<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Federalism and Social Justice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/09/federalism-and-social-justice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/09/federalism-and-social-justice/</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 05:39:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Platinum Rule &#171; LittleMargaretNan</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/09/federalism-and-social-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-921551</link>
		<dc:creator>The Platinum Rule &#171; LittleMargaretNan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 08:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=5432#comment-921551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Federalism and Social Justice &#8211; http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/09/federalism-and-social-justice/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Federalism and Social Justice &#8211; <a href="http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/09/federalism-and-social-justice/" rel="nofollow">http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/09/federalism-and-social-justice/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fish Hydrolysate</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/09/federalism-and-social-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-314678</link>
		<dc:creator>Fish Hydrolysate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=5432#comment-314678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is really what we are on about when we talk about social justice - it is the quest of justice entirely for someone else&#039;s sake. It is the quest of justice even if we do not get any benefit from the outcome. It&#039;s the quest of justice even if it costs us something... or everything. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is really what we are on about when we talk about social justice &#8211; it is the quest of justice entirely for someone else&#039;s sake. It is the quest of justice even if we do not get any benefit from the outcome. It&#039;s the quest of justice even if it costs us something&#8230; or everything. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashleynathomas</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/09/federalism-and-social-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-314424</link>
		<dc:creator>ashleynathomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=5432#comment-314424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federalism is a system of government that divides power between two or more levels of government. During the current conservative political climate in the United States, power has shifted increasingly from the federal government to states, a move that has implications for the achievement of social justice. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slateism.com/chargers&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;iPad charger&lt;/a&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federalism is a system of government that divides power between two or more levels of government. During the current conservative political climate in the United States, power has shifted increasingly from the federal government to states, a move that has implications for the achievement of social justice.<br />
<a href="http://www.slateism.com/chargers" target="_blank">iPad charger</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GCX</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/09/federalism-and-social-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-314197</link>
		<dc:creator>GCX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=5432#comment-314197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I figured out the fed govts end around of the Xth amendment was the problem over a year ago, well before I found this site. I also came to all the same conclusions about these fed govt social programs bankrupting us, because it merely has to fire up the US Treasury printing presses. Sadly, I came to the conclusion that it&#039;s only going to get worse and worse. Discipline in school is only going to get worse. Entitlements are only growing. Liberals are slowly leading us over a cliff whether we like it or not. Call me crazy, but the only thing I see working is splitting the country down the middle! They can have their &quot;Socialist Utopia&quot; on their side, and we&#039;ll take a shored up Constitution on our side with bullet proof language against social engineering. Because with these fairy tale living socialist idiots among us, it&#039;s only going to get progressively worse. We may find a Reaganesque politician to slow it down on occasion, but worse it will only get.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured out the fed govts end around of the Xth amendment was the problem over a year ago, well before I found this site. I also came to all the same conclusions about these fed govt social programs bankrupting us, because it merely has to fire up the US Treasury printing presses. Sadly, I came to the conclusion that it&#039;s only going to get worse and worse. Discipline in school is only going to get worse. Entitlements are only growing. Liberals are slowly leading us over a cliff whether we like it or not. Call me crazy, but the only thing I see working is splitting the country down the middle! They can have their &quot;Socialist Utopia&quot; on their side, and we&#039;ll take a shored up Constitution on our side with bullet proof language against social engineering. Because with these fairy tale living socialist idiots among us, it&#039;s only going to get progressively worse. We may find a Reaganesque politician to slow it down on occasion, but worse it will only get.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alz</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/09/federalism-and-social-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-314100</link>
		<dc:creator>Alz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 01:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=5432#comment-314100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I think the exact usage of the terms is important and I agree that accepting the Socialist/Modern Liberal/Progressive rhetoric is wrong, I don&#039;t think we have a problem here.  It may be advantageous to use their term, &quot;Social Justice&quot;, because it may make it easier to push the pendulum of understanding back in the other direction.  We have time to correct the termonology. 
 
Another example is the term &quot;liberal&quot;.  What does it mean today?  What did it mean prior to the 60&#039;s? 
 
I like the words Modern Liberal/Progressive so as to distinguish between the more benign form of &quot;liberal&quot; prior to the 60&#039;s and how these Modern Liberals are connected to the Progressives of the 30&#039;s. 
 
