by Harry Browne, on April 15, 2003
Someday, I hope, April 15th will no longer be Tax Day (the day your income tax return must be filed) but instead will be known as Freedom Day — a day to remember the huge, expensive, intrusive, and meddling government that was once was and that we should be on guard against forever.
That can come only after we repeal the income tax and reduce the federal government to a size that can subsist on just the tariffs and excise taxes already being collected. No flat tax, no “fair” tax, no replacement tax of any kind — because government has been made so small an income tax is no longer needed to finance it.
Impossible?
Not at all.
A Little History
Many people aren’t aware that America — conceived in liberty in 1776 — didn’t have a permanent income tax until 1913. In fact, the Constitution of the United States prohibited an income tax.
For over a century, the U.S. government survived quite well without an income tax. It operated a small, constitutional government on the revenue from tariffs and excise taxes.
Tariffs are taxes imposed upon imported products, and excise taxes are imposed at the manufacturing level on domestic products. Because those taxes affect the prices of products, they were self-limiting. That is, the taxes couldn’t produce unlimited revenue to the government.
If a tax was raised too far, the product would be priced out of the reach of the consumer, sales would fall, and the tax revenues would fall.
Thus, relying on tariffs and excise taxes, the U.S. government was able to raise only so much money and no more. The same was true of state and local governments: there were built-in limits to how much they could tax.
As a result, in 1913 federal, state, and local governments combined took in taxes only 8% of the national income.
But that changed quickly with the passage of the 16th Amendment, authorizing an income tax. In contrast to tariffs and excise taxes, income-tax rates can be raised upward and upward and upward, since most people can’t choose to stop working in order to avoid the tax.
That meant the federal government now had virtually unlimited resources to do whatever the politicians wanted. Respect for the Constitution disappeared almost overnight. The U.S. government plunged the nation into World War I, a strictly European war, something it couldn’t have done without the income tax to finance the war effort. (The top rate quickly zoomed upward to 77% from 7% where it had been set in 1913.)
Today governments at all levels take 47% of the national income. That means you work nearly half your life to support the welfare state. And now there’s no topic on which the politicians refuse to consider legislation. Your entire life is fair game for them to enact rules.
Benefits
Imagine what would happen if we repealed all forms of federal income tax — including the personal income tax, the corporate income tax, Social Security, the estate tax, and the gift tax. A world of benefits would quickly come in the wake of repealing these taxes.
The first benefit is the most obvious: all the money you’re paying in income taxes will be yours — to spend, to save, to give away as you see fit, not as the politicians think is best for you, best for the nation, and — most of all — best for them.
You are the one who gets up every day to go to work. You’re the one who puts in long hours. You’re the one who makes your job what it is.
What have the politicians done to earn that money?
Absolutely nothing.
What claim should they have on your earnings?
Absolutely none.
When we repeal the income tax, all that you pay now in income and Social Security taxes will be yours at last — to do with as you see fit.
If yours is the average American family, that means over 10,000 dollars a year that’s been going to the politicians that will stay in your hands.
Every dollar you earn will be yours — to spend, to save, to give away as you see fit — not as the politicians think best for you, for the nation, or for themselves.
They won’t have a claim on a single dollar you earn.
So what will you do with that money when they no longer take it away from you?
- Will you put your children in private schools — where you could get exactly the kind of education you believe best for them? No more wondering why more time is spent learning to be a good citizen than learning about history, geography, reading, ‘riting, and ‘rithmetic. No more fighting the Board of Education to try to get the curriculum changed. You pick the school that fits your idea of what a school should be.
- Will you start that business you’ve always dreamed of?
- Will you move into a better neighborhood, take your family on a better vacation, arrange a much more comfortable and much more secure retirement?
- Will you help your church or your favorite cause or charity in a way you’ve never been able to do before?
What will you do with that money?
At last, it will all be yours — and the government will no longer have a claim on it.
Other Benefits
That in itself is reason enough to want to end the income tax. But here are three additional benefits:
- There will be a similar increase in take-home pay for everyone you do business with — your customers or your employer — meaning that people will have more money to spend on what you have to offer.
- A similar increase in take-home pay will occur throughout America, unleashing the biggest boost in prosperity that America has ever seen. There will be a job for everyone who can work and charity for everyone who can’t.
- Your life will be your own again: an end to government snooping into your finances, an end to keeping books for the IRS, an end to fear of an audit, an end to rearranging your financial life to minimize your tax burden.
And there’s a fifth benefit that’s probably the greatest of all: No longer will the federal government have the resources to run our lives. It will be unable to continue ruining what was once the best health-care system the world has ever known, destroying American education, making millions of people dependent on welfare, subsidizing foreign dictators and meddling in explosive foreign affairs.
Our Chance
Repealing the income tax is the issue on which we can rally Americans to cut government truly to the bone — the bone being the functions authorized in the Constitution. Without the resources to meddle in our lives, the government will have to withdraw to the limits of the Constitution.
There isn’t space here to cover all the ramifications, objections, and possibilities surrounding this subject. But the rewards it offers provide an opportunity to reach all Americans with a message of a better life — leading perhaps to a better day, when we celebrate Freedom Day instead of Tax Day.
