed-on-federalism/comment-page-1/#comment-331783</link>
		<dc:creator>Origanalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 08:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6616#comment-331783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Dominic John, tell that to the judge after he sentences you to prison for not paying your taxes. Tell that to the property owners who have lost their property  because of the Kelo vs. New London decision. 
 
&quot;Recently, the city of Port Chester, N.Y., gave a private developer virtual power to condemn property within its designated redevelopment area. Bart Didden and Dominick Bologna, owners of property within the redevelopment area, approached the private developer for a permit to build a CVS pharmacy on their land. The developer told them to pay him $800,000 or give him a 50 percent interest in the CVS pharmacy or he&#039;d have the local government condemn the land. Didden and Bologna refused, and the next day their land was condemned. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the local government&#039;s decision, which is nothing less than sanctioning extortion. &quot;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.capitalismmagazine.com/law/property-rights/4911-Property-Rights-After-the-Kelo-Decision.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.capitalismmagazine.com/law/property-ri...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
To say that out of control government is a fiction that exists only in the imagination of the fearful and uninformed is to deny reality. It is the very nature of man that some will seek totalitarian power over others. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Dominic John, tell that to the judge after he sentences you to prison for not paying your taxes. Tell that to the property owners who have lost their property  because of the Kelo vs. New London decision. </p>
<p>&quot;Recently, the city of Port Chester, N.Y., gave a private developer virtual power to condemn property within its designated redevelopment area. Bart Didden and Dominick Bologna, owners of property within the redevelopment area, approached the private developer for a permit to build a CVS pharmacy on their land. The developer told them to pay him $800,000 or give him a 50 percent interest in the CVS pharmacy or he&#039;d have the local government condemn the land. Didden and Bologna refused, and the next day their land was condemned. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the local government&#039;s decision, which is nothing less than sanctioning extortion. &quot;  <a href="http://www.capitalismmagazine.com/law/property-rights/4911-Property-Rights-After-the-Kelo-Decision.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.capitalismmagazine.com/law/property-ri" rel="nofollow">http://www.capitalismmagazine.com/law/property-ri</a>&#8230; </p>
<p>To say that out of control government is a fiction that exists only in the imagination of the fearful and uninformed is to deny reality. It is the very nature of man that some will seek totalitarian power over others. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic John</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/20/even-those-who-disagreed-agreed-on-federalism/comment-page-1/#comment-330463</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6616#comment-330463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is a humanoid and does this writer have one in his pocket and that is the we he speaks of? 
The science of government is not a perfect science? 
Government is not a science at all. It is a fiction that doesn&#039;t really exist except in the imagination of the fearful and uninformed. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is a humanoid and does this writer have one in his pocket and that is the we he speaks of?<br />
The science of government is not a perfect science?<br />
Government is not a science at all. It is a fiction that doesn&#039;t really exist except in the imagination of the fearful and uninformed. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglass Bartley</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/20/even-those-who-disagreed-agreed-on-federalism/comment-page-1/#comment-330275</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglass Bartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6616#comment-330275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Federalist No. 28, Hamilton the ultra-nationalist, had this to say on state resistance to federal tyranny:  
 
&quot;It may safely be received as an axiom in our political system, that the State governments will, in all possible contingencies, afford complete security against invasions of the public liberty by the national authority. Projects of usurpation cannot be masked under pretenses so likely to escape the penetration of select bodies of men, as of the people at large. The legislatures will have better means of information. They can discover the danger at a distance; and possessing all the organs of civil power, and the confidence of the people, they can at once adopt a regular plan of opposition, in which they can combine all the resources of the community. They can readily communicate with each other in the different States, and unite their common forces for the protection of their common liberty. 
 
The great extent of the country is a further security. We have already experienced its utility against the attacks of a foreign power. And it would have precisely the same effect against the enterprises of ambitious rulers in the national councils. If the federal army should be able to quell the resistance of one State, the distant States would have it in their power to make head with fresh forces. The advantages obtained in one place must be abandoned to subdue the opposition in others; and the moment the part which had been reduced to submission was left to itself, its efforts would be renewed, and its resistance revive. 
 
We should recollect that the extent of the military force must, at all events, be regulated by the resources of the country. For a long time to come, it will not be possible to maintain a large army; and as the means of doing this increase, the population and natural strength of the community will proportionably increase. When will the time arrive that the federal government can raise and maintain an army capable of erecting a despotism over the great body of the people of an immense empire, who are in a situation, through the medium of their State governments, to take measures for their own defense, with all the celerity, regularity, and system of independent nations? The apprehension may be considered as a disease, for which there can be found no cure in the resources of argument and reasoning.&quot; 
 
Would welcome readers to take a look at &quot;The Kiss of Judice: The Constitution Betrayed, which is being published in installments  &lt;a href=&quot;http://@http://douglassbartley.wordpress.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@http://douglassbartley.wordpress.com/&lt;/a&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Federalist No. 28, Hamilton the ultra-nationalist, had this to say on state resistance to federal tyranny:  </p>
<p>&quot;It may safely be received as an axiom in our political system, that the State governments will, in all possible contingencies, afford complete security against invasions of the public liberty by the national authority. Projects of usurpation cannot be masked under pretenses so likely to escape the penetration of select bodies of men, as of the people at large. The legislatures will have better means of information. They can discover the danger at a distance; and possessing all the organs of civil power, and the confidence of the people, they can at once adopt a regular plan of opposition, in which they can combine all the resources of the community. They can readily communicate with each other in the different States, and unite their common forces for the protection of their common liberty. </p>
<p>The great extent of the country is a further security. We have already experienced its utility against the attacks of a foreign power. And it would have precisely the same effect against the enterprises of ambitious rulers in the national councils. If the federal army should be able to quell the resistance of one State, the distant States would have it in their power to make head with fresh forces. The advantages obtained in one place must be abandoned to subdue the opposition in others; and the moment the part which had been reduced to submission was left to itself, its efforts would be renewed, and its resistance revive. </p>
<p>We should recollect that the extent of the military force must, at all events, be regulated by the resources of the country. For a long time to come, it will not be possible to maintain a large army; and as the means of doing this increase, the population and natural strength of the community will proportionably increase. When will the time arrive that the federal government can raise and maintain an army capable of erecting a despotism over the great body of the people of an immense empire, who are in a situation, through the medium of their State governments, to take measures for their own defense, with all the celerity, regularity, and system of independent nations? The apprehension may be considered as a disease, for which there can be found no cure in the resources of argument and reasoning.&quot; </p>
<p>Would welcome readers to take a look at &quot;The Kiss of Judice: The Constitution Betrayed, which is being published in installments  <a href="http://@http://douglassbartley.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">@http://douglassbartley.wordpress.com/</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Ivory</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/20/even-those-who-disagreed-agreed-on-federalism/comment-page-1/#comment-330178</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Ivory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=6616#comment-330178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very important, timely article!  Gary, this is very well done. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very important, timely article!  Gary, this is very well done. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