Someone should come up with a timeline and an explanation of all of these names and labels. 
 
Anyways, Brian&#039;s piece is very good. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I think the exact usage of the terms is important and I agree that accepting the Socialist/Modern Liberal/Progressive rhetoric is wrong, I don&#039;t think we have a problem here.  It may be advantageous to use their term, &quot;Social Justice&quot;, because it may make it easier to push the pendulum of understanding back in the other direction.  We have time to correct the termonology. </p>
<p>Another example is the term &quot;liberal&quot;.  What does it mean today?  What did it mean prior to the 60&#039;s? </p>
<p>I like the words Modern Liberal/Progressive so as to distinguish between the more benign form of &quot;liberal&quot; prior to the 60&#039;s and how these Modern Liberals are connected to the Progressives of the 30&#039;s. </p>
<p>Someone should come up with a timeline and an explanation of all of these names and labels. </p>
<p>Anyways, Brian&#039;s piece is very good. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federalism and Social Justice &#171; Stand Up</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/09/federalism-and-social-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-314099</link>
		<dc:creator>Federalism and Social Justice &#171; Stand Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=5432#comment-314099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] clipped from www.tenthamendmentcenter.com [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] clipped from <a href="http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/09/federalism-and-social-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-314084</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=5432#comment-314084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, Brian is spot on by using the most current lingo.  Just because you don&#039;t like him using their terminology doesn&#039;t take away from his message.  Don&#039;t be so hypersensitive. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Brian is spot on by using the most current lingo.  Just because you don&#039;t like him using their terminology doesn&#039;t take away from his message.  Don&#039;t be so hypersensitive. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christianity, Federalism and Social Justice #fb</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/09/federalism-and-social-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-314064</link>
		<dc:creator>Christianity, Federalism and Social Justice #fb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=5432#comment-314064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Read more at the Tenth Amendment Center If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!      Posted in Biblical Worldview, Big Government, Charity vs. Welfare, Christianity, Conservatism, Conservative Principles, Constitutional Limits of Government, Entitlements, Federal Powers, Freedom, Government Spending &amp; Waste, Individual Liberty, Leftist Agenda, Making A Difference, Morality, Nanny State, Obama, Property Rights, Rights, Socialism, Statism &#124;  Tags: 10th Amendment, Biblical Worldview, Big Government, Charity, Christianity, Christians, Conservatism, Deception, Dependency, Entitlements, Federalism, Freedom, Hypocrisy, Individual Liberty, Injustice, Justice, Leftist Agenda, Liberalism, Morality, Nanny State, Property Rights, Radicals, Redistribution, Republicans, Rights, Role of Government, Socialism, Statism, Tyranny, Unconstitutional, Welfare [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more at the Tenth Amendment Center If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!      Posted in Biblical Worldview, Big Government, Charity vs. Welfare, Christianity, Conservatism, Conservative Principles, Constitutional Limits of Government, Entitlements, Federal Powers, Freedom, Government Spending &amp; Waste, Individual Liberty, Leftist Agenda, Making A Difference, Morality, Nanny State, Obama, Property Rights, Rights, Socialism, Statism |  Tags: 10th Amendment, Biblical Worldview, Big Government, Charity, Christianity, Christians, Conservatism, Deception, Dependency, Entitlements, Federalism, Freedom, Hypocrisy, Individual Liberty, Injustice, Justice, Leftist Agenda, Liberalism, Morality, Nanny State, Property Rights, Radicals, Redistribution, Republicans, Rights, Role of Government, Socialism, Statism, Tyranny, Unconstitutional, Welfare [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smack MacDougal</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/09/federalism-and-social-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-314061</link>
		<dc:creator>Smack MacDougal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=5432#comment-314061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
Kudos for your writing effort Brian Roberts. However, nothing that you wrote about has anything to do with &#039;Social Justice&#039;. 
 
You&#039;ve conflated Social Welfare and Socialism with Social Justice. 
 
Social Justice is a name that labels the concept that arose during the Civil &quot;Rights&quot; era of the U.S.A. being pushed by Martin Luther King. 
 