Harry Browne (RIP 1933-2006), the author of Why Government Doesn’t Work and many other books, was the Libertarian Party presidential candidate in 1996 and 2000, a co-founder of DownsizeDC, and the Director of Public Policy for the American Liberty Foundation. See his website.








[...] original here:Â Freedom from the Income Tax | Tenth Amendment Center By admin | category: federal income | tags: already-being, claims, claims-it-paid, [...]
[...] Someday, I hope, April 15th will no longer be Tax Day (the day your income tax return must be filed) but instead will be known as Freedom Day — a day to remember the huge, expensive, intrusive, and meddling government that was once was and that we should be on guard against forever. READ [...]
Yeah, just imagine how much better privatizing the function of social security would be. If the elderly invested too much with Madoff, AIG, GM, World.com, Enron, etc…… they're on their own.
Doesn't anyone remember that the great stock market crash in 1920 and the early 1930's was THE reason social security was enacted? It's quite silly to hear people talk of abandoning SS in favor of the free market to suggest everyone would be better off when left to the vices of the market.
I don't like the feds, but SS has been a good thing, despite all the scare-mongers out there who say we can't count on it. I don't know of any person who qualified and didn't get their money – not one. I trust SS more than any corporation out there.
Well, certainly, since YOU think SS is a great idea, we should all get on board and support a program that is unconstitutional.
We don't need no stinking Constitution!
PC correct interpretations of the General Welfare and Commerce Clauses aside, if Congress in FDR's time had exercised its Article V requirement, its only option, to petition the states to ratify an amendment to the Constitution to be granted the power to administrate SS, then we wouldn't be here discussing such issues. But evidently neither federal or state lawmakers at that time were upholding the Constitution that they had sworn to defend. And because FDR's outcome-driven justices allowed Congress to overstep its constitutional limits, we've now got an unconstitutionally big federal government mess on our hands.
Wouldn't it be nice if we had a choice if we wanted to contribute to this program? I would think that if it was better as you seem to think that people would naturally choose it over anything else?
No. I see no authority for the federal gov't to implement SS. That does not mean the same thing as SS is not a good plan for society. IMO, it would have been better had the states implemented SS.
Yes but would state governments want to implement such a thing knowing that someone can opt out just by hopping across the border?
Why not? I see no reason to worry about that. If a state matched payments based on the person's actual contributions, the state-hoppers would not benefit.
The author's argument is that a ready source of revenue is required for a government to grow into an oppressive behemoth. This ready source of revenue is found in the income tax. So, the income tax is allowing our government to become an oppressive behemoth. Since an oppressive behemoth is bad for the citizens, the income tax should be abolished via a constitutional amendment.
1. Is the national income tax all that is funding our federal government's growth into this behemoth?
2. Is there any reason to believe the politicians in Washington will voluntarily amend the constitution in this way?
1. Yes.
2. No.
Would you agree that the government also borrows money to fund its operations, and as it does this it inflates the currency?
No. Debt does not cause inflation in currency.
[...] LP presidential nominee Harry Browne: Someday, I hope, April 15th will no longer be Tax Day (the day your income tax return must be [...]
its ttime for a constitutional convention to repeal the 16th admenment f our constituton. ilike see congress repeal the federal reserv act too.
So my question from previous article is this. If a state decides to start using gold and silver for their payments to the employees and requires businesses to do the same, will they have to pay a federal income tax as they are not using federal promise notes? And then if people wants to do business outside of the state such as travel, they will have to go to the bank to exchange to the foreign money of the USD? Just a though I have.
Yes, they would still be subject to federal income tax. Income is defined as "anything of value" you earn. People have tried and tried to get around. For example, you will see people say that bartering is a legal way to avoid federal income tax. This is not true. If you barter labor for food, you will be taxed on the value of the food.
If that is the case, I would give them the food for taxes then. I would love to see the government deal with that issue.
LOL!!!! That would be great!
Every business will hand out 1099s saying they paid such and such service X amount in gold and silver backed currency. The IRS will still probably steal a portion of that but they would still have to accept the gold and silver currency.
“I live in Alexandria, Virginia. Near the Supreme Court chambers is a toll bridge across the Potomac. When in a rush, I pay the dollar toll and get home early. However, I usually drive outside the downtown section of the city and cross the Potomac on a free bridge. This bridge was placed outside the downtown Washington, DC area to serve a useful social service, getting drivers to drive the extra mile and help alleviate congestion during the rush hour.
If I went over the toll bridge and through the barrier without paying the toll, I would be committing tax evasion … If, however, I drive the extra mile and drive outside the city of Washington to the free bridge, I am using a legitimate, logical and suitable method of tax avoidance, and am performing a useful social service by doing so. For my tax evasion, I should be punished. For my tax avoidance, I should be commended. The tragedy of life today is that so few people know that the free bridge even exists."
~ Justice Louis Brandeis ~
That's right. Tax avoidance is legal. There is a distinction between tax avoidance and tax fraud.
When a sovereign man, (non – taxpayer) goes out to work and in return gets paid, there is no profit at all. It is just a median of exchange.
Sadly, it's not a profit tax, it's an income tax. Income is defined so broadly that you simply can't escape it within the letter of the law. It's been tried by so many people so many times, that it's unlikely anyone has a truly new way to try to get out of it. I have been involved as a lawyer in about 2 dozen of these cases and the taxpayer has never won – not even close. The deck is so stacked against the taxpayer that it would be laughable if it weren't serious. The judges are federal employees, for goodness sake!
About all you say on the positive side is that the parties involved at the time realized that a Constitutional amendment was needed to implement it. If the issue came up today, Congress would just pass it and laugh when people asked what authority Congress has to do it.
All the issues about whether the amendment was ratified properly and whether FR notes are payment and whether labor or barter is income and so on and on have been resolved against the taxpayer. In one of my cases, the taxpayer introduced an entire book into evidence. This book listed scores of arguments against the Internal Revenue Code and system of laws. I read the entire book. There were many ingenious arguments. I was impressed with the amount of work and creativity that went into it. The judge didn't even look at it and the taxpayer lost. Same on appeal. Same on the appeal of the appeal…
[...] Freedom from the Income Tax Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. — Thomas Jefferson [...]
The interesting thing is that the Republican Party does not take an anti-income-tax stand. Such a stand would clearly be an electoral winner, but it would also mean an end to big government meddling in foreign affairs, and tyranny in domestic affairs.
From this, we can correctly conclude that the leadership of the Republican Party is not interested in shrinking government. Of course, there are a few individual Republicans who would campaign on ending the income tax (Ron Paul being the most notable), but the party marginalizes such thinking.
True. You now are a member of the small part of America that gets it. The only difference I would point out is that it doesn't really matter what kind of tax we have. Under our current government, with the sentiments it has, they will effectively use any tax as far as it will go to reach the screaming point of most Americans.
It's really not about the type of tax. It is about the amount and who pays it.
Also something you will notice is that the majority of those who doesn't pay taxes are Democrats and those who do pay are Republicans (or further right). I'm not even an American yet and still I feel strongly on the subject that the Founding Fathers had it right and that the constitution is inspired by God. Also another thing is that percentage wise, there are more practicing Christians in the right wing vs how many practicing Christians on the left wing.
As it says in "The 5000 year leap". That if it is not legal for an individual to do, it is not legal for the Government to do either. In other words I can't go and take money from you to give to a friend of mine, so it is illegal for the Government to do the same.
I wasn't aware that Republicans are more likely to pay taxes than Democrats. Where did you get that data? Are these official statistics somewhere?
I have some links here. Some are more solid statistics than others. Enjoy the read.
http://www.taxfoundation.org/files/wp1.pdf http://www.taxfoundation.org/files/sr151.pdf http://pewresearch.org/pubs/451/money-walks (some stats from Idaho) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_states_and_blue_… http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/st…
Citizens, including the clowns that they elect to the federal and state governments, have forgotten the following. They have forgotten that the Founders made the 10th A. to reserve the lion's share of government power to serve the people to the states, not the Oval Office and Congress. But more importantly where taxes are concerned, citizens no longer understand the Founder's less obvious division of federal and state government taxes associated with those powers.
More specifically Chief Justice Marshall had established the following case precedent, now wrongly ignored by both federal and state legislators, that Congress cannot lay taxes in the name of state power issues.
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." –Chief Justice Marshall, GIBBONS V. OGDEN, 1824. http://supreme.justia.com/us/22/1/case.html
So not only is Obamacare, for example, constitutionally unauthorized as evidenced by the Constitution's silence on public healthcare, but based on Justice Marshall's official words, corrupt Congress never had the power to lay taxes to fund Obamacare.
But an arguably bigger problem than corrupt Congress is that the constitutionally powerful state legislatures have not been doing their jobs to protect citizens from illegal taxes imposed by the constitutionally weak federal government.
The bottom line is that citizens have big messes to clean up in both the federal and state legislatures in this year's midterm elections.
[...] http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/15/freedom-from-the-income-tax/ Easy AdSense by Unreal Bookmark It Hide Sites [...]
[...] (and property taxes as well!)? As 1996 and 2000 Libertarian presidential candidate Harry Browne has written, in ending the income tax, There will be a similar increase in take-home pay for everyone you do [...]
It is wildly erroneous to assume that a state citizen and a citizen of the U.S. are the same thing. These terms are often used interchangeably for the two classes of citizen, true, but their context is totally different.
For a quick reality check, think of the society that was instituted by the Founding Fathers. Compare with that of the persons “subject to the jurisdiction” in this document:
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/constitution/browse2002.html#08supp
The two couldn’t be more different! One is a Citizen, the other is a slave. Your liability to the income tax is merely one item that proves it.
[...] (and property taxes as well!)? As 1996 and 2000 Libertarian presidential candidate Harry Browne has written, in ending the income tax, There will be a similar increase in take-home pay for everyone you do [...]