In short, those seeking Social Justice were seeking laws to punish whites, en masse, who engaged in segregation, discrimination, and religious bigotry. 
 
You have let your enemies, the socialists, gain the upper hand by accepting their rhetoric, their purposeful misuse of the label &#039;Social Justice&#039; to mask their agenda of bureaucracy-control redistribution of income through socialism. 
 
Socialists have co-opted the label &#039;Social Justice&#039; precisely because the phrase contains the word, &#039;justice&#039;, which to any man or woman means fair, 50-50, punish the bad guys and the like. 
 
In short, Brian Roberts, as long as you continue to make public your mistake, you do not help the cause of those seeking Freedom instead of Officialdom, of those seeking to live by individualism instead of living by political collectivism. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Kudos for your writing effort Brian Roberts. However, nothing that you wrote about has anything to do with &#039;Social Justice&#039;. </p>
<p>You&#039;ve conflated Social Welfare and Socialism with Social Justice. </p>
<p>Social Justice is a name that labels the concept that arose during the Civil &quot;Rights&quot; era of the U.S.A. being pushed by Martin Luther King. </p>
<p>In short, those seeking Social Justice were seeking laws to punish whites, en masse, who engaged in segregation, discrimination, and religious bigotry. </p>
<p>You have let your enemies, the socialists, gain the upper hand by accepting their rhetoric, their purposeful misuse of the label &#039;Social Justice&#039; to mask their agenda of bureaucracy-control redistribution of income through socialism. </p>
<p>Socialists have co-opted the label &#039;Social Justice&#039; precisely because the phrase contains the word, &#039;justice&#039;, which to any man or woman means fair, 50-50, punish the bad guys and the like. </p>
<p>In short, Brian Roberts, as long as you continue to make public your mistake, you do not help the cause of those seeking Freedom instead of Officialdom, of those seeking to live by individualism instead of living by political collectivism. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmackMacDougal</title>
		<link>http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/04/09/federalism-and-social-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-314059</link>
		<dc:creator>SmackMacDougal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=5432#comment-314059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kudos for your writing effort Brian Roberts. However, nothing that you wrote about has anything to do with &#039;Social Justice&#039;. 
 
You&#039;ve conflated Social Welfare and Socialism with Social Justice. 
 
Social Justice is a name that labels the concept that arose during the Civil &quot;Rights&quot; era of the U.S.A. being pushed by Martin Luther King. 
 
In short, those seeking Social Justice were seeking laws to punish whites, en masse, who engaged in segregation, discrimination, and religious bigotry.  
 
You have let your enemies, the socialists, gain the upper hand by accepting their rhetoric, their purposeful misuse of the label &#039;Social Justice&#039; to mask their agenda of bureaucracy-control redistribution of income through socialism. 
 
Socialists have co-opted the label &#039;Social Justice&#039; precisely because the phrase contains the word, &#039;justice&#039;, which to any man or woman means fair, 50-50, punish the bad guys and the like. 
 
In short, Brian Roberts, you do not help the cause of those seeking Freedom instead of Officialdom, of those seeking to live by individualism instead of living by political collectivism. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos for your writing effort Brian Roberts. However, nothing that you wrote about has anything to do with &#039;Social Justice&#039;. </p>
<p>You&#039;ve conflated Social Welfare and Socialism with Social Justice. </p>
<p>Social Justice is a name that labels the concept that arose during the Civil &quot;Rights&quot; era of the U.S.A. being pushed by Martin Luther King. </p>
<p>In short, those seeking Social Justice were seeking laws to punish whites, en masse, who engaged in segregation, discrimination, and religious bigotry.  </p>
<p>You have let your enemies, the socialists, gain the upper hand by accepting their rhetoric, their purposeful misuse of the label &#039;Social Justice&#039; to mask their agenda of bureaucracy-control redistribution of income through socialism. </p>
<p>Socialists have co-opted the label &#039;Social Justice&#039; precisely because the phrase contains the word, &#039;justice&#039;, which to any man or woman means fair, 50-50, punish the bad guys and the like. </p>
<p>In short, Brian Roberts, you do not help the cause of those seeking Freedom instead of Officialdom, of those seeking to live by individualism instead of living by political collectivism. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
